280 JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY 3 1"2 APRIL 1993 recent, competing interpretations and its accessibility to contemporary philosophers (e.g., through lucid comparisons with Frege). Loux also explores various problems with the account, though I am less sanguine than he is that these are problems with Aristotle's theory rather than with his construal of it. The interpretation demands much finessing of recalcitrant texts. For example, on his view matter is a "this" and form a "such." So passages that call form a "this" (t0de) or "this something" (rode t0 require deft maneuvering, as do passages withholding "thisness" from matter. Louxjoins a number of scholars in denying that form is predicated of the composite. This view is adopted by those who believe that form is both a universal and primary ous/a, and it seems tailored to circumvent the argument in Z. 13 that no universal is ous/a. Z. 13 is taken to show that no universal is the ous/a of a subject of which it is predicated; form is a universal, but since it is predicated only of matter, it still succeeds as 0us/a of the composite. Some philosophers and scholars will find unappealing the denial that form is predicable of the composite: it seems as odd as denying that whiteness is predicable of a white man. Moreover, if the thesis is fundamental to Aristotle's theory, we expect him somewhere to say so. Instead there are texts (e.g., Z.8.1o33a3o-3 l) that simply predicate the form of the composite, as though such predications were never in question. In contrast to Loux, many interpreters identify an object's form, 0us/a, and essence. The essence is evidently predicated of the composite (e.g., lo~9b13-14), but since Loux distinguishes 0us/a and essence, this is unproblematic for him. However, his distinction is difficult to square with. the following passage from Z. 7, where Aristotle, in discussing the generation of artifacts, says: "By form I mean the essence of each thing and its primary ous/a" (lo3~bl-~). (Loux treats this text at p. 186n48 and p. 189n54.) Also questionable on textual grounds is Loux's claim that form is always predicated of matter accidentally. A number of texts in the central books of the Metaphysics (e.g., ~o35b~4-25) and elsewhere state that the proximate matter of living organisms loses its identity when the form is removed. This evidence strongly suggests that in the case of organisms form is essentially predicated, not just of the composite, but of its proximate matter as well. If one takes seriously these textual difficulties, they raise fundamental questions about Loux's general scheme. But even if one is not persuaded by some of his central proposals, Loux has provided an exceptionally provocative, unified, and subtle analysis of Aristotle's doctrine of ous/a, and his suggestions about particular texts and criticisms of alternative positions are often insightful and helpful. The book is a major contribution to its topic. MARY LOUISE GILL University of Pittsburgh R. M. Dancy. Two Studies in the Early Academy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991. Pp. xii + 219. Paper, $14.95. The first study deals with Eudoxus: it argues that he attempted to explain the relationship between forms and ordinary things by developing an "immanentist" theory--in particular, forms are to be construed as physical ingredients of things. The second BOOK REVIEWS 281 study deals with Speusippus: it argues that he attempted to explain the existence of all things by positing a principle, the One, which itself does not exist. The two studies are united by a common theme: the early Academy was not a church from which dogma was declaimed but a meeting-house in which problems were debated; and the studies gives us glimpses of two of these Academic debates. ~ The early Academy is dimly and fitfully illuminated; and Dancy presents his conjectures with an appropriate modesty. The book is written in a light style, which at times descends to the demotic; but it is also painstaking and scholarly: arguments are elaborated with rigor and care; texts are cited at length;' and references to...
Read full abstract