Nursing Facility Research Articles

Readmissions in Sepsis Survivors: Discharge Setting Risks.

Sepsis is a complex condition with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt treatment can improve survival, but for survivors the risk of deterioration and readmission remains high. Little is known about the association between discharge setting and readmission among sepsis survivors. To examine 30-day hospital readmission rates in adult sepsis survivors by the type of setting to which patients were discharged. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database was used to identify adult sepsis survivors and evaluate 30-day readmission by discharge setting. A χ2 contingency analysis was used with each factor and presence/absence of readmission. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare readmissions across discharge settings. From our sample (N = 7107; mean age 66.5 years; 46.2% women), 23.6% (n = 1674) were readmitted within 30 days and of those readmitted, 30% were readmitted between 1 and 3 times. Discharge setting (P < .001) and age (P = .02) were significantly associated with readmission, but sex, ethnicity, and insurance type were not. High numbers of readmissions were seen in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (29.6%), home health care (26.9%), and home (15.0%). Similar high comorbidity burden and acuteness of illness were seen in patients discharged to these settings. Sepsis survivors discharged to skilled nursing facilities, home health care, and home are at high risk for 30-day readmission. The rates of readmission from home health care and home settings were alarming. Often patients are discharged to inappropriate settings, placing them at risk for residual sepsis and readmission. Future research should focus on appropriate timing of hospital discharge and transition to the most appropriate discharge setting.

Skilled Nursing and Home Health Policy: A Primer for the Hospital Clinician

This paper addresses the increasing challenges faced by hospital clinicians in coordinating and recommending postacute care for patients, focusing on issues related to access to the most common postacute services: skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health agencies (HHAs). In coordinating discharges, hospital clinicians have minimal information on care delivery in these settings. This knowledge gap is exacerbated by the disrupted continuum of patient care between acute care hospitals, SNFs, and HHAs. To address these challenges, hospital clinicians must understand how recent federal policies have impacted SNF and HHA care provision. The paper provides an overview of recent Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) policies and programs affecting SNFs and HHAs, including: (1) fee-for-service reimbursement reform (ie, Patient Driven Payment Model [PDPM] and the Patient Driven Groupings Model [PDGM]); (2) bundled payment programs; (3) accountable care organizations; (4) Medicare Advantage plans. Overall, this paper aims to help hospital clinicians stay informed about the evolving landscape of postacute care delivery by providing relevant information on how recent policy changes have impacted patient care.

Geriatric Pharmacotherapy Case Series: Clotting and Gender-Affirming Care.

Background A transfeminine patient is a 79-year-old with past medical history significant for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gender dysphoria, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, total left hip replacement, and recent provoked deep venous thromboembolism (DVT). She was seen by a pharmacist in a primary care clinic after her discharge from a skilled nursing facility. The patient was experiencing symptoms of gender dysphoria after discontinuation of her estradiol in setting of her DVT. Assessment Her renal function was calculated to ensure she was on appropriate dosing of her medications. Because her DVT was provoked, providers determined she would require only 3 months of anticoagulation. Her laboratory test results showed a subtherapeutic estradiol level and her estradiol was restarted. Additionally, aspirin was being prescribed for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and was discontinued. Outcome She has significant improvement in her gender dysphoria symptoms with resuming her estradiol and now has a therapeutic estradiol level. She is tolerating her direct oral coagulant well and reports good quality of life. Conclusion When reviewing medications for patients it is important to take several factors into account, including dose, appropriate indication, and patient preference. Pharmacists play a key role, through collaboration with providers, in assessing these medication-specific factors. Estradiol was stopped in this patient because of her DVT, but given her DVT was provoked after a recent surgery, it was unlikely that estradiol was the cause of her clot. Weighing the risks and benefits for any patient is important when determining what medications are appropriate to continue. Additionally, calculating renal function appropriately in a gender-non-conforming patients ensures appropriate and safe dosing.

Estimating the Impact of Hospital-Level Variation on the Use of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Versus Skilled Nursing Facilities on Individual Patients With Stroke.

There is substantial hospital-level variation in the use of Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) versus Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) among patients with stroke, which is poorly understood. Our objective was to quantify the net effect of the admitting hospital on the probability of receiving IRF or SNF care for individual patients with stroke. Using Medicare claims data (2011-2013), a cohort of patients with acute stroke discharged to an IRF or SNF was identified. We generated 2 multivariable logistic regression models. Model 1 predicted IRF admission (versus SNF) using only patient-level factors, whereas model 2 added a hospital random effect term to quantify the hospital effect. The statistical significance and direction of the random effect terms were used to categorize hospitals as being either IRF-favoring, SNF-favoring, or neutral with respect to their discharge patterns. The hospital's impact on individual patient's probability of IRF discharge was estimated by taking the change in individual predicted probabilities (change in individual predicted probability) between the 2 models. Hospital-level effects were categorized as small (<10%), moderate (10%-19%), or large (≥20%) depending on change in individual predicted probability. The cohort included 135 415 patients (average age, 81.5 [SD=8.0] years, 61% female, 91% ischemic stroke) who were discharged from 1816 acute care hospitals to IRFs (n=66 548) or SNFs (n=68 867). Half of hospitals were classified as being either IRF-favoring (n=461, 25.4%) or SNF-favoring (n=485, 26.7%) with the remainder (n=870, 47.9%) considered neutral. Overall, just over half (n=73 428) of patients were treated at hospitals that had moderate or large independent effects on discharge settings. Hospital effects for neutral hospitals were small (ie, change in individual predicted probability <10%) for most patients (72.5%). However, hospital effects were moderate or large for 78.8% and 84.6% of patients treated at IRF- or SNF-favoring hospitals, respectively. For most patients with stroke, the admitting hospital meaningfully changed the type of rehabilitation care that they received.

A Novel Preoperative Risk Score to Identify Patients at High Risk for Nonhome Discharge after Elective Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Non-home discharge (NHD) to a rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility after vascular surgery is poorly described despite its impact on patients. For home-dwelling patients undergoing elective surgery, the need for postoperative NHD can have meaningful implications on quality of life, long-term outcomes, and healthcare spending. Understanding post-surgical NHD risk is essential to preoperative counseling and shared decision making. This is particularly true for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms as the postoperative course can vary between open and endovascular surgery. We aimed to identify independent predictors of NHD following elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR), and to create a clinically useful preoperative risk score. Elective OAR cases were queried from the SVS Vascular Quality Initiative from years 2013-2022. A risk score was created by splitting the data set into two-thirds for development and one-third for validation. A parsimonious stepwise hierarchical multivariable logistic regression controlling for hospital level variation was performed in the development dataset, and the beta-coefficients were used to assign points for a risk score. The score was then validated, and model performance assessed. Overall, 8,274 patients were included and 1,502 (18.2%) required NHD. At baseline, patients who required NHD were more likely to be ≥ 80 years old (23.6% vs. 6.5%), female (35.9% vs. 23.1%), not independently ambulatory (14.6% vs. 4.3%), anemic (24.4% vs. 13.9%), have COPD (41.6% vs. 30.7%), ASA class ≥ 4 (41.0% vs. 32.5%), and a supraceliac proximal clamp (9.8% vs. 5.7%; all P<0.05). Multivariable analysis in the development group identified the following independent predictors of NHD: age ≥ 80 years, not independently ambulatory, proximal clamp location, hypogastric artery occlusion, anemia (Hb <12 g/dL), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, female sex, hypertension, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 4. These were then used to create a 14-point risk score. Patients were stratified into three groups based upon their risk score: low risk (0-4 points; n=4,966) with an NHD rate of 9.9%, moderate risk (5-6 points; n=2,442) with an NHD rate of 25.5%, and high risk (≥ 7 points; n=886) with an NHD rate of 44.6%. The risk score had good predictive ability with c-statistic=0.73 for model development and c-statistic=0.72 in the validation dataset. This novel risk score can predict NHD following elective OAR using characteristics that can be identified preoperatively. Utilization of this score may allow for improved risk assessment, preoperative counseling, and shared decision making.

Elevated care at home: An alternative to traditional levels of care.

Elevated care at home (ECH) is a novel in-home care model supporting early hospital discharge and providing an alternative to institutional postacute care. This study compares patient characteristics, mortality, and readmission outcomes of hospitalized patients who transitioned to ECH to patients who transitioned to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and skilled home health services (SHH). A retrospective study of patients between May 2020 and January 2022 transitioned from the hospital to ECH, SNF, or SHH. The analysis compared patient characteristics, 30-day mortality, and readmission stratified by COVID-19 infection status. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression after propensity score matching. Of 32,132 eligible patients, 6.3% were transitioned to ECH, 39.7% to SNF, and 54.0% to SHH. After matching, all baseline characteristics except for age were balanced between groups. Postmatch and adjusting for age differences, ECH patients experienced lower risk of death compared to SNF (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.92) and similar risk of hospital readmission compared to SNF patients (AOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89, 1.31) and SHH patients (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). COVID-19-negative ECH patients compared to matched SNF patients were more likely to readmit (AOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02, 1.65) with no significant difference in risk of mortality (AOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.44, 1.18). ECH had similar or improved outcomes relative to SNF and SHH. COVID-19-negative ECH patients experienced higher readmissions relative to SNF. ECH supported patients to return home from the hospital and provided an alternative to an institutional postacute setting.

Physical and Cognitive Function Trends in Post-acute Care after Total Joint Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries: 2013-2018

ObjectivesPhysical and cognitive conditions of patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and home with home health agencies (HHAs) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study is to examine the physical and cognitive function trends of Medicare beneficiaries discharged to SNFs, HHAs, and IRFs following TJA from 2013 to 2018. DesignObservational study using Medicare enrollment, claims, and assessment data from 2013–2018. Setting and Participants1,278,939 Medicare beneficiaries discharged to SNFs, HHAs, or IRFs for post-acute care following TJA from 2013 to 2018. MethodsMedicare data were used to examine the association between the endpoints of interest [discharge destination (SNF, HHA, or IRF) and the physical (measured using activities of daily living) and cognitive (measured using a range of setting-specific metrics) status of patients in each setting] and the year of TJA (2013–2018) by estimating multivariable models that controlled for patient- and hospital-level covariates. ResultsMultivariable analysis of 1,278,939 TJAs revealed that SNF discharge decreased [44.15% (2013)–21.57% (2018), P < .001], HHA increased (46.72%–72.47%, P < .001), and IRF decreased (9.13%–5.69%, P < .001). For SNF, the mean physical function scores [14.61 (2013)–14.23 (2018), P < .001] and cognitive impairment (13.25%–12.33%, P = .01) decreased, indicating less dependence. Physical function scores (3.09–3.94, P < .001) and cognitive impairment (13.95%–16.52%, P < .001) increased for HHA patients, indicating greater dependence. For IRF, motor functional independence measure decreased (38.81–37.78, P < .001) and cognitive dependence increased (39.08%–46.36%, P < .001), indicating greater dependence. Conclusions and ImplicationsFrom 2013 to 2018, patients were increasingly discharged to HHA. Although SNF patients were less dependent over time, HHA and IRF patients were physically and cognitively more dependent. Each setting is likely to benefit from policy and fiscal supports that help them manage changes in the volume and clinical intensity of patients requiring their services.

Testing the Psychometric Properties of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale Among Residents in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Pilot Study.

Background and Purpose: The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) was created to determine the patient's readiness for discharge to home from the hospital. The purpose of this study is to determine the scale's internal consistency and predictive validity in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) setting. Methods: Participants (N = 30) over the age of 65 were conveniently selected from 10 different SNFs in the Midwest to complete the RHDS prior to discharge. Results: Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was 0.917. Participants with higher RHDS scores, those who were male, respondents with less education, and participants with Medicare Advantage insurance were more likely to be rehospitalized within 30 days of discharge to home. Conclusions: The results indicate that the RHDS has a good internal consistency in the SNF setting.

Investigating the relationship between sagittal spinal curvature and fall incidence and fall risk among elderly nursing home residents.

Poor balance is an underlying cause of falling in the elderly, for which a change in the natural curvature of the spine plays a major role. Little is known about the relationship between spinal curvatures and fall incidence in this population. We primarily aimed to investigate the relationship between sagittal plane spinal curvatures and fall incidence over 1year among nursing facility residents. Secondarily, we aim to determine associations of sagittal plane spinal curvatures with participants' perception of fall risk and balance capability. Participants (100 residents mean age 70.17 ± 6.01years) underwent standing measures of sagittal plane spinal curvatures (flexible ruler technique) and forward displacement of the head relative to the cervical spine. The Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) and Fall Efficacy Scale assessed participants' perception of balance and fear of falling. Incident falls were self-reported monthly and tracked across 1year. Spearman's correlations and logistic regression evaluated associations between fall incidence and spinal curvature. Predictive performance of spinal curvature and fall risk was determined by the corresponding ROC for defining a cut-off for variables of spinal curvature and fall risk indicators. Predictive performance of spinal curvature and fall risk factors indicated 84% and 77% of participants were correctly classified using models of kyphosis and head angle, respectively. Our study adds new data on spinal curvatures and incident falls among nursing facility residents. Efforts are needed to intervene to counter progression of spinal curvatures and improve fall prevention practices.

Trends in Post-Acute Care use in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

ObjectivesWe sought to describe national trends in hospitalization and post-acute care utilization rates in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home health (HH) for both Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries, reaching up to the COVID-19 pandemic (2015–2019). DesignRetrospective, observational using 100% sample of Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file (MedPAR), the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File, the Minimum Data Set (MDS), and the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). Setting and ParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older enrolled in MA or TM who were hospitalized and discharged alive. MethodsWe first calculated the proportions of MA and TM beneficiaries who were hospitalized and who used any post-acute care, as well as the total number of days of post-acute care used. We also calculated the size of the post-acute care network used by TM and MA beneficiaries within each hospital in our sample and the measured quality (star ratings) of the post-acute care providers used. ResultsWe found hospitalizations, SNF stays, and HH stays were all decreasing over time in both populations. Although similar proportions of MA and TM beneficiaries received SNF or HH care, MA beneficiaries received fewer days. The largest difference we found was in the number of post-acute care providers used in TM and MA, with MA using far fewer; however, quality ratings were similar among post-acute care providers used in each program. Conclusions and ImplicationsTogether, these results suggest MA beneficiaries have fewer days in post-acute care, receive care from fewer providers of similar measured quality to TM, but have a similar number of days outside the hospital or SNF in the first 100 days after hospital discharge.

Hospitals' strategies to reduce costs and improve quality: survey of hospital leaders.

Hospitals in the US operate under various value-based payment programs, but little is known regarding the strategies they use in this context to improve quality and reduce costs, overall or in voluntary programs including Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A). A survey was administered to hospital leaders at 588 randomly selected acute care hospitals, with oversampling of BPCI-A participants, from November 2020 to June 2021. Twenty strategies and 20 barriers were queried in 4 domains: inpatient, postacute, outpatient, and community resources for vulnerable patients. Summary statistics were tabulated, andresponses were adjusted for sampling strategy andnonresponse. There were 203 respondents (35%), of which 159 (78%) were BPCI-A participants and 44 (22%) were nonparticipants. On average, respondents reported implementing 89% of queried strategies in the inpatient domain, such as care pathways or predictive analytics; 65% of postacute strategies, such as forming partnerships with skilled nursing facilities; 84% of outpatient strategies, such as scheduling close follow-up to prevent emergency department visits/hospitalizations; and 82% of strategies aimed at high-risk populations, such as building connections with community resources. There were no differences between BPCI-A and non-BPCI-A hospitals in 19 of 20care redesign strategies queried. However, 78.3% of BPCI-A-participating hospitals reported programs aimed at reducing utilization of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities compared with 37.6% of non-BPCI-A hospitals(P < .0001). Hospitals pursue a broad range of efforts to improve quality. BPCI-A hospitals have attempted to reduce use of postacute care, but otherwise the strategies they pursue are similar to other hospitals.

Hospital-based skilled nursing facility survival: Organizational and market-level predictors.

Rising health care costs and consequent increases in Medicare reimbursements have led to many payment reforms over the years. Implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS) for hospitals in 1983 incentivized hospitals to either purchase skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) or utilize their excess capacity to establish one within the hospital. With PPS reimbursement being applied to SNFs in 1998, prior monetary incentives for hospitals to own an SNF disappeared. However, despite the reduction in numbers, many hospitals continued to operate their hospital-based skilled nursing facilities (HBSNFs). This study examines the organizational and market-level factors associated with the survival of HBSNFs using the population ecology of organizations framework. Using American Hospital Association survey data, event histories of all U.S. acute care hospitals with an open HBSNF in 1998 were plotted to examine if a hospital closed its HBSNF during a 22-year period (1998-2020). The primary independent variables included hospital size, ownership, total margin, market competition, and Medicare Advantage penetration. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year. Cox regressions were conducted to estimate the hazard ratios capturing the risk of HBSNF closure. The results showed that HBSNFs located in large, not-for-profit hospitals and those operating in less competitive markets had greater odds of surviving. The HBSNF administrators of small, for-profit hospitals and those operating in highly competitive markets could utilize the findings of this study to judiciously allocate slack resources to their HBSNFs to keep those open given the current emphasis on continuity of care by regulatory bodies.

Disparities in Access to Highly Rated Skilled Nursing Facilities among Medicare Beneficiaries with Opioid Use Disorder

ObjectivesTo investigate disparities in admissions to highly rated skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) between Medicare beneficiaries with and without opioid use disorder (OUD). DesignNationwide, retrospective observational cohort. Setting and ParticipantsMedicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries aged ≥18 years admitted to SNFs following hospitalization during 2016-2020 (n = 30,922 with OUD and n = 137,454 without OUD). MethodsData used were 100% Medicare inpatient claims, nursing home administrative databases, and Nursing Home Compare. We identified hospitalized patients with and without OUD and matched them on age, sex, Part D low-income subsidy (LIS), and residential county. We compared the overall and component (quality, staffing, and health inspections) star ratings of SNFs that beneficiaries entered. Beneficiary-level regression models were conducted adjusting for race and ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual status, comorbidity score, hospital length of stay, and state and year fixed effects. ResultsThe overall study sample had a mean (SD) age of 71.4 (11.4) years, 63.9% were female, and 57.4% had LIS. Among beneficiaries with OUD, 50.3% entered SNFs with above-average (4 or 5) overall rating compared with 51.3% among those without OUD. Distributions of above-average ratings among beneficiaries with and without OUD were as follows: 63.9% vs 62.2% for quality, 32.8% vs 34.9% for health inspections, and 46.2% vs 45.0% for staffing, respectively. Adjusted regression models indicated that beneficiaries with OUD were less likely to be admitted to facilities with above-average overall (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87-0.92), health inspection (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.93), and staffing (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.89-0.94) ratings compared with beneficiaries without OUD, whereas quality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01) ratings did not differ. Conclusions and ImplicationsDespite mixed results on component ratings, our findings suggest a concerning disparity in the overall quality of SNFs admitting Medicare beneficiaries with OUD. Enhancing equitable access to high-quality SNF care for individuals with OUD is imperative amid rising demand and legal protections under the American Disabilities Act.

Hospital–Skilled Nursing Facility Integration and Participation in a Bundled Payment Initiative

Reduced institutional postacute care has been associated with savings in alternative payment models. However, organizations may avoid voluntary participation if participation could threaten their own revenues. To characterize the association between hospital-skilled nursing facility (SNF) integration and participation in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) program. This is a cross-sectional analysis of hospital participation in BPCI-A beginning with its launch in 2018. Each SNF-integrated hospital was matched with 2 nonintegrated hospitals for each of 4 episode-specific analyses. Fifteen hospital-level variables were used for matching: beds, case mix index, days, area SNF beds, metropolitan location, ownership, region, system membership, and teaching status. Hospitals were also matched on episode-specific volume, target price, and the interaction of target price and case mix. Episode-specific logistic models were estimated regressing hospital participation on integration and the previously listed variables. The marginal effect of integration on participation was then calculated. Analysis took place from August 2022 to May 2024. Hospital-SNF integration, as defined by common ownership and referral patterns and identified using cost reports, Medicare claims, and Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System records. Additional sources included records of target prices and participation, the Area Health Resources File, and the Compendium of US Health Systems. Participation in BPCI-A. In total, 1524 hospitals met criteria for inclusion in the hip and femur (HFP) analysis, 1825 were included in the major joint replacement of the lower extremity (MJRLE) analysis, 2018 were included in the sepsis analysis, and 1564, were included in the stroke-specific analysis. Across episodes, 191 HFP-eligible hospitals (12.5% of HFP-eligible hospitals), 302 MJRLE-eligible hospitals (16.5%), 327 sepsis-eligible hospitals (16.2%), and 185 sepsis-eligible hospitals (11.8%) were SNF integrated. In total, 79 hospitals (5.2%) participated in the HFP episode, 128 (7.0%) participated in the MJRLE episode, 204 (10.1%) participated in the sepsis episode, and 141 (9.0%) participated in the stroke episode. Integration was associated with a 4.7-percentage point decrease (95% CI, 2.4 to 6.9 percentage points) in participation in the MJRLE episode. There was no association between integration and participation for HFP (0.5-percentage point increase in participation moving from nonintegrated to integrated; 95% CI, -2.9 to 3.8 percentage points), sepsis (1.0-percentage point increase; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.2 percentage points), and stroke (0.3-percentage point decrease; 95% CI, -3.1 to 3.8 percentage points). In this cross-sectional study, there was an uneven association between hospital-SNF integration and participation in Medicare's BPCI-A program. Other factors may be more consistent determinants of selection into voluntary payment reform.

Greater readmission rates after total hip arthroplasty with discharge to a facility vs. home: A propensity score matched analysis

PurposeProvided that total hip arthroplasties (THA) are some of the most common surgical procedures performed, there is a necessity to understand all factors that contribute to risks of adverse outcomes postoperatively and to find solutions to avoid these events with preventive measures. This retrospective cohort study sought to assess differences in (1) postoperative complication rates, (2) readmission rates and reasons, and (3) demographic variables that contribute to readmissions based on discharge destination within the first 30 days after a THA. MethodsPatients undergoing THA (27130) between 2015 and 2020 were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database based on procedural codes. Propensity score matching was then employed to reduce selection bias, and Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed. Multivariable analysis was then used to look for other factors associated with readmission risk. Results219,960 patients were identified with 189,841 discharged to home, 19,355 to a skilled nursing facility (SNF), and 10,764 to a rehabilitation facility. The rehabilitation and SNF cohorts both had greater rates of readmission (4.56 % home vs. 6.88 % SNF vs. 6.90 % rehabilitation, P<0.001) and any adverse event (AAE, 9.02 % vs. 18 % vs. 21.3 %, P<0.001) after matching. Older age, longer operative time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification four, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bleeding disorders, steroid use, and smoking were associated with an increased risk of readmission after THA. ConclusionOverall, THAs were shown to have low postoperative complications and readmissions in all patient populations despite differences in discharge destination which continues to demonstrate the safety and validity of this often elective procedure. However, the statistically significant risk of complications and readmissions in addition to the higher costs associated should be accounted for when considering patient discharges to a non-home facility.

Associations Between COVID-19 Symptoms &amp; Amounts of PT &amp; OT in COVID-19 Patients in a Skilled Nursing Facility

Abstract Date Presented 03/22/24 This study explored potential associations between COVID-19–related symptoms and rehabilitation intensities. COVID-19 patients with delirium may be less able to tolerate high rehabilitation amounts. Moderate rehabilitation amounts are recommended. Primary Author and Speaker: Benjamin Ezra Canter Additional Authors and Speakers: Anne Escher Contributing Authors: Lauren Raschen, Joann Reinhardt, Himali Weerahandi, Wingyun Mak, Orah Burack, Kenneth Boockvar

Wii Game Program Development

Abstract Date Presented 03/21/24 A Wii game program was developed for adults in a skilled nursing facility. Posttest scores from the BBS and the SCS–R indicate that OTs can use the Wii program as an evidence-based intervention to improve balance and socialization among older adults. Primary Author and Speaker: Sumair Rehman Additional Authors and Speakers: Dr. Rae Ann Smith, Julie L. Watson

C. auris and neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability in the state of Maryland from 2019 to 2022.

Candida auris is an emerging fungal pathogen increasingly recognized as a cause of healthcare-associated infections including outbreaks. We performed a mixed-methods study to characterize the emergence of C. auris in the state of Maryland from 2019 to 2022, with a focus on socioeconomic vulnerability and infection prevention opportunities. We describe all case-patients of C. auris among Maryland residents from June 2019 to December 2021 detected by Maryland Department of Health. We compared neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) with and without C. auris transmission outbreaks using both the social vulnerability index (SVI) and the area deprivation index (ADI). The SVI and the ADI were obtained at the state level, with an SVI ≥ 75th percentile or an ADI ≥ 80th percentile considered severely disadvantaged. We summarized infection control assessments at SNFs with outbreaks using a qualitative analysis. A total of 140 individuals tested positive for C. auris in the study period in Maryland; 46 (33%) had a positive clinical culture. Sixty (43%) were associated with a SNF, 37 (26%) were ventilated, and 87 (62%) had a documented wound. Separate facility-level neighborhood analysis showed SNFs with likely C. auris transmission were disproportionately located in neighborhoods in the top quartile of deprivation by the SVI, characterized by low socioeconomic status and high proportion of racial/ethnic minorities. Multiple infection control deficiencies were noted at these SNFs. Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability may contribute to the emergence and transmission of C. auris in a community.

Trends in Diverticular Disease Hospitalizations and Racial Disparities in Outcomes Across the United States.

Objective This study evaluated trends and racial disparities in hospitalization, clinical outcomes, and resource utilization for diverticular disease (DD) between 2017 and 2020. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis using the NISdatabase from 1 January 2017 to 31 December2020to study hospitalizations for DD (CCSRcode: DIG013). Our primary outcomes were hospitalization rates, all-cause mortality, total charges, and length of stay. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital complicationsand discharge status. Outcomes were stratified by race and ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islanders and Native Americans). Data were weighted and adjusted for clustering, stratification, and other relevant factors. The normality of the continuous data distribution was confirmed usingKolmogorov-Smirnov, and descriptive statistics were used to summarizevariables. Demographic characteristics were compared usingχ² and Student's t-test, with significance set at P<0.05. We usedstepwise multivariable logistic regressionto estimateadjusted odds ratios for studyoutcomes by race and ethnicity, controlling for demographic and clinical factorsand correcting for multicollinearity. Missing data were treated with multiple imputations, trend analyses were performed using Jonckheere-Terpstra tests, and costs were adjusted for inflation using the GDPprice index. Analyses were conducted with Stata 17MP. Results A total of 1,266,539 hospitalizations for DD were included for analysis. Approximately953,220 (75.3%) were White patients and 313,319 (24.7) did not belong to the White race. Atotal of 747,868 (59%) were women compared to 518,671 (41%) men. Compared to patients who were not of the White race, White patients were younger(63.5 vs. 66.8 years; p<0.001). Hospitalizations for DD increased by 1.2% from 323,764 to 327,770 hospitalizations (2017-2019) and decreased by 11.8% from 327,770 to 289,245 admissions in 2020. Mortality rates were higher among White patients than in those not of the White race (16,205 (1.7%) vs 5,013 (1.6%)).However, no significant difference was observed in mortality odds between both sets of patients (aOR, 0.953; 95% CI 0.881-1.032; P=0.237).Mortality rates showed an uptrend over the study period (4,850 (1.5%) in 2017 to 5,630 (1.9%) in 2020; Ptrend<0.001).DD accounted for 7,016,718 hospital days, 2,102,749 procedures, and US$ 6.8 billion in hospital costs. Mean hospital costs increased from US$54,705 to US$72,564 over the study period (P<0.000). Patients who were not of the White race incurred higher mean hospital charges than White patients ($67,635 ± $6,700 vs $59,103 ± $3,850; P<0.001). Black race correlated with lower odds of bowel perforation, routine home discharge, and bowel resection (P<0.001). Conclusion During the study period, hospitalization and mortality rates and resource utilization for DD increased. Patients from other racesincurred higher hospital costs than White patients. White Americans were more likely to be discharged to skilled nursing, intermediate care, and other facilities. Additionally, White patients were less likely to develop bowel abscesses compared to patients who were not White. Compared to White American patients, Black patients had fewer DD hospitalizations complicated by bowel perforations or requiring bowel resections. In contrast, DD admissions among Hispanic patients were more likely to require bowel resections than those among White American patients.

The implications of poor nutritional status on outcomes of geriatric trauma patients

BackgroundMalnutrition is shown to be associated with worse outcomes among surgical patients, yet its postdischarge outcomes in trauma patients are not clear. This study aimed to evaluate both index admission and postdischarge outcomes of geriatric trauma patients who are at risk of poor nutritional status. MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of the prospective observational American Association of Surgery for Trauma Frailty Multi-institutional Trial. Geriatric (≥65 years) patients presenting to 1 of the 17 Level I/II/III trauma centers (2019–2021) were included and stratified using the simplified Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (albumin [g/dL] + body mass index [kg/m2]/10) into severe (simplified Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index <5), moderate (5.5> simplified Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index ≥5), mild level of nutritional risk (6> simplified Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index ≥5.5), and good nutritional status (simplified Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index ≥6) and compared. ResultsOf the 1,321 patients enrolled, 22% were at risk of poor nutritional status (mild: 13%, moderate: 7%, severe: 3%). The mean age was 77 ± 8 years, and the median [interquartile range] Injury Severity Score was 9 [5–13]. Patients at risk of poor nutritional status had greater rates of sepsis, pneumonia, discharge to the skilled nursing facility and rehabilitation center, index-admission mortality, and 3-month mortality (P < .05). On multivariable analyses, being at risk of severe level of nutritional risk was independently associated with sepsis (adjusted odds ratio 6.21, 95% confidence interval 1.68–22.90, P = .006), pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio 4.40, 95% confidence interval 1.21–16.1, P = .025), index-admission mortality (adjusted odds ratio 3.16, 95% confidence interval 1.03–9.68, P = .044), and 3-month mortality (adjusted odds ratio 8.89, 95% confidence interval 2.01–39.43, P = .004) compared with good nutrition state. ConclusionNearly one quarter of geriatric trauma patients were at risk of poor nutritional status, which was identified as an independent predictor of worse index admission and 3-month postdischarge outcomes. These findings underscore the need for nutritional screening at admission.