Occult Hip Fractures Research Articles

An Umbrella Review and Updated Meta-Analysis of Imaging Modalities in Occult Scaphoid and Hip and Femoral Fractures.

Background: Occult fractures may cause multiple morbidities. If occult fractures were detected earlier, complications may be preventable. This umbrella review and updated meta-analysis will aim to evaluate the use of imaging modalities in detecting occult scaphoid and hip fractures. Methods: The protocol for this study is available in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42024525388). The literature search started and ended on 17 March 2024. We searched seven academic databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) database. The meta-analysis was conducted with the STATA program using the "midas" command. Results: There are four systematic reviews evaluating occult hip and femoral fractures with 6174 patients and two reviews evaluating occult scaphoid fractures with 1355 patients. The prevalence of occult scaphoid fracture and occult hip and femoral fractures is 23.87% (95% CI 18.25-29.49) and 44.8% (95% CI 39.38-51.4), respectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had the best posterior probability of positive likelihood ratio (LR+) with 95% and 96% and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) with 0.15% and 1% for both occult scaphoid and hip fractures, respectively, assuming a 25% baseline. MRI could both confirm and exclude occult hip fractures while it can only confirm occult scaphoid fractures. Bone scans are inappropriate for either type of occult fractures The level of evidence for occult scaphoid fracture is weak while it is suggestive for occult hip fractures. Conclusion: The findings strengthen the use of MRI after an initially negative radiograph fracture for occult hip and femoral fractures, with a CT scan as a viable second option.

Comparison of CT and MRI in diagnosing occult hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting occult hip fractures. We conducted a systematic literature review and identified 12 articles involving 1,819 participants for inclusion. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed with the Deek funnel plot asymmetry test. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to derive pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the diagnostic odds ratio, along with their 95% confidence intervals. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to illustrate the overall diagnostic accuracy. The methodological quality of the included studies was high, with minimal concerns about the applicability of the tests in clinical settings. Both CT and MRI showed good diagnostic efficacy for occult hip fractures. However, MRI consistently outperformed CT, exhibiting significantly higher sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios, thereby providing superior accuracy in confirming or excluding occult fractures. Meta-regression analysis revealed that sequence parameters and sample size significantly influenced the differences in sensitivity and specificity between CT and MRI. Both CT and MRI are effective modalities for detecting occult hip fractures, with MRI demonstrating greater diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis supports the use of MRI when higher sensitivity and specificity are required in clinical practice.

Fractures of the proximal femur and hip osteoarthrosis - coincidence or coherence?

The current study aimed to investigate the correlation between the grade of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and the fracture pattern observed in fragility fractures of the proximal femur. The information may help in cases of occult hip fractures. In this retrospective study all 448 patients treated with fragility fractures of the proximal femur in the years 2014-2018 were included. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group I) intracapsular (femoral neck) fractures and Group II) extracapsular (pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric) femoral fractures. The radiographic grade of OA was determined according to Kellgren and Lawrence's classification. One single observer examined all radiographs. Patients' age ranged between 52 and 104years with a mean of 80.0years. There was a significant difference in mean age between the two groups (76.9years intracapsular vs. 83.1years extracapsular fractures). A total of 250 (55.8%) fractures were intracapsular (femoral neck) and 198 (44.2%) were located extracapsular (pertrochanteric, subtrochanteric). A significant correlation between the degree of OA to fracture pattern was observed: Higher degrees of OA were related to extracapsular fractures and lower degrees of OA to intracapsular fractures. The results of this study support the hypothesis that hip osteoarthritis affects the fracture pattern in proximal femur fractures. More severe hip OA is associated with extracapsular fractures that can be treated surgically with lower complication rates compared to intracapsular fractures.

Value of Proximal Femur Geometry in Predicting Occult Hip Fracture.

Background and Objectives: Patients with occult hip fractures are a difficult subgroup to treat. MRI is the gold standard for diagnosing occult proximal femur fractures but is costly and may not be readily available in an emergency setting. The purpose of this study was to determine whether changes in the proximal femur geometry can predict the likelihood of an occult hip fracture in patients presenting with hip pain following a ground-level fall. Material and Methods: Patients admitted to the hospital with a clinical suspicion of a hip fracture but initial negative radiographs over a seven-year period were included. All patients were additionally investigated with an MRI scan, and retrospectively, six radiologic parameters were obtained on plain radiographs: The cortical thickness index (CTI), the canal to calcar ratio (CCR), the canal flare index (CFI), the morphological cortical index (MCI), the canal bone ratio (CBR) and the canal bone aria ratio (CBAR). Subsequently the result of the plain radiographic indices of the patients with a negative MRI (Group A, no occult fracture) were compared to those with a positive MRI (Group B, occult fracture). Results: A total of 78 patients (59 female, 19 male) could be included in the study. The mean age was 82 years. The univariate analyses revealed a poor predictive ability of all radiological parameters with AUC values ranging from 0.515 (CBR) to 0.626 (CTI), whereas a multivariate prognostic model demonstrated improved prognosis (AUC = 0.761) for the CTI (p = 0.024), CBAR (p = 0.074) and CRR (p = 0.081) as the most promising predictive radiological parameters. Conclusions: Single radiologic indices obtained from conventional X-rays of the proximal femur have a weak predictive value in detecting occult fractures of the hip and cannot be used as clinical decision-making factors.

Clinical outcomes of patients with Garden I and II femoral neck fractures as verified on MRI: a retrospective case series

BackgroundBetween 2 to 10% of non-displaced femoral neck fractures (nFNF) cannot be diagnosed on plain radiographs and require further imaging investigation to be detected or verified. These fractures are referred to as occult hip fractures. This study aimed to report treatment failures, reoperations and mortality in a consecutive series of occult femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with internal fixation (IF).MethodsA retrospective multicenter study was performed based on a consecutive series of patients aged ≥ 60 years with an occult magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) verified Garden I and II FNF sustained after a trauma and treated with primary IF. We included 93 patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment encompassed pre- and postoperative tilt, implant inclination, MRI and treatment failure. Data on reoperation and mortality were collected. Treatment failure was defined as fixation failure, nonunion, avascular necrosis or posttraumatic osteoarthritis.ResultsThe study comprised of 93 patients (72% women, 67/93) with a mean age of 82 (range, 60–97) years. Overall, 6 (6%) patients had major reoperations. 2 (2%) had minor reoperations. One-month mortality was 7%, 1-year mortality was 20% and 2-year mortality was 31%.ConclusionThis multicenter cohort study identifies a subgroup of elderly patients with MRI verified Garden I and II FNFs sustained after trauma, i.e. occult fractures. These fractures seem to have a lower complication rate compared to nFNF identified on plain radiographs.Level of evidencePrognostic Level V. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Supplementary DECT imaging cost effective for diagnosing occult hip fractures in Singapore

Supplementary DECT imaging cost effective for diagnosing occult hip fractures in Singapore

The Necessity of CT Hip Scans in the Investigation of Occult Hip Fractures and Their Effect on Patient Management

The diagnostic challenge of negative plain radiography in the context of a previously ambulatory patient is increasing with the rise in geriatric trauma. These patients are often diagnosed with small undisplaced fractures of the pelvis and femur which may not alter management. This study aims to assess the frequency at which computed tomography (CT) hip scans altered patient management and whether two X-ray projections of the hip affected fracture detection rate. All CT hip scans performed over a three-year period were identified retrospectively. Only CT hips pertaining to the identification of occult fractures were included in the study. A total of 447 (63.6%) CT hips were performed to exclude an occult fracture, which was only detected in 108 (24.1%) of the scans requested. The majority were subcapital (n = 58, 53.7%) or intertrochanteric (n = 39, 36.1%). There was no significant difference between fracture detection rates when comparing one and two views of the pelvis. 82.4% (n = 89) of occult hip fractures were managed operatively. CT imaging led to a change in patient management in 20% of cases. The frequency at which CT scan detects and alters management in occult hip fractures confirms the justification for its use. Increasing the number of X-ray projection views does not decrease the reliance on CT. Pelvic ring fractures are common in nonambulatory patients following trauma, and if confirmed on initial imaging, subsequent imaging to exclude a concurrent occult hip is unnecessary. The focus of further research should be towards the development of investigation algorithms which decrease the reliance on CT and defining the optimal surgical criteria for occult hip fractures.

Cost-Effective Analysis of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Occult Hip Fractures Among Older Adults

ObjectiveEarly and accurate diagnosis of hip fractures minimizes morbidity and mortality. Although current guidelines favor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of occult hip fractures, a new technology called dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) seems an effective alternative. This article investigates a potentially cost-effective strategy for the diagnosis of occult hip fractures in older adults in Singapore. MethodsA decision tree model was developed to compare costs from a payer’s perspective and outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of different imaging strategies for diagnosing occult hip fracture, comparing MRI with DECT supplementing single-energy computed tomography (SECT) and SECT alone. Model inputs were obtained from local sources where available. Sensitivity analyses are performed to test the robustness of the results. ResultsThe MRI strategy was dominated by the DECT strategy, whereas DECT supplementing SECT provided 0.30 more QALYs at an incremental cost of SGD106.41 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of SGD352.52 per QALY relative to SECT alone. DECT seemed a cost-effective strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD50 000 per QALY. ConclusionDECT supplementing SECT is a cost-effective imaging strategy to diagnose occult hip fractures among older adults in Singapore and should be included in clinical pathways to expedite timely treatment and considered for reimbursement schemes.

Differential diagnosis of acute traumatic hip pain in the elderly

Elderly patients who present with an inability to weight bear following a fall, with normal radiographs, should be appropriately investigated to rule out an occult hip fracture (OHF). We aim to identify both the range and incidence of the differential diagnosis of acute traumatic hip pain in a large series of patients investigated for OHF. A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients investigated for an OHF with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. Dedicated musculo- skeletal radiologists reported the MRI scans. All diagnoses including hip fractures, other fractures and soft tissue injuries were recorded. Case notes were reviewed for all patients to identify subsequent complications, management and outcomes. A total of 157 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 52 (33%) patients had a fracture of the proximal femur. The majority of patients with proximal femoral fractures required surgical intervention. 9 patients who had fractures of the greater trochanter of the femur without fracture extension across the femoral neck were managed non-operatively. 40 (25%) patients had fractures of the pelvis, with a combined pubic rami and sacral fracture occurring frequently. The most common diagnosis was a soft tissue injury alone that was seen in 60 (38%) patients imaged. Injuries to the gluteal muscle group, iliopsaos complex and trochanteric bursa were most prevalent. All patients with soft tissue injuries or fractures of the pelvis were successfully managed non-operatively. This study highlights a wide range of differential diagnoses in elderly patients presenting with acute traumatic hip pain. The proximal femur was fractured in 33% of patients imaged for OHFs in our series. The most common diagnosis was a soft tissue injury around the hip and pelvis ; these injuries can be successfully managed without surgery.

Clinical utility of a focused hip MRI for assessing suspected hip fracture in the emergency department.

A focused hip MRI (FHMR) for the detection of radiographically occult hip fractures was implemented in our emergency department (ED) in 2013. The goal of this study was to assess the clinical utility of this protocol. We retrospectively reviewed radiology reports of 262 unique patients who underwent 263 FHMR (coronal T1, coronal STIR, axial T2 fat saturated) for suspected hip fracture in the ED from October 2013 to March 2020. Electronic medical records were reviewed for the ED course, follow-up imaging, and clinical management within 90days. Seventy-one patients had one or more fractures identified by FHMR: one-third had proximal femoral fractures; two-third had pelvic fractures. Of these 71 patients, 53 (74%) had radiographically occult fractures, including 14 (20%) with occult proximal femoral fractures; 4 patients had fractures occult on CT. Nineteen patients with a suspected fracture on radiography were found to have no fracture on FHMR. Four fractures not reported on FHMR were later seen on follow-up imaging: these included 1 isolated greater trochanter, 1 additional ischial tuberosity, 1 additional superior pubic ramus, and 1 additional sacrum. All four fractures were treated non-operatively. Muscle/tendon injury was the most common type of injury, seen in 50% (130/262) patients with the most commonly torn tendons being the hamstring (44%; 15/34) followed by gluteus medius tendon (18%; 6/34). A full-hip or pelvis MRI was done after FHMR in only 5 patients, primarily for the purpose of better characterizing findings already identified on FHMR (2 for fracture, 2 for tendon injury, 1 for soft tissue metastasis). Only one of these five studies provided new information: ruling out a previously questioned fracture. Clinical management of the vast majority of patients was based solely on findings from the FHMR. FHMR offers reliable identification of radiographically occult hip fractures and muscle/tendon injuries. The protocol is well trusted in guiding patient management in our ED.

Justifying CT prior to MRI in cases of suspected occult hip fracture. A proposed diagnostic protocol.

Patients with clinical suspicion of hip fracture, but negative radiographs are suspected of having an occult hip fracture (OHF). Different diagnostic modalities are available for investigating OHF and various protocols have been suggested. MRI has the highest sensitivity and specificity, however availability is limited in many institutes. CT is readily accessible in the large majority of hospitals throughout the world but has lower sensitivity and may miss some fractures. In this article we investigate a protocol that balances these issues providing a practical and cost-effective solution. During a four-year period between 2012 and 2016 a strict diagnostic protocol was followed at our Medical Center for patients suspected of OHF. This MRI selective protocol consisted of CT initially being performed and only when negative for fracture, followed by an MRI. Retrospective analysis of all patients who followed the protocol was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: those diagnosed by CT alone and those diagnosed by MRI after having a negative CT scan. Diagnostic performance, time to diagnosis and the cost of this protocol were evaluated. 103 patients were treated under the protocol. In 50 patients (49%) hip fracture was diagnosed by CT alone. In the remaining 53 patients (51%) no definitive diagnosis was reached by CT and MRI was subsequently performed. 12 of these 53 patients (23%) were diagnosed with hip fracture necessitating surgery. In the CT only group mean time from admission to diagnosis was 3 hours, in the CT+MRI group this rose to 40 hours. Cost analysis showed that this protocol was more cost-effective than performing MRI in all patients, saving an estimated 66,805 Euro during the study period. The clinical challenge of diagnosing OHF can be minimised by implementing a diagnostic protocol. The protocol should take into consideration the diagnostic sensitivity, availability and cost of different imaging modalities. An MRI selective strategy with initial CT scanning is recommended, as it reduces time to diagnosis and lowers overall costs.

Negative predictive value of CT for occult fractures of the hip and pelvis with imaging follow-up

To determine the negative predictive value of multidetector CT for radiographically occult fracture of the hip or pelvis in an elderly population presenting to the emergency department. Two hundred thirty-seven elderly patients with suspected fracture were identified over a 5-year period with negative radiographs acquired in the emergency department followed by an index CT of the hip/pelvis within 24h. There were 81 cases with a negative index CT, as determined by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and with some form of imaging follow-up (MRI, CT, or x-ray) performed within 18months of the index CT. Follow-up imaging was reviewed by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists for the presence of fracture to determine the performance of the index CT. The electronic medical record was used to exclude the possibility of intervening trauma between the time of the index CT and follow-up imaging. There were 39 cases with follow-up imaging performed within 6weeks of the negative index CT, and 42 with follow-up imaging within 6weeks to 18months of the negative index CT. Eight of 81 patients demonstrated a fracture on follow-up imaging, with 3 of 8 involving the femoral neck or intertrochanteric femur. The negative predictive value of the index CT for the detection of a radiographically occult hip or pelvic fracture was 90.1%. If considering only surgically relevant fractures (femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures), the negative predictive value improved to 96.3%. Computed tomography for occult hip fractures has a high negative predictive value but there are cases not detected with surgical implications.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Limited MRI Protocols for Detecting Radiographically Occult Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of limited MRI protocols for detecting radiographically occult proximal femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and the gray literature through November 15, 2019, was performed. Original articles with 10 or more patients evaluating limited MRI protocols for the diagnosis of radiographically occult proximal femoral fractures compared with multiparametric MRI with or without clinical outcome as the reference standard were included in the analysis. Patient, clinical, MRI, and performance parameters were independently acquired by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate mixed-effects regression model. RESULTS. Eleven studies with 938 patients and 247 proximal femoral fractures met inclusion criteria, and five of these studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled and weighted summary sensitivity and specificity and the area under the summary ROC curve for limited MRI protocols in detecting radiographically occult hip fractures were 99% (95% CI, 91-100%), 99% (95% CI, 97-100%), and 1 (95% CI, 0.99-1), respectively. The aggregate sensitivity and specificity values for a single-plane T1-weighted sequence only, STIR sequence only, T1-weighted and STIR sequences, and T2-weighted sequence only were as follows: 97% (89/92) and 100% (76/76), 99% (126/127) and 99% (865/873), 100% (118/118) and 99% (867/874), and 86% (51/59) and 97% (137/141), respectively. Sensitivity was 100% (58/58) when images were acquired on 3-T scanners only and 99% (284/288) when interpreted only by certified radiologists. The mean scanning time for the limited MRI protocols was less than 5 minutes. CONCLUSION. Limited MRI protocols can be used as the standard of care in patients with a suspected but radiographically occult hip fracture. A protocol composed of coronal T1-weighted and STIR sequences is 100% sensitive.

Use of Advanced Imaging for Radiographically Occult Hip Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background The overall rate of hip fractures not identified on radiographs but that require surgery (ie, surgical hip fractures) remains unclear in elderly patients who are suspected to have such fractures based on clinical findings. Moreover, the importance of advanced imaging in these patients has not been comprehensively assessed. Purpose To estimate the frequency of radiographically occult hip fracture in elderly patients, to define the higher-risk subpopulation, and to determine the diagnostic performance of CT and bone scanning in the detection of occult fractures by using MRI as the reference standard. Materials and Methods A literature search was performed to identify English-language observational studies published from inception to September 27, 2018. Studies were included if patients were clinically suspected to have hip fracture but there was no radiographic evidence of surgical hip fracture (including absence of any definite fracture or only presence of isolated greater trochanter [GT] fracture). The rate of surgical hip fracture was reported in each study in which MRI was used as the reference standard. The pooled rate of occult fracture, diagnostic performance of CT and bone scanning, and strength of evidence (SOE) were assessed. Results Thirty-five studies were identified (2992 patients; mean age, 76.8 years ± 6.0 [standard deviation]; 66% female). The frequency of radiographically occult surgical hip fracture was 39% (1110 of 2835 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 35%, 43%) in studies of patients with no definite radiographic fracture and 92% (134 of 157 patients; 95% CI: 83%, 98%) in studies of patients with radiographic evidence of isolated GT fracture (moderate SOE). The frequency of occult fracture was higher in patients aged at least 80 years (44%, 529 of 1184), those with an equivocal radiographic report (58%, 71 of 126), and those with a history of trauma (41%, 977 of 2370) (moderate SOE). CT and bone scanning yielded comparable diagnostic performance in the detection of radiographically occult hip fracture (P = .67), with a sensitivity of 79% and 87%, respectively (low SOE). Conclusion Elderly patients with acute hip pain and negative or equivocal findings at initial radiography have a high frequency of occult hip fractures. Therefore, the performance of advanced imaging (preferably MRI) may be clinically appropriate in all such patients. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

MRI-only occult geriatric hip fractures: is displacement common with nonoperative treatment?

Although surgical fixation is routinely recommended for geriatric hip fractures, nonoperative treatment may be an option for certain stable fracture patterns. Occult hip fractures are nondisplaced fractures not evident on radiographs, but display intraosseous edema on MRI. Our aim is to report the rate of nonoperative treatment failure in patients with occult geriatric hip fractures. All nonoperatively treated femoral neck or intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO/OTA 31A and 31B) from 2003 to 2018 were identified. Patients older than 65years with negative radiographs but a hip fracture evident on MRI were included. Patients who died prior to fracture displacement or union were excluded. Charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, fracture type, clinical course, displacement, and whether corrective surgery was performed. Of 15 final study patients, there were 6 femoral neck and 9 intertrochanteric fractures. Two fractures displaced, both requiring surgery (2/15; 13.3%). Both displacements occurred in the femoral neck group (2/6; 33%) compared to none in the intertrochanteric cohort (0/9; 0%). This trend did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.14). Thirty-three percent (2/6, 33%) of femoral neck fractures displaced and required surgery. The remainder of the cohort (13/15, 87%) healed without complication, including all of the intertrochanteric fractures (9/9, 100%). Although this difference did not reach statistical significance, the results may better inform treatment discussions for geriatric patients with occult hip fractures diagnosed by MRI. Level III.

Computed tomography-based diagnosis of occult fragility hip fractures offer shorter waiting times with no inadvertent missed diagnosis.

Surgical delay due to the wait for advanced cross-sectional imaging in occult fragility hip fracture management is not well studied. Our study aims to investigate computed tomography (CT) as an alternative to the gold standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in occult hip fracture workup to decrease surgical delay. We conducted a retrospective review of all CTs and MRIs performed between 2015 and 2017 for patients with clinically suspected fragility hip fractures and negative plain radiographs to investigate surgical delay resulting from the wait for advanced imaging and representations due to missed fractures. A total of 243 scans (42 CTs and 201 MRIs) were performed for occult hip fracture workup over the study timeframe, of which 49 patients (20%) had occult hip fractures [CT: 6 (14%), MRI: 43 (21%), p = 0.296)]. There were no readmissions for fracture in the 12 months following a negative scan. The CT group had shorter waiting times (CT: 29 ± 24 h, MRI: 44 ± 32 h, p = 0.004) without significantly reducing surgical delay (CT: 82 ± 36 h, MRI: 128 ± 58 h, p = 0.196). The MRI group had a higher number of patients with a cancer history (p = 0.036), reflective of the practice for workup of possible metastases as a secondary intention. Advanced cross-sectional imaging wait times in occult hip fracture workup contribute significantly to surgical delay. Modern CT techniques are not inferior to MRI in detecting occult fractures and may be a suitable alternative in the absence of a cancer history if MRI cannot be obtained in a timely fashion or is contraindicated. Clinicians should utilize the more readily available imaging modality to reduce surgical delay.

Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detected Occult Neck of Femur Fractures: Do They Represent a Less Severe Injury with Improved Outcomes?

PurposeOccult hip fractures in the elderly can be missed on standard radiographs and are a known cause of morbidity. These are generally diagnosed on either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography scan, depending upon local hospital policy. While there is an abundance of literature on hip fractures in general, little is known about the clinical outcome of patients with occult hip fractures. The aim of this study was to review the demographics, injury characteristics, management and clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with occult femoral neck fractures on MRI.Materials and MethodsUsing an existing hospital database, a retrospective analysis of all patients with occult hip fractures diagnosed by MRI scan from 2005 to 2014 was conducted.ResultsSixty-four patients (23 males and 41 females) were included. The mean duration of hospitalisation was 16 days. A significantly higher percentage of patients were discharged to their pre-existing residence compared to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) commissioning guidelines (66% vs. 45%). The 30- and 60-day mortalities were 3% and 10%, respectively. Mortality was lower in patients who underwent internal fixation (n=3/31) compared with those undergoing replacement (hemi/total hip arthroplasty) (n=5/12) (P=0.056).ConclusionPatients with occult hip fractures diagnosed on an MRI scan are more likely to be discharged to their pre-existing residence and have lower mortality rates compared to NICE guidelines and National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD).

Use of Multislice CT for Investigation of Occult Geriatric Hip Fractures and Impact on Timing of Surgery.

Introduction:The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in the United Kingdom recommend magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the first-line investigation for radiographically occult hip fractures, if available within 24 hours. In our department, however, multislice computerized tomography (MSCT) is instead used as a first-line investigation due to significant delays associated with obtaining MRI. Our aim was to determine the validity and practicality of MSCT for diagnosis of occult hip fractures and its impact on timing of surgery.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed medical records and imaging for consecutive patients who underwent MSCT to investigate occult hip fractures between January 2014 and October 2016. We reviewed subsequent imaging and reattendances for patients with negative MSCT to exclude initially missed fractures.Results:Two hundred six patients underwent MSCT to investigate occult hip fracture during the study period. Hip fractures were identified in 59 patients, comprising 35 (59.3%) subcapital, 12 (20.0%) intertrochanteric, 8 (13.6%) transcervical, and 4 (6.8%) basicervical fractures. One missed hip fracture was identified: a patient with a negative MSCT was further investigated with MRI that demonstrated acute subcapital hip fracture. Multislice computerized tomography was obtained within 24 hours of initial radiograph in 145 (70.4%) patients. A total of 44.5% of occult hip fractures had surgery within the nationally recommended 36 hours of admission (hospital average for all hip fractures was 76.4% over the same period).Discussion and Conclusions:Multislice computerized tomography is a pragmatic approach to investigate the majority of occult hip fractures in a timely manner and minimize associated delay to surgery. However it cannot completely exclude the diagnosis, especially in abnormal anatomy. The lack of a true gold standard comparison (ie, MRI) means a true sensitivity and specificity cannot be calculated, although can be cautiously estimated by lack of subsequent reattendance or investigation. Further prospective randomized CT versus MRI trials are required.

A Case Series of Occult Femoral Neck Fracture, Why Plain Radiograph is not Enough?

Background: About 10% of hip fractures are missed on initial presentation and potentially expose patients to increased morbidity and unnecessary complex surgeries. 2,3 CT-scan and MRI in the emergency settings have been proposed to avoid a misdiagnosis.3,6,7 Case Series: three cases (two female and one male patient) patients with hip pain were presented with normal x-ray on initial presentation. Further investigation using CT-scan and MRI revealed femoral neck fractures. Case 1 : A 77 years-old female presented with right hip pain after a ground-level fall. Plain radiograph was normal and the patient was discharged from emergency. One week later, her hip pain worsened and a follow up x-ray showed a displaced femoral neck fracture. The fracture then treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Case 2 : An 87 years-old female presented with left hip pain after a fall in the bathroom. She was able to bear weight. Initial hip x-ray appeared normal. Further investigation with a pelvic CT scan revealed a displaced femoral neck fracture. Case 3 : A 49 years-old male presented with worsening right hip pain since more than a week. The patient was physically active and has no history of trauma or associated hip injury. Initial x-ray showed a normal hip but further imaging study using MRI revealed an undisplaced femoral neck fracture. The patient was treated conservatively as he refused to do surgery. Conclusion: Traumatic hip pain with negative plain radiograph should be followed by MRI or CT -scan to avoid misdiagnosis. Keywords : Occult hip fracture, Missed hip fracture, Femoral Neck Fracture, Elderly patient

Causes, Effects, Measures to Reduce MRI Interactions in Patients with Pacemakers and Proposed Design of High Dielectric Jacket for the Head and Thorax

The use of Magnetic Resonance imaging in this fast advancing technological era cannot be under estimated. It has been estimated that about 1 person in 1000 in the Western world has received a pacemaker worldwide [1] and each year up to 8 million MRI scans are performed in Europe [2] .It has become the choice in many applications due to its merits. They include detection of blood-brain-barrier disruption, identification of atherosclerotic plaque morphological, detection of occult hip fractures, fast imaging and high contrast resolution to name a few. Despite these overwhelming advantages, (MRl) has been contraindicated in patients with pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Due to these interactions, patients with these devices are often denied access this advantageous system. This paper considers some of the causes, adverse effects and provides solution to aid patient who need MRI imaging.