Emotion regulation at work has received considerable attention in recent years. According to lifespan-psychological theory and research, aging is associated with improvements in emotion regulation. Nevertheless, results regarding better emotion regulation strategy use with age in the organizational aging literature have been inconsistent. In the present study, we aim to reconcile some of these divergent results by studying emotion regulation strategies at the repertoire level as opposed to investigating the use of single strategies, and by investigating the role of work conditions as contextual affordances of these emotion regulation strategies. Using a sample of 980 participants, we first identified five work-related emotion regulation latent profiles and examined their associations with well-being outcomes. Second, using configural frequency analysis, we found that overall, emotion regulation profiles that were positively associated with well-being were more (less) likely to be afforded in favorable (unfavorable) working conditions, which calls into question the hypothesis of emotion regulation as a buffer to occupational demands. Third, older workers were more likely to be members of emotion regulation profiles that were positively associated with well-being, thereby replicating the older-age advantage in emotion regulation in the work context. Interestingly, older workers’ emotion regulation strategy use seemed more stable across all work contexts than younger workers’ strategy use, which points to the need for more research regarding younger workers’ responses to work conditions. Keywords: Emotion regulation; age; latent profile analysis; well-being; job design
Read full abstract