Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool Research Articles

Development of a CVD mortality risk score using nutritional predictors: A risk prediction model in the Golestan Cohort Study

Background and aimWe aimed to develop a dietary score using prediction model method for evaluating the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality and suggesting a simple and practical scoring system within the healthcare context. Method and resultsA total of 43878 adult participants (aged 37–80 years) from the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS) were included in analysis. A random split of the subjects into the derivation (n = 28930) and the validation sets (n = 14948) was done. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to develop prediction model for the 8-year risk of CVD mortality. The model's discrimination and calibration were assessed by C-statistic and calibration plot, respectively. To enhance clinical utility, we devised a point-based scoring system derived from our model. This prediction model was developed by nine predictors including age, physical activity level (MET minutes/week), waist-to-hip ratio, tea intake (cup/day), vegetable intake (gr/1000 kcal/day), white meat intake (gr/1000 kcal/day), salt intake (gr/1000 kcal/day), dairy intake (Cup/1000 kcal/day), and percentage of protein intake. The model had an acceptable discrimination in both derivation (C-statistic: 0.76, p < 0.001) and validation (C- statistic: 0.77, p < 0.001) samples. Also, the calibration of model in both derivation and validation datasets was 0.81. ConclusionThis is the first attempt to develop a risk prediction model of CVD mortality and the risk scoring system by the majority of nutritional predictors in a large cohort study. This nutritional risk assessment tool is suitable for motivating at-risk individuals to make lifestyle and dietary pattern changes to reduce future risk to prevent health problems.

Cut-off values of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for cardiovascular events in Japanese patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a straightforward nutritional risk assessment tool with an established relationship with poor prognosis in patients with heart failure. However, the utility of the GNRI in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains unclear given the time-dependent changes in the pathophysiology of AMI and the selected endpoints. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the optimal cut-off values of the GNRI for cardiovascular events in patients with AMI. We used time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis to identify the optimal cut-off values for two endpoints, all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke), over 4years in 360 patients with AMI between 2012 and 2020. The cumulative incidence of MACE was 11.6%. The cut-off value of the GNRI for all-cause death was 82.7 (area under the curve [AUC], 0.834) at 3months and 90.3 (AUC 0.854) at 4years. The cut-off value of the GNRI for MACE was 83.0 (AUC 0.841) at 3months and 95.3 (AUC 0.821) at 4years. The GNRI demonstrated consistently high reliability relative to other indicators of AMI. Our findings indicated that the optimal cut-off value and reliability of the GNRI for cardiovascular events varied according to the endpoints and observation periods. GNRI emerges as a crucial predictor of prognosis for patients with AMI.

Use of NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and Modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-Reactive Protein Scores as a Prognostic Indicator in COVID-19 Patients

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the applicability of the NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein scores for assessing nutritional risks and predicting outcomes of these critically ill coro- navirus disease 2019 patients. Methods: This retrospective study included 246 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit between March 15, 2020, and August 15, 2021, diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 which was confirmed with real-time-polymerase chain reaction, and who received invasive mechanical ventilation. Treatments in the intensive care unit and clinical outcomes of the patients were recorded. The nutritional risk for each patient was assessed using both the NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and the modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein scores. If the NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein scores were ≥6, and the nutritional risk was considered to be high. Results: The median age was 68 (21-93) years, and 61% of them were male. The median duration of invasive mechanical ven- tilation was 9 (1-62) days, the median length of stay in intensive care unit was 15 (1-65) days, and the mortality rate in 28 days was 77.2%. Most of the patients had low nutritional risk according to NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill score (75.2%) and modi- fied NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein score (69.1%). High NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein scores were not significantly associated with the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, length of stay in intensive care unit, and mortality at 28 days. Conclusion: It was shown that NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill and modified NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill with C-reactive protein scores were not correlated with the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, length of stay in intensive care unit, and 28-day mortality in critically ill coronavirus-19 patients. NUTrition Risk in the Critically Ill score was not an appropriate nutrition risk assessment tool as a prognostic marker in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, which is correlated to interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels.

Using Motivational Interviewing to Increase Confidence in Nutritional Counseling Among Dental Hygienists: A Pilot Study

Purpose: Dental hygienists have the unique opportunity to educate patients on connections between nutrition and oral health. Dental hygiene students are introduced to these concepts but struggle to gain confidence to share this knowledge with patients. This pilot study looked at an educational module on motivational interviewing (MI) and an assessment and counseling tool to build student confidence with nutritional counseling. Methods: Dental hygiene students participated in an educational module to review MI and introduce a nutritional risk assessment and counseling tool. Prior to the module, participants completed a pretest about confidence levels regarding MI and nutritional counseling. After three weeks of clinical practice, participants completed a posttest. Data was compared for quantitative changes and qualitative themes from responses. Results: Twenty-two senior dental hygiene students (n = 22) participated in both the pretest and posttest. There were statistically significant changes in participants’ confidence (p = 0.007) and comfort (p = 0.020) discussing nutrition with patients. Participants struggled to become more confident in MI as demonstrated by no significant change in their feelings surrounding MI (p = 0.150). Students reporting increased nutritional counseling sessions showed improvement in their confidence. Conclusion: Introducing MI with an assessment and counseling tool to aid students can improve confidence with nutritional counseling. This type of education may translate into more chairside discussions about nutrition, improving overall patient care.

Initial development and validation of a novel nutrition risk, sarcopenia, and frailty assessment tool in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: The NUTRIC-SF score.

Nutrition risk, sarcopenia, and frailty are interrelated. They may be due to suboptimal or prevented by optimal nutrition intake. The combination of nutrition risk (modified nutrition risk in the critically ill [mNUTRIC]), sarcopenia (SARC-F combined with calf circumference [SARC-CALF]), and frailty (clinical frailty scale [CFS]) in a single score may better predict adverse outcomes and prioritize resources for optimal nutrition in the intensive care unit (ICU) METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a single-center prospective observational study that enrolled mechanically ventilated adults with expected ≥96 h of ICU stay. SARC-F and CFS questionnaires were administered to patient's next-of-kin and mNUTRIC were calculated. Right calf circumference was measured. Nutrition data were collected from nursing record. The high-risk scores (mNUTRIC ≥ 5, SARC-CALF > 10, or CFS ≥ 4) of these variables were combined to become the nutrition risk, sarcopenia, and frailty (NUTRIC-SF) score (range: 0-3). Eighty-eight patients were analyzed. Increasing mNUTRIC was independently associated with 60-day mortality, whereas increasing SARC-CALF and CFS showed a strong trend towards a higher 60-day mortality. Discriminative ability of NUTRIC-SF for 60-day mortality is better than its component (C-statistics, 0.722; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.677-0.868). Every increment of 300 kcal/day and 30 g/day is associated with a trend towards higher rate of discharge alive for high (≥2; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.453 [95% CI, 0.991-2.130] for energy; 1.503 [0.936-2.413] for protein) but not low (<2) NUTRIC-SF score. NUTRIC-SF may be a clinically relevant risk stratification tool in the ICU.

Translation and adaptation of the modified NUTRIC score for critically ill patients.

Some critically ill patients are at high nutritional risk, and early identification of these patients is needed to reduce morbidity and mortality related to underfeeding. The Modified NUTrition Risk in Critically ill (mNUTRIC) score is the first nutritional risk assessment tool developed and validated specifically for ICU patients. This study aims to translate and adapt the Modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) Score into Persian to facilitate use in Iranian Intensive Care Units and assess its efficiency in a pilot sample. The translation process followed standardized steps: initial translation, synthesis of translations, back -translation to the English language, revision and cultural adaptation of the tool by language specialist and expert committee. A pilot study was conducted on the application of the tool in 46 critically ill patients from three ICUs in Iran hospitals. The translation and adaptation process generated a feasible version of the mNUTRIC Score in the Persian language.The translated version was easily introduced into Iranian ICUs. The prevalence of patients with a mNUTRIC score of five or more was 43% (n=46). Translation of mNUTRIC Score from English into Persian, following internationally accepted methodology, has provided the ICU care in Iran with a comprehensive and useful instrument.

Validation of the modified NUTRIC score on critically ill Jordanian patients: A retrospective study.

Nutritional status has been proven to be associated with poor outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units (ICU). Nutritional assessment has been assessed using different tools. Few data are available on the validity of the modified Nutrition Risk Assessment Tool for Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score in ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV). This study aimed to assess prognostic performance of the mNUTRIC score for discriminative abilities for 30-day mortality and prolonged MV. This was a multi-centre retrospective study that included 737 mechanically ventilated patients using secondary data analysis. Data were collected on variables required to calculate mNUTRIC score. Patients with a mNUTRIC score ≥5 were considered at nutritional risk. Predictive performance of the mNUTRIC was assessed for discriminative abilities for Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II at baseline, mortality in 42 days of follow-up and outcomes related to MV. A total of 737 patients on MV met the inclusion criteria. The majority (57.1%) of patients were male. The mean age of the participants was 62.1±18 years. Of all patients, 482 (58%) were at high nutritional risk (mNUTRIC score ≥5). Median ventilator days were 3 (±7.2) days and 72 (±174) hours. The overall mortality rate was 78.8% (n=652), and weaning failure was 79.8% (n=660). This study showed new evidence on the validity of the mNUTRIC as a tool for assessing nutritional risk in an ICU population in Jordan. The mNUTRIC score obtained from the current retrospective data suggests that the use of the tool can truly identify and diagnose critically ill patients with malnutrition.

Identifying Critically-ill Patients With COVID-19 Who Will Benefit Most From Nutrition Support Therapy: Validation of the NUTRIC Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool

This website is for sale! casemedicalresearch.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, casemedicalresearch.com has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!

Nutrition Risk Assessment Using the Modified NUTRIC Score in Cirrhotic Patients with Acute Gastroesophageal Variceal Bleeding: Prevalence of High Nutrition Risk and its Independent Prognostic Value.

Malnutrition is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis. Relevant data about nutrition risk in critically ill cirrhotic patients are lacking. The modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score is a novel nutrition risk assessment tool specific for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic significance of nutrition risk in cirrhotic patients with acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) using mNUTRIC scores computed on admission to the intensive care unit. The major outcome was 6-week mortality. One-hundred-and-thirty-one admissions in 120 patients were analyzed. Thirty-eight percent of cirrhotic patients with acute GEVB were categorized as being at high nutrition risk (a mNUTRIC score of ≥5). There was a significantly progressive increase in mortality associated with the mNUTRIC score (χ2 for trend, p < 0.001). By using the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the mNUTRIC demonstrated good discriminative power to predict 6-week mortality (AUROC 0.859). In multivariate analysis, the mNUTRIC score was an independent factor associated with 6-week mortality. In conclusion, the mNUTRIC score can serve as a tool to assess nutrition risk in cirrhotic patients with acute GEVB.

Association of intestinal permeability with a NUTRIC score in critically ill patients.

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of intestinal permeability with the Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (NUTRIC) score and the modified NUTRIC score (mNUTRIC) in intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalized patients. One hundred and fifty ICU hospitalized adult patients admitted between October 2017 and April 2018 who stayed for >24 h in the general ICU were enrolled in the study. Nutrition status was estimated using the NUTRIC score, an ICU-specific nutrition risk assessment tool. The NUTRIC score was calculated using the exact same thresholds and point system as developed previously. Admission plasma endotoxin and zonulin concentrations were measured to assess intestinal permeability. Median plasma endotoxin and zonulin increased with increasing mNUTRIC and NUTRIC categories in the overall study population and in the glutamine-deficient subgroup. Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses showed a significant association between the plasma endotoxin (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.52) and zonulin (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20) levels with NUTRIC category in the overall population and the glutamine-deficient subgroup. Similar results were obtained when using mNUTRIC. Results from the present study provided evidence that higher plasma endotoxin and zonulin levels are associated with a progressively higher NUTRIC score in critically ill patients.

Applicability of modified nutric, a nutritional risk assessment tool, in critical patients in an intensive care unit

Applicability of modified nutric, a nutritional risk assessment tool, in critical patients in an intensive care unit

Geriatric nutritional risk index as a nutritional and survival risk assessment tool in stable outpatients with systolic heart failure

Background and aimsMalnutrition is frequent in heart failure (HF). However, the best tool for evaluating malnutrition in geriatric patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the incremental prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in stable geriatric outpatients with HFrEF compared with a clinical/laboratory prognostic model. Methods and resultsA total of 143 outpatients with HFrEF, aged >65 years, a LVEF <40%, and who were stable and on optimal therapy were studied. Follow-up lasted 3 years. The outcome was all-cause death. The GNRI was calculated as follows: [(1.489 × serum albumin (g/L)) + (41.7 × (current body weight/ideal weight)]. The 3-year death rate was 36.4% and 16 (11.2%) patients were at risk of malnutrition (GNRI ≤98). Deceased patients had a lower GNRI (113.6 ± 9.1 vs. 105.6 ± 9.2; p < 0.001) than did survivors. Greater values of the GNRI (hazard ratio = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.90–0.95; p < 0.001) and GNRI >98 (hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI 0.15–0.57; p < 0.001) were associated with better survival. These factors remained significant after adjustment of significant confounders. The GNRI was a better discriminator of death than weight and albumin. Adding the GNRI to the clinical/laboratory predictor survival model significantly increased the c-statistics from 0.93 to 0.95 (p < 0.001) and the chi-square likelihood ratio test from 106.15 to 119.9. ConclusionThe risk of malnutrition, as assessed by the GNRI, in stable geriatric outpatients with HFrEF is a strong independent predictor of survival. The GNRI adds significant prognostic information to the clinical/laboratory model.

Association of modified NUTRIC score with 28-day mortality in critically ill patients

For patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), nutritional risk assessment is often difficult. Traditional scoring systems cannot be used for patients who are sedated or unconscious since they are unable to provide information on their history of food intake and weight loss. We aim to validate the NUTRIC (NUTrition RIsk in Critically ill) score, an ICU-specific nutrition risk assessment tool in Asian patients. This was an observational study in the medical ICU of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital. We included all adult patients (≥18years) admitted between October 2013 and September 2014 who stayed for more than 24hours in the ICU. Components of the modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) score, demographic details, body mass index (BMI), use of mechanical ventilation (MV), vasopressor drugs, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) were obtained from the ICU database. For patients on MV (maximum 12 days), we calculated the energy intake and nutritional adequacy (energy received ÷ energy recommended) from enteral or parenteral feeding data. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used with 28-day mortality as the outcome of interest. 401 patients (62% male, mean age 60.0±16.3 years, mean BMI 23.9±6.2kg/m2) were included. In the univariate analysis, BMI, mNUTRIC score, MV, vasopressor drug, and RRT were associated with 28-day mortality. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (Odds ratio, OR 1.48, Confidence Interval, CI 1.25-1.74, p<0.001), vasopressor drug (OR 2.31, CI 1.28-4.15, p=0.005), and BMI (OR 0.92, CI 0.87-0.97, p=0.002) were associated with 28-day mortality. Nutritional adequacy was assessed in a subgroup of 273 (68%) patients who received MV for at least 48hours. Median (IQR) nutritional adequacy was 0.44 (0.15-0.70). In patients with high mNUTRIC score (5-9), higher nutritional adequacy was associated with a lower predicted 28-day mortality; this was not observed in patients with low mNUTRIC (0-4) score (effect modification, p interaction <0.001). In a mixed Asian ICU population, mNUTRIC score is independently associated with 28-day mortality. Increased nutritional adequacy may reduce the 28-day mortality in patients with a high mNUTRIC score.

MON-PP180: Nutric Score Effectiveness of a Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool in Critically Ill Patients of Portuguese Intensive Care Units

MON-PP180: Nutric Score Effectiveness of a Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool in Critically Ill Patients of Portuguese Intensive Care Units

Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the “modified NUTRIC” nutritional risk assessment tool

Better tools are needed to assist in the identification of critically ill patients most likely to benefit from artificial nutrition therapy. Recently, the Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) score has been developed for such purpose. The objective of this study was to externally validate a modified version of the NUTRIC score in a second database. We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database of a randomized control trial of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with multi-organ failure. Data for all variables of the NUTRIC score with the exception of IL-6 levels were collected. These included age, APACHE II score, SOFA score, number of co-morbidities, days from hospital admission to ICU admission. The NUTRIC score was calculated using the exact same thresholds and point system as developed previously except the IL-6 item was omitted. A logistic model including the NUTRIC score, the nutritional adequacy and their interaction was estimated to assess if the NUTRIC score modified the association between nutritional adequacy and 28-day mortality. We also examined the association of elevated NUTRIC scores and 6-month month mortality and the interaction between NUTRIC score and nutritional adequacy. A total of 1199 patients were analyzed. The mean total calories prescribed was 1817 cal (SD 312) with total mean protein prescribed of 98.3 g (SD 23.6). The number of patients who received PN was 9.5%. The overall 28-day mortality rate in this validation sample was 29% and the mean NUTRIC score was 5.5 (SD 1.6). Based on the logistic model, the odds of mortality at 28 days was multiplied by 1.4 (95% CI, 1.3-1.5) for every point increase on the NUTRIC score. The mean (SD) nutritional adequacy was 50.2 (29.5) with an interquartile range from 24.8 to 74.1. The test for interaction confirmed that the association between nutritional adequacy and 28-day mortality is significantly modified by the NUTRIC score (test for interaction p = 0.029). In particular, there is a strong positive association between nutritional adequacy and 28 day survival in patients with a high NUTRIC score but this association diminishes with decreasing NUTRIC score. Higher NUTRIC scores are also significantly associated with higher 6-month mortality (p < 0.0001) and again the positive association between nutritional adequacy and 6 month survival was significantly stronger (and perhaps only present) in patients with higher NUTRIC score (test for interaction p = 0.038). The NUTRIC scoring system is externally validated and may be useful in identifying critically ill patients most likely to benefit from optimal amounts of macronutrients when considering mortality as an outcome.

OP004: Identifying Critically-Ill Patients Who Will Benefit Most from Nutritional Therapy: Further Validation of the “Modified Nutric” Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool

OP004: Identifying Critically-Ill Patients Who Will Benefit Most from Nutritional Therapy: Further Validation of the “Modified Nutric” Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool

PP265-SUN: Evaluation of Pnutric score, a Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool, for Ill Pediatric Patients

PP265-SUN: Evaluation of Pnutric score, a Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool, for Ill Pediatric Patients

Novel simple and practical nutritional screening tool for cancer inpatients: a pilot study

There is lack of consensus on how nutritional screening and intervention should be provided to cancer patients. Nutritional screening and support of cancer patients are not well established in the Middle East. We report our systematic and practical experience led by a qualified specialist dietician in a cancer inpatient setting, using a novel nutritional screening tool. Ninety-seven consecutive inpatients underwent nutritional screening and categorised into three nutritional risk groups based on oral intake, gastrointestinal symptoms, body mass index (BMI) and weight loss. Nutritional support was introduced accordingly. Statistical tests used included ANOVA, Bonferroni post hoc, chi-square and log rank tests. Median age was 48 (19-87)years. Patients were categorised into three nutritional risk groups: 55 % low, 37 % intermediate and 8 % high. Nutritional intervention was introduced for 36 % of these patients. Individually, weight, BMI, oral intake, serum albumin on admission and weight loss significantly affected nutritional risk and nutritional intervention (all significant P values). Eighty-seven, 60 and 55 % of patients admitted for chemotherapy, febrile neutropenia and other reasons, respectively, did not require specific nutritional intervention. There was a statistically significant relationship between nutritional risk and nutritional intervention (P=0.005). Significantly more patients were alive at 3 months in low (91 %) than intermediate (75 %) than high (37 %)-risk groups. About a third of cancer inpatients require nutritional intervention. The adopted nutritional risk assessment tool is simple and practical. The validity of this tool is supported by its significant relation with known individual nutritional risk factors. This should be confirmed in larger prospective study and comparing this new tool with other established ones.

Pilot Testing a Female Athletes' Nutrition Risk Assessment Tool

Pilot Testing a Female Athletes' Nutrition Risk Assessment Tool

Vulnerable patients with a fractured neck of femur: nutritional status and support in hospital

Malnutrition has serious consequences for recovery and increases the risk of complications in hospital patients. Fractured neck of femur (NOF) patients may be particularly at risk because of their old age and frail state of health. We conducted an observational study to evaluate the nutritional state and the nutritional support, which was provided to this group during their stay in hospital. Twenty-five consecutive people admitted to an orthopaedic ward with a fractured NOF at Charing Cross Hospital, London were recruited. Anthropometric measures, biochemical indices, 3 days dietary intake and dietetic referral rates were collected. Patients had a significantly lower body mass index (BMI) compared with the mean BMI for sex and age in an elderly UK population (21.97 +/- 1.06 versus 26.73 +/- 0.03 kg m(-2); P < 0.005). They took just 58.6% of their energy requirements in hospital (4219 +/- 319 versus 7199 +/- 202 kJ mean(-1) daily intake over 3 days in week 2). Using the hospitals own nutritional risk assessment tool 56% of patients were found to be at risk of malnutrition on admission, which increased to 68% after 2-3 weeks. Of these 64% were referred to a dietitian and were given nutritional supplements. Nutritional assessment revealed that their nutritional status worsened during stay. This group of patients with fractured NOF is likely to be malnourished on admission and to show a rapid deterioration in its nutrition status during admission. Energy needs were not met in up to 50% of patients. These results reinforce the need to screen, supplement and monitor fractured NOF patients.