Esophageal Function Research Articles

Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.

The 4th iteration of the Chicago Classification (CC v4.0) for esophageal motility disorders offers more restrictive criteria for the diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM) compared to version 3.0 (CC v3.0). In light of the updated criteria for IEM, we aimed to characterize and compare the patients who retained their IEM diagnosis to those who were reclassified as normal motility, and to evaluate the clinical impact of the newly introduced CC v4.0. We performed a retrospective case-control study. We included all individuals who underwent a high-resolution manometry (HRM) between 2020 and 2021 at two centers. Consecutive studies reported as IEM according to the CC v3.0 were reanalyzed according to the CC v4.0. We compared demographics, clinical, manometry, and pH-monitoring parameters. Out of 452 manometry studies, 154 (34%) met criteria for IEM as per the CC v3.0 (CC v3.0 IEM group). Of those, 39 (25%) studies were reclassified as normal studies according to the CC v4.0 (CC v4.0 normal group), while the remaining 115 studies (25% of the overall cohort) retained an IEM diagnosis (CC v4.0 IEM group). The CC v4.0 normal group had more recovered contractions during solid swallows (p = 0.01), less ineffective swallows (p = 0.04), and lower acid exposure time (p = 0.02) compared to the CC4.0 IEM group. Under CC v4.0 criteria, fewer patients are diagnosed with IEM. Those diagnosed with IEM had worse esophageal function and higher acid burden. Though further studies are needed to confirm these findings, our results indicate that CC v4.0 criteria restrict the IEM diagnosis to a more clinically meaningful population.

Heterotopic Sebaceous Glands in the Esophagus: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review

Heterotopic sebaceous glands (HSG) are one of the rarest benign lesions discovered on endoscopy. Treatment is currently not recommended given the benign and asymptomatic presence of these lesions. We present a case of an elderly male patient who presented with symptoms of throat itching, cough, phlegm, and altered taste found to have esophageal dysmotility in the setting of multiple, diffuse HSGs in the esophagus. HSG was confirmed on histopathological examination. Functional esophageal studies revealed spastic motility of the esophageal body, poor clearance of liquids, and impaired distensibility of upper and lower esophageal sphincters. Our case illustrates that they may be responsible for symptoms and may be associated with impaired esophageal function. HSGs do not require surveillance endoscopy or treatment. They should be considered in the differential diagnosis of yellowish elevated lesions in the esophagus.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy with Dor Fundoplication for Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction (EGJOO): a Comparison of Outcomes and Impact on Physiology

IntroductionEsophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by failure of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation with preserved peristalsis. Studies have shown that Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication (HMD) and per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are effective treatments for EGJOO. However, there is paucity of data comparing the efficacy and impact of these two procedures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare outcomes and impact on esophageal physiology in patients undergoing HMD or POEM for primary EGJOO. MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients who underwent either HMD or POEM for primary EGJOO at our institution between 2013 and 2021. Favorable outcome was defined as an Eckardt score ≤ 3 at 1 year after surgery. GERD–HRQL questionnaire, endoscopy, pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) results at baseline and 1 year after surgery were compared pre- and post-surgery and between groups. Objective GERD was defined as DeMeester score > 14.7 or LA grade C/D esophagitis. ResultsThe final study population consisted of 52 patients who underwent HMD (n = 35) or POEM (n = 17) for EGJOO. At a mean (SD) follow-up of 24.6 (15.3) months, favorable outcome was achieved by 30 (85.7%) patients after HMD and 14 (82.4%) after POEM (p = 0.753). After HMD, there was a decrease GERD-HRQL total score (31 (22–45) to 4 (0–19); p < 0.001), and objective reflux (54.2 to 25.9%; p = 0.033). On manometry, there was a decrease in LES resting pressure (48 (34–59) to 13 (8–17); p < 0.001) and IRP (22 (17–28) to 8 (3–11); p < 0.001), but esophageal body characteristics did not change (p > 0.05). Incomplete bolus clearance improved (70% (10–90) to 10% (0–40); p = 0.010). After POEM, there was no change in the GERD-HRQL total score (p = 0.854), but objective reflux significantly increased (0 to 62%; p < 0.001). On manometry, there was a decrease in LES resting pressure (43 (30–68) to 31 (5–34); p = 0.042) and IRP (23 (18–33) to 12 (10–32); p = 0.048), DCI (1920 (1600–5500) to 0 (0–814); p = 0.035), with increased failed swallows (0% (0–30) to 100% (10–100); p = 0.032). Bolus clearance did not improve (p = 0.539). Compared to HMD, POEM had a longer esophageal myotomy length (11 (7–15)-vs-5 (5–6); p = 0.001), more objective reflux (p = 0.041), lower DCI (0 (0–814)-vs-1695 (929–3101); p = 0.004), and intact swallows (90 (70–100)-vs-0 (0–40); p = 0.006), but more failed swallows (100 (10–100); p = 0.018) and incomplete bolus clearance (90 (90–100)-vs-10 (0–40); p = 0.004). ConclusionPeroral endoscopic myotomy and Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication are equally effective at relieving EGJOO symptoms. However, POEM causes worse reflux and near complete loss of esophageal body function. Graphical Abstract [Display omitted]

Higher obesity class is associated with more severe esophageal symptoms and reflux burden but not altered motor function or contractile reserve.

Patients with obesity often report esophageal symptoms, with abnormal reflux and esophageal motility suggested as potential mechanisms. However, prior studies showed varying results, often limited by study design/size and esophageal function/symptom measures utilized. We aimed to examine the relationship between obesity and objective esophageal function testing and patient-reported outcomes, utilizing prospective symptom, manometric and reflux monitoring data with impedance. Adults referred for high-resolution impedance-manometry (HRiM) and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) to evaluate esophageal symptoms were enrolled. Validated symptom and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) instruments were prospectively collected: GERDQ, reflux symptoms index (RSI), dominant symptom intensity (DSI, multiplied 5-point Likert scales for symptom frequency/severity), global symptom severity (GSS, 100-point visual analog scale), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) for HR-QOL. Esophageal function testing measures were compared across body mass index (BMI) categories and correlated with patient-reported outcomes. Seven hundred and fifty four patients were included (Normal:281/Overweight:253/Class I obesity:137/Class II/III obesity:83). Reflux burden measures on MII-pH (acid exposure time, total reflux episodes, bolus exposure time), conclusive pathologic reflux (Lyon), and hiatal hernia were increased in higher obesity classes compared to normal BMI. Class II/III obesity was associated with more normal/hypercontractile swallows, less ineffective swallows, and better bolus transit on HRiM. BMI correlated positively with GERDQ/RSI/DSI/GSS, and negatively with physical component score (SF-12). Esophageal symptom severity and HR-QOL correlated strongly with MII-pH findings, but not HRiM measures. Obesity is associated with increased esophageal symptom burden and worse physical HR-QOL, which correlate with higher acid/bolus reflux burden but not altered esophageal motility/transit/contractile reserve.

S2828 In Patients With Autoimmune Disease and Achalasia Diagnosed by HRM, FLIP Can Clarify Lower Esophageal Sphincter Function

S2828 In Patients With Autoimmune Disease and Achalasia Diagnosed by HRM, FLIP Can Clarify Lower Esophageal Sphincter Function

Proton Pump Inhibitors Modulate Gene Expression Profile in Esophageal Mucosa and Microbiome.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to manage children with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and without a formal diagnosis. We investigated the effect of PPIs on esophageal mucosal transcriptome and active microbiota in children with normal esophagi. Furthermore, we examined whether the differences in host esophageal mucosal gene expression were driven by an underlying esophageal epithelial cell type composition. Using metatranscriptomics, the host transcriptional and active microbial profiles were captured from 17 esophageal biopsy samples (PPI naïve [PPI-], n = 7; PPI exposed [PPI+], n = 10) collected from children without any endoscopic and histologic abnormalities in their esophagus (normal esophagus). Deconvolution computational analysis was performed with xCell to assess if the observed epithelial gene expression changes were related to the cell type composition in the esophageal samples. The median (IQR) age of our cohort was 14 years (12-16) with female (63%) preponderance. Both groups were similar in terms of their demographics and clinical features. Compared with PPI-, the PPI+ had upregulation of 27 genes including the MUC genes. The cell type composition was similar between the PPI- and PPI+ groups. Prevotella sp and Streptococcus sp were abundant in PPI+ group. In children with normal esophagus, PPI exposure can be associated with upregulation of esophageal mucosal homeostasis and epithelial cell function genes in a cell-type independent manner, and an altered esophageal microbiome. Additional studies are warranted to validate our findings and to investigate the causal effect of PPIs on the normal esophageal epithelium and microbial communities.

Esophageal Function and Reflux Evaluations in Lung Transplantation: A Nationwide Survey of UNOS-Accredited Transplant Centers in the United States.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease has been associated with worse lung transplant outcomes. We aimed to assess local practices for esophageal function testing (EFT) across transplant centers. This was a survey study of all United Network for Organ Sharing-accredited adult lung transplant centers regarding local EFT practice. Among 39/63 (60%) responded centers, 38.5% required any EFT (35.9% esophageal manometry, 15.4% pH monitoring, and 28.2% pH impedance), while another 28.2% may consider EFT based on symptoms. Five-year transplant volume was higher among centers requiring EFT (253 vs 159, P = 0.04). Only a minority of lung transplant centers routinely obtained EFT, supporting the need for guidelines for standardized reflux/esophageal assessment.

Esophageal Infusion of Menthol Does Not Affect Esophageal Motility in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Menthol is thought to trigger gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms by influencing esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. We evaluated the effect of esophageal menthol infusion on esophageal motility and the LES in healthy volunteers and in patients with GERD. High resolution manometry (HRM) catheter with attached thin tube for menthol infusion was placed transnasally. Protocol which included baseline recording, 16 water swallows (5ml, 10ml, and 15ml) and the multiple rapid swallows was performed before and after esophageal infusion of menthol (3mM, 20min, 8ml/min). We evaluated the effect of this infusion on the HRM parameters of esophageal peristalsis (distal contractile integral, distal latency, contractile front velocity) and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function (integrated relaxation pressure and the inspiratory augmentation of the LES). Simultaneously we evaluated the quality and intensity of the symptoms during the menthol infusion. Esophageal infusion of menthol did not appreciably affect HRM measurements characterizing esophageal peristalsis and LES pressure in healthy subjects (N = 13) or GERD patients (N = 11). The magnitude of the distal contractile integral (5ml) was changed neither in the healthy volunteers' group, (735 ± 127 vs. 814 ± 117mmHg, p = 0.5), nor in the GERD patients (295 ± 78 vs. 338 ± 96mmHg, p = 0.99). In healthy volunteers menthol did not change the inspiratory augmentation of the LES (8.67 ± 1.09 vs. 7.69 ± 0.96mmHg, p = 0.15) and neither did for GERD patients (8.8 ± 1.18 vs. 8.22 ± 0.91mmHg, p = 0.43). We observed no significant difference in any HRM parameter following menthol infusion, except for distal latency in 10ml swallows. By contrast, menthol infusion induced significantly more intense discomfort in GERD patient than in healthy volunteers. Our results suggest no significant temporal effect of menthol on the esophageal motility or LES function, neither in healthy volunteers, nor in GERD. Arguably, other mechanisms are responsible for menthol-related heartburn.

Mechanism of spirometry associated gastro-esophageal reflux in individuals undergoing esophageal assessment.

Persistent variability observed during spirometry, even when technical and personal factors are controlled, has prompted interest in uncovering its underlying mechanisms. Notably, our prior investigations have unveiled that spirometry has the potential to trigger gastro-esophageal reflux in a susceptible population. This current study embarks on elucidating the intricate mechanisms orchestrating reflux induced by spirometry. To achieve this, we enlisted twenty-four (24) participants exhibiting reflux symptoms for esophageal assessment. These participants underwent two sets of spirometry sessions, interspersed with a 10-minute intermission, during which we closely scrutinized fluid flow dynamics and esophageal function through high-resolution impedance esophageal manometry. Our comprehensive evaluation juxtaposed baseline manometric parameters against their equivalents during the initial spirometry session, the intervening rest period, and the subsequent spirometry session. Remarkably, impedance values, serving as a metric for fluid quantity, exhibited a substantial elevation during each spirometry session and the ensuing recovery interval in the pan-esophageal and hypopharyngeal regions when compared to baseline levels. Additionally, the resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter experienced a noteworthy reduction subsequent to the first bout of spirometry (13.6 ± 8.8 mmHg) in comparison to the baseline pressure (22.5 ± 13.3 mmHg). Furthermore, our observations unveiled a decline in spirometric parameters-FEV1 (0.14 ± 0.24 L, P = 0.042) and PEFR (0.67 L/s, P = 0.34)-during the second spirometry session when contrasted with the first session. Collectively, our study underscores the compelling evidence that spirometry maneuvers can elicit gastro-esophageal reflux by eliciting intra-esophageal pressure differentials and inducing temporary relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Effect of Body Weight and Obesity on Esophageal Function.

The incidence of obesity in the population is gradually increasing. Obesity can cause a variety of complications in the digestive system such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, and impacts the integrity of the esophageal mucosal barrier and esophageal motility. However, not many studies have focused on the effect of varying degrees of obesity on the esophagus. A total of 611 participants were included in this study. We divided them into three groups according to their body mass index (BMI): the normal weight group, the overweight group, and the obesity group. We performed a retrospective comparison between groups based on indicators from high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) and 24-hour pH impedance monitoring, and did a correlation analysis on multiple indicators such as esophageal mucosal barrier, esophageal motility, and acid reflux. The mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) in the overweight and obesity groups was lower than that in the normal group. The MNBI of the subjects in Z5-Z6 channels in the overweight group was significantly lower than that in the normal group. With respect to Z3-Z6 channels, MNBI values in the obesity group were significantly lower than those in the normal group. 'The acid exposure time (AET), the DeMeester scores (DMS) and 24-hour total reflux episodes was significantly higher in the obesity group than those in the normal and overweight groups. The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) residual pressure, and intrabolus pressure (IBP) in the overweight and obesity groups were significantly higher than those in the normal group. In addition, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure, and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) in the obesity group were significantly higher than those in the normal group. We found that increase in body weight affected the integrity of esophageal mucosa, and different degrees of increase associated with different degrees and different aspects of changes in esophageal motility.

268. DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL ESOPHAGUS-ON-A-CHIP MODEL: A HIGH-FIDELITY PLATFORM FOR DIRECTING PERSONALIZED THERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA

Abstract Background 80% of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) die of disease. Current standard of care for EAC is systemic cytotoxic, platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection and additional rounds of chemotherapy. Locally advanced, resectable patients often fail to respond due to intrinsic and/or acquired chemoresistance. Traditional preclinical models fail to offer alternative salvage options. To our knowledge, this is the first high-fidelity dynamic 3D platform implemented to study esophageal function, pathophysiology, and drug effects. Methods Primary tissues obtained from EAC patients at diagnostic biopsy were propagated into patient-derived organoids (PDOs). The upper (mucosal) channel of the esophagus-chip was designated for PDO-derived epithelial cells, while the lower stromal channel was designated for matched fibroblasts. Autologous cell types were exposed to a physiologically relevant flow of nutrient media and microtissues were formed. Epithelial permeability was determined by cascade blue assay. Using this model, a clinically relevant chemotherapy protocol was administered to study patient-specific tumor response. To determine microtissue development and cellular fate in response to chemotherapy, level of several epithelial/mesenchymal biomarkers were evaluated. Results Study cohort consisted of both chemo-sensitive and -resistant EAC patients. Esophagus-chip models were developed with samples from patient-matched tumor and normal tissue. Chips recapitulated morphological and histological features of their parental tissues. Epithelial barrier integrity was established within 5 days on-chip. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the presence of pleomorphic cells and mature microvilli in EAC-chips. In vitro administration of docetaxel triplet chemotherapy demonstrated efficacy similar to that observed in the clinical setting when assessed directly or indirectly. Confocal imaging revealed treatment-associated differential expression of epithelial (CK7, CK19), and mesenchymal (vimentin) markers. Conclusion 3D-organoids conserve cellular heterogeneity of source patients, whereas esophagus-on-chip expand on this diversity by adding microphysiological relevance, stromal influence &amp; flexible complexity. This high-fidelity biomimetic platform enables clinical mimicry and can predict patient-specific chemosensitivity within a clinically relevant timeframe. This esophagus-chip system is a promising potential replacement for both inefficient preclinical animal models and existing tumor-only avatars lacking stromal and microphysiological context.

12. NEUROKININ A AND SUBSTANCE P SERUM CONCENTRATIONS CORRELATE WITH MOTILITY METRICS PREDISPOSING TO REFLUX, BUT NOT WITH ESOPHAGITIS PRESENCE IN GERD

Abstract Background Neurokinin A (NKA) and substance P (SP) may be responsible for airway hyper-reactivity and hypersensitization. Animal studies showed an increase of their blood concentration in response to acid installation into the esophagus, suggesting the presence of neurogenic inflammation in pathogenesis of asthma and chronic cough. Association between serum concentration of these cytokines and esophageal function testing parameters in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is poorly studied. Aim of the study was to assess serum concentration of neurokinin A and substance P in patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive form of GERD and perform correlation analysis between concentrations of these substances and data of multichannel esophageal pH-impedance (MII-pH) and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). Methods The data of examination of 88 subjects (31 with erosive esophagitis (EE); 57 with non-erosive form of GERD (NERD)) served as a source for the study. Diagnosis of GERD was established per Lyon criteria. Subjects with autoimmune disorders, receiving some medications able to affect esophageal motility were not eligible. Patients underwent HREM with the use of 36-channel solid-state catheters and MII-pH with 2-pH, 6-impedandce sensors. Serum concentrations of NKA and SP were measured with ELISA kits and biochemistry analyzer. Results Acid exposure time (AET), and number of high gastroesophageal refluxes were higher in EE compared to NERD, while number of refluxes and concentrations of NKA and SP were similar. Mean, minimal and residual lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures were lower in EE compared to NERD. There was direct correlation between serum concentration of SP and number of gastroesophageal refluxes (Spearman rank R = 0.26), AET (R = 0.25), and number of refluxes lasting &amp;gt;5 min (R = 0.35). NKA concentration correlated directly with number of refluxes &amp;gt;5 min long (R = 0.28), and inversely with levels of integrated relaxation pressure (R = –0.32), and contractile front velocity (R = –0.38). Conclusions In patients with GERD, serum concentrations of Neurokinin A and Substance P do not depend on the presence of esophagitis and probably are not caused by the influence of reflux content to sensory neurons of esophageal mucosa. Established correlations may support the involvement of Neurokinin A and Substance P in pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Comparative Study of Reflux Esophagitis as a Complication between Mini-Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy

Abstract Background All currently commonly performed bariatric operations involve manipulation and alteration of gastroesophageal anatomy, resulting in change of multiple physiologic parameters, such as gastric emptying and even the function of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) itself. Reflux control involves a complex interplay of LES function, esophageal function, and gastric emptying. While all 3 can be affected by any foregut procedure, LES function and gastric emptying are most directly altered in bariatric surgery Aim and Objectives was for discussing the post-operative reflux esophagitis in both Mini gastric bypass &amp; sleeve gastrectomy in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity. Subjects and Methods This prospective comparative study was carried out at ASU Hospital (El-Demerdash Hospital), Al Haram Hospital &amp; other authorized hospitals between July 2017 and March 2019 and ethically approved. The study involved 40 Patients who were targeted to be recruited &amp; randomly ordered to receive either Group 1 (MGBP (n = 20) or Group 2 Results After 6 months of follow up, we found that reflux esophagitis symptoms remained postoperatively among patients who performed SG operation compared to the MGB group (15% vs 5%). This was statistically insignificant (p = 0.737). Although the resolve rate was higher in the SG group compared to the MGB group (15% vs 5%), this was statistically insignificant (p = 0.605). Conclusion LSG and LMGB are both safe and effective procedures for the surgical management of morbid obesity. Bleeding and leakage are the most common and most serious complications in both procedures. The incidence of complications between both procedures is not significantly different.

Dental evaluation is helpful in the differentiation of functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Heartburn is identically the key symptom of both, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional heartburn (FHB), making the differential diagnosis resource-intensive. Oral manifestations of GERD can be easily examined; therefore, their exploration might be a cheap, widely available, and useful tool in the differentiation of GERD and FHB. To evaluate the prevalence of dental erosions (DE) and periodontal diseases (PD) in patients with heartburn and their association with GERD and FHB. A total of 116 [M/F: 51/65, mean age: 54 (17-80) years] consecutive patients with heartburn were enrolled for detailed esophageal function and orodental examinations. Dental disorders were detected in 89% (103/116). Patients with PD + DE had significantly more often pathologic reflux (90.0% vs 27.8%; P < 0.05), higher esophagitis scores (1.8 vs 0.9; P < 0.05), and a significantly different mean impedance curve (P = 0.04) than those without any dental diseases. The opposite approach established that patients with GERD had significantly higher prevalence of DE and PD, especially if both were present (28.9% vs 2.0%; P < 0.01), more severe PD (1.5 vs 1.0; P < 0.01), and longer history of heartburn (15 years vs 9 years; P < 0.01) than those with FHB. The dental evaluation of patients with heartburn seems to be useful in the differential diagnosis of GERD and FHB. Among the studied parameters, the co-appearance of DE and PD seems to be the best predictor of GERD, whereas the absence of dental disorders was mostly observed in FHB.

Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on growth and esophageal motility for pediatric esophageal achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a novel minimally invasive treatment for esophageal achalasia, has been shown to be effective and safe for both adult and pediatric patients. However, studies on its application in children in Taiwan and its impact on growth and esophageal motility are lacking. We conducted a retrospective study on consecutive pediatric patients who were diagnosed with esophageal achalasia at National Taiwan University Hospital and underwent POEM during 2015-2022. Disease characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Ten patients (age 16.9±3.1 years), nine newly diagnosed and one previously treated with pneumatic dilatation, underwent POEM for achalasia (type I/II/III: 3/7/0). Average symptom duration before diagnosis was 19.4±19.9 months, mean POEM procedure time was 83.6±30.7min, and clinical success (Eckardt score ≤3) was achieved in all patients. Eight patients experienced mild adverse events during POEM, but none required further endoscopic or surgical intervention. Over a mean follow-up period of 3.7±1.6 years, mean Eckardt score decreased significantly from 5.7±2.4 to 1.1±0.7 (p=0.0001). The BMI z-score also increased significantly after POEM (p=0.023). Five patients received follow-up high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM), and all had improved lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures (p=0.011), body contractility, and bolus transit (p=0.019). POEM is an effective and safe treatment for pediatric achalasia in Taiwan. Early diagnosis and treatment with POEM may help to restore esophageal function and nutrition status in children.

Oesophageal stasis is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and allograft failure in lung transplant recipients.

Morbidity and mortality in lung transplant recipients are often triggered by recurrent aspiration events, potentiated by oesophageal and gastric disorders. Previous small studies have shown conflicting associations between oesophageal function and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Herein, we sought to investigate the relationship between oesophageal motility disorders and long-term outcomes in a large retrospective cohort of lung transplant recipients. All lung transplant recipients at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program from 2012 to 2018 with available oesophageal manometry testing within the first 7 months post-transplant were included in this study. Patients were categorised according to the Chicago Classification of oesophageal disorders (v3.0). Associations between oesophageal motility disorders with the development of CLAD and allograft failure (defined as death or re-transplantation) were assessed. Of 487 patients, 57 (12%) had oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (OGJOO) and 47 (10%) had a disorder of peristalsis (eight major, 39 minor). In a multivariable analysis, OGJOO was associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.55, p=0.008) and allograft failure (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.13-2.53, p=0.01). Major disorders of peristalsis were associated with an increased risk of CLAD (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01-2.37, p=0.04) and allograft failure (HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.53-7.25, p=0.002). Minor disorders of peristalsis were not significantly associated with CLAD or allograft failure. Lung transplant recipients with oesophageal stasis characterised by OGJOO or major disorders of peristalsis were at an increased risk of adverse long-term outcomes. These findings will help with risk stratification of lung transplant recipients and personalisation of treatment for aspiration prevention.

Radionuclide Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Objective: to evaluate the possibilities of dynamic scintigraphy for the diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility (ED) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SS).Material and methods. The study group included 77 patients with established SS of different disease duration (from several months to 30 years) who underwent Technephyt 99mTc dynamic esophageal scintigraphy using two-stage protocol. During the first stage, the esophageal transport function was evaluated; during the second stage, the presence and severity of GER were assessed. Scans were analyzed using visual assessment, quantitative estimation of time/activity curves, and a proposed three-point scale for evaluating ED and GER severity. The control group consisted of 19 practically healthy individuals who underwent a routine examination to exclude digestive system and gastrointestinal tract diseases, the algorithm of which included dynamic scintigraphy.Results. ED was found in 74 of 77 patients (96%). According to three-point scale, severe ED (3 points) was registrated in 41 (55%) patients, moderate ED (2 points) in 15 (21%), and mild ED in 18 (24%). GER was diagnosed in 35 of 77 cases (45%): mild GER in 13 (37%), moderate GER (2 points) in 22 (63%), and none of the patients was found to have severe GER (3 points). A significant relationship between the presence of GER and the severity of ED was not obtained, but a direct correlation was established between ED and GER severity.Conclusion. Most SS patients demonstrated ED of varying severity associated with mild and moderate GER in nearly 45% of the cases. The study results confirm the practical significance of dynamic scintigraphy for assessing the esophageal transport function and GER in SS patients.

Mixed Esophageal Disease (MED): A New Concept.

We define mixed esophageal disease (MED) as a disorder of esophageal structure and/or function that produces variable signs or symptoms, simulating-fully or in part other well-defined esophageal conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophageal motility disorders, or even neoplasia. The central premise of the MED concept is that of an overlap syndrome that incorporates selected clinical, endoscopic, imaging, and functional features that alter the patient's quality of life and affect natural history, prognosis, and management. In this article, we highlight MED scenarios frequently encountered in medico-surgical practices worldwide, posing new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. These, in turn, emphasize the need for better understanding and management, aiming towards improved outcomes and prognosis. Since MED has variable and sometimes time-evolving clinical phenotypes, it deserves proper recognition, definition, and collaborative, multidisciplinary approach, be it pharmacologic, endoscopic, or surgical, to optimize therapeutic outcomes, while minimizing iatrogenic complications. In this regard, it is best to define MED early in the process, preferably by teams of clinicians with expertise in managing esophageal diseases. MED is complex enough that is increasingly becoming the subject of virtual, multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional meetings.

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Medical treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis.

Esophageal Inlet Patch: Association with Barrett's Esophagus.

Esophageal inlet patch (IP) with heterotopic gastric mucosa is an incidental finding on esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Although IP is thought to be embryologic in nature, IP has been associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to compare prevalence, symptoms, demographic factors, and esophageal testing in patients with IP and BE. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic findings of EGDs, high-resolution esophageal manometry and esophageal pH impedance studies from January 2010 to January 2021 at a single academic medical center. Patients were grouped by presence or absence of IP and BE. Of 27,498 patients evaluated, 1.3% had endoscopic evidence of IP and 4.9% had BE. Of 362 patients with IP, 17.1% had BE; of 1356 patients with BE, 4.6% had IP. Both IP and BE patients presented primarily with heartburn and/or regurgitation. Patients with BE and/or IP were older and had higher BMI than those without (p < 0.001). Mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was lower and mean acid exposure time (AET) was higher in patients with IP and/or BE than those without (p < 0.05). Our study reports an IP prevalence of 1.3%, with 17.1% patients having concomitant BE; and a BE prevalence of 4.9%, with 4.6% also having IP. Patients with IP alone presented with similar symptoms to patients with concomitant BE. Esophageal function testing showed that patients with either IP or BE had decreased LES pressures and increased esophageal AET. During endoscopy, patients found to have one of these findings should be carefully examined for the other.