Objective Knee Score Research Articles

ACL Reconstruction with Double-Bundle Technique: A Review of Clinical Results

Anatomical and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primarily consists of 2 distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL), which act separately during the knee's range of motion. Conventional ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on restoration of the AM bundle only, while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The outcomes of these single-bundle techniques have been relatively good in ACL reconstruction. In recent years, many authors have developed double-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques to better replicate ACL anatomy and its 2 bundles. The purpose of this article is to analyze the clinical results of the double-bundle ACL reconstruction according to the current literature. The review focuses primarily on randomized controlled trials. According to the 14 randomized controlled trials published in the literature and included in this review, 4 (29%) trials did not find any significant differences in the results between double-bundle and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Ten (71%) trials reported significantly better results with double-bundle technique than with single-bundle technique, of which 7 (50%) reported better rotational stability, 6 (43%) reported better anterior stability, 3 (21%) reported better objective knee scores, 3 (21%) reported better subjective knee scores, 2 (14%) reported fewer graft failures, and 1 (7%) reported less degenerative changes of the knee. In addition, none of the trials found the single-bundle technique to have better results in any of these evaluations when compared with the double-bundle technique. However, 13 (93%) of the 14 trials had only a short-term follow-up (1–3 years), and only 1 (7%) trial conducted long-term follow-up (8–10 years). Therefore, only through long-term follow-up studies will we be able to determine whether the double-bundle reconstruction is really better than the single-bundle technique.

The St. Leger total knee replacement: A 10-year clinical and radiological assessment

The St. Leger total knee replacement (Zynergy Orthopaedics Ltd, Rotherham, UK) was developed as a cheaper alternative to similar implants of its time. Between October 1993 and June 1999, 144 St. Leger total knee replacements were implanted into 114 patients. Seventy-three patients (99 knees) were recalled for assessment (mean follow-up of 10.2 years). Eighteen patients had had their prostheses revised, 11 had died and 12 were lost to follow-up. Functional Score showed 90% poor results and the Objective Knee Score showed 31% poor results. Radiological assessment identified 12 arthroplasties that had failed and 58 that required close follow. Kaplan–Meier cumulative survivorship was 87% at 10 years. The St. Leger knee replacement did not perform as well as others of the same generation and was not worth the initial financial savings.

Einfluss des Zyklops-Syndroms nach vorderer Kreuzbandplastik auf das klinische Ergebnis

A review of recent reports concerning the functional outcome after treatment for Cyclops syndrome can produce contradictory results. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of our patients treated for Cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Between 1998 and 2006 ten patients were followed for the occurrence of a Cyclops syndrome. The Lysholm score, Marshall score and Tegner activity score was used for clinical evaluation at final follow up; in addition, a subjective assessment of knee function and knee pain on a visual analogue scale was registered. Knee stability was measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer. Results were compared with a control group of 24 uneventful ACL reconstructions. Revision arthroscopy for symptomatic extension block was performed after a mean of 6.8 months. After a mean follow-up of 23 months after second surgery all patients' regained full range of motion. The mean Lysholm score and Marshall score was 85 and 41 after Cyclops syndrome and 92 and 46 for the control group. After Cyclops syndrome patients experienced a significantly increased ACL transplant laxity but no significant difference was found concerning patient's subjective rating of knee function and knee pain. Although patients subjective rating of knee function and knee pain was nearly identical in both groups objective knee scores disclosed impaired knee function in our patients treated for Cyclops syndrome.

Functional evaluation of the modified Elmslie–Trillat procedure for patello-femoral dysfunction

A series of 28 knees in 27 patients were evaluated at an average of 36 months following surgical treatment for patella dislocation, patello-femoral pain, or a combination of both. All cases were treated by the modified Elmslie–Trillat procedure, which involves a lateral retinacular release and medialisation of the tibial tubercle on a distal pedicle. The evaluation included subjective, objective (Fulkerson and Kujala functional knee scores) and radiographic assessments. Subjectively, eight knees (28%) had excellent results, nine knees (33%) good results and seven knees (25%) fair results, accounting for an overall improvement of 86% over the preoperative status. All the knees in patients with a primary symptom of patella dislocation had an excellent or good subjective result, whilst only four knees (40%) in those patients with a primary symptom of pain and four knees (44%) in those with both pain and dislocation had a good or excellent result. The mean objective knee score was excellent for patients with dislocation only, and fair for those with only pain or both pain and dislocation. There have been no further episodes of dislocation in all patients. Six knees (21%) required later screw removal. The modified Elmslie–Trillat procedure produces a favourable outcome in patients with patella dislocation.

Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for Painful Germ Valgum A Five-to???11-Year Follow-Up Study

From 1978 until 1984, 23 patients (24 knees) were treated with varus producing distal femoral osteotomy for painful, lateral compartment osteoarthrosis. Evaluation at five to 11 years (average, 8.3 years) included orthopedic examination, calculation of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, and standing knee roentgenograms. Based on the objective knee scores, 71% of the patients had good or excellent results, with no difference in those followed for longer periods. Complications occurred in 63% of the cases, including nonunion (25%) and loss of correction (21%). Both complications were associated exclusively with staple fixation, which was performed during the period of this study and is now known to be inadequate to fix this osteotomy. Despite increasing morbidity rates, these complications did not appear to influence the ultimate result. A statistically significant prognostic factor was the severity of the disease as reflected by the pre- and postoperative knee scores. Further, the degree of correction was a function of the initial deformity. At follow-up evaluation 13% of the knees had been converted to a total knee replacement.

The Ellison iliotibial-band transfer for a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Long-term follow-up.

We studied the long-term results of the Ellison technique of extra-articular transfer of the iliotibial band, without advancement of the biceps tendon, as the sole operative treatment for a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Thirty-two patients (thirty-two knees) were evaluated an average of eleven years (range, seven to fifteen years) after the operation. The average age at the time of the operation was twenty-two years (range, sixteen to thirty-four years). Eighteen patients (56 per cent) had a modified Lysholm score of less than 84 points, indicating symptoms during the activities of daily living. Only six patients (19 per cent) had a subjectively normal knee (a modified Lysholm score of more than 94 points). The most common reason for a poor subjective score was the presence of symptoms of instability, in twenty-four patients (75 per cent). Twenty-four patients (75 per cent) had a positive pivot-shift test and twenty-nine patients (91 per cent), a positive Lachman test. Twelve patients (38 per cent) had severe (grade 3 or 4) radiographic changes. The radiographs of the knee appeared normal (grade 0) in only eight patients (25 per cent). There was a significant association between a meniscal injury and radiographic changes (p < 0.05). Fourteen patients (44 per cent) had subsequent procedures due to persistent instability or pathological changes in the articular cartilage or in a meniscus. There was a significant decline in the subjective and objective knee scores in the twenty-one patients who were evaluated at both two and eleven years. The number of patients who had a positive pivot-shift test increased from five (24 per cent) to sixteen (76 per cent). Subjectively, the number of patients who had a good result decreased from fourteen (67 per cent) to five (24 per cent). Objectively, nine patients (43 per cent) had a rating of good at two years; this fell to three (14 per cent) at eleven years. Symptomatic instability, pain, and a positive pivot-shift test were the most common reasons for a poor result. Because of the decline in the subjective and objective scores, we no longer recommend the Ellison procedure as the sole operative treatment for a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee.