Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 levels in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer treated with a self-expandable metallic stent and curative surgery.

The importance of tumor markers is well established; yet little is known about their prognostic value for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). We investigated the clinical significance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 levels in patients with non-metastatic OCRC, who underwent insertion of a self-expandable metallic stent and curative surgery. Clinical data on 91 patients with OCRC were analyzed retrospectively to evaluate the associations of preoperative serum values of tumor makers with short- and long-term outcomes. The 91 patients comprised 53 men and 38 women, with a median age of 71years. Twelve patients had an elevated preoperative CA 19-9 level. Multivariate analyses revealed that an elevated CA 19-9 level was independently associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06-10.14, P < 0.001] and overall survival (HR = 4.06, 95% CI 1.46-11.24, P = 0.007). A CEA level > 5ng/ml had no prognostic value, whereas a CEA level > 10.8ng/ml was significantly associated with worse DFS (P = 0.032). Measuring the CA 19-9 level concomitantly with the CEA level for patients with advanced CRC, including OCRC, may provide a valuable means to improve prognostication.

Impact of a novel-covered colonic stent in obstructive colon cancer.

Although the short-term outcomes of bridge-to-surgery (BTS) procedures using self-expandable metal stents are favorable, concerns remain regarding worsened prognosis due to tissue injury in the tumor area. Herein, we describe a newly developed covered stent, the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent™, designed to reduce tissue damage/injury associated with stent-related complications in BTS procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent as a BTS for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC). This multicenter retrospective observational study included 44 OCC patients who underwent BTS with stents at four facilities between September 2020 and November 2022. The groups of patients receiving the Kawasumi Jabara and non-covered colonic stents were designated Groups C and NC, respectively. Treatment outcomes related to stent placement and surgery were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Groups NC and C (n = 34 and 10, respectively) showed no significant differences in sex, age, tumor location, histological type, Colorectal Obstruction Scoring System (CROSS) score, or cStage; however, the stent placement duration was shorter in Group C. No significant differences were found in terms of the technical and clinical success rates for stent placement. Stent dislocation was observed in 0 and 2 cases in Groups C and NC, respectively. PSM analysis between eight cases, each from Groups C and NC, revealed no significant differences in stent-related or surgical outcomes between the groups. However, regarding the gross injury score in the resected specimens, Group C had a lower score than Group NC (1.8 vs. 5.5), and the proportion of pathological tissue injury involving deeper layers was also lower in Group C (37.5% vs. 100%). Compared to conventional non-covered stents, the Kawasumi Jabara colonic stent™ demonstrated favorable safety during stent insertion, retention, and surgery, with only mild tissue injury.

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a useful predictor of postoperative complications in patients with a colonic stent for obstructive colorectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study.

The C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index is a novel score that offers a good reflection of nutritional status, inflammatory response, and immune system status. The CALLY index is reported to correlate with the prognosis of various carcinomas. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between the CALLY index and the short-term prognosis of obstructive colorectal cancer managed with a colonic stent. The subjects of this retrospective study were 263 patients who underwent colorectal resection after colonic stenting for obstructive colorectal cancer between 2016 and 2023. Patients were classified into a group with a low CALLY index (CALLY-L group, n = 85) and a group with a high (CALLY-H group, n = 178) CALLY index. The CALLY-L group had greater blood loss (53mL vs 20mL, p = 0.002) and higher poor performance status (PS3; 20% vs 10.1%, p = 0.033), open surgery (21.2% vs 7.3%, p = 0.001), distant metastases (41.2% vs 20.8%, p = 0.01), and postoperative complications (30.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.039) than the CALLY-H group. Multivariate analysis identified a prolonged operative time (odds ratio 1.983, 95% confidence interval 1.013-3.881; p = 0.045), greater blood loss (odds ratio 2.572, 95% confidence interval 1.291-5.129; p = 0.007) and a low CALLY index (odds ratio 1.961, 95% confidence interval 1.013-3.795; p = 0.045) as independent predictors of complications. The CALLY index may be a useful predictor of postoperative complications of obstructive colorectal cancer.

A predictive model for colorectal cancer complicated with intestinal obstruction based on specific inflammation score

PurposeInflammatory factors play an important role in the onset and progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to develop and validate a novel scoring system that utilizes specific inflammatory factor indicators to predict intestinal obstruction in CRC patients.MethodsThis study conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,470 CRC patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2013 and July 2018. These patients were randomly allocated to the training group (n = 1060) and the validation group (n = 410). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictive factors for intestinal obstruction. The CRC peculiar inflammation score (CPIS), comprising lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and alanine transaminase-to-lymphocyte ratio index (ALRI) scores, was significantly associated with the occurrence of intestinal obstruction. A nomogram combining CPIS with other clinical features was developed to predict this occurrence. Model accuracy was assessed by determining the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).ResultsThe CPIS generated by multi-factor logistic regression was as follows: − 1.576 × LMR − 0.067 × PNI + 0.018 × ALRI. Using CPIS cutoff values of 50% (− 7.188) and 85% (− 6.144), three predictive groups were established. Patients with a high CPIS had a significantly higher risk of intestinal obstruction than those with a low CPIS (odds ratio [OR]: 10.0, confidence interval [CI]: 5.85–17.08, P < 0.001). The predictive nomogram demonstrated good calibration and discrimination abilities. The AUC of the ROC curve for the obstruction nomogram was 0.813 (95% CI: 0.777–0.850) in the training set and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.752–0.860) in the validation set. The calibration curve exhibited neither bias nor high credibility. Decision curve analysis indicated the utility of this predictive model.ConclusionCRC-associated intestinal obstruction is closely linked to inflammatory markers in patients. CPIS is a CRC-specific inflammatory predictive score based on a combination of inflammatory-related indicators. A high CPIS serves as a strong indicator of intestinal obstruction. Its integration with other clinical factors and preoperative inflammatory-specific indicators significantly enhances the diagnosis and treatment of CRC patients with intestinal obstruction.

A Comparative Analysis between Enhanced Recovery after Surgery and Traditional Care in the Management of Obstructive Colorectal Cancer.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) represents evidence-based transformation in perioperative care, which has been demonstrated to reduce both recovery times and postoperative complication rates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of the ERAS program in comparison with conventional postoperative care. This longitudinal cohort observational study enrolled 120 consecutive patients diagnosed with intestinal obstruction caused by colorectal cancers, with 40 patients in the ERAS group and 80 patients receiving conventional postoperative care forming the non-ERAS group. Our study compares the effectiveness of ERAS protocols to non-ERAS methods, focusing on the time to first flatus, defecation, the resumption of normal diet, and early mobilization. The main endpoints are morbidity and hospitalization length. The results showed that despite a longer admission-to-surgery interval in the ERAS group, median hospitalization was significantly shorter compared to the non-ERAS group (p = 0.0002). The ERAS group showed a tendency towards a lower incidence of overall postoperative complications, indicating that implementing the ERAS protocol does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, ensuring the safety of enhanced recovery strategies for patients. Also, ERAS patients had notably fewer stomas than those in the non-ERAS group, indicating the potential effectiveness of reducing stoma necessity. This study shows that ERAS surpasses conventional care for colonic or rectal surgery patients, reducing hospital stays and costs while enhancing recovery. This highlights the comprehensive advantages of adopting ERAS in surgical settings.

A Bridge to Curative Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Self-expandable Metallic Stent Versus Decompression Tube.

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is becoming the standard bridge-to-surgery (BTS) strategy for potentially curable left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). The study objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of SEMS placement as a BTS strategy for both right- and left-sided OCRC. We retrospectively compared the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with OCRC who underwent placement of a SEMS versus a trans-nasal/anal decompression tube (DCT). The cohort comprised 57 patients with stage II/III right-sided OCRC (DCT, n=20; SEMS, n=8) or left-sided OCRC (DCT, n=9; SEMS, n=20). The short-term outcomes were the incidence of postoperative complications, rate of laparoscopic surgery, rate of stoma construction, and postoperative hospital stay; long-term outcomes were the 3-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The SEMS group had a higher rate of laparoscopic surgery (85.7% vs. 6.9%, p<0.001), lower rate of stoma construction (10.7% vs. 34.5%, p=0.03), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (14 vs. 17 days, p=0.04) than the DCT group. Both groups had a similar incidence of postoperative complications. The 3-year OS and RFS were also similar in the DCT and SEMS groups for both right-sided OCRC (OS, 75.0% vs. 87.5%, HR=1.51, 95% CI=0.22-10.25, p=0.7; RFS, 65.0% vs. 50.0%, HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.28-3.36, p=0.9) and left-sided OCRC (OS, 88.8% vs. 90.0%, HR=1.19, 95% CI=0.10-14.29, p=0.9; RFS, 77.8% vs. 85.0%, HR=1.03, 95% CI=0.16-6.5, p=0.9). SEMS placement is a reasonable BTS strategy for left- and right-sided OCRC that achieves comparable short- and long-term outcomes to DCT insertion.

Does Colorectal Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Increase Perineural Invasion?

To clarify whether self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) increases perineural invasion (PNI), thereby worsening the prognosis. In total, 1022 patients with pathological T3 or T4 colon or rectosigmoid cancer who underwent resection were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were divided into a no obstruction group (n=693), obstruction without stent group (n=251), and obstruction with stent group (n=78), and factors demonstrating an independent association with PNI, the difference in PNI incidence and severity between groups, and the association between PNI and the duration from SEMS placement to surgery were investigated. Survival analysis was performed for each group. On multivariate analysis, SEMS placement (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08) was independently associated with PNI whereas SEMS placement was not. PNI occurred in 39%, 45%, and 68% of the no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. In the obstruction with stent group, the proportion of PNI was not associated with the duration from SEMS placement to surgery. Extramural PNI, an advanced form of PNI, demonstrated no increase with increasing interval. The five-year OS was 86.3%, 76.7%, and 73.1% in no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, obstruction was an independent risk factor of decreased OS (HR: 1.57) whereas SEMS placement was not. The prognosis was comparable between patients with SEMS placement and those with an obstruction who did not undergo SEMS placement, thus demonstrating that SEMS is a viable, therapeutic option for BTS.

Effect of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer with a colonic stent: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan

Effect of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio on the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer with a colonic stent: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan

Significance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer After Stent Placement: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

To explore the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) managed by self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to surgery (BTS). One hundred twenty-nine patients with pathological stage II/III OCRC who underwent BTS using a SEMS were included in this multicenter retrospective study. Patients were divided into the no-adjuvant chemotherapy group (No-Adj group) (n=52) and adjuvant chemotherapy group (Adj group) (n=77), and relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared. The No-Adj group had more fragile patient background factors, such as higher age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and lower preoperative albumin compared with the Adj group. The 3-year RFS rates for the overall cohort were significantly different between the No-Adj and Adj groups (56.4% and 78.5%, respectively; p=0.003). Significant RFS benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy were observed in both pathological stage II and III cancer. Characteristics of more advanced cancer, such as high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), pathological T4, and lymphovascular invasion, were associated with survival improvement by adjuvant chemotherapy. T4 and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with RFS in the multivariate Cox proportional analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with OCRC undergoing BTS using a SEMS. Adjuvant chemotherapy is basically recommended regardless of the cancer stage and is strongly recommended with more advanced characteristics, such as high CEA, T4, and lymphovascular invasion.

Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stents as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive and Symptomatic Primary Tumors of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Analysis.

Background: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) was introduced for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) a few decades ago. However, its long-term outcomes remain controversial, especially for stage IV CRC. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcomes of SEMS as a "bridge to surgery" (BTS) for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in stage IV CRC by one-to-one propensity-score matching. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center from January 2007 to December 2017. Patients with obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors of stage IV CRC underwent primary resection (PR) or placement of a SEMS as a BTS. They were divided into SEMS and PR groups, and their short- and long-term outcomes were compared. Results: In total, 52 patients were reviewed (SEMS group, 21; PR group, 31). Sixteen patients in both groups were matched using propensity scores. Patients in the SEMS group more frequently underwent laparoscopic surgery than those in the PR group (75% versus 19%, P = .004). The two groups showed no significant differences in perioperative and pathological outcomes. The 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between groups (29% versus 20%, P = .53). Conclusions: As a BTS, the use of SEMS for obstructive and symptomatic primary tumors in CRC stage IV can be a comparable option to PR in terms of short- and long-term outcomes, and would be less invasive with respect to surgical procedures.

Oncologic investigation of the interval from stent placement to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is widely used as a bridge to surgery (BTS) procedure for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding the optimal interval between SEMS placement and elective surgery is lacking. We retrospectively collected data from patients with BTS between January 2013 and October 2021. Inverse probability treatment-weighted propensity score analyses were used to compare short- and long-term outcomes between the short-interval (SI) and long-interval (LI) groups, using a cutoff of 20days. In total, 138 patients were enrolled in this study (SI group, n = 63; LI group, n = 75). In the matched cohort, the patients' backgrounds were well balanced. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications was not significantly different between the SI and LI groups (19.0% vs. 14.0%, P = 0.47). There were no significant differences between the SI and LI groups in the 3-year recurrence-free survival (68.0% vs. 76.4%, P = 0.73) or 3-year overall survival rates (86.0% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.72). A longer interval did not deteriorate the oncological outcomes. Individual perioperative management with an appropriate interval to improve the patient's condition is required to ensure safe surgery.

Colon stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructive colorectal cancer management.

Colonic stent placement is a commonly used bridging strategy for surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. The procedure involves the placement of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) across the obstructive lesion to restore intestinal patency and alleviate the symptoms of obstruction. By allowing patients to receive surgery in a planned and staged manner with time for preoperative optimization and bowel preparation, stent placement may reduce the need for emergency surgery, which is associated with higher complication rates and poorer outcomes. This review focuses on the role of colon stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of obstructive colorectal cancer. SEMS as a bridge to surgery for left-sided colon cancer has been demonstrated to be particularly useful; however, further research is needed for its application in cases of right-sided colon cancer. Colon stent placement also has limitations and potential complications including stent migration, re-obstruction, and perforation. However, the timing of curative surgery after SEMS placement remains inconclusive. Considering the literature to date, performing surgery at an interval of approximately 2 weeks is considered appropriate. Therefore, colonic stent placement may be an effective strategy as a bridge to surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Artificial intelligence algorithms for predicting post-operative ileus after laparoscopic surgery

ObjectiveBy constructing a predictive model using machine learning and deep learning technologies, we aim to understand the risk factors for postoperative intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer patients, and establish an effective artificial intelligence-based predictive model to guide individualized prevention and treatment, thus improving patient outcomes. MethodsWe constructed a model of the artificial intelligence algorithm in Python. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a training set for variable identification and model construction, or a test set for testing model performance, at a ratio of 7:3. The model was trained with ten algorithms. We used the AUC values of the ROC curves, as well as accuracy, precision, recall rate and F1 scores. ResultsThe results of feature engineering composited with the GBDT algorithm showed that opioid use, anesthesia duration, and body weight were the top three factors in the development of POI. We used ten machine learning and deep learning algorithms to validate the model, and the results were as follows: the three algorithms with best accuracy were XGB (0.807), Decision Tree (0.807) and Neural DecisionTree (0.807); the two algorithms with best precision were XGB (0.500) and Decision Tree (0.500); the two algorithms with best recall rate were adab (0.243) and Decision Tree (0.135); the two algorithms with highest F1 score were adab (0.290) and Decision Tree (0.213); and the three algorithms with best AUC were Gradient Boosting (0.678), XGB (0.638) and LinearSVC (0.633). ConclusionThis study shows that XGB and Decision Tree are the two best algorithms for predicting the risk of developing ileus after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. It provides new insight and approaches to the field of postoperative intestinal obstruction in colorectal cancer through the application of machine learning techniques, thereby improving our understanding of the disease and offering strong support for clinical decision-making.

Short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent compared with tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with obstructive colorectal cancer managed by emergency surgery show high morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation rates. Decompression modalities, including the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and tube drainage (TD), have been used to improve surgical outcomes. However, there have been limited studies comparing the 2 modalities. We performed a meta-analysis on short- and long-term outcomes between SEMS and TD. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Data were pooled, and the overall effect size was calculated using random effect models. Outcome measures were perioperative short-term and 3-year survival outcomes. We included 20 nonrandomized studies that examined 2,047 patients in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed SEMS had better short-term outcomes in clinical success rate, decompression-related complications, laparoscopic surgery rate, stoma formation rate, and postoperative complication rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.54; I2 = 20%), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.50; I2 = 0%), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66; I2 = 87%), 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24-0.49; I2 = 52%), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.89, I2 = 28%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year overall survival (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.27; I2 = 0%). Although the long-term oncologic impact of SEMS is still unclear compared with TD, the results of this meta-analysis may suggest that SEMS insertion can be performed more successfully and safely and may have benefits for short-term perioperative outcomes compared with TD. Further studies are warranted to provide more definitive survival results.

A case of giardiasis diagnosed from a high output stoma after surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer

This report describes a case of giardiasis detected through stool smear analysis of postoperative stool fluid collected from a high output stoma for obstructive colorectal cancer. The patient, a 67-year-old male, underwent right hemicolectomy with ileostomy for obstructive colorectal cancer. The persistent excessive excretion of postoperative stool fluid from the stoma prompted a stool smear test. The findings revealed the presence of Giardia intestinalis. Fecal output decreased when metronidazole was administered orally. The study strongly recommends that patients with prolonged gastrointestinal symptoms need to undergo stool smear tests.

Prognostic significance of Ishii's sarcopenia screening score for patients undergoing curative surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer after intraluminal decompression.

Sarcopenia influences the short- and long-term outcomes of various medical conditions including malignancy. Ishii's screening test estimates the probability of sarcopenia based on a score calculated by three simple variables: age, grip strength, and calf circumference. We investigated the clinical significance of Ishii's score for patients with non-metastatic obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) who underwent curative surgery after intraluminal decompression. Ishii's score was calculated in 79 patients with OCRC. Muscle volume loss and decreased muscle quality were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) images as skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), respectively. There were 46 men and 33 women, with a median age of 70years old. The cutoff value for Ishii's score was 155.1 and 15 patients were in the high-score group. The high-score group was significantly associated with worse time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS), and a high Ishii's score was an independent negative prognostic factor for TTR (hazard ratio = 2.93, P = 0.015). A high Ishii's score was significantly associated with a low SMI value but not with the IMAC value. A high Ishii's score was independently associated with poorer TTR in patients with non-metastatic OCRC.

Morusinol Extracted from Morus alba Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Induces Autophagy via FOXO3a Nuclear Accumulation-Mediated Cholesterol Biosynthesis Obstruction in Colorectal Cancer.

The incidence rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing significantly in recent years, and it is urgent to develop novel drugs that have more effects for its treatment. It has been reported that many molecules extracted from the root bark of Morus alba L. (also known as Cortex Mori) have antitumor activities. In our study, we identified morusinol as a promising anticancer agent by selecting from 30 molecules extracted from Morus alba L. We found that morusinol treatment suppressed cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis of CRC cells in vitro. Besides this, we observed that morusinol induced cytoprotective autophagy. The GO analysis of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data showed that morusinol affected cholesterol metabolism. Then we found that key enzyme genes in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway as well as the sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 2 (SREBF2) were significantly downregulated. Furthermore, additional cholesterol treatment reversed the anti-CRC effect of morusinol. Interestingly, we also found that morusinol treatment could promote forkhead box O3 (FOXO3a) nuclear accumulation, which subsequently suppressed SREBF2 transcription. Then SREBF2-controlled cholesterol biosynthesis was blocked, resulting in the suppression of cell proliferation, promotion of apoptosis, and production of autophagy. The experiments in animal models also showed that morusinol significantly impeded tumor growth in mice models. Our results suggested that morusinol may be used as a candidate anticancer drug for the treatment of CRC.

Modified Naples prognostic score for evaluating the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer

BackgroundInflammatory, immune, and nutritional status are key factors in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). This study aims to investigate the value of modified Naples prognostic score (M-NPS) in evaluating OCRC prognosis.MethodsA total of 196 OCRC patients were retrospectively analyzed to construct M-NPS based on serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (CHOL), neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte:monocyte ratio (LMR), and then they were divided into three groups. The Kaplan–Meier (KM) method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of OCRC patients.ResultsPatients with high M-NPS had worse OS and DFS (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0011). Multivariate COX analysis showed that M-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients. Patients in the M-NPS 2 group had significantly worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.930 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.217–10.964), P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 3.508 (95% CI, 1.691–7.277), P < 0.001) than those in the 0 group.ConclusionM-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients; it might provide a potential reference for immunonutritional intervention in patients with obstruction.

Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundUsing self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and decompression tubes (DT) as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) treatment may avoid emergency operations for patients with colorectal cancer-caused obstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two approaches.MethodsWe systematically retrieved literature from January 1, 2000, to May 30, 2023, from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, Wanfang Data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of SEMS versus DT as BTS in colorectal cancer obstruction were selected. Risks of bias were assessed for RCTs and cohort studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2 and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Graded Recommendation Assessment. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to analyze measurement data.ResultsWe included eight RCTs and eighteen cohort studies involving 2,061 patients (SEMS, 1,044; DT, 1,017). Pooled RCT and cohort data indicated the SEMS group had a significantly higher clinical success rate than the DT group (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.04, 3.81, P = 0.04), but no significant difference regarding technical success (OR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.56, 2.96, P = 0.55). SEMS had a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays (MD = − 4.47, 95% CI − 6.26, − 2.69, P < 0.00001), a lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain (OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05, 0.50, P = 0.002), intraoperative bleeding (MD = − 37.67, 95% CI − 62.73, − 12.60, P = 0.003), stoma creation (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.23, 0.73, P = 0.002) and long-term tumor recurrence rate than DT (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.22, 0.99, P = 0.05).ConclusionSEMS and DT are both safe as BTS to avoid emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. SEMS is preferable because of higher clinical success rates, lower rates of operation-related abdominal pain, intraoperative bleeding, stoma creation, and long-term tumor recurrence, as well as a shorter postoperative length of hospital stays.Trial registrationCRD42022365951.

Colonic Resection, Stoma, or Self-expanding Metal Stents for Obstructive Left Colon Cancer: the CROSCO-1 study protocol.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. There are several causes of a mechanical left bowel obstructive but CRC accounts for approximately 50% of cases and in 10-30% of whom it is the presenting syndrome. In most cases, the left colon is involved. At present, the range of therapeutic alternatives in the management of obstructive left CRC in emergency conditions (primary resection vs. staged resection with applied self-expanding metallic stents) is broad, whereas internationally validated clinical recommendations in each condition are still lacking. This enormous variability affects the scientific evidence on both the immediate and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes. CROSCO-1 (Colonic Resection, Stoma or Self-expanding Metal Stents for Obstructive Left Colon Cancer) study is a national, multi-center, prospective observational study intending to compare the clinical results of all these therapeutic regimens in a cohort of patients treated for obstructive left-sided CRC. The primary aim of the CROSCO-1 study is the 1-year stoma rate of patients undergoing primary emergency surgical resection (Hartmann procedure or primary resection and anastomosis) compared with patients undergoing staged resection. Secondary outcomes are 30-day and 90-day major morbidity and mortality, 1-year quality of life and the timing of chemotherapy initiation in the two groups. Future CROSCO studies will follow in which, instead, we will evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of the two treatment strategies. The results of a large prospective cohort study which will analyze what really happens in the common clinical practice of managing patients with obstructive left CRC will have the aim of understanding which is the best strategy in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. Indeed, the CROSCO-1 study will analyze the early surgical outcomes for patients with obstructed left CRC. Future CROSCO studies will follow in which, instead, we will evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of the two treatment strategies.