Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Research Articles

Prognostic role of pre-sarcopenia and body composition with long-term outcomes in obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe clinical significance of pre-sarcopenia in colorectal cancer obstruction has not yet been described. The present study aimed to determine the short- and long-term oncologic impacts of pre-sarcopenia in obstructive colorectal cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 214 patients with obstructive colon cancer between January 2004 and December 2013. Initial staging computed tomography (CT) scans identified pre-sarcopenia and visceral obesity by measuring the muscle and visceral fat areas at the third lumbar vertebra level. Both short-term postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed.ResultsAmong all 214 patients, 71 (33.2%) were diagnosed with pre-sarcopenia. Pre-sarcopenia had a negative oncologic impact in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–3.13, p = 0.037, and HR = 1.92, CI 1.02–3.60, p = 0.043, respectively). Visceral adiposity, body mass index (BMI), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) did not significantly impact DFS and OS.ConclusionPre-sarcopenia is a clinical factor significantly associated with OS and DFS but not with short-term complications in obstructive colorectal cancer. In future, prospective studies should incorporate body composition data in patient risk assessments and oncologic prediction tools.

Bridge to surgery using a self-expandable metallic stent for stages II\u2013III obstructive colorectal cancer

BackgroundBridge to surgery (BTS) using a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for the treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer improves the patient’s quality of life. This study aimed to examine prognostic factors of obstructive colorectal cancer.MethodsWe analyzed stage II-III resectable colon cancer cases (Cur A) retrospectively registered between January 2005 and December 2017. Overall, 117 patients with Cur A obstructive colorectal cancer were evaluated: 67 of them underwent emergency surgery (ES Group) and 50 of them after BTS with SEMS placement (BTS group). We compared surgical results and prognoses between the two groups.ResultsA total of 50 patients underwent endoscopic SEMS placement, which technical success of 96% and morbidity rate of 18%. Primary anastomosis rates were 77.6% in ES and 95.7% in BTS (p < 0.001); postoperative complication, 46.3% in ES and 10.5% in BTS (p < 0.001); pathological findings of lymphatic invasion, 66.7% in ES and 100% in BTS (p < 0.001); venous invasion were 66.8% in ES and 92% in BTS (p = 0.04); and recurrence of 25.4% in ES and 39.1% in BTS. The 3-year overall survival was significantly different between two groups (ES, 86.8%:BTS, 58.8%), BTS is worse than ES (log-rank test; p < 0.001). Venous invasion independently predicted worsened recurrence-free and overall survival.ConclusionsThe vascular invasiveness was correlated with tumor progression after SEMS placement, and the survival rate was lower in BTS. SEMS potentially worsens prognostic outcomes in stage II–III obstructive colorectal cancer.

The Value of Haematological Parameters and Tumour Markers in the Prediction of Intestinal Obstruction in 1474 Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Intestinal obstruction, a life-threatening problem, often occurs in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the cause of obstruction is still unknown. Very few prediction models for intestinal obstruction in CRC exist, and their results are unreliable. Therefore, we investigated whether preoperative serum tumour markers (STMs) combined with haematological and biochemical markers could be used as predictors. We retrospectively analysed 1474 patients with CRC who underwent radical resection after admission. Several clinical features, STMs, and serum biochemical and haematological indicators were analysed. Predictors of intestinal obstruction were analysed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The accuracy of the multivariate predictors of obstruction was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Obstruction was found more in males (62.18%), never-smokers (73.95%), the left colon (54.20%), the tumour diameter > 4.5 cm (55.88%), high differentiation (89.50%), and negative nerve invasion (70.17%). The serum tumour markers (STMs) and peripheral blood routine indexes (PBRI) were significantly associated with obstructive status (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 125, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total protein, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were predictors of intestinal obstruction (p < 0.05). The AUC for the curve with all the eight factors was 0.715 (95% confidence interval: 0.673-0.758). The STMs and PBRI were related to the obstruction status of the patients, and they could be used in combination with other clinical factors to significantly improve diagnosis and management of intestinal obstruction in CRC patients.

Obstructive colon cancers at endoscopy are associated with advanced tumor stage and poor patient outcome. A retrospective study on 398 patients.

The detection of obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) masses during endoscopic examination hindering the passage of endoscope and precluding complete examination is not uncommon. The significance and implications of this finding on patients' prognosis and outcomes were not fully investigated and will be addressed in this study. In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed endoscopy, surgery, pathology and oncology reports of patients diagnosed with CRC over a 10-year period (2007-2016). We compared surgical stages, histologic grades and overall survival between patients with subclinical obstructive tumors at endoscopy to those with nonobstructive tumors. We performed multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors associated with advanced CRC stage at diagnosis. A total of 144 patients had obstructive colonic tumors while 254 had nonobstructive tumors and constituted the control group. Obstructive CRC group was significantly associated with advanced tumor stage at diagnosis (69 vs. 42%, OR = 3.018, 95% CI, 1.951-4.670; P < 0.01) and had prominently higher rates of moderate to poorly differentiated tumors (64.5 vs. 38.4%; P < 0.001) when compared to non-obstructive controls. Patients with obstructive tumors were significantly associated with decreased five years overall survival (53.4 vs. 67.3% vs.; P < 0.01). Increased overall mortality was observed in survival curves of patients with obstructive tumors along all follow-up periods. Even in the absence of clinical sequela, obstructive CRC at endoscopic level may be associated with higher stage at diagnosis and reduced overall survival. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and address their implication on patients' management.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a prognostic factor for obstructive colorectal cancer patients received stenting as a bridge to curative surgery.

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score, originally developed as a nutritional screening tool, is a cumulative score calculated from the serum albumin level, total cholesterol level, and total lymphocyte count. Previous studies have demonstrated that the score has significant prognostic value in various malignancies. We investigated the relationship between the CONUT score and long-term survival in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) patients who underwent self-expandable metallic colonic stent placement and subsequently received curative surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 57 pathological stage II and III OCRC patients between 2013 and 2019. The associations between the preoperative CONUT score and clinicopathological factors and patient survival were evaluated. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for the CONUT score was 7. A CONUT score of ≥ 7 was significantly associated with elevated CA19-9 level (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses revealed that a CONUT score of ≥ 7 was independently associated with cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-85.9, p = 0.03) and disease-free survival (HR = 7.1, 95% CI 2.3-21.7, p = 0.0006). The results demonstrated that the CONUT score was a potent prognostic indicator. Evaluating the CONUT score might result in more precise patient assessment and tailored treatment.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves outcomes after elective colorectal operations. Whether it is beneficial for emergency colorectal surgery is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence from all studies comparing ERAS versus conventional care in patients having emergency colectomy and/or proctectomy for obstructive colorectal cancer. EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PUBMED from 1981 to December 2019 were systematically searched. Any studies comparing our primary outcome of interest (length of hospitalization) among patients having emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer who received ERAS versus conventional care were selected. Primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal recovery, postoperative complication, 30-day readmission and mortality, and time to start adjuvant therapy. Three cohort studies with 818 participants (418 received ERAS and 400 received conventional care) were included. Length of hospitalization (mean reduction 3.07 days; 95% CI, - 3.91 to - 2.23) and risk of overall complication (risk ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97) were significantly lower in ERAS than in conventional care. ERAS was also associated with quicker time to gastrointestinal recovery, a lower incidence of ileus, and a shorter interval between operation and commence of adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the rates of anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and mortality within 30 days after surgery between groups. ERAS had advantages over conventional care in patients undergoing emergency resection for obstructive colorectal cancer-including a shorter length of hospitalization, a lower incidence of overall complication, and a quicker gastrointestinal recovery.

Mo1706 OBSTRUCTIVE COLON CANCER AT ENDOSCOPY AS AN INDEPENDENT RISK PREDICTOR OF ADVANCED TUMOR STAGE AND REDUCED SURVIVAL

It is still debatable whether a colorectal cancer tumor size affects patients' prognosis and outcome. A more clinically relevant and frequently encountered scenario is the presence of subclinical obstructive mass during endoscopic exam hindering the passage of endoscope and precluding complete exam. The significance and implications of this finding were not fully investigated, and will be addressed in this study. In this retrospective cohort study we reviewed endoscopy, surgery, pathology and oncology reports of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer over a 10-year period (2007-2016). Data on patients' demographics and ethnicities were documented. Patients with a finding of obstructive tumors at endoscopy were compared to a control group of patients with non-obstructive tumors. We compared surgical stages, histologic grades and overall survival between both groups. We performed multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors associated with advanced CRC stage and grade at diagnosis. 144 patients had obstructive colonic tumors while 254 had non-obstructive tumors and constituted the control group. Obstructive colon cancer group was significantly associated with advanced tumor stage (Stage 3 or above) at diagnosis compared to the non-obstructive controls (69% Vs. 42%, P<0.01) (Table 1). Likewise, in terms of histologic grade, more patients in the obstructive group were classified as moderate to poorly differentiated compared to controls (64.5 % vs. 38.4%; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis obstructive tumor finding was associated with increased risk of advanced CRC stage at diagnosis (odds ratio=3.018, p<0.0001 and 95%CI=1.951-4.670). A prominent difference of overall survival curves was also noted as obstructive colon cancer was significantly associated with decreased one (77.8% vs. 86%; P=0.01), three (63.6% vs.77.4%; P<0.01) and five years (53.4% vs. 67.3% vs.; P<0.01) survival (Figure 1). Even in the absence of clinical sequela, obstructive colorectal cancer at endoscopic level may be associated with higher stage at diagnosis and reduced overall survival. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and address their implication on patients' management.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Endoscopic stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction as a bridge-to-surgery strategy.

Acute obstructive colorectal cancer requires prompt decompression commonly by emergency surgery (ES). However, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been increasingly used as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) strategy. In an 8-year period, consecutive patients with acute left-sided colonic obstruction, due to locally advanced colorectal cancer, underwent ES or SEMS implantation. We evaluated technical/clinical success of SEMS, adverse events, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the two therapeutic options. Forty-five patients underwent ES (n=23) or SEMS (n=22). The two groups were comparable for sex, age, ASA score and cancer site/stage. Technical and clinical successes of SEMS were 100% and 72.7%, respectively. Clinical success correlated with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98, P=.04). SEMS allowed primary anastomosis in the 45.5% of cases (0% in ES). SEMS implantation allowed a higher rate of surgery carried out by a laparoscopic approach: 36.4% vs 13.0% in ES. Performance of a definitive stoma and complications were similar. Median OS (34 in SEMS; 45 in ES, P=.33) and DFS (36 in SEMS; 35 in ES, P=.35) did not differ between the two groups. At univariate analysis, DFS was positively associated with primary anastomosis (HR=2.44, 95% CI 1.4-16.6, P=.04) and laparoscopic surgery (HR=8.33, 95% CI 1.08-50, P=.04), and inversely associated with a NLR>3.6 (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.16-0.92, P=.03). At multivariate analysis, no feature retained an independent predictive power. SEMS is an effective and safe procedure, equivalent to emergency surgery in terms of complications, OS and DFS, providing the chance of a primary anastomosis in the majority of patients.

Obstructive left side colon cancer: time for a tailored operative approach?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) obstruction is frequent but doubts remain on the best treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the different operative approach used for CRC treatment and evaluate the outcomes for the different cases. Patients were collected from January 2014 to December 2019 and divided in four groups: two "P" groups, namely the Hartmann's procedure (PH) group and the primary anastomosis (PA) group, and two "S" groups, namely the deviating stoma (SD) group and the self-expanding metallic stent (SS) group. The main endpoints were the quality of life and the oncologic safety. One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. The mean follow-up time was 39 months. The stomas were performed less frequently in SS but lasted more in that group. Only 45% underwent reversal surgery. Cumulative operating time was greater in S versus P groups. The rate of major complications was similar. PA had greater overall survival and disease-free survival rates than PH. The various options of treatment should have different indications: primary anastomosis in stable patients, Hartmann in critical cases, SEMS for palliative intent and stoma when neo-adjuvant therapy is needed.

The prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index and inflammation-based markers in obstructive colorectal cancer.

Inflammation-based markers predict long-term outcomes of various malignancies. We investigated the relationship between these markers and the long-term survival in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) patients with self-expandable metallic colonic stents (SEMSs) who subsequently received curative surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 72 consecutive pathological stage II and III OCRC patients between 2013 and 2019. The prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was evaluated. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly shorter in the PNI < 35 group than in the PNI ≥ 35 group (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively), and multivariate analyses revealed the PNI to be the only inflammation-based marker independently associated with the survival. A PNI < 35 was significantly associated with an elevated CA 19-9 level (p = 0.04) and longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.03). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also significantly associated with the OS (p = 0.040) and DFS (p = 0.011) in multivariate analyses. The results showed that the PNI was a potent prognostic indicator. For OCRC patients, both systemic inflammation and the nutrition status seem to be important for predicting the prognosis, and administering adjuvant chemotherapy was very important.

Treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients in tumor hospitals under the background of corona virus disease 2019

In December 2019, a new outbreak of corona virus disease 2019 began to occur. Its pathogen is 2019-nCoV, which has the characteristics of strong infectivity and general susceptibility. The current situation of prevention and control of new coronavirus pneumonia is severe. In this context, as front-line medical workers bearing important responsibilities and pressure, while through strict management strategy, we can minimize the risk of infection exposure. By summarizing the research progress and guidelines in recent years in the fields of colorectal cancer disease screening, treatment strategies (including early colorectal cancer, locally advanced colorectal cancer, obstructive colorectal cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer and the treatment of patients after neoadjuvant therapy), the choice of medication and time limit for adjuvant therapy, the protective measures for patients undergoing emergency surgery, the re-examination of postoperative patients and the protection of medical staff, etc., authors improve treatment strategies in order to provide more choices for patients to obtain the best treatment under the severe epidemic situation of new coronavirus pneumonia. Meanwhile we hope that it can also provide more timely treatment modeling schemes for colleagues.

Thinking of treatment strategies for colorectal cancer patients in tumor hospitals under the background of coronavirus pneumonia

In December 2019, a new outbreak of coronavirus pneumonia began to occur. Its pathogen is 2019-nCoV, which has the characteristics of strong infectivity and general susceptibility. The current situation of prevention and control of new coronavirus pneumonia is severe. In this context, as front-line medical workers bearing important responsibilities and pressure, while through strict management strategy, we can minimize the risk of infection exposure. By summarizing the research progress and guidelines in recent years in the fields of colorectal cancer disease screening, treatment strategies(including early colorectal cancer, locally advanced colorectal cancer, obstructive colorectal cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer and the treatment of patients after neoadjuvant therapy), the choice of medication and time limit for adjuvant therapy, the protective measures for patients undergoing emergency surgery, the re-examination of postoperative patients and the protection of medical staff, etc., authors improve treatment strategies in order to provide more choices for patients to obtain the best treatment under the severe epidemic situation of new coronavirus pneumonia. Meanwhile we hope that it can also provide more timely treatment modeling schemes for colleagues.

Determining the difference in the efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stents as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colon cancer among patients in the CROSS 0 group and those in the CROSS 1 or 2 group: a pooled analysis of data from two Japanese prospective multicenter trials

PurposeThis study compared the feasibility and safety of endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) between patients with obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) classified as ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System (CROSS) 0 and those with CROSS 1 or 2.MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of two prospective, observational, single-arm multicenter clinical trials and performed a pooled analysis of the data. In total, 336 consecutive patients with malignant colorectal obstruction underwent SEMS placement. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as resolution of symptoms and radiological findings within 24 h. Secondary endpoints were technical success and adverse events.ResultsHigh clinical (98.0% vs. 98.4%) and technical (96.7% vs. 97.8%) success rates were observed in both groups (CROSS 0 vs. CROSS 1 or 2). The adverse event rate was low. The mean stricture length was lower (3.8 ± 1.2 cm vs. 4.4 ± 1.8 cm) and laparoscopic surgery more common (56.7% vs 52.2%) in the CROSS 0 group than in the CROSS 1 and 2 group.ConclusionThis study was the first to compare the degree of stricture in different CROSS groups and demonstrated comparable results with respect to the short-term efficacy and safety of SEMS placement as a BTS for obstructive CRC in CROSS 0, 1, and 2 patients.

閉塞性大腸癌の治療：oncology emergencyへの対応を含めて

閉塞性大腸癌の治療：oncology emergencyへの対応を含めて

Self-expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Oncological Outcomes.

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) raises concerns regarding the short-term as well as oncological outcome. The present study aimed to investigate the safety of SEMS placement and risk factors of worse short-term and oncological outcomes as BTS. Twenty-four patients with obstructive CRC who underwent SEMS placement as BTS were included. Success rate of SEMS placement and 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates in stage II/III BTS patients were assessed. Technical and clinical success rates for SEMS placement were 100% and 87.5%, respectively. In Multivariate analyses, longer tumour length, longer interval to surgery, and angular positioning were risk factors related with the complication of stent placement. Two-year RFS rates were significantly higher in the no-complication than in the complication group (100% vs. 75%, log-rank test, p<0.01). A long tumour length, long interval between SEMS insertion and surgery, and angular positioning of the SEMS were identified as risk factors for SEMS-related complications. Moreover, SEMS insertion and/or surgery complications were associated with worse oncological outcome in CRC patients.

Current Status of “Bridge to Surgery” Using a Self-expandable Metallic Stent for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Current Status of “Bridge to Surgery” Using a Self-expandable Metallic Stent for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Colonic stent vs surgical resection of the primary tumor. Effect on survival from stage-IV obstructive colorectal cancer.

the impact of surgical primary tumor resection on survival of obstructive metastatic colorectal cancer remains controversial. The primary goal of this study was to analyze survival in patients with obstructive metastatic colorectal cancer after treatment with either resection surgery or a colonic stent. a prospective study was performed of all patients with stage-IV colorectal cancer and obstructive manifestations, diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 and managed with either resection surgery or a colonic stent. Cases with a perforation, abscess, right colon or distal rectal malignancy, multiple colorectal cancer or derivative surgery were excluded. a total of 95 patients were included, 49 were managed with resection surgery and 46 with a colonic stent. The colonic stent group had a higher Charlson index (9.5 ± 2.1 vs 8.6 ± 1.5, p = 0.01), a shorter time to oral intake (0.9 ± 1.1 vs 16.4 ± 53.5 days, p = 0.05), a shorter hospital stay (4 ± 4.8 vs 16.7 ± 15.5 days, p = 0.0001), less need for stomata (11.1 % vs 32.7 %, p = 0.01), fewer early complications (4.3 % vs 46.9 %, p = 0.0001) and more late complications (33.3 % vs 6.4 %, p = 0.001). Undergoing chemotherapy (p = 0.008) was the only independent factor related to increased survival. In the subgroup of patients managed with chemotherapy, surgical primary tumor resection was an independent factor associated with increased survival. both treatments are effective for resolving obstructive manifestations in patients diagnosed with stage-IV obstructive colorectal cancer. Resection surgery has no positive impact on survival and thus cannot be recommended as a therapy of choice.

Current Status of Decompression Therapy with Preoperative Decompression Tube (Ileus Tube) for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Current Status of Decompression Therapy with Preoperative Decompression Tube (Ileus Tube) for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Clinical application of stent insertion before surgical operation for malignant colorectal obstruction

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of colon stenting as bridge surgery for colorectal cancer obstruction. Methods: A total of 30 patients (stent group), who underwent colonic stenting for colorectal obstruction at the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from September 2015 to June 2017, were selected to receive the preoperative bridge surgery. Technical success rates, clinical success rates, and stent-related complications were observed. A total of 38 patients (emergency surgery group), who underwent surgical operation for colorectal obstruction, served as a control. The tumor resection rate at Stage I, ostomy rate, hospitalization time, and hospitalization cost were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The technical success and clinical success rates were 100.0% and 90.0% in the stent group, respectively. The stent-related complications included bleeding in 2 cases (6.7%), micro-perforation in 1 case (3.3%), stent displacement in 1 case (3.3%), and stent occlusion in 3 cases (10.0%) in the stent group. The Stage I tumor resection rate in the stent group was significantly higher than that in the emergency surgery group (90.0% vs 68.4%, P<0.01). The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the stent group was lower than that in the emergency surgery group (3.3% vs 10.5%, P<0.05); the stoma rate in the stent group was lower than that in the emergency surgery group (13.3% vs 44.7%, P<0.01). The surgical complications occurred in the stent group were significantly lower than those in the emergency surgery group (20.0% vs 47.3%, P<0.01). The average hospital stay in the stent group was lower than that in the emergency surgery group (20.0 vs 24.5 days, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization costs between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative colonic stenting for colorectal obstruction surgery as a bridge is feasible in terms of methods, and which can significantly increase the Stage I tumor resection rate, reduce the ostomy rate, decrease surgical complications, shorten the average length of hospital stay, and reduce patient suffering.

Emergency surgery for obstructed colorectal cancer in Vietnam

The benefit of one-stage surgery in emergency surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer (oCRC) by colorectal surgeons has increased during the last century but little is known about the outcomes of this technique conducted by general surgeons in developing countries. This retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of emergency surgery for oCRC in a general surgery unit. A retrospective review of data from 1175 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between January 2013 and January 2018 was performed. Among these, a total of 186 patients with oCRC who underwent surgery within 24h of hospital admission were analyzed. For patients with resectable right-sided oCRC, one-stage surgery was performed. For left-sided oCRC, primary anastomosis was mainly attempted; otherwise, a stoma was formed. The rates of primary resection, PRa, stoma, mortality, and morbidity were evaluated. Among 186 patients, oCRC involving the right colon, left colon, and rectum were found in 33.3%, 59.1% and 7.5% respectively. Primary resection and anastomosis were performed in 100%, 44.7%, and 0% of patients with oCRC in the right colon, left colon, and rectum respectively. The complication incidence based on Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher was 16.1% and the mortality rate was 7.5%. The median length of hospital stay was 8.5 days, ranging from 2 to 70 days. General surgeons with colorectal surgery experience can still manage oCRC effectively. Primary resection and anastomosis for left-sided oCRC is safe in selective patients. The emergency surgery for oCRC could be benefit with the participation of colorectal surgeons.