Abstract
Background
Next to classic full-time studies, a significant part of students of universities of applied (UAS) chooses part-time or dual study formats leading to double burden and higher stress levels. Up to now, the impact of different study formats on student's health status (HS) and health behavior (HB) has not been analysed in the context of UAS comprehensively. Also, the role of health literacy (HL) is not sufficiently investigated (Bai et al., 2019; Krüsmann, 2019; Plotnikoff et al., 2019). The primary aim of the study is to collect associated data on various aspects of HS, HB and HL of UAS students.
Methods
The prospective cohort study collects data on HS, HB and HL every semester from winter semester 20/21 to 22/23. HS is operationalized with stress level (SL), sleep quality (SQ) and life-study-satisfaction (LSS). HB included physical activity (PA), screen-time (ST) nutrition (NU), smoking, drinking and drug-use behavior (SDB); HL was assessed with the HLS-EU-Q16. At t1 n = 295 students (n: ♂=213; ♀=82; age∅=28,8 (SD = 8,49) could be included.
Results
Analysis revealed that all HS-domains correlated significantly with all HL (Range: r=.14** to .31**) and most HB-scores (NU: r=.22** to .35**; ST: r=.15** to .28**). PA correlated significantly with most HS-scores (r=.13** to .29**), but not with HL. Also, no correlations could be found between SQ, SDB and HS, HB and HL. With regard to gender difference, female students show significantly lower SDB (t = 4,38***), higher SL (t=-3,92***) and ST (t = 3,99***). Also, NU (R2 =, 30***; F = 27,21; f2 =, 32) and PA (R2 =, 34***; F = 17.9; f2 =, 37) reveal a strong explanation of variance of HS.
Conclusions
HS, HB and HL are complex dimension of students' health. The results indicate that HL AS a major impact on overall HS, but not necessarily on all HB-scores such as PA. Health promoting interventions should consider these findings on HS, HB and HL and target specific groups with individualized interventions.
Key messages
Health literacy plays an important role in students’ health, but is not linked to physical activity as a health behavior. Student health promotion should be target group specific and focus on different aspects of health behaviours.