Esophageal Stricture Research Articles

Optimizing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease treatment: A call to shift from omeprazole.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disorder of the upper respiratory tract, which develops due to the regurgitation of acid from the stomach into the oesophagus. If left untreated, GERD may cause serious complications such as Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal strictures, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. According to a study published by Nirwan JS et al in 2020, individuals suffering from Gastroesophageal reflux disease globally is 1.03 billion.[1] Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently used drugs for the treatment of GERD. Omeprazole belongs to PPIs class of drugs and it has been a drug of choice for GERD because it is affordable, easily available, and it can be taken along with other medicines. However, Proton pump inhibitors are not completely risk-free, chronic use of Proton Pump inhibitors has been associated with decreased calcium and magnesium absorption increasing the risk of osteoporosis and electrolyte disturbances respectively. It also increases the risk of community-acquired pneumonia [2] However, Esomeprazole the s-isomer of omeprazole yields much better results than omeprazole. It is more effective and safe in the treatment of GERD, not only does it decrease the symptoms of the disease rapidly ie. heartburn [4] but also it reduces the relapse of the symptoms twice that of omeprazole. Maintenance of intragastric pH > 4 is an effective measure for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease, esomeprazole has demonstrated improved acid inhibition over omeprazole with a high mean percentage of 24-hour intragastric pH > 4. The healing rate for reflux esophagitis and relapse was also higher for esomeprazole than that of omeprazole.[3] According to a study, the number of individuals with GERD in the South Asia region is around 8000 per 100000 [4]. Knowing the extent of Gastroesophageal patients present in Pakistan and how rapidly this number can escalate due to poor lifestyle modifications. Omeprazole which is the most frequent drug prescribed for the treatment of GERD [5] should be discouraged and Esomeprazole being more beneficial in terms of healing time and relapse of symptoms should be promoted to prevent chronic use adverse effects of Proton pump inhibitors. Overall, such a measure will improve the quality of life of a person suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease which otherwise may lead to more severe implications.

Enhanced Risk of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Esophageal Complications in the Ulcerative Colitis Population.

Background: Although heartburn and reflux are frequently reported in ulcerative colitis [UC], the correlation between UC and gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD], and its complications, esophageal stricture and Barrett's esophagus [BE], is not well understood. This study aims to examine the prevalence and associated risk of GERD and its complications within the UC population. Methods: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset, consisting of 7,159,694 patients, comparing GERD patients with and without UC to those without GERD. We assessed the degree of colonic involvement in UC and the occurrence of esophageal complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted using the chi-squared test or Fisher exact test (two-tailed). Results: A higher prevalence of GERD (23.0% vs. 16.5%) and GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (22.3% vs. 16%) and erosive esophagitis (EE) (1.2% vs. 0.6%), was found in UC patients (p < 0.01), including pancolitis, proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, and indetermined UC (with undefined colonic involvement). UC patients were more likely to develop GERD (1.421), NERD (1.407), and EE (1.681) (p < 0.01). A higher prevalence of esophageal stricture (16.9 vs. 11.4 per 10,000 patients) and BE without dysplasia (94.5 vs. 39.3 per 10,000 patients) was found in UC (p < 0.05). The odds of developing BE without dysplasia were higher (1.892) in patients with UC (p < 0.01), including ulcerative pancolitis, proctitis, and indeterminate UC (OR of 1.657, 3.328, and 1.996, respectively) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an increased risk of developing GERD and its complications in UC. This highlights the importance of vigilant monitoring and early intervention to minimize associated GERD-related risks in patients with UC.

Vascular Ring Surgical Repair: Re-Implantation of the Left Subclavian Artery into the Left Carotid Artery in a Pediatric Patient.

Vascular rings are a rare congenital anomaly of the aortic arch, in which a ring-shaped structure forms, surrounding the trachea and/or esophagus, potentially causing compression. We describe the case of a 14-month-old female patient with failure to thrive secondary to dysphagia, and a vascular ring formed by a right aortic arch, an aberrant left subclavian artery, and a left ligamentum arteriosum. Surgical repair involved ligamentum arteriosum division, Kommerell's diverticulum obliteration, and left subclavian artery re-implantation into the left carotid artery. Endoscopy and EndoFLIPTM evaluated the intraoperative improvement in esophageal narrowing and impedance, respectively. The postoperative period was uneventful, and follow-up visits demonstrated dysphagia resolution and a patent re-implanted left subclavian artery.

Attenuation of esophageal anastomotic stricture through remote ischemic conditioning in a rat model

Anastomotic stricture is a typical complication of esophageal atresia surgery. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) has demonstrated multiorgan benefits, however, its efficacy in the esophagus remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether applying RIC after esophageal resection and anastomosis in rats could attenuate esophageal stricture and improve inflammation. Sixty-five male Sprague–Dawley rats were categorized into the following groups: controls with no surgery, resection and anastomosis only, resection and anastomosis with RIC once, and resection and anastomosis with RIC twice. RIC included three cycles of hind-limb ischemia followed by reperfusion. Inflammatory markers associated with the interleukin 6/Janus kinase/ signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (IL-6/JAK/STAT3) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha/nuclear factor-κB (TNF-α/NF-kB) signaling pathways were evaluated with RNA and protein works. The RIC groups showed significantly lower stricture rates, lower inflammatory markers levels than the resection and anastomosis-only group. The RIC groups had significantly lower IL-6 and TNFa levels than the resection and anastomosis-only group, confirming the inhibitory role of remote ischemic conditioning in the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 and TNF-α/NF-kB signaling pathways. RIC after esophageal resection and anastomosis can reduce the inflammatory response, improving strictures at the esophageal anastomosis site, to be a novel noninvasive intervention for reducing esophageal anastomotic strictures.

Management Strategies and Outcomes of Distal Congenital Esophageal Strictures in the Setting of Long-gap Esophageal Atresia

BackgroundThe management of neonates with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) combined with distal congenital esophageal strictures (CES) is challenging. We sought to review our approach for this rare set of anomalies. MethodsWe reviewed children with LGEA + CES surgically treated at two institutions (2018–2024). LGEA repair was performed using the Foker technique (traction-induced esophageal lengthening). A CES strategy was chosen based on preoperative evaluations and intraoperative findings. The configuration and length of the CES were assessed using retrograde flexible esophagoscopy via gastrostomy with contrast fluoroscopy. ResultsEight patients (75% male) with LGEA + CES were treated: Four had type A and four had type B EA. Median gap length was 3.5 cm. Three underwent thoracoscopic esophageal lengthening. After a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR: 9–25), all retained their native esophagus. However, those who had CES resection concurrent with the lengthening process or at the time of EA anastomosis had more challenging perioperative courses: one required additional time on traction and another required esophageal anastomotic stricture resection. ConclusionsOur experience with LGEA and distal CES emphasizes tailoring surgical approaches to each patient's unique condition, avoiding a one-size-fits-all strategy. However, if the esophageal tissue above the distal CES is in good condition, our preference has shifted towards retaining the CES during traction, performing gentle dilation at anastomosis time, and conducting definitive endoscopic management subsequently. We would caution against making the assumption that salvage of the native esophagus is not possible or that resection of the CES is always needed. Level of EvidenceLevel III.

A pilot study on endoscopic delivery of injectable bioadhesive for esophageal repair in a porcine model

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the gold-standard surgical procedure for superficial esophageal cancer. A significant and challenging complication of this technique is post-ESD esophageal stricture. In this study, the feasibility of endoscopic catheter delivery of bioadhesive to esophageal lesions in a porcine model was tested. Injectable bioadhesive was composed of oxidized dextran (ODA) and chitosan hydrochloride (CS), its physicochemical properties, injectability, antibacterial activity, and cytocompatibility were investigated beforein vivotest. ODA-CS bioadhesive was delivered to the wound bed of the esophageal tissue using a custom-made catheter device after ESD in a porcine model. Our results show that the ODA-CS bioadhesive is of good injectability, tissue adhesive strength, antibacterial capacity, and blood compatibility.In vivodelivery was achieved by endoscopic spraying of ODA and CS in separate catheters fixed on the endoscopic probe. ODA and CS can be mixed well to allow in situ bioadhesive formation and firmly adhere to the esophageal wound surface. After two weeks, the bioadhesive maintained structural integrity and adhered to the surface of esophageal wounds. However, histological analysis reveals that the ODA-CS bioadhesive did not show improvement in attenuating inflammatory response after ESD. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of ODA-CS bioadhesive for shielding esophageal wounds after ESD, whereas efforts need to improve its anti-inflammatory activity to reduce fibrosis for stricture prevention.

Local triamcinolone injection and selective add-on oral steroids to prevent esophageal post-endoscopic submucosal dissection stricture: a retrospective analysis in a Western center.

Extensive esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs) without preventive measures carry a high risk of stricture. Oral steroids and local injection of triamcinolone acetonide have proven to be effective in Asia for the prevention of esophageal stricture. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a systematic steroid administration protocol for stricture prevention in a Western center. A retrospective review was conducted of all esophageal ESDs performed at H.U.B. Erasme Hospital, Brussels between 2016 and 2022. Injection of triamcinolone was performed for mucosal defects between 50% and 89% of the circumference. We added oral corticosteroids for patients with resections of ≥90% of the circumference. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic stenosis at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative stricture rate assessed by endoscopy within 6 months of ESD. Potential risk factors of stricture were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. 111 patients underwent 130 esophageal ESDs, with 59 patients receiving triamcinolone acetonide local injection and eight receiving local and oral corticosteroids. The primary outcome demonstrated a stricture incidence of 8.4%. The cumulative stricture rate assessed by endoscopy within 6 months of ESD was 10.4%. A mucosal defect of ≥60 mm in length was associated with a 15-fold increased risk of stricture, with circumferential extent also identified as being an independent prognostic factor for stricture. Our protocol led to a low stricture rate, even after extensive resection. As a single session treatment without systemic side effects, triamcinolone injection could provide benefits as a preventive method after large esophageal resections.

Prognostic factors for esophageal respiratory fistula in unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy

Limited studies have focused on the prognostic factors of esophageal respiratory fistula (ERF) associated with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Between January 1st, 2014 and January 1st, 2021, we included patients who were initially diagnosed with unresectable ESCC and underwent radiotherapy. All patients were followed up for a period of 2 years after completing their radiotherapy treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were defined as death or severe adverse events. The survival curves of ERF were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was employed to calculated the prognostic factors. A cohort of 232 patients underwent radiotherapy, of whom 32 patients experienced ERF. The median period from initial diagnosis of ESCC to ERF was 5.75 months, and the median period from ERF to the primary outcome was 4.6 weeks. Neck + upper chest location (odds ratio [OR] 3.305), high T stage (OR 1.765), esophageal stenosis (OR 1.073), high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.384) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR 1.765) were risk factors for the occurrence of ERF. Cox regression analysis suggested that tumor location (hazards ratio [HR] 3.572, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.467–5.1), high T stage (HR 4.050, 95% CI 2.812–5.831), esophageal stenosis (HR 2.643, 95% CI 1.753–3.983), high PLR (HR 2.541, 95% CI 1.868–3.177) were independent prognostic factors for poor survival. Esophageal stenosis, neck + upper chest tumor location, high T stage and PLR predicted the prognosis of ERF in ESCC patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Additional chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective study

BackgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a potentially efficient therapeutic intervention for superficial esophageal cancer. Additional treatment such as chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or esophagectomy is recommended in cases of muscularis mucosa invasion with positive resection margins or lymphovascular invasion or submucosal layer invasion, which are considered noncurative ESD, due to an increased risk of lymph node metastasis. However, the adequacy of additional CRT after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD has not been fully discussed. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of additional CRT for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD, which was defined as a mucosal defect measuring ≥ 3/4 of the esophageal circumference.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 24 patients who received additional CRT for superficial esophageal SCC after near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD between 2012 and 2018. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was performed in all patients and boost irradiation (BI) was performed after ENI in 4 patients with positive resection margins. The prescription doses of ENI and BI were 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions and 9 Gy in 5 fractions, respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy (a combination of cisplatin or nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil) was administered to all patients.ResultsThe 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 92% and 78%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 83% and 70%, respectively. Grade 2 esophageal stenosis occurred in 8 (33%) patients. There was no case of Grade 3 or worse esophageal stenosis. Among them, 4 (17%) patients developed stenosis before additional CRT, which persisted after the completion of additional CRT. The remaining 4 (17%) patients developed de novo stenosis within 5 months following the completion of additional CRT. One patient (4%) still requires regular bougie dilation. Grade 3 and Grade 4 acute toxicity, including anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and esophagitis occurred in 1 (4%) and 0 (0%), 6 (25%) and 1 (4%), 1 (4%) and 0 (0%), and 1 (4%) and 0 (0%) patients, respectively. One (4%) patient who underwent salvage CRT for the out-of-field lymph node recurrence died with acute myeloid leukemia.ConclusionsAdditional CRT is a viable treatment option even in patients who have undergone near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD. Esophageal stenosis after additional CRT following near-circumferential or full-circumferential noncurative ESD is manageable and acceptable.

Birth weight and thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula—a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study aimed to analyze the results, feasibility and safety of the thoracoscopic approach for patients with esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) depending on the patient’s birth weight.MethodsThe study involved only type C and D EA/TEF. Among the analyzed parameters were the patients’ characteristics, surgical treatment and post-operative complications: early mortality, anastomosis leakage, anastomosis strictures, chylothorax, TEF recurrence, and the need for fundoplication or gastrostomy.Results145 consecutive newborns underwent thoracoscopic EA with TEF repair. They were divided into three groups—A (N = 12 with a birth weight < 1500 g), B (N = 23 with a birth weight ≥ 1500 g but < 2000 g), and C—control group (N = 110 with a birth weight ≥ 2000 g). Primary one-stage anastomosis was performed in 11/12 (91.7%) patients—group A, 19/23 (82.6%)—group B and 110 (100%)—group C. Early mortality was 3/12 (25%)—group A, 2/23 (8.7%)—group B, and 2/110 (1.8%)—group C and was not directly related to the surgical repair. There were no significant differences in operative time and the following complications: anastomotic leakage, recurrent TEF, esophageal strictures, and chylothorax. There were no conversions to an open surgery. Fundoplication was required in 0%—group A, 4/21 (19.0%)—group B, and 2/108 (1.9%)—group C survivors. Gastrostomy was performed in 1/9 (11.1%)—group A, 3/21 (14.3%)—group B and 0%—group C.ConclusionIn an experienced surgeon’s hands, even in the smallest newborns, the thoracoscopic approach may be safe, feasible, and worthy of consideration. Birth weight seems to be not a direct contraindication to the thoracoscopic approach.

Esophageal ganglioneuromatosis; a rare cause of intractable esophageal stenosis: a case report

BackgroundGanglioneuromatosis is a rare type of benign neurogenic tumor that usually affects the sites of the major sympathetic ganglia in the retroperitoneum and the posterior mediastinum. Affection of the gastrointestinal tract is rare, and involvement of the esophagus is exceptional. To the best of our knowledge, only 4 cases of esophageal ganglioneuromatosis in adults were reported in the literature. No cases have been reported in the pediatric age group.Case presentationAn 11-year-old boy presented with dysphagia due to severe esophageal stenosis caused by esophageal ganglioneuromatosis.ConclusionsDespite its rarity, the present case implies that ganglioneuromatosis should be considered in children with idiopathic esophageal stenosis.

Role of endoscopy in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease involving inflammation of the esophagus. Endoscopy is essential in the diagnosis and treatment of EoE and shows typical findings, including esophageal edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stenosis. However, studies involving pediatric and adult patients with EoE suggest that even a normally appearing esophagus can be diagnosed as EoE by endoscopic biopsy. Therefore, in patients with suspected EoE, biopsy samples should be obtained from the esophagus regardless of endoscopic appearance. Moreover, follow-up endoscopies with biopsy after therapy initiation are usually recommended to assess response. Although previous reports of endoscopic ultrasonography findings in patients with EoE have shown diffuse thickening of the esophageal wall, including lamina propria, submucosa, and muscularis propria, its role in EoE remains uncertain and requires further investigation. Endoscopic dilation or bougienage is a safe and effective procedure that can be used in combination with medical and/or dietary elimination therapy in patients with esophageal stricture for the management of dysphagia and to prevent its recurrence.

Endoscopic variceal ligation combined with sclerotherapy for management of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in pediatric patients: a single-center retrospective study.

Portal hypertension (PH) frequently gives rise to severe and life-threatening complications, including hemorrhage accompanied by the rupture of esophageal and gastric varices. In contrast to the guidelines for the management of PH in adults, the optimal endoscopic management of variceal bleeding for secondary prophylaxis in children remains unclear. The present study evaluated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) to control gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in children. This retrospective study included children with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding who underwent EST or EVL at Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, between February 2013 and March 2020. Short-term hemostasis rate and long-term rebleeding rate were evaluated. Adverse events related to the procedures, such as esophageal ulcer, esophageal stricture, abnormal embolization, pneumonia and perforation, were also recorded. EVL (n = 8) and EST (n = 13) were performed successfully in all pediatric patients diagnosed with moderate to severe esophageal varices concurrent with gastric varices. Hemostasis was achieved during episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The mean volume of each single aliquot of cyanoacrylate injected was 0.3 ± 0.1 ml (range: 0.1-0.5 ml). Varices were eradicated in six (75%) of the eight patients who underwent EVL after a median 2 (range: 1-4) procedures and a median time of 3.40 months (range: 1.10-13.33 months). Eleven (52.4%) of the 21 patients developed rebleeding events, with the mean duration of hemostasis being 11.1 ± 11.6 months (range 1.0-39.2 months). No treatment-related complications, for example, distal embolism, occurred except for abdominal pain in one patient (4.8%). EST, alone or in combination with EVL, is an effective and safe method of managing gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage in children undergoing secondary prophylaxis.

1193 Could Acute Severe Pancreatitis Have Caused These Oesophageal Strictures?

1193 Could Acute Severe Pancreatitis Have Caused These Oesophageal Strictures?

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the cervical esophagus and efficacy of local steroid injection for stricture prevention (with video)

There is a high incidence of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal cancer. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for stricture and to evaluate the efficacy of steroid injection for stricture prevention in the cervical esophagus. We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent ESD for cervical esophageal cancer to (1) identify the factors associated with stricture among patients who did not receive steroid injection, and (2) compare the incidence of stricture between patients with and without steroid injection. Among 48 patients who did not receive steroid injection, there were significant differences in tumor size (P= .026), resection time (P= .028), and circumferential extent of the mucosal defect (P= .005) between patients with stricture (n= 5) and without stricture (n= 43). Compared with patients without steroid injection, patients with steroid injection had a significantly lower incidence of stricture when the post-ESD mucosal defect was<3/4 and≥1/2 (40% versus 8%; P= .039). For the patients with a post-ESD mucosal defect of≥3/4 (n= 13), local steroid injection was performed for all of them, and 6 (46%) developed stricture. Patients who underwent≥1/2 circumferential resection were at high risk of cervical esophageal stricture. Steroid injection had a stricture prevention effect in patients with<3/4 and≥1/2 circumferential resection, but seemed to be insufficient in preventing stricture in patients with≥3/4 circumferential resection.

ENDOSCOPIC BOUGIENAGE AS PALLIATIVE TREATMENT FOR INOPERABLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: A CASE SERIES

Relevance: Esophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive tumors of the digestive tract, with a 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Given the global aging of the population and consequently the increase in the number of patients who will not undergo surgery, chemotherapy, andradiation, or the fact that they do not want it, especially due to deficiencies and concomitant pathology, endoscopic methods for palliative treatment are an alternative. The article aimed to report the results using distal caps to treat esophageal stenosis in inoperable esophageal cancer. Methods: The article describes cases of endoscopic cap bougienage in patients with inoperable cancerous esophageal stenosis at the National Scientific Cancer Center (Astana, Kazakhstan). Results: All 5 patients had inoperable cancerous esophageal stenosis and endoscopically installed percutaneous gastrostomy. All patients refused to eat through gastrostomy and wanted to take food physiologically orally while preserving the perception of food taste. Sessions of distal esophageal bougienage with distal caps were performed outpatiently and without sedation; the intervals between sessions ranged from 7 to 20 days and the number of bougees ranged from 4 to 11. Conclusions In our clinic, distal cap bougienage has been successfully used in patients with benign strictures for a long time, and in this article we present cases of bougienage in 5 patients with malignant stenoses. Further investigation of the effectiveness of cap bougienage of malignant stenoses requires a more extensive sample of patients and longer follow-ups. However, we decided to publish our preliminary results since we were the first in Kazakhstan to use them in inoperable cancer patients. Bougie, as a palliative treatment for inoperable esophageal cancer, is a method to improve food passage and a more physiological meal, which, according to taste preferences, is more psychologically demanded by patients, compared to eating through gastrostomy. Bougie caps are a safe method since the Bougie Cap is transparent and the bougie is performed under the visual supervision of an endoscopist. This bougie technique can be recommended for widespread use in clinics as the safest bougie method not only for malignant stenoses but also for benign strictures of the esophagus.

Esophageal stenosis as an initial presentation of Behçet’s disease: A case report and literature review

IntroductionBehçet’s disease (BD) is a multiorgan inflammatory vascular disease of unknown etiology, affecting vessels of any size and type. While, gastrointestinal involvement in BD is uncommon, esophageal Behçet’s disease (EBD) is rarely reported, especially in the Mediterranean region. Aim of the workTo report a case with esophageal stenosis as an initial presentation of BD and compare to reported cases worldwide. Case presentationA 30-year-old Syrian male presented with dysphagia, odynophagia with weight loss 20 kg. He had a history of recurrent oral ulcers and was otherwise healthy. On examination he appeared pale, dehydrated with normal systemic examination. Blood tests revealed anemia (hemoglobin 10.5 mg/dl), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (90 mm/1sthr) and C-reactive protein (CRP)(98 mg/dl)levels. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed mild ulceration with edema and mucosal thickness at the upper sphincter of the esophagus, leading to stenosis. Biopsy showed nonspecific inflammation, without granulomas or signs of malignancy. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was placed and during hospitalization he developed genital ulcers and hemoptysis, with chest computed tomography revealing pulmonary vasculitis. The patient was diagnosed with BD, and treated with methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, leading to significant improvement. After two months he could swallow normally, and the PEG tube was removed with no recurrence after one year follow-up. He was maintained on azathioprine 100 g/day and prednisolone 7.5 mg/day. ConclusionBD is a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse manifestations and geographic variations. EBD is rare and can cause disability. Early diagnosis of EBD and appropriate treatment are crucial for improving outcomes.

Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: An update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the esophagus characterized by symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and histologically by predominantly eosinophilic infiltration of the squamous epithelium. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published a guideline in 2014; however, the rapid evolution of knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic options have made an update necessary. A consensus group of pediatric gastroenterologists from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (ESPGHAN EGID WG) reviewed the recent literature and proposed statements and recommendations on 28 relevant questions about EoE. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2014 to 2022. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. A total of 52 statements based on the available evidence and 44 consensus-based recommendations are available. A revision of the diagnostic protocol, options for initial drug treatment, and the new concept of simplified empiric elimination diets are now available. Biologics are becoming a part of the potential armamentarium for refractory EoE, and systemic steroids may be considered as the initial treatment for esophageal strictures before esophageal dilation. The importance and assessment of quality of life and a planned transition to adult medical care are new areas addressed in this guideline. Research in recent years has led to a better understanding of childhood EoE. This guideline incorporates the new findings and provides a practical guide for clinicians treating children diagnosed with EoE.

Long-Term Functional Outcomes in Pediatric Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.

The multimodal treatments for pediatric head and neck (H&N) malignancies can have significant long-term functional consequences for growing patients. This systematic review aims to analyze the current knowledge of functional outcomes for pediatric H&N cancer survivors. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed, and 1356 papers were reviewed by 3 team members with conflict resolution by a senior member. Fourteen studies were included. Nine of 14 (64%) papers reported issues with swallowing, characterized as either dysphagia, odynophagia, oropharyngeal fibrosis, esophageal stenosis, xerostomia, trismus, or general issues with the throat and mouth. Six of 14 papers noted nutritional and feeding deficiencies, and 5 of 14 additionally noted issues with speech and voice changes. Four of 14 (29%) reported hearing impairments and/or loss. A majority of papers (9/14) reported long-term functional characteristics as a secondary outcome. Three of 14 (21%) reported a quality of life (QoL) measure. Heterogeneity in methodology and reporting precluded analysis of any relationship between treatment type and functional outcomes. Recommendations include integration of objective measures of feeding support and swallowing, as well as regular measurements of function and QoL parameters during treatment to better understand the evolution of QoL and function throughout care. Relatively few studies focus on functional outcomes following the treatment of pediatric H&N cancer. Swallowing difficulty is the most frequently reported deficit, but objective data is rarely reported. Standardization of functional outcome assessment could improve the quality of evidence for pediatric patients treated for H&N cancer.

Nissen fundoplication in a series of 53 consecutive patients

Hiatal hernia (HH) is often seen in surgery practice. The main feature of HH is the migration of abdominal viscera in the mediastinum via the esophageal hiatus. We performed - on 53 patients from November 2009 to June 2018 in the Department of General and Digestive Surgery of General Hospital of Villarobledo. Forty-one patients were diagnosed with hiatal hernia, 9 - with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 3 - with Barrett&amp;rsquo;s esophagus. The average operative time was 89 &amp;plusmn; 33 minutes, and the average follow-up was four years. The following complications were recorded: perforation of the distal esophagus in 1 patient (1.9%), postoperative spleen hemorrhage requiring emergency laparotomy in 1 patient (1.9%), dysphagia in 6 patients (11.3%) in the early postoperative period (treated conservatively), one patient had small bowel obstruction in the fourth postoperative year, three patients (5.6%) had radiological signs of HH recurrence and GERD despite the fundoplication. One patient (1.9%) was reoperated for stenosis of the distal esophagus and recurrent paraesophageal hiatal hernia one year after the first intervention. Postoperative ventral hernia (POVH) was seen in 2 patients (3.8%). All recurrence rate was 7.5%, recorded in 4 patients.