Oct-1 POU Domain Research Articles

HMGB1-Facilitated p53 DNA Binding Occurs via HMG-Box/p53 Transactivation Domain Interaction, Regulated by the Acidic Tail

Facilitated binding of p53 to DNA by high mobility group B1 (HMGB1) may involve interaction between the N-terminal region of p53 and the high mobility group (HMG) boxes, as well as HMG-induced bending of the DNA. Intramolecular shielding of the boxes by the HMGB1 acidic tail results in an unstable complex with p53 until the tail is truncated to half its length, at which point the A box, proposed to be the preferred binding site for p53(1-93), is exposed, leaving the B box to bind and bend DNA. The A box interacts with residues 38-61 (TAD2) of the p53 transactivation domain. Residues 19-26 (TAD1) bind weakly, but only in the context of p53(1-93) and not as a free TAD1 peptide. We have solved the structure of the A-box/p53(1-93) complex by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The incipient amphipathic helix in TAD2 recognizes the concave DNA-binding face of the A box and may be acting as a single-stranded DNA mimic.

Impact of Protein/Protein Interactions on Global Intermolecular Translocation Rates of the Transcription Factors Sox2 and Oct1 between DNA Cognate Sites Analyzed by z-Exchange NMR Spectroscopy

Oct1 and Sox2 synergistically regulate developmental genes by binding to adjacent sites within promoters. We have investigated the kinetics of global intermolecular translocation of Sox2 and Oct1 between cognate sites located on different DNA molecules by z-exchange NMR spectroscopy. In the Hoxb1 promoter, the Sox2 and Oct1 sites are immediately adjacent to one another, and the intermolecular translocation rates are too slow to be measured by z-exchange spectroscopy. By introducing a 3-bp insertion between the Sox2 and Oct1 sites to mimic the spacing in the FGF4 enhancer, the interprotein contact surface is reduced, and the translocation rates are increased. Interaction between Sox2 and the POU-specific domain (POU(S)) of Oct1 does not affect the translocation mechanism but modulates the rates. Translocation involves only jumping (dissociation and reassociation) for Sox2, but both jumping and direct intersegment transfer (no dissociation into free solution) for Oct1. The dissociation (k(off) ∼1.5 s(-1)) and association (k(on) ∼5.1 × 10(9) m(-1)s(-1)) rate constants for Sox2 are reduced 4-fold and increased 5-fold, respectively, in the presence of Oct1. k(off) (∼3.5 s(-1)) for Oct1 is unaffected by Sox2, whereas k(on) (∼1.3 × 10(9) m(-1)s(-1)) is increased ∼13-fold. The direct intermolecular translocation rate (k(inter) ∼1.8 × 10(4) m(-1)s(-1)) for the POU(S) domain of Oct1 is reduced 2-fold by Sox2, whereas that for the POU homeodomain (POU(HD)) of Oct1 (k(inter) ∼ 1.7 × 10(4) m(-1)s(-1)) remains unaltered, consistent with the absence of contacts between Sox2 and POU(HD). The data suggest a model for the sequence of binding events involved in synergistic gene regulation by Sox2 and Oct1.

Interplay between Minor and Major Groove-binding Transcription Factors Sox2 and Oct1 in Translocation on DNA Studied by Paramagnetic and Diamagnetic NMR

The pathways whereby Sox2 scans DNA to locate its specific binding site are investigated by NMR in specific and nonspecific Sox2·DNA complexes and in a specific ternary complex with Oct1 on the Hoxb1 regulatory element. Direct transfer of Sox2 between nonspecific sites on different DNA molecules occurs without dissociation into free solution at a rate of ∼10(6) M(-1) s(-1), whereas one-dimensional sliding proceeds with a diffusion constant of ≥0.1 μm(2)·s(-1). Translocation of Sox2 from one specific DNA site to another occurs via jumping, involving complete dissociation into free solution (k(d) ∼5-6 s(-1)) followed by reassociation (k(a) ∼5 × 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)). In the presence of Oct1 bound to an adjacent specific site, k(d) is reduced by more than 10-fold. Paramagnetic relaxation measurements, however, demonstrate that sparsely populated (<1%), transient states involving nonspecifically bound Sox2 in rapid exchange with specifically bound Sox2 are sampled in both binary Sox2·DNA- and ternary Oct1·Sox2·Hoxb1-DNA-specific complexes. Moreover, Sox2 modulates the mechanism of translocation of Oct1. Both Sox2 and the Oct1 POU(HD) domain are transiently released from the specific ternary complex by sliding to an adjacent nonspecific site, followed by direct transfer to another DNA molecule, whereas the Oct1 POU(S) domain is fixed to its specific site through direct interactions with Sox2. Intermolecular translocation of POU(HD) results in the formation of a bridged intermediate spanning two DNA molecules, enhancing the probability of complete intermolecular translocation of Oct1. By way of contrast, in the specific Oct1·DNA binary complex, POU(S) undergoes direct intermolecular translocation, whereas POU(HD) scans the DNA by sliding.

DNA Recognition Mechanism of the ONECUT Homeodomain of Transcription Factor HNF-6

Hepatocyte nuclear factor-6 (HNF-6), a liver-enriched transcription factor, controls the development of various tissues, such as the pancreas and liver, and regulates the expression of several hepatic genes. This protein belongs to the ONECUT class of homeodomain proteins and contains a bipartite DNA-binding domain composed of a single cut domain and a characteristic homeodomain. This transcription factor has two distinct modes of DNA binding and transcriptional activation that use different coactivators depending on the target gene. The crystal structure of the bipartite DNA-binding domain of HNF-6alpha complexed with the HNF-6-binding site of the TTR promoter revealed the DNA recognition mechanism of this protein. Comparing our structure with the DNA-free structure of HNF-6 or the structure of Oct-1, we discuss characteristic features associated with DNA binding and the structural basis for the dual mode of action of this protein, and we suggest a strategy for variability of transcriptional activation of the target gene.

The Groucho-related Gene Family Regulates the Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Gene through Interaction with the Homeodomain Proteins MSX1 and OCT1

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is exclusively expressed in a unique population of hypothalamic neurons that controls reproductive function. GnRH gene expression is highly dynamic. Its transcriptional activity is regulated in a complex spatiotemporal manner during embryonic development and postnatal life. Although a variety of transcription factors have been identified as regulators of GnRH transcription, most are promiscuous in their DNA-binding requirements, and none are solely expressed in GnRH neurons. Their specific activity is probably determined by interactions with distinct cofactors. Here we find that the Groucho-related gene (GRG) family of co-repressors is expressed in a model cell line for the GnRH neuron and co-expresses with GnRH during prenatal development. GRG proteins associate in vivo with the GnRH promoter. Furthermore, GRG proteins interact with two regulators of GnRH transcription, the homeodomain proteins MSX1 and OCT1. Co-transfection experiments indicate that GRG proteins regulate GnRH promoter activity. The long GRG forms enhance MSX1 repression and counteract OCT1 activation of the GnRH gene. In contrast, the short form, GRG5, has a dominant-negative effect on MSX1-dependent repression. Taken together, these data suggest that the dynamic switch between activation and repression of GnRH transcription is mediated by recruitment of the GRG co-regulators.

TALE Homeodomain Proteins Regulate Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Gene Expression Independently and via Interactions with Oct-1

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) is the central regulator of reproductive function. Expression of the GnRH gene is confined to a rare population of neurons scattered throughout the hypothalamus. Restricted expression of the rat GnRH gene is driven by a multicomponent enhancer and an evolutionarily conserved promoter. Oct-1, a ubiquitous POU homeodomain transcription factor, was identified as an essential factor regulating GnRH transcription in the GT1-7 hypothalamic neuronal cell line. In this study, we conducted a two-hybrid interaction screen in yeast using a GT1-7 cDNA library to search for specific Oct-1 cofactors. Using this approach, we isolated Pbx1b, a TALE homeodomain transcription factor that specifically associates with Oct-1. We show that heterodimers containing Pbx/Prep1 or Pbx/Meis1 TALE homeodomain proteins bind to four functional elements within the GnRH regulatory region, each in close proximity to an Oct-1-binding site. Cotransfection experiments indicate that TALE proteins are essential for GnRH promoter activity in the GT1-7 cells. Moreover, Pbx1 and Oct-1, as well as Prep1 and Oct-1, form functional complexes that enhance GnRH gene expression. Finally, Pbx1 is expressed in GnRH neurons in embryonic as well as mature mice, suggesting that the associations between TALE homeodomain proteins and Oct-1 regulate neuron-specific expression of the GnRH gene in vivo.

Combination of a zinc finger and homeodomain required for protein-interaction.

The Zinc Finger Homeodomain Enhancer-binding Protein (Zfhep) is involved in skeletal patterning, immune cell, muscle, and brain development, and is necessary for life. Zfhep contains a single central homeodomain (HD) adjacent to an isolated zinc finger, the function of which is unknown. The placement of a zinc finger so close to a homeodomain is novel in nature. The aim of this work was to characterize the Zfhep homeodomain (HD) or the zinc finger homeodomain (ZHD), with respect to DNA-binding and protein-protein interactions. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins containing either just the HD or both the zinc finger and HD (ZHD) were expressed in E. coli. The GST fusion protein affinity-binding assay demonstrated that Zfhep ZHD interacts specifically with the POU domain of the Oct-1 transcription factor. The adjacent zinc finger is required since Zfhep HD alone does not interact with Oct-1 POU domain. Furthermore, ZHD does not bind to the POU homeodomain lacking the POU specific region. These results demonstrate that the Zfhep zinc finger homeodomain motif functions as a protein-binding domain in vitro, and suggests that Zfhep may modulate the activity of POU domain transcription factors. However, neither the Zfhep ZHD nor the HD bound DNA in EMSA or selected a DNA-binding site from a pool of random oligonucleotides. This is the first demonstration of a function for the HD region of Zfhep, which is the first case of a bi-partite domain requiring both a zinc finger and a HD for binding to protein.

Activator recruitment by the general transcription machinery: X-ray structural analysis of the Oct-1 POU domain/human U1 octamer/SNAP190 peptide ternary complex.

Transcriptional activation of the human U1 snRNA genes is dependent on a noncanonical octamer element contained within an upstream enhancer. The U1 octamer only weakly recruits the Oct-1 POU domain, although recruitment is stimulated by a peptide containing the Oct-1-binding domain of SNAP190. Structural analysis of the Oct-1 POU domain/U1 octamer/SNAP190 peptide complex revealed that SNAP190 makes extensive protein contacts with the Oct-1 POU-specific domain and with the DNA phosphate backbone within the enhancer. Although SNAP190 and OCA-B both interact with the Oct-1 POU domain through the same Oct-1 interface, a single nucleotide within the U1 octamer ablates OCA-B recruitment without compromising activator recruitment by SNAP190.

POU/TBP Cooperativity: A Mechanism for Enhancer Action from a Distance

Enhancers when functioning at a distance cannot effectively stimulate transcription from core promoters. We demonstrate that this is due to the inability of enhancer-bound activators to recruit TBP to a distal TATA box. Surprisingly, binding of a transcriptionally inert Oct-1 POU domain near a core promoter enables an enhancer to function from a distance. POU activity neither requires the coactivator OCA-B nor the interaction of TBP with TFIIA. Instead, the POU domain directly facilitates TBP recruitment to the promoter utilizing a bipartite interaction surface. These results establish that an interaction between the DNA binding domain of an activator and TBP can be used to stimulate transcription. Furthermore, they suggest a mechanism for long-range enhancer function in which a TBP complex is preassembled on a promoter via localized recruitment and then acted upon by distal activators.

The affinity-enhancing roles of flexible linkers in two-domain DNA-binding proteins.

Recently many attempts have been made to design high-affinity DNA-binding proteins by linking two domains. Here a theory for guiding these designs is presented. Flexible linkers may play three types of roles: (a) linking domains which by themselves are unfolded and bind to DNA only as a folded dimer (as in a designed single-chain Arc repressor), (b) connecting domains which can separately bind to DNA (as in the Oct-1 POU domain), and (c) linking a DNA-binding domain with a dimerization domain (as in the lambda repressor). In (a), the linker keeps the protein as a folded dimer so that it is always DNA-binding-competent. In (b), the linker is predicted to enhance DNA-binding affinity over those of the individual domains (with dissociation constants K(A) and K(B)) by p(d(0))/K(B) or p(d(0))/K(A), where p(d(0)) = (3/4pil(p)bL)(3/2) exp(-3d(0)(2)/4l(p)bL)(1 - 5l(p)/4bL +...) is the probability density for the end-to-end vector of the linker with L residues to have a distance d(0). In (c), the linker is predicted to enhance the binding affinity by K(d)(C)/p(d(0)), where K(d)(C) is the dimer dissociation constant for the dimerization domain. The predicted affinity enhancements are found to be actually reached by the Oct-1 POU domain and lambda repressor. However, there is room for improvement in many of the recently designed proteins. The theoretical limits presented should provide a useful guide for current efforts of designing DNA-binding proteins.

Differential Dimer Activities of the Transcription Factor Oct-1 by DNA-Induced Interface Swapping

Two crystal structures of Oct-1 POU domain bound to DNA provide a rationale for differential, conformation-dependent recruitment of transcription cofactors. The POU-homeo and POU-specific subdomains of Oct-1 contain two different nonoverlapping pairs of surface patches that are capable of forming unrelated protein-protein interfaces. Members of the POU factor family contain one or two conserved sequence motifs in the interface that are known to be phosphorylated, as noted for Oct-1 and Pit-1. Modeling of Oct-4 reveals the unique case where the same conserved sequence is located in both interfaces. Our studies provide the basis for two distinct dimeric POU factor arrangements that are dictated by the architecture of each DNA response element. We suggest interface swapping in dimers could be a general mechanism of modulating the activity of transcription factors.

A Positioned Nucleosome on the Human U6 Promoter Allows Recruitment of SNAP c by the Oct-1 POU Domain

The human snRNA promoters contain a proximal sequence element (PSE) required for basal transcription and a distal sequence element (DSE) required for activated transcription. The PSE recruits the multisubunit factor SNAP c, whereas the DSE recruits Oct-1. Oct-1 and SNAP c bind cooperatively to DNA when their respective binding sites are moved into proximity through a mechanism that involves a defined protein–protein contact. Here, we show that on the natural U6 promoter, cooperative binding of Oct-1 and SNAP c is mediated by a positioned nucleosome that resides between the DSE and the PSE. This cooperative binding requires the same protein–protein contact as cooperative binding to closely spaced sites on naked DNA and mediates transcription activation.

Optimal Oct-2 Affinity for an Extended DNA Site and the Effect of GST Fusion on Site Preference

The regulator of immunoglobulin expression Oct-2 and the related widely expressed transcription factor Oct-1 have been shown to interact with DNA sequences containing an “octamer” motif, ATGCA/TAAT. To better understand Oct-2 function we have used random oligonucleotide selection and competition assays to define the optimal recognition site for this protein. The selected site contains an extended sequence that is remarkably similar to octamer-heptamer sequences found in immunoglobulin heavy-chain regulatory sequences, and the affinity of Oct-2 for this site is at least 50-fold greater than for sites containing the octamer motif alone. Fusion to glutathione S-transferase, a widely used model for protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction, does not alter the optimal Oct-2 recognition site, but inhibits Oct-2 POU-domain dimerization, slows the dissociation rate of the GST-Oct-2/DNA complex, and increases the relative importance of the heptamer domain for Oct-2 binding. These data advance our ability to identify in vivo targets of POU-factor regulation and also suggest that GST-fusion proteins should be used with caution in DNA-binding studies.

Cutting Edge: Lack of Peripheral B Cells and Severe Agammaglobulinemia in Mice Simultaneously Lacking Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase and the B Cell-Specific Transcriptional Coactivator OBF-1

OBF-1 is a B cell-restricted transcriptional coactivator that is recruited to octamer-containing promoters by interacting with the POU domain of Oct-1 or Oct-2. We have shown earlier that mice lacking OBF-1 were dramatically impaired in their ability to mount humoral immune responses and did not develop germinal centers in the spleen; however, they had a largely normal B cell development in the bone marrow. In this study, we demonstrate that OBF-1-deficient mice also have an early defect in B cell development and show that OBF-1-/- immature B cells are greatly impaired at the transition from the bone marrow to the spleen. In addition, when the OBF-1 mutation is combined to a mutation in the gene encoding Bruton's tyrosine kinase, a striking phenotype is observed. These double-deficient animals lack peripheral B cells and have virtually no serum Igs, thus closely resembling human X chromosome-linked agammaglobulinemia.

Crystal structure of an OCA-B peptide bound to an Oct-1 POU domain/octamer DNA complex: specific recognition of a protein-DNA interface.

We have determined the crystal structure, at 3.2 A, of a ternary complex containing an OCA-B peptide, the Oct-1 POU domain, and an octamer DNA site. The OCA-B peptide binds in the major groove near the center of the octamer site, and its polypeptide backbone forms a pair of hydrogen bonds with the adenine base at position 5 of the octamer DNA. Numerous protein-protein contacts between the OCA-B peptide and the POU domain are also involved in the ternary complex. In particular, the hydrophobic surface from a short alpha-helix of OCA-B helps to stabilize the complex by binding to a hydrophobic pocket on the POU-specific domain. The structure of this ternary complex is consistent with previous biochemical studies and shows how peptide-DNA and peptide-protein contacts from OCA-B provide structural and functional specificity in the regulation of immunoglobulin transcription.

Selective Binding of Steroid Hormone Receptors to Octamer Transcription Factors Determines Transcriptional Synergism at the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Promoter

Transcriptional synergism between glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and octamer transcription factors 1 and 2 (Oct-1 and Oct-2) in the induction of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) transcription has been proposed to be mediated through directed recruitment of the octamer factors to their binding sites in the viral long terminal repeat. This recruitment correlates with direct binding between the GR DNA binding domain and the POU domain of the octamer factors. In present study, in vitro experiments identified several nuclear hormone receptors to have the potential to bind to the POU domains of Oct-1 and Oct-2 through their DNA binding domains, suggesting that POU domain binding may be a property shared by many nuclear hormone receptors. However, physiologically relevant binding to the POU domain appeared to be a property restricted to only a few nuclear receptors as only GR, progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR), were found to interact physically and functionally with Oct-1 and Oct-2 in transfected cells. Thus GR, PR, and AR efficiently promoted the recruitment of Oct-2 to adjacent octamer motifs in the cell, whereas mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), estrogen receptor alpha, and retinoid X receptor failed to facilitate octamer factor DNA binding. For MMTV, although GR and MR both induced transcription efficiently, mutation of the promoter proximal octamer motifs strongly decreased GR-induced transcription without affecting the total level of reporter gene activity in response to MR. These results suggest that the configuration of the hormone response element within the MMTV long terminal repeat may promote a dependence for the glucocorticoid response upon the recruitment of octamer transcription factors to their response elements within the viral promoter.

The Oct-2 POU Domain Gene in the Neuroendocrine Brain: A Transcriptional Regulator of Mammalian Puberty

The Oct-2 POU Domain Gene in the Neuroendocrine Brain: A Transcriptional Regulator of Mammalian Puberty

The Oct-2 POU domain gene in the neuroendocrine brain: a transcriptional regulator of mammalian puberty.

POU homeodomain genes are transcriptional regulators that control development of the mammalian forebrain. Although they are mostly active during embryonic life, some of them remain expressed in the postnatal hypothalamus, suggesting their involvement in regulating differentiated functions of the neuroendocrine brain. We show here that Oct-2, a POU domain gene originally described in cells of the immune system, is one of the controlling components of the cell-cell signaling process underlying the hypothalamic regulation of female puberty. Lesions of the anterior hypothalamus cause sexual precocity and recapitulate some of the events leading to the normal initiation of puberty. Prominent among these events is an increased astrocytic expression of the gene encoding transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF alpha), a tropic polypeptide involved in the stimulatory control of LHRH secretion. The present study shows that such lesions result in the rapid and selective increase in Oct-2 transcripts in TGF alpha-containing astrocytes surrounding the lesion site. In both lesion-induced and normal puberty, there is a preferential increase in hypothalamic expression of the Oct-2a and Oct-2c alternatively spliced messenger RNA forms of the Oct-2 gene, with an increase in 2a messenger RNA levels preceding that in 2c and antedating the peripubertal activation of gonadal steroid secretion. Both Oct-2a and 2c trans-activate the TGF alpha gene via recognition motifs contained in the TGF alpha gene promoter. Inhibition of Oct-2 synthesis reduces TGF alpha expression in astroglial cells and delays the initiation of puberty. These results suggest that the Oct-2 gene is one of the upstream components of the glia to neuron signaling process that controls the onset of female puberty in mammals.

SNAP(c): a core promoter factor with a built-in DNA-binding damper that is deactivated by the Oct-1 POU domain.

snRNA gene transcription is activated in part by recruitment of SNAP(c) to the core promoter through protein-protein contacts with the POU domain of the enhancer-binding factor Oct-1. We show that a mini-SNAP(c) consisting of a subset of SNAP(c) subunits is capable of directing both RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and Pol III snRNA gene transcription. Mini-SNAP(c) cannot be recruited by Oct-1, but binds as efficiently to the promoter as SNAP(c) together with Oct-1 and directs activated RNA Pol III transcription. Thus, SNAP(c) represses its own binding to DNA, and repression is relieved by interactions with the Oct-1 POU domain that promote cooperative binding. We have shown previously that TBP also represses its own binding, and in that case repression is relieved by cooperative interactions with SNAP(c). This may represent a general mechanism to ensure that core promoter-binding factors, which have strikingly slow off-rates, are recruited specifically to promoter sequences rather than to cryptic-binding sites in the genome.

HCF-dependent nuclear import of VP16.

Transactivation by VP16 requires the formation of a multicomponent complex, the TAATGAAAT recognition factor complex (TRF.C), that contains in addition to VP16, two cellular proteins, Oct-1 and HCF. HCF binds directly to VP16 and this promotes subsequent interaction of the VP16-HCF complex with the POU DNA-binding domain of Oct-1 and selective assembly onto target sites. Here we demonstrate a novel role of HCF in the intracellular compartmentalization of VP16. We show that while VP16 does not contain a consensus nuclear localization signal (NLS) and is largely cytoplasmic, co-expression with HCF resulted in VP16 nuclear accumulation. A candidate NLS within the C-terminus of HCF was identified and insertion of this motif into green fluorescent protein (GFP) promoted nuclear accumulation. Conversely, removal of this signal from HCF (HCFDeltaNLS) resulted in its cytoplasmic accumulation. Co-expression of HCFDeltaNLS with wild-type (wt) VP16, or of wt HCF with VP16 mutants lacking HCF-binding activity failed to promote the nuclear enrichment of VP16. These results indicate that in addition to its role in stabilizing TRF.C, HCF acts as a nuclear import factor for VP16.