You have accessJournal of UrologyPenile & Testicular Cancer: Penile & Testicular Cancer I (MP11)1 Apr 2020MP11-19 LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION AND PRESENCE OF EMBRYONAL CARCINOMA AS RISK FACTORS FOR OCCULT METASTASES IN CLINICAL STAGE I NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS Joost Blok*, Ilse Pluim, Gedske Daugaard, Thomas Wagner, Katarzyna Jozwiak, Erica Wilthagen, Leendert Looijenga, Ruud Bosch, Simon Horenblas, and Richard Meijer Joost Blok*Joost Blok* More articles by this author , Ilse PluimIlse Pluim More articles by this author , Gedske DaugaardGedske Daugaard More articles by this author , Thomas WagnerThomas Wagner More articles by this author , Katarzyna JozwiakKatarzyna Jozwiak More articles by this author , Erica WilthagenErica Wilthagen More articles by this author , Leendert LooijengaLeendert Looijenga More articles by this author , Ruud BoschRuud Bosch More articles by this author , Simon HorenblasSimon Horenblas More articles by this author , and Richard MeijerRichard Meijer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000831.019AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and embryonal carcinoma (EC) are important factors that aid clinical decision-making in patients with clinical stage I (CS I) nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Several studies have investigated the association between these predictors and occult metastasis. A systematic review with meta-analysis is necessary to quantify the strength of these predictors more precisely. Our aim was to review the literature on the prognostic value of LVI and EC for occult metastasis in CS I NSGCT. In particular, we aimed to compare the prognostic value of two different methods of EC assessment. METHODS: The Pubmed, Embase (OVID) and SCOPUS databases were searched up to March 2019. Studies reporting on the association between LVI and/or EC and occult metastasis were considered for inclusion. EC was assessed as EC predominance (presence of >50% EC in the primary tumor) or as EC presence (without a percentage cut-off value). The meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane's Review Manager tool. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. RESULTS: We screened 5,287 abstracts and 207 full-text articles. We included 35 studies in the narrative synthesis and 24 studies in one of the meta-analyses. LVI showed the strongest effect. Pooled rates of occult metastasis were 47.5% and 16.9% for LVI positive and LVI negative patients, respectively (OR 4.33; 95% CI 3.55-5.30; p<0.001). Presence of EC showed a significantly higher pooled rate of occult metastasis (33.2%), compared to EC absence (16.2%; OR 2.49; 95% CI; 1.64-3.77; p<0.001). For EC predominance, defined as >50%, the pooled rate of occult metastasis was 40.0%. This was significantly higher than patients without EC predominance (20.0%; OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.93-3.56; p<0.001). The risk of bias was moderate or high for all studies. CONCLUSIONS: LVI is the strongest risk factor for relapse. The prognostic value of EC is high, but there is no common agreement on how to define this risk factor. EC presence and EC>50% have similar ORs for occult metastasis. This suggests that the assessment of EC presence is sufficient for risk stratification. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e142-e143 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Joost Blok* More articles by this author Ilse Pluim More articles by this author Gedske Daugaard More articles by this author Thomas Wagner More articles by this author Katarzyna Jozwiak More articles by this author Erica Wilthagen More articles by this author Leendert Looijenga More articles by this author Ruud Bosch More articles by this author Simon Horenblas More articles by this author Richard Meijer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract