BackgroundRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The neurobiological mechanisms of rTMS in OCD have been incompletely characterized. We compared clinical outcomes and changes in task-based brain activation following 3 different rTMS protocols, all combined with exposure and response prevention. MethodsIn this 3-arm proof-of-concept randomized trial, 61 treatment-refractory adult patients with OCD received 16 sessions of rTMS immediately before exposure and response prevention over 8 weeks, with task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging scans and clinical assessments before and after treatment. Patients received high-frequency rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]), high-frequency rTMS to the left pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) (n = 23 [13 women/10 men]), or control rTMS to the vertex (n = 19 [13 women/6 men]). Changes in task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging activation before/after treatment were compared using both a Bayesian region of interest and a general linear model whole-brain approach. ResultsMean OCD symptom severity decreased significantly in all treatment groups (Δ = −10.836, p < .001, 95% CI −12.504 to −9.168), with no differences between groups. Response rate in the entire sample was 57.4%. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS group showed decreased planning-related activation after treatment that was associated with greater symptom improvement. No group-level activation changes were observed for the preSMA and vertex rTMS groups. Participants in the preSMA group with greater symptom improvement showed decreased error-related activation, and symptom improvement in the vertex group was associated with increased inhibition-related activation. ConclusionsrTMS to preSMA and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with exposure and response prevention led to activation decreases in targeted task networks in individuals showing greater symptom improvement, although we observed no differences in symptom reduction between groups.
Read full abstract