Occurrence Of Severe Toxicity Research Articles

Current challenges and therapeutic advances of CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors.

The application of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in the management of hematological malignancies has emerged as a noteworthy therapeutic breakthrough. Nevertheless, the utilization and effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors are still limited primarily because of the absence of tumor-specific target antigen, the existence of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, restricted T cell invasion and proliferation, and the occurrence of severe toxicity. This review explored the history of CAR-T and its latest advancements in the management of solid tumors. According to recent studies, optimizing the design of CAR-T cells, implementing logic-gated CAR-T cells and refining the delivery methods of therapeutic agents can all enhance the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy. Furthermore, combination therapy shows promise as a way to improve the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy. At present, numerous clinical trials involving CAR-T cells for solid tumors are actively in progress. In conclusion, CAR-T cell therapy has both potential and challenges when it comes to treating solid tumors. As CAR-T cell therapy continues to evolve, further innovations will be devised to surmount the challenges associated with this treatment modality, ultimately leading to enhanced therapeutic response for patients suffered solid tumors.

Complete DPYD genotyping combined with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping to prevent fluoropyrimidine toxicity: A retrospective study.

In April 2019, French authorities mandated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) screening, specifically testing uracilemia, to mitigate the risk of toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, this subject is still of debate as there is no consensus on a standardized DPD deficiency screening test. We conducted a real-life retrospective study with the aim of assessing the impact of DPD screening on the occurrence of severe toxicity and exploring the potential benefits of complete genotyping using next-generation sequencing. All adult patients consecutively treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or its oral prodrug at six cancer centers between March 2018 and February 2019 were considered for inclusion. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency screening included gene encoding DPD (DPYD) genotyping using complete genome sequencing and DPD phenotyping (uracilemia or dihydrouracilemia/uracilemia ratio) or both tests. Associations between each DPD screening method and (i) severe (grade ≥3) early toxicity and (ii) fluoropyrimidine dose reduction in the second chemotherapy cycle were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the concordance between DPD genotype and phenotype using Cohen's kappa. A total of 551 patients were included. Most patients were tested for DPD deficiency (86%) including DPYD genotyping only (6%), DPD phenotyping only (8%), or both (72%). Complete DPD deficiency was not detected in the study population. Severe early toxicity events were observed in 73 patients (13%), with two patients (0.30%) presenting grade 5 toxicity. Despite the numerically higher toxicity rate in untested patients, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not significantly associated with the DPD screening method (p = 0.69). Concordance between the DPD genotype and phenotype was weak (Cohen's kappa of 0.14). Due to insufficient numbers, our study was not able to demonstrate any added value of DPYD genotyping using complete genome sequencing to prevent 5-FU toxicity. The optimal strategy for DPD screening before fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy requires further clinical evaluation.

Update of Swatch Study: Selinxor Combined with Lenalidomide and Rituximab (R2) in Adults with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL)

Background： Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL and iNHL who are ineligible for, or relapse after, high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Selinexor, a selective inhibitor of nuclear export has received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for the treatment of adult patients with R/R DLBCL. Phase I/II study (NCT05265975), selinexor in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab (R2) for R/R DLBCL and iNHL, is ongoing. Phase I results were previously reported at ICML 2023 (Weili Zhao et al., ICML 2023, #658) and the recommended phase 2 dosing (RP2D) was determined. Aims: Here we update the preliminary results of SWATCH study. Methods： Additional 6 subjects will be recruited at this dose level 60mg to further confirm the safety and tolerability of RP2D. Eligible pts were treated with 6 cycles of rituximab (375mg/m2 on day 1), lenalidomide (25mg on d1-10) and selinexor (dose level: 60mg, on days 1, 8,15 of each 28-day cycle), followed by selinexor and lenalidomide maintenance until disease progression. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) was defined as the occurrence of severe toxicities during the first cycle: grade 3 febrile neutropenia> 5 days, grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia >7 days, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage, or any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity >7 days. Results: From May 2022 to April 2023, 16 pts were enrolled and no DLT occurred. At baseline in these 16 pts, refractory to last line was 93.75% and primary refractory was 68.75%. Among 12 efficacy evaluable pts, 3 pts achieved complete response (CR), 5 pts achieved partial response (PR) and another 4 pts achieved progressive disease (PD). Most AEs were grade 1 or 2 and were reversible with supportive care or dose modification. At data cutoff (June 1, 2023), 7 pts were still receiving treatment and no pts came off study due to intolerability or AEs. Median PFS and median DOR were 11.2 months and not reached. Conclusion： Selinexor in combination with lenalidomide and rituximab showed encouraging preliminary efficacy and generally tolerable toxicity with an ORR of 66.7%, CR of 25% and median PFS 11.2 months in all evaluable dose level pts, and with an ORR of 80% and CR of 20% in evaluable selinexor 60mg dose (RP2D). This study is currently enrolling patients in the dose expansion group.

Phase 1 Trial of Orelabrutinib in Combination with Rituximab, Methotrexate, and Dexamethasone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma Implementing Bayesian Design for Dose-Seeking

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive extranodal subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based regimens are the first-line treatment for PCNSL, but remain suboptimal due to response instability and short effective remission duration. Orelabrutinib is a novel, potent, highly selective BTK inhibitor with a high CSF concentration. This study aims to investigate optimal combination dose of Orelabrutinib in combination with Rituximab, Methotrexate, and Dexamethasone (ORMD) as well as safety and efficacy of the regimen. Methods: This was a phase 1, investigator-initiated, dose-escalation study of ORMD, being conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (NCT05036577). Eligible patients must have histopathologically confirmed PCNSL-DLBCL by biopsy of brain lesions and be aged 18-75 years with adequate organ functions. Patients were treated for 6-8 cycles of induction therapy with 21 days per cycle, receiving rituximab (375mg/m 2 on day 1), dexamethasone (10-15mg on d1-d4), MTX (d2, 3.5g/m 2 or 5g/m 2), and orelabrutinib (once daily, after MTX clearance, 150mg/d, or 200mg/d), followed by orelabrutinib maintenance up to one year among CR/CRu patients. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of orelabrutinib and MTX with R and D and investigate the safety and tolerability of this regimen using Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) waterfall design to determine rule of dose escalation and movement among dose combination matrix to identify MTD contour. DLT was defined by the occurrence of severe toxicities during the first cycle: any grade 4 hematologic toxicity, grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage, or any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity that failed to respond to supportive therapy and possibly related to orelabrutinib and/or MTX (assessed according to NCI CTCAE V5.0). The secondary objectives included ORR/CR（u） and PFS/OS. Results: From October 2021 to July 2023, the study completed enrollment of all 13 patients. The median age was 60 years, and other basic characteristics are shown in Figure 1. All the patients had completed at least one cycle of ORMD treatment and were evaluable for DLT. The median cycle of ORMD was seven (range: 2.5-8). No DLT occurred among first 3 patients in cohort 1 (Orelabrutinib: 150mg/MTX: 3.5g/m 2) and dose escalation was allowed to cohort 2 (Orelabrutinib: 200mg/MTX: 3.5g/m 2). In cohort 2, 5 patients were dosed in total, and Gr 3 lung infection was observed in patient #4 during cycle 1, was deemed as a DLT. Another four patients were enrolled in the same cohort according to BOIN design algorithm and no DLT was identified, allowing to escalate to cohort 3 (Orelabrutinib:200mg/MTX:5g/m 2). In cohort 3, 5 patients were dosed in total, and Gr 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) was observed in patient #9 during cycle 1, was deemed as a DLT. The causality of this AE was certain to methotrexate due to folate metabolic gene polymorphism in the assessment of the investigator. The toxicity probability from 3 dose combo cohort is 0.13, 0.13 and 0.21, all of which is below predefined threshold 0.3. So MTD is not reached and 200mg+5g/m 2 dose combo remains to be RP2D candidate. No Gr 4 AE had been observed. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (Gr 3 in 8 case), neutropenia(Gr 3 in 2 case), Covid-19(Gr 3 in 2 case) and hyperglycemia (Gr 3 in 2 case). No atrial fibrillation or bleeding was observed by the cut-off date. ORR and CR/CRu in 12 patients possessed at least one efficacy evaluation were both 83.3%, the PFS and OS rate were 56.6% (95% CI, 29.6% ,100%) and 100%(95% CI, 100% ,100%) at 1 year. Among nine patients completed ≥6 cycles of induction therapy, ORR and CR/CRu were both 100%. PFS and OS rate were 75.0% (95% CI, 42.6% ,100%) and 100%(95% CI, 100% ,100%) at 1 year. All patients in remission achieved CR/CRu, the high rate of deep remission may be related to the addition of orelabrutinib. Conclusions: As a novel therapeutic combination of induction therapy, ORMD therapy has shown deep remission potential as well as a predictable and manageable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL. MTD contour not reached. The combination of this induction therapy with consolidation therapies such as ASCT deserves further investigation and may provide greater survival benefit for patients.

CD4 CAR-T cells targeting CD19 play a key role in exacerbating cytokine release syndrome, while maintaining long-term responses

BackgroundTo date, T cells redirected with CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) have gained impressive success in B-cell malignancies. However, treatment failures are common and the occurrence of severe toxicities, such...

Preliminary Result of Phase 1 Trial of Orelabrutinib in Combination with Rituximab, Methotrexate, and Dexamethasone in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma Implementing Bayesian Design for Dose-Seeking

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive extranodal subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based regimen is the first-line treatment of PCNSL, with or without the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, remaining to be suboptimal due to unstable response and short effective remission time. Genetic alterations often occur in the chronic active B-cell receptor signaling featured by MYD88 and CD79B which mediate the response to BTK inhibition (BTKi) in PCNSL. Orelabrutinib is a novel, potent, highly selective BTK inhibitor with a high CSF concentration. This study aims to investigate optimal combination dose of Orelabrutinib in combination with Rituximab, Methotrexate, and Dexamethasone (ORMD) as well as safety and efficacy of the regimen. Methods: This was a phase 1, investigator-initiated, dose-escalation study of ORMD, being conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05036577). It was planned to enroll 12-15 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL to the regimen of orelabrutinib and MTX combined with the fixed dose of rituximab(R) and dexamethasone(D). Eligible patients must have histopathologically confirmed PCNSL-DLBCL by biopsy of brain lesions and be aged 18-75 years with adequate organ functions. Patients were treated for 6-8 cycles of induction therapy with 21 days per cycle, receiving rituximab (375mg/m2 on day 1), dexamethasone (10-15mg on d1-d4), MTX (d2, 3.5g/m2 or 5g/m2), and orelabrutinib (once daily, after MTX clearance, 150mg/d, or 200mg/d), followed by orelabrutinib maintenance up to one year among CR/CRu patients. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of orelabrutinib and MTX with R and D and investigate the safety and tolerability of this regimen using Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) waterfall design to determine rule of dose escalation and movement among dose combination matrix to identify MTD contour. DLT was defined by the occurrence of severe toxicities during the first cycle: any grade 4 hematologic toxicity, grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage, or any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity that failed to respond to supportive therapy and possibly related to orelabrutinib and/or MTX (assessed according to NCI CTCAE V5.0). The secondary objectives included ORR/CR(u) and PFS/OS. Baseline tissue/CSF samples and sequential CSF/plasma samples were collected for targeted NGS and pharmacokinetics evaluation as exploratory objectives. Results: Eight patients were enrolled from October 2021 to June 2022 as the preliminary analysis set. The median age was 62 year (range: 43-73) and six patients were male. All the patients with histologically confirmed DLBCL (6 non-GCB subtypes and 2 GCB subtypes) had completed at least one cycle of ORMD treatment and were evaluable for DLT. The median cycle of ORMD was one (range: 1-7). No DLT occurred among first three patients in cohort 1 (Orelabrutinib: 150mg/MTX: 3.5g/m2) and dose escalation was allowed to cohort 2 (Orelabrutinib: 200mg/MTX: 3.5g/m2). In cohort 2, 5 patients were dosed in total, and Gr 3 lung infection was observed in patient #4 during cycle 1, was deemed as a DLT. Another four patients were enrolled in the same cohort according to BOIN design algorithm and no DLT was identified, allowing to escalate to cohort 3 (Orelabrutinib:200mg/MTX:5g/m2). No Gr 4 AE had been observed. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (Gr 3 in 4 case) and hyperglycemia (Gr 3 in 1 case). No atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or bleeding was observed by the cut-off date. The study is ongoing. Further results will be updated as data becomes mature. Conclusions: ORMD regimen preliminarily demonstrated predictable and manageable safety profile in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients with 200mg/d orelabrutinib and 3.5g/m2 MTX to date. MTD contour not reached and further evaluation continues. Longer follow-up is needed regarding efficacy, biomarker, and more safety data Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Insights from a pharmacometric analysis of HDMTX in adults with cancer: Clinically relevant covariates for application in precision dosing.

High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is an essential part of the treatment of several adult and paediatric malignancies. Despite meticulous supportive care during HDMTX administration, severe toxicities, including acute kidney injury (AKI), may occur contributing to patient morbidity. Population pharmacokinetics provide a powerful tool to predict time to clear HDMTX and adjust subsequent doses. We sought to develop and validate pharmacokinetic models for HDMTX in adults with diverse malignancies and to relate systemic exposure with the occurrence of severe toxicity. Anonymized, de-identified data were provided from 101 US oncology practices that participate in the Guardian Research Network, a non-profit clinical research consortium. Modelled variables included clinical, laboratory, demographic and pharmacological data. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by means of nonlinear mixed effects modelling using MonolixSuite. A total of 693 HDMTX courses from 243 adults were analysed, of which 62 courses (8.8%) were associated with stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (43 stage 2, 19 stage 3). A three-compartment model adequately fitted the data. Time-dependent serum creatinine, baseline serum albumin and allometrically scaled bodyweight were clinically significant covariates related to methotrexate clearance. External evaluation confirmed a satisfactory predictive performance of the model in adults receiving HDMTX. Dose-normalized methotrexate concentration at 24 and 48 hours correlated with AKI incidence. We developed a population pharmacometric model that considers weight, albumin and time-dependent creatinine that can be used to guide supportive care in adult patients with delayed HDMTX elimination.

1184P Improving the tolerability of osimertinib by identifying its toxic limit

Osimertinib is the cornerstone in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, ±25% of patients experience severe treatment-related toxicities. Currently, it is impossible to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity beforehand. We hence aimed to study the relationship between osimertinib exposure and severe toxicity, and to identify a safe toxic limit for a preventive dose reduction. In this real-life prospective cohort study, patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib were followed for severe toxicity (grade ≥3 toxicity, dose reduction or discontinuation, hospital admission, or treatment termination). Blood for pharmacokinetic analyses was withdrawn during every out-patient visit. To quantify individual exposure to osimertinib, a population-pharmacokinetic model was developed. Primary endpoint was the correlation between osimertinib clearance (exposure) and severe toxicity. Secondary endpoint was the exposure-efficacy relationship, defined as progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 819 samples from 159 patients were included in the analysis. Multivariate competing risk analysis showed osimertinib clearance (c.q. exposure) to be significantly correlated with severe toxicity (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 – 0.99). An ROC-curve showed the optimal toxic limit to be 259 ng/mL osimertinib. This target concentration divides the cohort in two groups: the risk of severe toxicity in the >259 ng/mL group is 34% versus 14% in the <259 ng/mL group. A 50% dose reduction in the high-exposure group - i.e. 25.8% of the total cohort - would reduce the risk of severe toxicity by 53%. Correlation of the first plasma trough concentrations in collected in the first two months of treatment revealed a similar difference in severe toxicity (31% versus 17%), when dividing the cohort in two by the toxic limit of 259 ng/mL osimertinib. Osimertinib exposure was not significantly associated with PFS nor OS. Osimertinib exposure is highly correlated with occurrence of severe toxicity. To optimize tolerability, patients above the toxic limit concentration of 259 ng/mL could benefit from a preventive dose reduction, without fear for diminished effectiveness.

Improving the tolerability of osimertinib by identifying its toxic limit.

Background:Osimertinib is the cornerstone in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, ±25% of patients experience severe treatment-related toxicities. Currently, it is impossible to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity beforehand. Therefore, we aimed to study the relationship between osimertinib exposure and severe toxicity and to identify a safe toxic limit for a preventive dose reduction.Methods:In this real-life prospective cohort study, patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib were followed for severe toxicity (grade ⩾3 toxicity, dose reduction or discontinuation, hospital admission, or treatment termination). Blood for pharmacokinetic analyses was withdrawn during every out-patient visit. Primary endpoint was the correlation between osimertinib clearance (exposure) and severe toxicity. Secondary endpoint was the exposure–efficacy relationship, defined as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results:In total, 819 samples from 159 patients were included in the analysis. Multivariate competing risk analysis showed osimertinib clearance (c.q. exposure) to be significantly correlated with severe toxicity (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88–0.99). An relative operating characteristic curve showed the optimal toxic limit to be 259 ng/mL osimertinib. A 50% dose reduction in the high-exposure group, that is 25.8% of the total cohort, would reduce the risk of severe toxicity by 53%. Osimertinib exposure was not associated with PFS nor OS.Conclusion:Osimertinib exposure is highly correlated with the occurrence of severe toxicity. To optimize tolerability, patients above the toxic limit concentration of 259 ng/mL could benefit from a preventive dose reduction, without fear for diminished effectiveness.

Predictive impact of sarcopenia in solid cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta‐analysis

Sarcopenia, which is characterized by a decrease in muscle quantity or quality, is commonly observed in patients with cancer. Recent research has reported contradictory results on the association between sarcopenia and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to investigate this discrepancy. We systematically searched three electronic databases to identify articles reporting on the association between sarcopenia and treatment outcomes in patients with solid cancers who received ICIs. The outcomes assessed were hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS), and odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Pooled estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 2501 patients from 26 studies were analysed. Sarcopenia was observed in 44.7% (95% CI: 38.2–51.3) of the patients and was significantly associated with poor survival (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.32–1.82 for OS and HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.93 for PFS). The HRs (95% CIs) for OS according to the diagnostic measures used were 1.97 (0.88–4.41) for psoas muscle index (PMI), 1.41 (0.87–2.28) for skeletal muscle density (SMD), and 1.43 (1.23–1.67) for skeletal mass index (SMI). The HRs (95% CIs) for PFS were 1.86 (1.08–3.21) for PMI, 1.27 (0.94–1.71) for SMD, and 1.38 (1.11–1.71) for SMI. Poor radiological response to ICI therapy was observed in patients with sarcopenia (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.34–0.80 for ORR and OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.30–0.67 for DCR). The ORs for ORR (95% CIs) were 0.56 (0.15–2.05) for PMI and 0.78 (0.56–1.09) for SMI. The oncologic outcomes associated with melanoma and non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were comparable with those observed overall (HR for OS = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.26–3.24 for melanoma and HR for OS = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.19–2.18 for NSCLC). In contrast, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not associated with sarcopenia (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.51–2.52). Poor survival and poor response in patients with sarcopenia indicate a negative association between sarcopenia and efficacy of ICIs. Sarcopenia's predictive ability is consistent across various tumour types. For the selection of patients who may respond to ICIs pre‐therapeutically, the presence of sarcopenia should be assessed in clinical practice.

Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BackgroundIt is important to understand how elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) should be treated, since the number of elderly cancer patients will increase. However, the optimal treatment for elderly patients with LAPC remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine for elderly patients with LAPC.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the data from LAPC patients aged ≥ 75 years treated with hypofractionated IMRT (48 Gy in 15 fractions) with concurrent weekly gemcitabine at our institution from February 2013 to December 2018. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and the pattern of recurrence and toxicity were analysed.ResultsFifteen patients received treatment during the study period. The median age was 78 years (range 75–86 years), and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of all patients was 0–1. The median survival time (MST) and median PFS were 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.3–36.8] and 13.5 (95% CI 6.4–20.3) months, respectively, and the 1-year OS and PFS rates were 80.0% (95% CI 50–93.1%) and 66.7% (95% CI 37.5–84.6%), respectively. The median LRPFS and median DMFS were 15.6 (95% CI 6.4–36.8) and 14.9 (95% CI 7.0–20.5) months, respectively, and the 1-year LRPFS and DMFS rates were 73.3% (95% CI 43.6–89.1%) and 66.7% (95% CI 37.5–84.6%), respectively. Non-haematologic grade 3 toxicity was observed in three cases, of which only one was induced by radiotherapy, whereas grade 4–5 non-haematologic acute or late toxicities were not observed.ConclusionsThe OS and PFS of elderly patients with LAPC treated using hypofractionated IMRT with concurrent gemcitabine were favourable and without the occurrence of severe toxicity. This treatment strategy is feasible and promising for elderly LAPC patients with good PS.

The association of genetic variations in DNA repair pathways with severe toxicities in NSCLC patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy.

Genetic variations in genes involved in repairing platinum-induced DNA lesions may contribute to the toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy. The role of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within DNA repair pathways in the occurrence of severe toxicity is not yet understood. Current studies prefer to do original works rather than analyze previously published data. Our study aimed to replicate associations between previously investigated SNPs and toxicities and to identify new genetic makers. We systematically examined the relevance of 97 SNPs in 54 candidate genes responsible for repairing DNA interstrand and intrastrand cross-links to severe toxicity in a discovery cohort of 437 NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Statistically significant SNPs were then assessed for replication in an independent validation cohort of 781 NSCLC patients. We found that 7 SNPs were significant at p < 0.01 (RRM1 rs12806698, XPC rs2228000, XPF rs1799801, hMLH1 rs1800734, PMS2 rs1062372, REV3L rs462779 and FANCC rs4647554) in the discovery cohort. Among them, two SNPs (RRM1 rs12806698 and hMLH1 rs1800734) remained significant after Bonferroni correction. XPC rs2228000 showed a significant relationship with severe gastrointestinal toxicity in the validation cohort. When the two cohorts were combined, XPC rs2228000 presented better tolerance of severe hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity and leukopenia (OR = 0.677, 95% CI: 0.510-0.899, p = 0.007; OR = 0.565, 95% CI: 0.368-0.869, p = 0.009; OR = 0.628, 95% CI: 0.439-0.899, p = 0.011, respectively). Our findings can offer comprehensive pharmacogenetic information for platinum-induced toxicities.

Dendrimer-doxorubicin conjugates exhibit improved anticancer activity and reduce doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in a murine hepatocellular carcinoma model.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related deaths every year globally. The most common form of treatment, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), involves the direct injection of doxorubicin (DOX) into the hepatic artery. It is plagued with limited therapeutic efficacy and the occurrence of severe toxicities (e.g. cardiotoxicity). We aim to improve the therapeutic index of DOX delivered via HAI by loading the drug onto generation 5 (G5) poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers targeted to hepatic cancer cells via N-acetylgalactosamine (NAcGal) ligands. DOX is attached to the surface of G5 molecules via two different enzyme-sensitive linkages, L3 or L4, to achieve controllable drug release inside hepatic cancer cells. We previously reported on P1 and P2 particles that resulted from the combination of NAcGal-targeting with L3- or L4-DOX linkages, respectively, and showed controllable DOX release and toxicity towards hepatic cancer cells comparable to free DOX. In this study, we demonstrate that while the intratumoral delivery of free DOX (1 mg/kg) into HCC-bearing nod scid gamma (NSG) mice achieves a 2.5-fold inhibition of tumor growth compared to the saline group over 30 days, P1 and P2 particles delivered at the same DOX dosage achieve a 5.1- and 4.4-fold inhibition, respectively. Incubation of the particles with human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC CMs) showed no effect on monolayer viability, apoptosis induction, or CM electrophysiology, contrary to the effect of free DOX. Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging revealed that P1- and P2-treated mice maintained cardiac function after intraperitoneal administration of DOX at 1 mg/kg for 21 days, unlike the free DOX group at an equivalent dosage, confirming that P1/P2 can avoid DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. Taken together, these results highlight the ability of P1/P2 particles to improve the therapeutic index of DOX and offer a replacement therapy for clinical HCC treatment.

Detección y evaluación del papel de la sarcopenia en ancianos con cáncer tratados con quimioterapia. Proyecto ONCOSARCO

ObjectivesTo develop a predictive model of toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer, using the variables associated with sarcopenia, and to identify which of these parameters, sarcopenia or frailty, is the best predictor of toxicity to chemotherapy in the elderly. Material and methodsA prospective observational study with patients ≥70 years treated with chemotherapy in the Cancer Unit for the Elderly, in the Medical Oncology Section of the Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca.The following tests will be performed by each patient before chemotherapy: muscle strength (handgrip, cylindrical handgrip, pinch gauge, hip flexion, knee extension), muscle mass (skeletal muscle mass index), and physical function (gait speed and 5STS test). The occurrence of severe toxicity will be recorded over a period of 4 months of chemotherapy treatment.It will be evaluated, using logistic regression analysis, whether sarcopenia (defined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People) or frailty (defined by the phenotype of frailty) is the best predictor of chemotherapy toxicity. Using a multinomial logistic regression analysis, we will try to create the first model to predict toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with diagnosis of cancer, based on the definition of sarcopenia. ConclusionsIt is expected that the final analysis of this project will be useful to detect predictive factors of toxicity to chemotherapy in elderly patients with cancer.

Sorafenib use in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: caution about use of platelet aggregation inhibitors.

Sorafenib is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The peak incidence of HCC is around 70 years. We aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of sorafenib in the elderly population. We retrospectively reviewed data from patients treated with sorafenib for HCC at our institution. We compared safety and efficacy data across different age groups. Since 2005, 129 patients were treated, 78 (60.5 %) were <70 years old and 51 (39.5 %) were ≥70. The frequency of dose reduction was similar between the two groups (48.7 vs. 58.8 %), as was the occurrence of severe toxicities (41.0 vs. 51.0 %) and hospitalization due to toxicity (9.0 vs. 13.7 %). However, asthenia and bleeding were more frequent in the elderly. The higher frequency of bleeding was explained by concomitant antiplatelet treatments, and major asthenia was frequent in PS1 elderly patients. There was a trend toward less frequent interruption of treatment in the younger group (25.6 vs. 39.2 %) and significantly less frequent definitive discontinuation of treatment due to toxicity (24.4 vs. 45.1 %). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in both age groups, while median overall survival was 9.6 months in the younger age group and 12.6 months in the older age group. Sorafenib showed similar results in terms of safety and efficacy in the elderly and younger HCC populations. Careful baseline evaluation is needed for patient's selection in the elderly population, including discussion about antiplatelet therapy discontinuation and caution in PS1 patients, as well as active management of toxicity.

The discussion of age and geriatric assessment domains in oncology consultations

problem. Unfortunately, elderly cancer patients are under-represented in clinical trials for new cancer therapies. Chronological age itself is less important than biological events in driving the aging process within an individual. There is no simple way to assess biological age, and the best tool available to date is a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, however it is time consuming. For this reason, alternative screening tools are being evaluated Objectives: Two proposed screening tools; the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) and the G8 were compared, to identify vulnerable patients who could avoid severe toxicities if offered best supportive care. Methods: All patients aged ≥60 years attending Alexandria Clinical Oncology Department between October 2011 and March 2012 were classified into two groups; group A included patients b70 years while group B included patients N70 years and were assessed with VES-13 and G8 before starting treatment, using the translated Arabic versions for both scoring systems. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC)-analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of both screening instruments taking into consideration the occurrence of severe toxicities as the outcome endpoint. Decision analysis tree was plotted for the two groups. Results: 138 patients were recruited, of which 39.9% and 46.4% were defined vulnerable when evaluated with VES-13 and G8 respectively. The areas under the ROC-curves of VES-13 (0.857) and G8 (0.4451) were significantly different (P b 0.001). A sensitivity and specificity of respectively 84% and 73.3% for VES-13 (cut-off ≥3) and 68% and 36.6% for G8 (cut-off ≤14) were obtained. The optimal cut-off score of 4 for VES-13 resulted in a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 80%, while 10 for G8 resulted in a sensitivity of 28% and a specificity of 86.6%. The difference between G8 and VES-13 in the decision analysis was not large but VES-13 showed superiority. The decision pathway of the highest utility outcome was using VES-13 for screening and treating ‘Fit’ patients. Vulnerable patients would avoid severe complications or inadequate treatment when offered best supportive care, until a tailored tolerable effective protocol is available. TestingVES-13 ‘Vulnerable’ patientswithG8 did not add significantly to the outcome. The utility outcome for both VES-13 and G-8 scoring systems did not differ whether the cutoff scores used were those proposed in literature or the newly proposed ones. Conclusion: VES-13 screening tool showed superiority over G-8 scoring system as regards sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and also utility outcome when taking into consideration the occurrence of severe toxicity as the outcome endpoint. To the time being, the patient who becomes vulnerable by VES-13 would be better offered best supportive care or a tailored tolerable effective protocol within the context of a prospective randomized trial. Disclosure of interest: None declared.

Association of CDC25 phosphatase family polymorphisms with the efficacy/toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy in Chinese advanced NSCLC patients.

To explore relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the CDC25 protein family and the survival and chemotherapy responses of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We genotyped 14 SNPs of the CDC25 family in 663 Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and, in evaluable patients, analyzed relationships between the CDC25 family and the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy. CDC25A rs3731513 and rs1380053, CDC25C rs6861656, CDC25A haplotype T/A/A/A/C and CDC25C haplotype A/G/G/G/C were significantly associated with the patients' progression-free survival. In addition, CDC25B rs3761218 and haplotype G/T/G/G were associated with the occurrence of severe toxicity with platinum-based chemotherapy, especially gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity. These findings reveal a relationship between genetic variations of the CDC25 family and the efficacy and toxicity of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC, especially in those with non-squamous-cell carcinoma.

DMET™ (Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters) microarray analysis of colorectal cancer patients with severe 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been widely used since the 1980s, and it remains the backbone of many chemotherapeutic combination regimens. However, its use is often limited by the occurrence of severe toxicity. Although several reports have shown the detrimental effect of some dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS) gene polymorphisms in patients undergoing 5-FU-based treatment, they account for only a minority of toxicities. Looking for new candidate genetic variants associated with 5-FU-induced toxicity, we used the innovative genotyping microarray Affymetrix Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters (DMET)™ Plus GeneChip that interrogates 1,936 genetic variants distributed in 231 genes involved in drug metabolism, excretion, and transport. To reduce variability, we analyzed samples from colorectal cancer patients who underwent fairly homogenous treatments (i.e., Machover or Folfox) and experienced G3 or G4 toxicity; control patients were matched for therapy and selected from those who did not disclose toxicity (G0-G1). Pharmacogenetic genotyping showed no significant difference in DPYD and TYMS genetic variants distribution between cases and controls. However, other polymorphisms could account for 5-FU-induced toxicity, with the CHST1 rs9787901 and GSTM3 rs1799735 having the strongest association. Although exploratory, this study suggests that genetic polymorphisms not directly related to 5-FU pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are involved in 5-FU-induced toxicity. Our data also indicates DMET™ microarray as a valid approach to discover new genetic determinants influencing chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 polymorphisms and clinical outcome of Chinese patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with first‐line, platinum‐based chemotherapy

Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is well known for its critical role in cell survival and cancer development. It also plays an important role in hematopoietic recovery after chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. In this study, the authors investigated the association of MMP-2 polymorphisms with treatment efficacy and the occurrence of severe toxicity in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were receiving first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. A pharmacogenetic association study was performed in 663 Chinese patients who had inoperable stage III/IV NSCLC and were receiving first-line, platinum-based regimens. Information about objective response, progression-free survival, overall survival, grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea/vomiting), and hematologic toxicity (neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia) was available. Sixteen tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MMP-2 were assessed. In 7 polymorphisms, significant associations were observed with the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. The variant homozygotes of reference SNP rs12934241 exhibited the most significant effect on the risk of neutropenia, leading to an incidence rate that increased from 12.3% (for the C/C genotype) to 50% (for the T/T genotype; odds ratio, 8.33; P = 8.8 × 10(-5)). Stratified analyses indicated that rs12934241 exhibited a much stronger influence in the cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen subgroup than subgroups that received other regimens (P(interaction) = .003). Further haplotype analyses produced results that were consistent with results from single-SNP analyses. However, no significant association was observed between MMP-2 polymorphisms and treatment efficacy, including response rate, clinical benefit, progression-free survival, and overall survival. To the authors' knowledge, this study provides the first evidence for a predictive role of MMP-2 polymorphisms in the variability of severe chemotherapy-related neutropenia among Chinese patients with platinum-treated, advanced NSCLC.

Concurrent high-dose radiotherapy with low-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer of the superior sulcus

Background and purposeIn the treatment of patients with tumours of the sulcus superior (SST), achieving local control is essential because residual or recurrent disease is associated with severe locoregional problems. This study evaluates the efficacy of concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin (6mg/m2) and high-dose radiotherapy (66Gy) followed by surgical resection in selected patients. Material and methodsClinical charts, imaging and pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method. ResultsForty-nine patients with stage II/III SST were treated with concurrent high-dose radiotherapy and low-dose chemotherapy (CRT). Mean follow-up was 49months (range 2–152).Nineteen patients underwent additional resection after CRT. In 53% a pathological complete response (pCR) was observed (10/19pts). Acute severe toxicity occurred in 49% (9/19pts). Late severe toxicity occurred in 3 patients. The 2- and 5-year overall survival was 74% and 33%, respectively. Local tumour control was 100%. Thirty patients received CRT only. Acute severe toxicity occurred in 23% (7/30pts). Treatment-related mortality was 2%. The 2- and 5-year overall survival was 31% and 18%, respectively. Locoregional disease-free survival was 48% at 5years. ConclusionsConcurrent high-dose (66Gy) radiotherapy and daily low-dose cisplatin was associated with a high pCR rate. Excellent local control was achieved after additional resection in selected patients. However, the occurrence of severe toxicity in long-term survivors after concurrent chemoradiation followed by surgery must be considered.