Off-label Drug Research Articles

Perspective on Off-Label Drug Use–Lessons from Three Drug-injury Relief Cases

Perspective on Off-Label Drug Use–Lessons from Three Drug-injury Relief Cases

Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of biosimilars of bevacizumab in näive patients with diabetic macular edema.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy restores retinal architecture and enhances vision in diabetic macular edema (DME). Bevacizumab is an off-label anti-VEGF drug that effectively treats DME. The safety and efficacy of bevacizumab biosimilars, which are more affordable than the original medication, still need to be established. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of biosimilars for treating patients with naïve DME across various price ranges that are accessible in the Indian market. Two biosimilars, BevaciRelTM (Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.) and ZyBev (Cadila Healthcare Limited), were compared to their original, Avastin (Roche Products [India] Pvt. Ltd.), in a randomized, control study. Three end-notes were used to assess safety and efficacy: persistence, improvement, and adverse events. Cost-effective analysis was carried out using a decision-tree analysis model. This study included 69 (59%) men and 54 (41%) women with naïve DME. The cohort had an average log MAR visual acuity of 0.87 ± 0.22, and the central retinal thickness at baseline on OCT was 398.5 ± 37.61 μm. The visual acuity showed a similar improvement, and there was a decrease in central retinal thickness as observed on OCT across the groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 10.8. The biosimilars of bevacizumab are safe and efficacious in treating DME in a cost-effective manner.

Gabapentin use in the management of pruritus: Students survey

This study at Howard University College of Pharmacy assessed student knowledge and opinions on off-label gabapentin use for treating pruritus—a persistent, distressing itch where gabapentin is commonly prescribed despite lack of FDA approval. Focused on its primary use for seizures and neuropathic pain, concerns arise over potential misuse when extended to pruritus treatment. Surveying 39 students, findings indicated only 27% recognized its approval for seizures, and a mere 10.8% were aware of its use for hemodialysis-related pruritus. Furthermore, just 32.4% acknowledged its broad safety in dosing. Many students expressed caution against off-label use due to potential adverse effects outweighing benefits, with 40.5% hesitant about using non-approved medications for pruritus, and 37.8% advising against promoting its off-label application. Conversely, 48.6% supported the use of established treatments instead. The study highlights the need for targeted educational interventions to correct misconceptions and improve understanding of off-label drug use, though its findings are limited by reliance on self-reported data and a sample restricted to one institution—potentially impacting wider applicability. These results lay the groundwork for further research into off-label drug implications in varied medical settings.

Awareness, Practice, and Views of Pediatricians, General Physicians, and Pharmacists about Prescribing Off-label Medication in Pediatric Patients in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

An off-label medication involves the use of an approved drug for an unapproved indication, population, route of administration, or dosage.The physiological state of children differs from that of adults, making the adult formulation potentially dangerous to children. Off-label prescribing is quite common in children due to challenges in the development of pediatric formulations. The current study was conducted to determine the awareness, practice, and views of pediatricians, general physicians, and pharmacists about prescribing Off-label medication to pediatric patients in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire was conducted among pediatricians, general physicians, and pharmacists (clinical and community) in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Statistical analysis was conducted using the data exported from Google Forms (Mountain View, California, USA) and Microsoft Excel (Version 2016) and then exported into Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 (IBM, Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square was deemed suitable. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Among the study participants, 53(35.09%) were pharmacists, followed by 24(15.89%) others, 22(14.565) pediatricians, 19(12.58%) other specialists, 17(11.25%) general physicians, and 16(10.59%) were clinical pharmacist. About 73(48.34%) described the definition of off-label correctly. About 114(75.49%) believed that parents and guardians must be informed about off-label medicine prescribed to their children. About 52(34.43%) had concerns about the safety of the medication, and 98(64.90%) believed they should be tested in pediatrics during clinical trials. Further, 97(64.23%) considered themselves not enough knowledgeable about off-label medications. The barriers reported by the participants were as follows: 89(58.945%) said lack of information resources, 71(47.01%) said lack of training, 56(37.08%) said lack of information on the safety of excipients used in pediatrics, 47(31.12%) said lack of formulary, 44(29.13%) said lack of guidelines, and 58(5.29%) said lack of information related to the safety of excipient concentration in pediatrics. The proportion of healthcare professionals who agreed that excipients in adult medication may be harmful to pediatrics was 103(68.21%). The drugs most often prescribed as off-label were paracetamol 54(21.68%), followed by Phenobarbital 35(14%), and Amoxicillin 33(13.25%). There are a considerable number of healthcare professionals unaware of the description of off-label medication. The majority have concerns over the safety and efficacy of the off-label drugs and believe that most frequently used off-label drugs in pediatrics must be tested in pediatrics during clinical trials. In addition, excipient safety data are of considerable importance to ensure off-label drug safety in pediatrics, who believe their knowledge is inadequate and need proper guidelines and training on this issue.

Younger Children with Respiratory Tract Infections Are More Exposed to Off-Label Treatments: An Exploratory Retrospective Study in a Pediatric Emergency Setting.

We performed a retrospective data analysis. All patients aged 0-18 referred to PED from 1 September to 1 October 2022, were included. Further analysis was performed when respiratory tract infections were diagnosed. gender, age, triage group, chronic diseases, vital signs, and PED-prescribed treatment (medications, dosages, methods of administration). Statistical analysis used SPSS 28.0, with significance at p < 0.05. Data from 473 patients were analyzed, median age 3.5 years. Chronic diseases were present in 17.1% of children. 387 medications were prescribed, 47.5% being off-label. Off-label treatment was common for external otitis, acute laryngitis, and acute bronchitis (p < 0.001). There was incorrect administration of tobramycin with dexamethasone for otitis (n = 16, 100%) and inappropriate use of salbutamol inhalations by age (34.8%, n = 16). Some medications were given orally instead of injections (ondansetron n = 5, 62.5%; dexamethasone n = 82, 98.7%) or intranasally instead of intravenously (IV) (midazolam n = 7, 87.5%). IV adrenalin was prescribed for inhalations (n = 46). Younger children were more likely to receive off-label treatment (p < 0.001). Our study highlights the widespread issue of off-label and unlicensed drug prescribing in pediatric emergency care. Further research is necessary, because this reliance on off-label prescribing raises concerns about patient safety and compliance, especially given the limited clinical trials and therapeutic options available.

History of suicidal behavior and clozapine prescribing among people with schizophrenia in China: a cohort study

BackgroundClozapine is an off-label drug used in most countries to prevent suicide in individuals with schizophrenia. However, few studies have reported real-world prescription practices. This study aimed to explore the association between a history of suicidal behavior and clozapine prescribing during eight weeks of hospitalization for individuals with early-stage schizophrenia.MethodsThis observational cohort study used routine health data collected from a mental health hospital in Beijing, China. The study included 1057 inpatients who had schizophrenia onset within 3 years. History of suicidal behavior was coded from reviewing medical notes according to the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Information on antipsychotic use during hospitalization was extracted from the prescription records. Time to clozapine use was analyzed using Cox regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.ResultsThe prevalence rates of self-harm, suicidal behavior, and suicide attempt were 12.3%, 7.5%, and 5.4%, respectively. A history of self-harm history was positively associated with clozapine uses upon admission (4.1% vs. 0.8%, exact p = 0.009). Among those who had not used clozapine and had no clozapine contraindication, A history of suicidal behavior increased the possibility of switch to clozapine within 56 days after admission (Hazard Ratio[95% CI], 6.09[2.08–17.83]) or during hospitalization (4.18[1.62–10.78]).ConclusionThe use of clozapine for early-stage schizophrenia was more frequent among those with suicidal behavior than among those without suicidal behavior in China, although the drug instructions do not label its use for suicide risk.

Ingestion of Fluids of the Ocular Surface Containing Eye Drops of Imidazole Derivatives-Alpha Adrenergic Receptor Agonists as Paragons.

Accidental poisonings by ingesting conjunctival fluid mixed with eye drops commonly involve alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists and tetrahydrozoline. These substances are recognized in commonly reported ingestions. Victims of all ages, otherwise in good health, often present as pale and lethargic to the emergency department (ED) after unintentionally ingesting topical eye medication. While eye drop poisoning cases in childhood include accidents during the play and poisonings in adults mean either suicide attempts or side effects caused by the systemic absorption of the substance, fluid of the ocular surface is a risk to all age groups. With this in mind, this study aimed to summarize data in the literature on tetrahydrozoline and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists as dangerous medications, even when administered in low-bioavailability forms, such as eye drops. With this aim, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review of relevant studies was conducted. A search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost yielded nine studies that met the rigorous inclusion criteria. The primary studies were subject to a meta-analysis once a quality appraisal of the studies and a narrative synthesis of the extracted data had been conducted. The author hopes that this information will provide observations that will lead to better designs for over-the-counter eye drops, off-label drug usage policies, and parental attention.

Pediatric Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider: Advances and Limitations.

Despite >1 in 5 children taking prescription drugs in the United States, off-label drug use is common. To increase the study of drugs in children, regulatory bodies have enacted legislation to incentivize and require pediatric drug studies. As a result of this legislation, novel trial approaches, and an increase in personnel with pediatric expertise, there have been numerous advancements in pediatric drug development. With this review, we aim to highlight developments in pediatric pharmacology over the past 6 years for the most common disease processes that may be treated pharmacologically by the pediatric primary care provider. Using information extracted from label changes between 2018 and 2023, the published literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov, we discuss advances across multiple therapeutic areas relevant to the pediatric primary care provider, including asthma, obesity and related disorders, mental health disorders, infections, and dermatologic conditions. We highlight instances in which new drugs have been developed on the basis of a deeper mechanistic understanding of illness and instances in which labels have been expanded in older drugs on the basis of newly available data. We then consider additional factors that affect pediatric drug use, including cost and nonpharmacologic therapies. Although there is work to be done, efforts focused on pediatric-specific drug development will increase the availability of evidence-based, labeled guidance for commonly prescribed drugs and improve outcomes through the safe and effective use of drugs in children.

COMPARATIVE SAFETY EFFICACY OF CONVENTIONAL AND TRADITIONAL MEDICINE FOR COVID-19 TREATMENT: UMBRELLA REVIEW

Until now, no specific drug to kill the virus that causes COVID-19 has received approval from the Food and Drug Association (FDA). However, the drugs that are often used are off-label antiviral drugs. The research design used is an umbrella review that identifies, assesses and interprets all findings on a systematic review and meta-analysis research topic. This umbrella review research involved 76 studies and 871,985 COVID-19 patients. Statins, colchicine, aspirin and siltuximab are associated with a reduced risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients, but siltuximab has the side effects of cytopenias, infections and hypersensitivity reactions. Remdesivir and umifenovir have the side effect of diarrhea, while ribavirin has the side effect of severe bradycardia in COVID-19 patients. Anakinra, oseltamivir, umifenovir, azithromycin, interferon beta and favipiravir are ineffective and have no significant benefit. Meanwhile, treating COVID-19 with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with conventional medicine has excellent results, efficacy, and safety effects. Only Jinhua qinggan granule (JHQG) has side effects in the form of mild diarrhea. Further research is needed regarding the concentration of TCM administered to COVID-19 patients, both children and adults.

Potential drug-drug interactions analysis in Polish pediatric pneumonology units, including cystic fibrosis patients.

The lack of data on drug-drug interactions in pediatrics represents a relevant problem in making appropriate therapeutic decisions. Our study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in pediatric pneumonology units, including cystic fibrosis patients. We performed a 6-month prospective observational study during which clinical pharmacists, using the Lexicomp Drug Interactions checker, screened medical records to identify pDDIs. Spearman's rank coefficient, logistic regression, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to identify correlations, analyze risk factors for pDDIs, and compare cystic fibrosis patients with the rest, respectively. Recommendations were provided for the D and X pDDIs categories. Within the 218 patients, 428 pDDIs were identified, out of which 237 were classified as clinically significant. Almost 60% of patients were exposed to at least one relevant interaction. The number of pDDIs correlated with the number of; drugs (rs = 0.53, P < .001), hospitalization length (rs = 0.20, P < .01), and off-label medicines (rs = 0.25, P < .001). According to the multivariate analysis, at least 6 administered medications (OR = 4.15; 95% CI = 2.21-7.78), 4 days of hospitalization (OR = 6.41; 95% CI = 2.29-17.97), and off-label therapy (OR = 3.37; 95% CI = 1.69-6.70) were the risk factor for pDDIs. Despite significant differences in the number of medications taken, comorbidities, and off-label drugs, cystic fibrosis patients were not more exposed to pDDI. Given the lack of data on pDDIs in the pediatric population, the need for close cooperation between clinicians and clinical pharmacists to improve the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy is highlighted.

Adverse drug reactions in paediatric surgery: prospective study on frequency and risk related factors

BackgroundPaediatric patients are especially prone to experiencing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and the surgical environment gathers many conditions for such reactions to occur. Additionally, little information exists in the literature on ADRs in the paediatric surgical population. We aimed to quantify the ADR frequency in this population, and to investigate the characteristics and risk factors associated with ADR development.MethodsA prospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of 311 paediatric patients, aged 1–16 years, admitted for surgery at a tertiary referral hospital in Spain (2019–2021). Incidence rates were used to assess ADR frequency. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on ADR development.ResultsDistinct ADRs (103) were detected in 80 patients (25.7%). The most frequent being hypotension (N = 32; 35%), nausea (N = 16; 15.5%), and emergence delirium (N = 16; 15.5%). Most ADRs occurred because of drug-drug interactions. The combination of sevoflurane and fentanyl was responsible for most of these events (N = 32; 31.1%). The variable most robustly associated to ADR development, was the number of off-label drugs prescribed per patient (OR = 2.99; 95% CI 1.73 to 5.16), followed by the number of drugs prescribed per patient (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.41), and older age (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.49). The severity of ADRs was assessed according to the criteria of Venulet and the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System. According to both methods, only four ADRs (3.9%) were considered serious.ConclusionsADRs have a high incidence rate in the paediatric surgical population. The off-label use of drugs is a key risk factor for ADRs development.

Paediatric off-label use of drugs in Gansu, China: a multicentre cross-sectional study

ObjectiveTo examine the current prevalence and cost of paediatric off-label drug prescriptions in Gansu, China, and the potential influencing factors.DesignThe prevalence of off-label prescriptions in paediatrics was evaluated according to...

Trigeminal neuralgia: drug therapy : The new German guideline

Trigeminal neuralgia is characterized by severe, lightning-like attacks of pain, which are mandatory for the diagnosis. The pain typically occurs on one side and is often triggered by simply touching the face, chewing or talking. In acute exacerbations, this can also hinder food and fluid intake, resulting in alife-threatening clinical picture. Adistinction is made between classical, secondary and idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. For the diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia, the medical history and imaging procedures are key for classification. The only active substances approved for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia in Germany are carbamazepine and phenytoin, which is why off-label drugs often need to be used if there is no or insufficient effect or inacceptable side effects. Cooperation between research and clinical practice to improve the care of affected patients is therefore essential.

Glycosylation Modulation Dictates Trafficking and Interaction of SARS-CoV-2 S1 Subunit and ACE2 in Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cells.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mainly targets the upper respiratory tract. It gains entry by interacting with the host cell receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) via its heavily glycosylated spike glycoprotein. SARS-CoV-2 can also affect the gastrointestinal tract. Given the significant role of glycosylation in the life cycle of proteins and the multisystem target of SARS-CoV-2, the role of glycosylation in the interaction of S1 with ACE2 in Caco-2 cells was investigated after modulation of their glycosylation patterns using N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (NB-DNJ) and 1-deoxymannojirimycin (dMM), in addition to mutant CHO cells harboring mutations at different stages of glycosylation. The data show a substantial reduction in the interactions between the altered glycosylation forms of S1 and ACE2 in the presence of NB-DNJ, while varied outcomes resulted from dMM treatment. These results highlight the promising effects of NB-DNJ and its potential use as an off-label drug to treat SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Medicines management in children and young people: pharmacokinetics, drug calculations and off-label drug use.

Medicines management in children and young people presents specific challenges because children differ from adults in their response to medicines. The way in which medicines work inside the human body, or pharmacokinetics, varies according to age and stage of development. Accurate drug calculations for a child rely on the careful consideration of a series of factors, such as weight and height, pharmacokinetics and drug characteristics. This article focuses on three fundamental aspects: pharmacokinetics, drug calculations, and unlicensed and off-label drug use.

Barriers and facilitators to guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a qualitative descriptive study

BackgroundDespite being a global public health concern, there is a research gap in analyzing implementation strategies for managing off-label drug use in children. This study aims to understand professional health managers’ perspectives on implementing the Guideline in hospitals and determine the Guideline’s implementation facilitators and barriers.MethodsPediatric directors, pharmacy directors, and medical department directors from secondary and tertiary hospitals across the country were recruited for online interviews. The interviews were performed between June 27 and August 25, 2022. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was adopted for data collection, data analysis, and findings interpretation to implement interventions across healthcare settings.ResultsIndividual interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare professionals from all over the Chinese mainland. Key stakeholders in implementing the Guideline for the Management of Pediatric Off-Label Use of Drugs in China (2021) were interviewed to identify 57 influencing factors, including 27 facilitators, 29 barriers, and one neutral factor, based on the CFIR framework. The study revealed the complexity of the factors influencing managing children’s off-label medication use. A lack of policy incentives was the key obstacle in external settings. The communication barrier between pharmacists and physicians was the most critical internal barrier.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this study significantly reduces the implementation gap in managing children’s off-label drug use. We provided a reference for the standardized management of children’s off-label use of drugs.

Abstract 952: Ex vivo drug testing identifies a potentially effective drug in 94% of cases for 403 patients in 42 tumor types

Abstract Objective: To determine whether patient derived tumor cells (PDTC) could be derived from a variety of solid tumors and used to select effective therapies, we developed a CLIA certified assay, the PARIS® test, to quantify drug sensitivities using PDTCs. Methods: Oncologists referred patients for the PARIS® test and patients had the option to consent to SEngine Precision Medicine’s IRB protocol. Samples were obtained from multiple cancer centers across the US and abroad. Patients were at all stages in their clinical journey ranging from treatment naïve to late stage, recurrent/refractory disease settings. Fresh specimens obtained from surgical resections, core biopsies, or body fluids arrived at our CLIA laboratory within 48 hrs from collection. Tumor origin and driver mutations were confirmed by IHC or DNA sequence in 88% of the cases. Results: PDTCs derived from 403 patients diagnosed with 42 different solid tumor types, including both common and rare tumors, were subjected to the PARIS® assay. An average of 67 oncology drugs (ranging from 6-307), including chemotherapies and targeted agents, were tested for each patient sample. A report ranking drug sensitivities was provided to the oncologist with an average turnaround time of less than 3 weeks. Drug sensitivity was classified as exceptional/good, moderate/low and no responses. Remarkably, 94.2% of the PDTCs exhibited selective exceptional/good responses to at least one, and typically several drugs, despite the majority of PDTCs being derived from patients with drug resistant, metastatic disease. The drug sensitivity profiles showed highly individualized responses as well as tumor type specificity. While known biomarkers/drug sensitivity associations were confirmed, many samples exhibited sensitivity to targeted agents in the absence of known biomarkers. For example, HER2+ breast cancers demonstrated sensitivity to HER2/EGFR inhibitor and a subset of luminal B and triple negative breast cancers demonstrated HER2/EGFRi responses without underlying genetic alterations. Functional testing was also useful in the rare tumor types. For example, low grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) cells, differentiated from high grade by their response to specific receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and estrogen antagonists, but a poor response to standard of care, as is observed in the clinic. Three patients with LGSOC that were treated with the PARIS test top scoring drugs had a positive clinical response and cases from other tumor types will be presented. Conclusions: Functional testing of PDTCs from both common and rare tumor types is feasible, even for those that have failed standard of care. We provide an unprecedented view of patient-specific, actionable vulnerabilities to current oncology drugs. Personalization of cancer care will require improved access to off-label drugs. Citation Format: Rachele Rosati, Alex C. Rajevski, Payel Chatterjee, Lauren R. Appleyard, Ana Cristina Cordero Schmidt, Shalini Pereira, Robert L. Diaz, Brady Bernard, Brady Bernard, Carla Grandori, Christopher J. Kemp. Ex vivo drug testing identifies a potentially effective drug in 94% of cases for 403 patients in 42 tumor types [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 952.

Effect of off-label targeted drugs on long-term survival in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Insights from a national multicentre prospective registry.

Off-label pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted drugs are commonly prescribed for non-operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but their effect on the long-term prognosis of CTEPH remains unknown. This study investigated the effect of off-label PAH-targeted drugs on the long-term survival of CTEPH patients. CTEPH patients were enrolled from a prospective multicentre national registry. Except for licensed riociguat and treprostinil, other PAH-targeted drugs were off-label. In the original and propensity score-matched (PSM) samples, five-year survival was compared in two groups: (a) patients not receiving off-label PAH-targeted drugs (control) versus (b) patients receiving off-label PAH-targeted drugs (treatment). The latter group was investigated for the effect of started off-label PAH-targeted drugs at baselines (initial) or during follow-up (subsequent). Of 347 enrolled patients, 212 were treated with off-label PAH-targeted drugs initially (n = 173) or subsequently (n = 39), and 135 were untreated. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (97.1% vs. 89.4%, 92.3% vs. 82.1%, 83.2% vs. 75.1% and 71.1% vs. 55.3%, respectively, log-rank test, p = 0.005). Initial treatment was correlated with better 5-year survival after excluding patients with subsequent treatment to reduce the immortal-time bias (hazard ratio: 0.611; 95% CI: 0.397-0.940; p = 0.025). In PSM samples, patients given initial treatment showed significantly better 5-year survival than untreated patients (68.9% vs. 49.3%, log-rank test, p = 0.008). Off-label targeted drugs contributed to improved long-term survival in CTEPH patients receiving pharmacotherapies.

Repurposing of rituximab biosimilars to treat B cell mediated autoimmune diseases.

Rituximab, the first monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of lymphoma, eventually became one of the most popular and versatile drugs ever in terms of clinical application and revenue. Since its patent expiration, and consequently, the loss of exclusivity of the original biologic, its repurposing as an off-label drug has increased dramatically, propelled by the development and commercialization of its many biosimilars. Currently, rituximab is prescribed worldwide to treat a vast range of autoimmune diseases mediated by B cells. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of rituximab repurposing in 115 autoimmune diseases across 17 medical specialties, sourced from over 1530 publications. Our work highlights the extent of its off-label use and clinical benefits, underlining the success of rituximab repurposing for both common and orphan immune-related diseases. We discuss the scientific mechanism associated with its clinical efficacy and provide additional indications for which rituximab could be investigated. Our study presents rituximab as a flagship example of drug repurposing owing to its central role in targeting cluster of differentiate 20 positive (CD20)B cells in 115 autoimmune diseases.

Unlocking the potential of fondaparinux: guideline for optimal usage and clinical suggestions (2023).

Background: Thromboembolic disease is associated with a high rate of disability or death and gravely jeopardizes people's health and places considerable financial pressure on society. The primary treatment for thromboembolic illness is anticoagulant medication. Fondaparinux, a parenteral anticoagulant medicine, is still used but is confusing due to its disparate domestic and international indications and lack of knowledge about its usage. Its off-label drug usage in therapeutic settings and irrational drug use are also common. Objective: The aim of this guideline is to enhance the judicious clinical application of fondaparinux by consolidating the findings of evidence-based research on the drug and offering superior clinical suggestions. Methods: Seventeen clinical questions were developed by 37 clinical pharmacy experts, and recommendations were formulated under the supervision of three methodologists. Through methodical literature searches and the use of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation grading techniques, we gathered evidence. Results: This guideline culminated in 17 recommendations, including the use of fondaparinux for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention and treatment, perioperative surgical prophylaxis, specific diseases, special populations, bleeding and overdose management. For different types of VTE, we recommend first assessing thrombotic risk in hospitalized patients and then administering the drug according to the patient's body mass. In surgical patients in the perioperative period, fondaparinux may be used for VTE prophylaxis, but postoperative use usually requires confirmation that adequate hemostasis has been achieved. Fondaparinux may be used for anticoagulation prophylaxis in patients hospitalized for oncological purposes, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after resuscitation, in patients with cirrhosis combined with portal vein thrombosis (PVT), in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fondaparinux should be used with caution in special populations, such as pregnant female patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or platelet counts less than 50 × 109/L, pregnant patients with a prethrombotic state (PTS) combined with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA), and children. For bleeding caused by fondaparinux, dialysis may partially remove the drug. Conclusion: The purpose of this guideline is to provide all healthcare providers with high-quality recommendations for the clinical use of fondaparinux and to improve the rational use of the drug in clinical practice. Currently, there is a lack of a dedicated antidote for the management of fondaparinux. The clinical investigation of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) or recombinant activated factor VII (rFⅦa) as potential reversal agents is still pending. This critical gap necessitates heightened scrutiny and research emphasis, potentially constituting a novel avenue for future inquiries into fondaparinux sodium. A meticulous examination of adverse events and safety profiles associated with the utilization of fondaparinux sodium will contribute significantly to a more comprehensive understanding of its inherent risks and benefits within the clinical milieu.