You have accessJournal of UrologyTechnology & Instruments: Robotics/Laparoscopy/Ureteroscopy II1 Apr 2010912 ROBOTIC LIMITED AND EXTENDED PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER Hugh Lavery and Ronney Abaza Hugh LaveryHugh Lavery More articles by this author and Ronney AbazaRonney Abaza More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1668AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer is unknown. More extensive dissections have shown increased overall nodal yields as well as more frequent identification of positive nodes. With the advent of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), the ability to achieve adequate lymph node dissections with this approach has been questioned with many series reporting lower nodal yields than historical series or lower nodal positivity than expected based upon the biology of the disease. We reviewed our experience with both extended (ePLND) and limited pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) to determine nodal yield, complications, and rate of node positivity. METHODS We reviewed 250 consecutive RALP procedures with PLND from Feb 2008 to Jan 2009 by a single surgeon (RA). Nodal packets were dissected en bloc and nodes counted before paraffin-embedding to prevent double counting from cutting of nodes. Pathology processing was without knowledge of the study. ¡°Low-risk¡± patients underwent a limited PLND including the external iliac and obturator lymph nodes. An extended dissection was performed in ¡°high-risk¡± patients with preoperative PSA >10ng/dl, cT3 disease, Gleason ¡Ý8, or cancer in ¡Ý50% of biopsy tissue extending the template to all nodes medial to the genitofemoral nerve including the hypogastric nodes and common iliac nodes up to the crossing of the ureter. Patient and pathologic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Of 250 patients, 173 underwent limited PLND while 77 underwent ePLND. Mean nodal yield for all patients was 11 nodes, with 8.6 and 16.4 nodes for limited and extended PLND, respectively. A total of 17 (7%) node-positive (N+) patients were identified overall, with 2 (1.1%) in the limited group and 15 (19.5%) in the ePLND group. Of the 183 organ-confined (OC) tumors, only 1 was N+ (0.5%), compared to 16 of 67 (24%) non-OC tumors. Complications of the lymphadenectomy included four symptomatic lymphoceles requiring percutaneous drainage, one ureteral injury requiring a temporary stent, and one transient obturator nerve palsy for an overall complication rate of 2.4% (0.5% of limited and 8% of ePLND). CONCLUSIONS Pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer can be adequately performed in robot-assisted laparoscopic fashion with nodal yields and rate of positivity comparable to published open surgical series. The role of limited PLND remains unclear, but ePLND appears warranted for high risk cancers. Columbus, OH© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAbaza R, Dangle P, Gong M, Bahnson R and Pohar K (2018) Quality of Lymphadenectomy is Equivalent With Robotic and Open Cystectomy Using an Extended TemplateJournal of Urology, VOL. 187, NO. 4, (1200-1205), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012. Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e356 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hugh Lavery More articles by this author Ronney Abaza More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...