Obstetric Quality Research Articles

A Study of Etiological Spectrum of Maternal Near-miss Cases and Quality Care Indicators in Western Region of India

Background: Maternal death review has remained the fundamental quality care indicator for any maternal health-care governance program. Maternal near-miss (MNM) cases which are the forerunner of mortality cases could serve as a proxy indicator to evaluate the obstetric quality care. Objectives: To calculate MNM to mortality ratio of the institute and to study the etiological spectrum of MNM cases. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective observational study was carried out. Cases were taken as defined based on the WHO MNM criteria. Data collection was done through information retrieval from case records and by in-depth interviews with the help of semi-structured questionnaire of MNM cases from 2 days after their admission up till discharge. Each case was documented with respect to the demographic details, adverse events and aetiology. Results: The MNM to mortality ratio was 1.16:1, MNM incidence ratio in our study was 4.12 and the mortality index was 46.23. Seventy-six per cent of cases were referred cases. The main causes for near-miss were post-partum haemorrhage (30%) followed by pre-eclampsia (26%). Hypertension was the most significant comorbidity in 28% of cases, while 26% had cardiac disease and 26% had severe anaemia. Conclusions: Studying near-miss mortality cases provides a valuable insight of the quality of care of the institute. MNM case review should be a part of regular governance process of the maternity care unit to plan and implement focused care.

Validation of Chinese version of a global anesthetic recovery questionnaire: A multicenter observational trial on ObsQoR-11

The obstetric quality of recovery (ObsQoR-11) is considered one of the best patient-reported outcome measures of post-cesarean recovery. However, it has been neither validated in Chinese nor evaluated at >24h after delivery. Parturients from three hospitals (n=279) completed the Chinese ObsQoR-11 at 24h (T1) and 96h (T2) after elective cesarean delivery. Convergent validity was assessed by correlation of Chinese ObsQoR-11 with a 100-mm numerical rating scale (NRS) of general health status; discriminant validity of good recovery (NRS ≥ 70-mm); and construct validity by correlation with influential factors to post-cesarean recovery. The reliability and responsiveness were also assessed. The Chinese ObsQoR-11 correlated moderately with the NRS [T1: r=0.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.48), p<0.0001; T2: r=0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.52), p<0.0001] and discriminated between good and poor recovery [T1: mean (SD) score: 64 (20) vs 49 (17), p<0.0001; T2: median (IQR) score: 81 (66-94) vs. 61 (53-72); p=0.0002]; weakly correlated with gestational age, successful breastfeeding, and operation time. It was reliable (internal consistency: 0.75 (T1) and 0.82 (T2); split-half: 0.77 (T1) and 0.85 (T2); test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient r>0.6 for each item) and responsive (Cohen effect size: 0.88; standardized response mean: 0.81). The Chinese ObsQoR-11may be used for assessing recovery at 24h and 96h after cesarean delivery. However, its' cutoff value for good recovery may be lower than that of other versions.

Measuring enhanced recovery in obstetrics: a narrative review

Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery is a protocolized approach to perioperative care, with the aim to optimize maternal recovery after surgery. It is associated with improved maternal and neonatal outcomes, including decreased length of hospital stay, opioid consumption, pain scores, complications, increased maternal satisfaction, and increased breastfeeding success. However, the pace and enthusiasm of adoption of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery internationally has not yet been matched with high-quality evidence demonstrating its benefit, and current studies provide low- to very low-quality evidence in support of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. This article provides a summary of current measures of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, and optimal measures of inpatient and outpatient postpartum recovery. We summarize outcomes from 22 published enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies and 2 meta-analyses. A variety of disparate metrics have been used to measure enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery success, including process measures (length of hospital stay, bundle compliance, preoperative fasting time, time to first mobilization, time to urinary catheter removal), maternal outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures, complications, opioid consumption, satisfaction), neonatal outcomes (breastfeeding success, Apgar scores, maternal-neonatal bonding), cost savings, and complication rates (maternal readmission rate, urinary recatheterization rate, neonatal readmission rate). A core outcome set for use in enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies has been developed through Delphi consensus, involving stakeholders including obstetricians, anesthesiologists, patients, and a midwife. Fifteen measures covering key aspects of enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery adoption are recommended for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery implementation studies. The use of these outcome measures could improve the quality of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Using evidence-based evaluation guidelines developed by the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) group, the Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR) was identified as the best patient-reported outcome measure for inpatient postpartum recovery. Advances in our understanding of postpartum recovery as a multidimensional and dynamic construct have opened new avenues for the identification of optimum patient-reported outcome measures in this context. The use of standardized measures such as these will facilitate pooling of data in future studies and improve overall levels of evidence surrounding enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery. Larger studies with optimal study designs, using recommended outcomes including patient-reported outcome measures, will reduce variation and improve data quality to help guide future recommendations.

Factors Driving the Difference in Quality of Recovery Scores Between Scheduled and Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery Patients

(Br J Anaesth. 2022;128:e219–e221. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.026) Patients undergoing unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs) are shown to have worse Obstetric Quality of Recovery Scores (ObsQoR-11) than those undergoing scheduled CDs. This quality improvement study investigated the causes behind this difference in scores.

Proposed Domains for Assessing Postpartum Recovery: A Concept Elicitation Study

(BJOG. 2022;129:9–20) Although ~3.8 million people have children per year, few people have researched postpartum recovery. This may be because tools developed to measure postpartum recovery, such as the Obstetric Quality of Recovery instrument, have not been used, validated, or developed sufficiently. The authors of this study previously created a list of domains they considered valuable to postpartum recovery, but had not determined which are important to stakeholders, postpartum individuals, obstetricians, maternal and fetal medicine specialists, nurses, and obstetric anesthetists. This study aimed to identify and propose a list of domains, rank these domains based on perspectives and feedback from stakeholders, identify factors that positively and negatively impact postpartum recovery, and establish the greatest difficulties individuals face after childbirth through concept elicitation interviews and focus group meetings.

Development and Validation of a Turkish Version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10.

The 10-item Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scale is a validated patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of recovery following delivery. This study aims to develop a Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10 to evaluate its validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility. Term parturients who underwent vaginal delivery or elective caesarean delivery were asked to complete a Turkish version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery 10 scoring tool and EuroQol 5-dimension 3L scores (including a global health visual analogue scale) 24 hours after delivery. To validate the Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish, we assessed validity, reliability, and clinical feasibility and compared it with the EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. One hundred parturients completed the questionnaire in 24 hours (100% response rate). Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish correlated highly with EQ-5D-3L score (r=-0.611) and global health visual analogue scale score (r = 0.652) at 24 hours and discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (global health visual analogue scale score ≥70 vs <70; median interquartile range were 86 [80-90] and 68 [59-75] (P < .001), respectively). Scores were similar for caesarean and vaginal deliveries, 83 (76-89) and 82.5 (69-90), respectively (P = .5). Twenty-four-hour Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish scores did not correlate with any baseline demographic and clinical data parameters. Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.87 and inter-item correlation=0.41), and split-half reliability was very good (Spearman-Brown prophesy reliability estimate=0.86). Test-retest reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient=0.99). No floor or ceiling effects were demonstrated. The Obstetric Quality of Recovery 10-Turkish is a valid, reliable, and clinically feasible measure of inpatient postpartum recovery following caesarean and vaginal delivery modes.

Validation of translated Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-10A) score after nonelective cesarean delivery (CD) in an Arabic-speaking population.

The ObsQoR-11 is a validated scale that assesses recovery after cesarean delivery (CD). This observational study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of its Arabic version. The original ObsQoR-11 was translated into an Arabic version (ObsQoR-10A). All participants completed the ObsQoR-10A at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively after CD. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility were assessed. The ObsQoR-10A correlated with Global Health Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 24 h (R = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56-0.80, P < 0.001) and at 48 h (R = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54-0.78, P < 0.001) and differentiated between good and poor recovery (median scores at 24 h 88 vs. 71, P < 0.001; at 48 h 95.5 vs. 70, P < 0.001). ObsQoR-10A correlated with hospital length of stay at 24 h (R = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.02, P = 0.03) and at 48 h (R = -0.21, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.03, P = 0.02); gestational age at 24 h (R = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.03-0.40, P = 0.02); change in hemoglobin at 24 h (R = -0.30, 95% CI: 0.51 to -0.10, P < 0.01); and total opioids at 48 h (R = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.27, P < 0.001). There was a significant difference between 24 h and 48 h postoperative ObsQoR-10A scores (median difference: -18; P < 0.001 which shows responsiveness). Other key measures included a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87, split-half 0.75, and intra-class correlation >0.62 with no floor or ceiling effects. Median (IQR) completion time was 3 (3-5) and 3 (2.5-3.5) minutes at 24 h and 48 h. ObsQoR-10A is a valid, reliable, responsive, and a clinically feasible tool in an Arabic-speaking obstetric population.

Limited Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic-related Lockdowns and Reduced Population Mobility on Preterm Birth Rates: A Secondary Analysis of Bavarian Obstetric Quality Parameters from 2010 to 2020.

Introduction International studies on preterm birth rates during COVID-19 lockdowns report different results. This study examines preterm birth rates during lockdown periods and the impact of the mobility changes of the population in Bavaria, Germany. Material and Methods This is a secondary analysis of centrally collected data on preterm births in Bavaria from 2010 to 2020. Preterm births (< 37 weeks) in singleton and twin pregnancies during two lockdowns were compared with corresponding periods in 2010 – 2019. Fisherʼs exact test was used to compare raw prevalence between groups. Potential effects of two fixed lockdown periods and of variable changes in population mobility on preterm birth rates in 2020 were examined using additive logistic regression models, adjusting for long-term and seasonal trends. Results Unadjusted preterm birth rates in 2020 were significantly lower for singleton pregnancies during the two lockdown periods (Lockdown 1: 5.71% vs. 6.41%; OR 0.88; p < 0.001; Lockdown 2: 5.71% vs. 6.60%; OR = 0.86; p < 0.001). However, these effects could not be confirmed after adjusting for long-term trends (Lockdown 1: adj. OR = 0.99; p = 0.73; Lockdown 2: adj. OR = 0.96; p = 0.24). For twin pregnancies, differences during lockdown were less marked (Lockdown 1: 52.99% vs. 56.26%; OR = 0.88; p = 0.15; Lockdown 2: 58.06% vs. 58.91%; OR = 0.97; p = 0.70). Reduced population mobility had no significant impact on preterm birth rates in singleton pregnancies (p = 0.14) but did have an impact on twin pregnancies (p = 0.02). Conclusions Reduced preterm birth rates during both lockdown periods in 2020 were observed for singleton and twin pregnancies. However, these effects are reduced when adjusting for long-term and seasonal trends. Reduced population mobility was associated with lower preterm birth rates in twin pregnancies.

The Pathophysiology of Labor Dystocia: Theme with Variations.

Abnormally prolonged labor, or labor dystocia, is a common complication of parturition. It is the indication for about half of unplanned cesarean deliveries in low-risk nulliparous women. Reducing the rate of unplanned cesarean birth in the USA has been a public health priority over the last two decades with limited success. Labor dystocia is a complex disorder due to multiple causes with a common clinical outcome of slow cervical dilation and fetal descent. A better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of labor dystocia could lead to new clinical opportunities to increase the rate of normal vaginal delivery, reduce cesarean birth rates, and improve maternal and neonatal health. We conducted a literature review of the causes and pathophysiologic mechanisms of labor dystocia. We summarize known mechanisms supported by clinical and experimental data and newer hypotheses with less supporting evidence. We review recent data on uterine preparation for labor, uterine contractility, cervical preparation for labor, maternal obesity, cephalopelvic disproportion, fetal malposition, intrauterine infection, and maternal stress. We also describe current clinical approaches to preventing and managing labor dystocia. The variation in pathophysiologic causes of labor dystocia probably limits the utility of current general treatment options. However, treatments targeting specific underlying etiologies could be more effective. We found that the pathophysiologic basis of labor dystocia is under-researched, offering wide opportunities for translational investigation of individualized labor management, particularly regarding uterine metabolism and fetal position. More precise diagnostic tools and individualized therapies for labor dystocia might lead to better outcomes. We conclude that additional knowledge of parturition physiology coupled with rigorous clinical evaluation of novel biologically directed treatments could improve obstetric quality of care.

Exploration of the Effect of Health Education on Improving Nursing Quality in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

Exploration of the Effect of Health Education on Improving Nursing Quality in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

Analysis of Application of Pain Nursing in Nursing Quality of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

Analysis of Application of Pain Nursing in Nursing Quality of Obstetrics and Gynecology Department

Expert Consensus Regarding Core Outcomes for Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Delivery Studies: A Delphi Study

Heterogeneity among reported outcomes from enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery impact studies is high. This study aimed to develop a standardized enhanced recovery core outcome set for use in future enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery studies. An international consensus study involving physicians, patients, and a director of midwifery and nursing services was conducted using a three-round modified Delphi approach (two rounds of electronic questionnaires and a third-round e-discussion) to produce the core outcome set. An initial list of outcomes was based on a previously published systematic review. Consensus was obtained for the final core outcome set, including definitions for key terms and preferred units of measurement. Strong consensus was defined as 70% or greater agreement and weak consensus as 50 to 69% agreement. Of the 64 stakeholders who were approached, 32 agreed to participate. All 32, 31, and 26 stakeholders completed Rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The number of outcomes in the final core outcome set was reduced from 98 to 15. Strong consensus (70% or greater stakeholder agreement) was achieved for 15 outcomes. The core outcome set included length of hospital stay; compliance with enhanced recovery protocol; maternal morbidity (hospital re-admissions or unplanned consultations); provision of optimal analgesia (maternal satisfaction, compliance with analgesia, opioid consumption or requirement and incidence of nausea or vomiting); fasting times; breastfeeding success; and times to mobilization and urinary catheter removal. The Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item composite measure was also included in the final core outcome set. Areas identified as requiring further research included readiness for discharge and analysis of cost savings. Results from an international consensus to develop a core outcome set for enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery are presented. These are outcomes that could be considered when designing future enhanced recovery studies.

Availability, Utilization, and Quality of Basic Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care Services in Farta District, Rural Health Centers, Ethiopia.

Emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) is a cost-effective priority intervention to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in poorresource settings. In most sub-Saharan African countries, all signal functions perform below the appropriate United Nations standard. This study aims to assess the availability, utilization, and quality of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care services in Farta District, Ethiopia primary health care centers. A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in primary health care centers in Farta District, South Gondar zone, Ethiopia. Out of ten rural health centers, 50% administered parenteral antibiotics, 50% administered parenteral anticonvulsants, 30% performed assisted vaginal delivery, 40% performed manual placenta removal, and 70% administered oxytocin for treatment of postpartum hemorrhage and 60% performed neonatal resuscitation with bag and mask. All of the health centers in the study area were not fully implementing the BEmONC signal functions.

Development and validation of a Portuguese version of Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese)

BackgroundWe aimed to develop and validate a Portuguese version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10-Portuguese) patient-reported outcome measure and evaluate its psychometric properties. MethodsAfter ethical approval, we recruited term pregnant women undergoing uncomplicated elective cesarean delivery in a single Brazilian institution. Women were invited to complete the translated ObsQoR-10-Portuguese and EuroQoL (EQ-5D) questionnaires (including a global health visual analog scale [GHVAS]) at 24 h (±6 h) following delivery, and a subset of women an hour later. We assessed validity and reliability of ObsQoR-10-Portuguese. ResultsOne hundred thirteen enrolled women completed the surveys at 24 h and 29 women at 25 h (100% response rate). Validity: (i) convergent validity: ObsQoR-10-Portuguese correlated moderately with EuroQoL score (r = −0.587) and GHVAS score (r = 0.568) at 24 h. (ii) Discriminant validity: ObsQoR-10 discriminated well between good versus poor recovery (GHVAS score ≥ 70 versus < 70; difference in mean scores 14.2; p < 0.001). (iii) Hypothesis testing: 24-h ObsQoR-10-Portuguese scores correlated with gestational age (r = 0.191; p = 0.043). (iv) Cross-cultural validity: differential item functioning analysis suggested bias in 2 items. Reliability: (i) internal consistency was good (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82 and inter-item correlation = 0.31). (ii) Split-half reliability was very good (Spearman–Brown Prophesy Reliability Estimate = 0.80). (iii) Test re-test reliability was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.87). (iv) Floor and ceiling effects: < 5% women scored either 0 or 100 (lowest and highest scores, respectively). ConclusionObsQoR-10-Portuguese is valid and reliable, and should be considered for use in Portuguese-speaking women to assess their quality of inpatient recovery following cesarean delivery.

Active Management of Labor Process under Smart Medical Model Improves Vaginal Delivery Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Preeclampsia.

Background In a global environment of increasing cesarean delivery rate, promoting vaginal delivery, reducing the rate of first cesarean section, and the incidence of vaginal delivery complications are the objectives of obstetric medical quality and safety in China. As a common obstetric complication, preeclampsia affects the safety of many pregnant women. It is the obstetrician's great responsibility to promote vaginal delivery and improve delivery outcomes in preeclampsia. To this end, we explored the roles of active labor management under the smart medical model in improving the outcomes of vaginal delivery for pregnant women with preeclampsia. Methods The clinical data of 219 cases of preeclampsia pregnant women who delivered vaginally in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different labor process management, they were divided into study group (active labor process management group) and control group (normal labor process management group). Active labor process management methods included intrapartum ultrasound, central fetal heart rate monitoring, Doula delivery, labor analgesia, and quality of life care. The differences in delivery process, delivery outcome, bleeding causes, and hemostatic measures were compared between the two groups. Results (1) The incidence of preeclampsia in our hospital showed an increasing trend in recent four years; (2) in smart hospitals, the active management of labor process reduced the probability of transferring to the cesarean section in preeclampsia pregnant women with vaginal trial failure; and (3) active labor process management reduced the rate of lateral episiotomy, decreased the postpartum hemorrhage volume within two hours, and improved the vaginal delivery outcome of preeclampsia pregnant women. Conclusions In the era of the rapid development of the Internet, vigorously promoting the construction of smart hospitals and actively managing the delivery process can reduce the failure rate of vaginal trial delivery and improve the outcomes of vaginal delivery in preeclampsia women.

Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

The Obstetric Quality of Recovery (ObsQoR-11) score is a new scoring tool that assesses maternal recovery after cesarean section (CS). We aimed to validate the translated Korean version of ObsQoR-11 (ObsQoR-11K) after elective CS. We validated ObsQoR-11K between March 2021 to August 2021. Validity (convergent, discriminant, and construct), reliability (Cronbach’s α, inter-item, split-half, and test-retest correlation), responsiveness, and clinical feasibility (recruitment rate and time for ObsQoR-11K completion) of ObsQoR-11K were evaluated. One hundred and twenty women completed the ObsQoR-11K 24 h after CS, and 24 women repeated it 25 h after CS. We found good convergent validity between the ObsQoR-11K score and the global health numerical rating scale (NRS) (ρ = 0.73 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.81); p < 0.001). The ObsQoR-11K score discriminated well between good (NRS ≥ 70 mm, n = 68, 69.6 ± 13.7) and poor recovery (NRS < 70 mm, n = 52, 50.6 ± 12.6, p < 0.001). The ObsQoR-11K score showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.78), split-half reliability (0.89), intra-class correlation > 0.4, and no floor or ceiling effect. Of the participants, 100% completed the ObsQoR-11K and median (IQR) time for ObsQoR-11K completion was 81 s (66–97.5 s). ObsQoR-11K is a valid and reliable scoring tool for assessing maternal recovery after elective CS in Korean women.

Obstetric Safety and Quality at Istishari Arab Hospital: Where Are We Now and How Can We Improve

Background: Indicators for tracking progress in maternal and newborn health have been recommended by a number of global monitoring initiatives. Quality of care is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of maternal and newborn health, particularly in the labor and delivery and immediate postnatal period. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to estimate the frequency of obstetric complications. Furthermore, in 2018, Istishari Arab Hospital assessed the safety and quality of obstetrical procedures. Identifying risk factors that contributed to adverse events in the obstetric department. Methods: A retrospective study is dependent on the use of electronic medical records from inpatient hospitals. Research was conducted in the field of inquiry in an electronic database, as well as related studies. Maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10-CM) within the health information system. Aside from the paper files. SPSS was used for descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analysis. Results This study included 418 women, with 62.2 percent of them having their babies delivered by CS. The average age of the women in this study was 27.84.8 years, with 58.1 percent of them coming from Ramallah. Following a multivariate analysis using logistic regression, our study discovered a positive correlation with P-value 0.05 between educational level and prior CS on one side and surgical site infection on the other. Furthermore, our study found a link between the rate of CS on one side and maternal age, diabetes, hypertension, and gynecological factors on the other (prematurity, multiple gestation). Conclusion: Regardless of the number, patients with a lower education level or a history of CS have a higher risk of surgical site infection and other complications. By focusing on these factors and increasing awareness and education, we may be able to reduce obstetric complications in the future.

Varying Dosages of Subcutaneous Unfractionated Heparin and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Hospitalized Antepartum Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States. Subcutanous unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been used for decades for VTE prophylaxis and under many obstetric quality of care initiatives, hospitalized antepartum patients now receive doses as high as 10,000 units every 12 hours. This practice increases the likelihood of UFH administration around the time that epidural labor analgesia is requested or neuraxial analgesia for cesarean delivery is needed. To clarify the effect of UFH on coagulation, we reviewed the care of hospitalized antepartum patients receiving VTE prophylaxis with UFH to determine the incidence of concurrent abnormal activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values and associated risk factors. This retrospective cohort study used data from the University of Chicago Pharmacy database to identify hospitalized antepartum patients receiving subcutaneous UFH from June 1, 2016 to July 1, 2019. Our institutional protocol states that all patients hospitalized for antepartum conditions should receive pharmacologic prophylaxis empirically unless contraindicated. For patients receiving UFH, dosing was based on gestational age: 5000 units every 12 hours for first trimester antepartum patients, 7500 units every 12 hours for second trimester patients, and 10,000 units every 12 hours for patients in the third trimester. As per protocol, aPTT values were obtained 2 hours after the third dose of heparin, and platelet counts after 4 days. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, heparin doses, aPTT values, platelet counts, creatinine if available, and anesthetic type and complications. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association between elevated aPTT >40 seconds and study variables. Of the 321 antepartum patients who received subcutaneous UFH, 33 (10.3%) had an aPTT >40 seconds, 4 of those 33 patients (12.1%) received 5000 units every 12 hours, 14 (42.2%) received 7500 units every 12 hours, and 15 (45.5%) received 10,000 units every 12 hours. The likelihood of a patient having aPTT >40 seconds was 2.8% with 5000 units every 12 hours, 18.9% with 7500 units every 12 hours, and 14.6% with 10,000 units every 12 hours. Elevated aPTT values are likely with total daily doses of 15,000 or 20,000 units subcutaneous UFH in hospitalized antepartum patients.

Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Kepuasan Pasien Ruang Rawat Inap Kebidanan

Introduction: Service quality refers to the level of perfection of health services in meeting the needs of each customer. So, the quality of health is to meet the needs and satisfying services, which if the service is satisfactory it will lead to a sense of satisfaction with the health that is held. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of service quality on patient satisfaction in obstetrics at RSDH Cianjur. Methods: This research is a quantitative type with an analytic nature with a cross-sectional study. The population in this study were obstetric inpatients at RSDH Cianjur. The sample in this study was 98 respondents. Researchers used the Chi-Square test. Results: Based on the research, it is known that most of the patients stated that they were satisfied as many as 60 people (61.2%) and most of the patients stated that the service quality was good as many as 51 people (52%). Statistical test results There is a relationship between service quality and patient satisfaction in obstetrics at RSDH Cianjur r with P-value = 0.009 and OR = 3.322. In conclusion, there is an effect of service quality on the satisfaction of obstetric inpatients at RSDH Cianjur. Discussion: There is an effect of service quality on the satisfaction of obstetric inpatients at RSDH Cianjur.

Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study

BackgroundThe obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) was developed and validated in the United Kingdom for use after elective and emergency caesarean delivery. Quality of recovery scoring tools validated in one country may not be valid in other countries with significant cultural, socio-economic and linguistic variations. The aim of the current study was to validate a Hindi version of the ObsQoR-11. MethodsIn this prospective observational study, 100 parturients who underwent elective caesarean delivery in a tertiary care obstetric referral university hospital in North India were asked to complete a Hindi version of the ObsQoR-11 scoring tool 24 h after surgery. The performance of the Hindi version of ObsQoR-11 was assessed using measures of validity, reliability, and feasibility. ResultsThe Hindi version of ObsQoR-11 correlated moderately with the global health visual analogue scale (r=0.45, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.59; P <0.0001) and discriminated well between good and poor recovery (mean (SD) score 84.6 (9.4) vs 75.0 (11.2); P <0.0001). The reliability and internal consistency were moderate (Cronbach’s alpha=0.66; Spearman-Brown Prophesy Reliability estimate=0.57) with good repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.85, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93; P <0.0001) and no floor or ceiling effects. All parturients completed the questionnaire in a (median (IQR) time of completion of 3 (1.5 – 5.5) min). ConclusionThe Hindi version of the ObsQoR-11 questionnaire is a promising scoring tool to evaluate quality of recovery after elective caesarean delivery. Further research is needed to evaluate the Hindi tool in other institutions in India as well as in other languages.