Objective Response Research Articles

Efficacy of anti PD-1 therapy in children and adolescent melanoma patients (MELCAYA study)

BackgroundData on the efficacy and safety of anti PD-1 antibodies in children and adolescents (CA) with melanoma are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of CA melanoma patients receiving anti PD-1 antibodies. MethodsMelanoma patients ≤18 years treated with anti PD-1 were retrospectively retrieved from 15 academic centers. Information on histopathological diagnosis, surgical treatment, systemic therapy, objective response rate (ORR), safety profile was collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsBetween April 2016 and March 2024, 99 patients treated with systemic therapy were retrieved, 81 treated with anti PD-1 therapy. Median age was 14 years (range 2–18 years), 37 pts were ≤12 yrs. Overall, 38 CA patients received anti PD-1 in adjuvant setting, and the 3-year PFS and OS were 70.6 % and 81.1 %, respectively. Two patients received anti-PD-1 based neoadjuvant treatment, both had a pathologic complete response and remain disease free. Fifty-six received a systemic therapy for advanced disease and among them, 43 received anti PD-1-based therapy for advanced disease in 1st line, while 12 and 5 pts received a 2nd and 3rd line, respectively. Among patients receiving a 1st line therapy with anti PD-1 monotherapy the ORR was 25 %, and the 3-year OS was 34 %. Toxicities were consistent with previous studies in adult melanoma patients. ConclusionsOur study provides the first evidence of efficacy of anti PD-1 in CA melanoma patients and supports the use of anti PD-1 therapy in pts ≤18 years, included those <12 years.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 followed by gemcitabine-oxaliplatin as first-line alternating sequential treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Alternating sequential administration of drugs may be a promising approach to overcome chemotherapy resistance in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study was an open-label, single-arm, and prospective trial included patients with untreated advanced PDAC. They received 2 cycles of NS regimen (nab-paclitaxel:125mg/m2, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, plus S-1:40-60mg, orally twice per day for 1-14 days) followed by 2 cycles of GemOx regimen (gemcitabine, intravenously injected on days 1 and 8, and oxaliplatin: 130mg/m2, intravenously injected on day 1). The primary efficacy endpoint was a progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFSR-6m). The secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Specific mRNA transcripts were used to explore survival associated genes. Forty-two patients received a minimum of one treatment cycle, and of these, 30 patients completed one alternating treatment consisting of 4 cycles. The PFSR-6m was 71% (95% CI = 58%-87%). The median PFS and OS were 6.53 months (95% CI = 6.03-8.43) and 11.4 months (95% CI = 9.8-14.4), respectively. Common grades 3-4 hematological AEs included neutropenia 30.9%, leukopenia 26.2%, anemia 2.4%, and thrombocytopenia in 11.9%. Patients with OS > 10 months showed high expression of HLA-DQA2 while melanoma-associated antigen genes (MAGE) were notably upregulated in patients with OS < 10 months. The alternating sequential administration of the NS and GemOx regimens may be a novel approach for first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced PDAC requiring further study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ChiCTR1900024867).

Chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 may be a potential better alternative option for advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective real-world study.

Currently, the prognosis of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and the current treatment methods are not effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with ICC. We retrospectively screened patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) who received chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1. We evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the tumor shrinkage rate, and safety. We enrolled 95 patients with ICC and divided them into three groups with a median follow-up duration of 15.1 months. The chemotherapy group (chemo-regimen group), chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (dual-regimen group), and chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib (triple-regimen group) had median OS times of 13.1 months, 20.8 months, and 39.6 months, respectively. Notably, the triple-regimen group had a significantly longer OS than did the chemo-regimen and dual-regimen groups. The chemo-regimen group, dual-regimen group, and triple-regimen group reported median PFS durations of 4.8 months, 11.9 months, and 23.4 months, respectively. Both combination groups exhibited significantly longer PFS than the chemotherapy-only group (P<0.05). The ORRs of the chemo-regimen, dual-regimen, and triple-regimen groups were 18.2%, 55.5%, and 54.7%, respectively. The DCRs were 72.7%, 90%, and 96.2%, respectively, indicating significantly better outcomes in the combination therapy groups. The combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib demonstrates considerable efficacy and tolerability as a treatment strategy for patients with advanced ICC.

Impact of taxanes after PD-1 blockade exposure in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade improves survival in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the efficacy of taxanes after exposure to PD-1 blockade remains unclear in patients with advanced ESCC. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of advanced ESCC patients treated with taxanes (paclitaxel or docetaxel) with/without prior exposure to PD-1 blockade (Exposed /Naïve group) at National Cancer Center Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020. Ninety-nine patients (Exposed group, n = 32; Naïve group, n = 67) were included. The objective response rate (ORR) of the Exposed group was significantly higher than that of the Naïve group (37.5% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.009). The median progression-free survival was similar between the Exposed and Naïve groups (3.8 vs. 2.8months, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.86, p = 0.66). PD-1 blockade exposure independently predicated higher ORR to taxanes in multivariate analysis. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were comparable between the Exposed and Naïve groups (45.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.64). Taxanes following PD-1 blockade in advanced ESCC showed a higher ORR but similar PFS compared to taxanes without prior PD-1 exposure.

Dynamic Peripheral T-Cell Analysis Identifies On-Treatment Prognostic Biomarkers of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction: Variability in response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underscores the critical need for the development of effective biomarkers. We sought to identify peripheral blood biomarkers reflecting response to AB treatment. Methods: We analyzed dynamic changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a prospective, multicenter cohort of 65 patients with HCC, using flow cytometry to evaluate the T-cell population before and 3 weeks after the first AB treatment. Results: We found a unique response of the CD8+ T cells in terms of both frequency and phenotype, in contrast to CD4+ T cells and regulatory T cells. Notably, CD8+ T cells showed significant changes in expression of Ki-67 and T-cell immunoreceptors with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT). These distinct responses were observed particularly in the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)+ subpopulation of CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, the baseline differentiation status of PD-1+CD8+ T cells, particularly the central memory T-cell subset, correlated positively with greater proliferation (higher Ki-67 expression) of PD-1+CD8+ T cells after treatment. Moreover, effector memory cells expressing CD45RA correlated negatively with the increase in TIGIT+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells. The increase in TIGIT+/CD8+ T cells was associated with the development of immune-related adverse events, whereas increase in Ki-67+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells was associated with the better objective response rate. Importantly, dynamic shifts of Ki-67+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells and TIGIT+/CD8+ T cells significantly predicted progression-free survival and overall survival, as confirmed by multivariate analysis. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of dynamic changes in CD8+ T cells as an on-treatment prognostic biomarker. Our study underscores the value of peripheral blood profiling as a noninvasive and practical method for predicting the clinical outcomes of AB treatment in patients with HCC.

Irinotecan plus raltitrexed as second-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a prospective open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II study

BackgroundColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. There are limited therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancers which fail first-line chemotherapy. Phase I/II studies showed that the combined application of the raltitrexed and irinotecan has significant synergistic effect and acceptable toxicity. However, most of these previous studies have relatively small sample size.MethodsThis is a prospective open-label, single-arm, multi-center, Phase II trial. Brief inclusion criteria: patients were aged 18 to 75 years with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of 5-FU and oxaliplatin therapy. Enrolled patients received raltitrexed (3 mg/m2, d1) and irinotecan (180 mg/m2, d1) each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, objective response rate, overall survival and safety.ResultsA total of 108 patients were enrolled between September 2016 and May 2020. The median age was 61 years, ECOG 1 score accounts for 67.6%, the rest were ECOG 0. A total of 502 cycles were completed, with an average of 4.6 cycles and a median of 4 cycles. 108 patients were evaluated, with an objective response rate of 17.6%, and disease control rate of 76.9%. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range:3.1–61.0 m) at data cut-off on March 2023. Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI 4.1–5.7) and median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 12.2–15.5). The most common adverse events that were elevated are alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, fatigue, diarrhoea, neutrocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypohemoglobin, and leukocytopenia. Most of the adverse events were Grade I/II, which were relieved after symptomatic treatment, and there were no treatment-related cardiotoxicities and deaths.ConclusionsThe combination of raltitrexed and irinotecan as second-line treatment for mCRC could be a reliable option after failure of standard 5-Fu-first-line chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancers, especially for patients with 5-FU intolerance (cardiac events or DPD deficiency patients).Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03053167, registration date was 14/2/2017.

A phase II clinical trial of toripalimab in advanced solid tumors with polymerase epsilon/polymerase delta (POLE/POLD1) mutation

Patients carrying mutations in polymerase epsilon/polymerase delta have shown positive responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Yet, prospective trials exploring the efficacy in those with polymerase epsilon/polymerase delta mutations are still lacking. A phase II clinical trial was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody to human PD-1, in patients with advanced solid tumors with unselected polymerase epsilon/polymerase delta mutations but without microsatellite instability-high. A total of 15 patients were enrolled, 14 of whom were assessed for treatment efficacy. There was a 21.4% overall response rate, with a disease control rate of 57.1%. The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 17.9 (95% CI 13.5-not reach) months and 2.5 (95% CI 1.4-not reach) months, respectively. For patients with exonuclease domain mutations, the objective response rate was 66.7% (2/3), with a disease control rate of 66.7% (2/3). For those with non-exonuclease domain mutations, the rates were 9.1% (1/11) and 54.5% (6/11), respectively. Notably, patients with PBRM1 gene mutations exhibited a high response rate to toripalimab at 75.0% (3/4). This study showed that neither the exonuclease domain mutations nor non-exonuclease domain mutations could fully predict the efficacy of immunotherapy, urging the need for more investigations to clarify potential immune sensitization differences within polymerase epsilon/polymerase delta mutation variants.

Evaluation of pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and fluorouracil in radical treatment for patients with T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundPembrolizumab plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered as first-line therapy for advanced esophageal cancer patients has shown a better objective response and survival than conventional chemotherapy with less severe hematological adverse events. The safety and efficacy of this regimen were evaluated in patients with T4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).MethodsEight consecutive patients with T4b ESCC received this regimen according to KEYNOTE-590 as induction, and they were evaluated after 1–3 courses. The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) was also evaluated before chemotherapy. Efficacy for the primary lesion was evaluated by our original formula for the tumor reduction rate.ResultsThe numbers of patients with partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) were 5, 1, and 2, respectively. The tumor reduction rate ranged from 69 to 87% in PR patients, and all PR patients had relief from T4b. Two patients underwent conversion surgery with R0 resection. PD-L1 CPS was over 90 in 2 PR patients, but under 10 in 2 other PR patients. PD-L1 CPS was under 10 in PD patients. One patient had hyperprogression, resulting in an esophago-pulmonary fistula. Greater than grade 3 adverse events were bleeding gastric ulcer in one patient (12.5%), neutropenia without G-CSF in 3 patients (37.5%), and hypopotassemia in 1 patient (12.5%). No patient had febrile neutropenia.ConclusionsMarked tumor reduction was confirmed in 62.5% of patients with pembrolizumab plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with less adverse events. This regimen could be administered as induction chemotherapy for patients with T4b ESCC.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma

The evolving oncology treatment paradigm has created an unmet need for administration options that improve patient experiences and health care efficiencies. CheckMate 67T (NCT04810078) was a phase III, open-label, multicenter, noninferiority trial in which patients with advanced/metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma were randomized to subcutaneous nivolumab (1200 mg every 4 weeks; coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 20 000 units) or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab by coprimary endpoints determined from a population pharmacokinetics analysis [time-averaged serum concentration over the first 28 days (Cavgd28), and minimum steady-state serum concentration (Cminss); noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) ≥0.8]. Objective response rate (ORR) was a key secondary endpoint powered for noninferiority [noninferiority threshold: lower boundary of 95% CI of relative risk of ORR (subcutaneous versus intravenous nivolumab) ≥0.60]. Overall, 495 patients were randomized. Relative exposure in the subcutaneous versus intravenous arm reported by the GMR of Cavgd28 and Cminss was 2.098 (90% CI 2.001-2.200) and 1.774 (90% CI 1.633-1.927), respectively. After 8 months of minimum follow-up, ORR was 24.2% with subcutaneous nivolumab (95% CI 19.0%-30.0%) versus 18.2% with intravenous nivolumab [95% CI 13.6%-23.6%; relative risk: 1.33 (95% CI 0.94-1.87)]. Coprimary endpoints and ORR met noninferiority thresholds. Additional efficacy and safety measures were similar. Subcutaneous nivolumab was noninferior to intravenous nivolumab based on pharmacokinetics and ORR. No new safety signals were observed.

Savolitinib in patients in China with locally advanced or metastatic treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: results from a single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b confirmatory study.

Savolitinib has been approved in China for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping alterations in previously treated patients and those unable to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. We report results from a treatment-naive cohort of a phase 3b study that was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of savolitinib in locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC. This single-arm, multicohort, multicentre, open-label, phase 3b study was done at 48 hospitals in China in adult (≥18 years) patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC who had not received previous systemic antitumour therapy. Patients with a bodyweight of 50 kg or more and those with a bodyweight of less than 50 kg received savolitinib once daily at 600 mg or 400 mg, respectively, in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1. The full analysis set comprised all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, which was used to assess the efficacy endpoints and baseline and safety data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04923945) and is closed to accrual. Between Aug 31, 2021, and Oct 20, 2023, 125 treatment-naive patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 87 were enrolled and received savolitinib. The median age of patients was 70·0 years (IQR 65·2-75·8) and 51 (59%) of 87 patients were male and 36 (41%) were female. In the full analysis set, the IRC-assessed objective response rate was 62% (95% CI 51-72) and the investigator-assessed objective response rate was 60% (49-70), showing a high concordance rate (84%). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 85 (98%) of 87 patients, with peripheral oedema (54 [62%]) being the most common. Two of these treatment-related adverse events led to death (cardiac failure n=1, unknown reasons n=1). Savolitinib showed manageable toxicity and promising efficacy in treatment-naive patients with advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC. HUTCHMED and AstraZeneca.

Curcumin's effect in advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first or second-line docetaxel: A randomized trial.

In this study, we investigated whether the association of curcumin and docetaxel among advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients in first or second-line treatment potentiated the objective response rate. A multicentre, randomized, open label, phase-II study was conducted and included 42 patients from July 2009 to January 2017. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate of the docetaxel-curcumin combination in comparison with docetaxel alone. The secondary endpoints were the assessment of clinical benefit, overall survival, time-to-progression, progression-free survival, compliance, and safety. An interim analysis was planned to evaluate safety and efficacy. In this interim analysis conducted on 37 patients (19 in the control group vs. 18 in the experimental group), no difference was observed for the objective response rate (p = 0.25, control 73.7% vs. experimental 55.6%). Concerning clinical benefit, overall survival and time-to-progression, we also failed to show any difference between the two arms. A slight tendency towards longer progression-free survival at 12 months after randomization was observed in the curcumin group (65.5% vs. 41.4%) but this difference did not reach significance (p = 0.14). In this study, we showed for the first time that adding oral curcumin for advanced and metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first or second-line docetaxel was not efficacious, although safe. Consequently, this study was stopped for reasons of futility. Further studies with a larger number of patients, a different curcumin preparation, a longer treatment period and a pharmacokinetic evaluation of curcumin are needed to explore the real efficacy of this compound.

First-in-human study of AMG 193, an MTA-cooperative PRMT5 inhibitor, in patients with MTAP-deleted solid tumors: results from phase I dose exploration

Homozygous deletion of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) occurs in ∼10%-15% of solid tumors. AMG 193, a CNS-penetrant methylthioadenosine-cooperative protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) inhibitor, selectively induces synthetic lethality in MTAP-deleted tumor cells. Here, we report results of the completed monotherapy dose exploration evaluating AMG 193 in patients with MTAP-deleted solid tumors. In this first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase I study, patients with advanced CDKN2A-deleted and/or MTAP-deleted solid tumors received AMG 193 orally [once (o.d.) or twice (b.i.d.) daily] continuously in 28-day cycles. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability assessed by dose-limiting toxicities and determination of the maximum tolerated dose; secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity measured by RECIST v1.1. As of 23 May 2024, 80 patients in dose exploration received AMG 193 at doses 40-1600 mg o.d. or 600 mg b.i.d. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (48.8%), fatigue (31.3%), and vomiting (30.0%). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in eight patients at doses ≥240 mg, including nausea, vomiting, fatigue, hypersensitivity reaction, and hypokalemia. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 1200 mg o.d. Mean exposure of AMG 193 increased in a dose-proportional manner from 40 mg to 1200 mg. Among the efficacy-assessable patients treated at the active and tolerable doses of 800 mg o.d., 1200 mg o.d., or 600 mg b.i.d. (n= 42), objective response rate was 21.4% (95% confidence interval 10.3% to 36.8%). Responses were observed across eight different tumor types, including squamous/non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and biliary tract cancer. At doses ≥480 mg, complete intratumoral PRMT5 inhibition was confirmed in paired MTAP-deleted tumor biopsies, and molecular responses (circulating tumor DNA clearance) were observed. AMG 193 demonstrated a favorable safety profile without clinically significant myelosuppression. Encouraging antitumor activity across a variety of MTAP-deleted solid tumors was observed based on objective response rate and circulating tumor DNA clearance.

Cemiplimab monotherapy in Japanese patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

In the phase 3 EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9 study, cemiplimab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Japan. Patients were enrolled regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 status and randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator's choice single-agent chemotherapy for up to 96 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Overall, 608 patients were randomized, of whom 56 (9.2%) were in Japan (cemiplimab, n = 29; chemotherapy, n = 27). The median (range) duration of follow-up was 13.6 (6.0-25.3) versus 18.2 (6.0-38.2) months for patients in Japan and for the overall population, respectively. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.4 (7.0-not evaluable) and 9.4 (5.4-14.9) months for cemiplimab versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43-1.68). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.0 (1.4-8.2) versus 3.7 (1.8-4.2) months with cemiplimab and chemotherapy (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50-1.61), respectively. ORR was 17.2% for cemiplimab and 7.4% for chemotherapy (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.44-13.99). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at any grade was 79.3% for cemiplimab and 100% for chemotherapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events were 37.9% versus 66.7% with cemiplimab and chemotherapy, respectively. While acknowledging limitations inherent to a small subgroup analysis, the HR of 0.86 observed in Japanese patients suggests an emerging survival benefit despite a 4.6-month shorter median duration of follow-up versus the overall study population.

Novel computed tomography-based nomograms for the pretherapeutic prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin with or without the addition of docetaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Selecting the appropriate preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) is critical to effective treatment. The aim of this study was to develop nomograms based on pretherapeutic computed tomography (CT) features to predict response to NACT with S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) or that with docetaxel and SOX (DOS) in patients with advanced GC. This study enrolled 311 consecutive patients with confirmed advanced GC undergoing contrast-enhanced CT before and after the three cycles of NACT with DOS (n=152) or SOX (n=159), who were randomized into a training cohort (TC) (NACT with DOS: n=111; NACT with SOX: n=120) and validation cohort (VC) (NACT with DOS: n=41; NACT with SOX: n=39). The objective response rate (ORR) was used to evaluate the response to NACT. In the TC, ORR was compared between the DOS and SOX regimens, and independent predictors including CT features and tumor differentiation were determined by univariate and binary logistic regression analyses. Individual nomograms were constructed for the SOX and DOS regimens in the TC, and the predictive accuracy was validated in the VC. After NACT, the percentage of ORR was higher in patients receiving DOS than in those receiving SOX in TC (P value <0.05). The independent predictors after DOS and SOX were pretherapeutic cT stage [odds ratio (OR) =7.364; OR =8.848], cN stage (OR =1.027; OR =1.345), degree of differentiation (OR =7.127; OR =7.835), and gross tumor volume (OR =8.960; OR =8.161) (all P values <0.05). The concordance indexes of the individual nomograms developed using these predictors were 0.940 and 0.932 after DOS or SOX in the TC, respectively, which was validated by calibration plots with a slope close to 45° in the TC and VC. Despite there being a superior response to DOS compared with SOX, nomograms for predicting response to both NACT regimens were similar, with each demonstrating good predictive performance.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer achieving SD post first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly in patients who exhibit stable disease (SD) following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib, a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy in this patient cohort. This retrospective, single-center study enrolled patients with advanced NSCLC who showed SD after receiving a combination of first-line chemo-immunotherapy for 4 cycles, then add anlotinib to subsequent standard maintenance therapy, continuing treatment until disease progression or the occurrence of intolerable toxic side effects. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (P FS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety profile. A total of 52 patients were enrolled, the median P FS and OS was 5.0m and 10.0m, respectively. The ORR and DCR was 28.85% and 67.31%. subgroup analysis indicated that its efficacy correlate with certain Adverse Effects (AEs, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome). Further mechanistic analysis suggests that this regimen may likely reduce immune suppression by depleting Tregs, thereby further activating the immune system to exert synergistic anti-tumor effects. Besides promising efficacy, the toxicity can be tolerated. Anlotinib demonstrates promising efficacy as a maintenance therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who have achieved SD following first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. The manageable safety profile and the observed extension in P FS and OS suggest that Anlotinib could be a valuable therapeutic option for this challenging patient population. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings and to optimize patient selection and management strategies.

384. NEOADJUVANT ANLOTINIB COMBINED WITH PENPULIMAB FOR RESECTABLE LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (ESCC): A PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-ARM, PHASE II TRIAL

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy followed by radical surgery has been extensively recommended for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, toxicities and challenges to the subsequent surgery limit its wide clinical application. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with antiangiogenesis have synergistic effects and have shown good therapeutic effects in previous studies, as well as fewer side effects. Here, we tested a novel combination of anlotinib (an antiangiogeneic kinase inhibitor) and penpulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody), without the use of radio- or chemo-therapy, for the neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced ESCC. Methods In this prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR2200064848), patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC (clinical stage III-IVa) were recruited. The study was designed using a two-stage minimax approach. The planned sample size was 40 patients would provide 80% power at a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold pathological complete response (pCR) of 16% and expected pCR of 30%. Here, the first-stage data was included. Notably, 85% (22/25) enrolled patients had medical contraindications (including cardiopulmonary diseases or other underlying medical conditions, along with poor nutritional status and so on). Patients received neoadjuvant therapy with anlotinib (8 mg, po, D1-14, Q3W) combined with penpulimab (200 mg, ivgtt, Q3W) for 2 cycles. Six to eight weeks later, patients underwent radical surgery after exclusion of contraindications. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included tumor regression grade (TRG), R0 resection rate, objective response rate (ORR) and safety profile. Results From Jan 2023 to Sep 2023, 25 patients (19 males and 6 females) were enrolled with a median age of 67 years (range: 50-74). All patients were available for efficacy assessment and 16 were evaluable for the primary end point. The rest of the patients are waiting for surgery. As of 15 Sep, 2023, 19 patients underwent esophagectomy and R0 resection rate was 87.5%. The pCR rate was 18.8% (3/16) and 31.3% of patients had a major pathologic response (MPR). The ORR and DCR were 48.0% and 96.0%, respectively. 84.0% of patients experienced grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 3 (12.0%) patients experienced grade 3 TRAEs (2 elevated blood pressure and 1 elevation of liver enzymes). The safety profile revealed that the most common TRAEs (≥10%) included hypertension (28.0%), hand-foot syndrome (20%), fatigue (20%), abdominal pain (12%), toothache (12%). Conclusions The preliminary results of this study show promising safety and efficacy of anlotinib combined with penpulimab as neoadjuvant for patients with ESCC, especially for patients not suitable for neoadjuvant chemoradiation or chemotherapy. More ESCC patients would be recruited in the future.

Phase Ib/II study on the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as second-line monotherapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as a second-line monotherapy for treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. According to the "3 + 3" dose-escalation principle, patients received intravenous JK1201I at 180 or 220 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for four cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze PFS and overall OS. Brookmeyer and Crowley's method was used for mPFS and mOS. This study included 29 patients with stage III-IV SCLC (stage IIIa, n = 1; stage IIIb, n = 1; and stage IV, n = 27). Of these, 26 patients were enrolled in the 180 mg/m2 dose group, and 3 patients were enrolled in the 220 mg/m2 dose group. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was noted during the first 28 days of treatment. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were recorded in the 180 mg/m2 group, including diarrhea (11.5%, 3/26), neutropenia (7.7%, 2/26), and leukopenia (7.7%, 2/26). In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient (33.3%, 1/3) experienced neutropenia or leukopenia. In the 180 mg/m2 group, 38.5% (10/26) of patients achieved an objective response rate (ORR), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 73.1% (19/26). The mPFS and mOS were 3.4 and 12.1 months, respectively. In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient had stable disease, and one had progressive disease (PD). The ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 0% (0/3) and 33.3% (1/3), 2.7 months and 2.7 months, respectively. JK1201I exhibits promising efficacy and relatively low toxicities as a second-line monotherapy for SCLC, warranting further large-scale clinical studies to evaluate its efficacy in greater detail.

Randomized phase II dose comparison LITESPARK-013 study of belzutifan in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Belzutifan is a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor subunit 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor approved at a dose of 120 mg once daily for certain adults with VHL disease and adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following therapy with a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) [or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] inhibitor and a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. However, whether the belzutifan dose could be optimized is unclear. The phase II LITESPARK-013 study (NCT04489771) enrolled patients with advanced clear cell RCC whose disease progressed after one to three prior systemic therapies, including an anti-PD-(L)1 regimen. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive belzutifan 120 or 200 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Overall, 154 patients were enrolled (120 mg: n= 76; 200 mg: n= 78). The median follow-up was 20.1 months (range 14.8-28.4). The ORR was 23.7% versus 23.1% for the 120 mg and 200 mg groups, respectively [P= 0.5312;-0.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI)-14.0% to 12.9%]. The median DOR was not reached for the 120 mg arm and was 16.1 months (2.1+ to 23.5+) for the 200 mg arm. No between-group differences were observed for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.40] or OS (medians not reached; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.65-1.90). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 35 patients (46.1%) in the 120 mg group and 36 patients (46.2%) in the 200 mg group. The efficacy of belzutifan was similar between the 120 mg dose and the 200 mg dose for previously treated clear cell RCC. Safety at both doses was consistent with the known safety profile of belzutifan. These results further support 120 mg once daily as the preferred dose for belzutifan.

Phase 2 dose-ranging study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan (LY01610) as a second-line treatment for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer

This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60mg/m2, 80mg/m2, and 100mg/m2. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60mg/m2, 80mg/m2, and 100mg/m2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval <90 days. In all 66 patients, the ORR was 32% (21/66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-44), with a median DoR of 5.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.3). Median PFS and OS were 4.0 (95% CI, 2.9-5.5) and 9.7 (95% CI, 7.2-12.3) months, respectively. The ORR of 60mg/m2, 80mg/m2, and 100mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 33% (10/30), and 30% (9/30), respectively. The median DoR of 60mg/m2, 80mg/m2, and 100mg/m2 dose group were 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-not reached), 6.9 (95% CI, 2.5-9.9), and 4.0 (95% CI, 2.7-6.8) months, respectively. The incidence of ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the 60mg/m2, 80mg/m2, and 100mg/m2 dose group were 33% (2/6), 47% (14/30), and 50% (15/30), respectively. Themost common≥grade 3 TRAEs of all 66 patients were neutropenia (27%), leukopenia (24%) and anemia (15%). LY01610 exhibited promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with relapsed SCLC, the 80mg/m2 dose group had the best benefit-risk ratio. This study was supported by Luye Pharma Group Ltd.

Efficacy of sorafenib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in treating hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating hepato-cellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Twelve randomized controlled trials published until 28th Sep 2022 were finally included. Of the total 1746 patients, of whom 458 received sorafenib and TACE treatment (Group S+TACE), and 1288 only underwent TACE (Group TACE), were enrolled. Outcomes including time to progression (TTP), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), survival rate (SR), and adverse reactions, were extracted. The OS (HR: 0.596, 95 %CI: 0.507-0.685, p < 0.001; I2 = 0.0 %) and TTP (HR: 0.379, 95 %CI: 0.205-0.553, p < 0.001; I2 = 4.5 %) in the S+TACE group were longer than those in the TACE group. The ORR (RR: 2.101, 95 %CI: 1.555-2.839, p < 0.001; I2 = 0.0 %), DCR (RR: 1.547, 95 %CI: 1.126-2.126, p = 0.007; I2 = 79.6 %) and SR (RR: 1.416, 95 %CI: 1.183-1.694, p < 0.001; I2 = 83.8 %) in the S+TACE group were higher than those in the TACE group. Compared with the TCAE group, the higher odds of HFSR, oral ulcer, and diarrhea among patients with HCC complicated by PVTT were discovered in the S+TACE group. The marginal significance was found in ascites and gastrointestinal bleeding between the two groups. Sorafenib plus TACE has good efficacy and mild adverse reactions, which may be worthy of clinical promotion.