The building industry uses numerous engineering standards, building codes, specifications, and regulations (henceforth, all are referred to as “regulations” for the purposes of brevity), and a diverse set of industry vocabularies to describe, assess, and deliver constructed facilities. These building regulations are available as hardcopy and searchable digital documents. Some building design software applications (e.g., building-energy analysis and fire-egress assessment) are available that include computer-interpretable representations of the logic and rules from relevant building regulations. As part of the expanding use of building information modeling and new types of software applications, building and regulatory stakeholders and their software suppliers are recognizing the value of combining building models with rule sets for multidomain analyses, optimization, and assessing regulatory compliance. The availability of validated representations of building regulations for use by model-checking applications will streamline and shorten the building process, reduce inefficiencies and errors in the process, and enable new capabilities for optimizing designs and for automating the regulations-compliance assessment process. There has been a significant amount of research on this topic, and some of these results have been published in this journal during the past three decades. There are now a number of very important initiatives [e.g., by Associated General Contractors of America (AGC); American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC); American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE); Fiatech: Industry Consortium to Advance Innovation (ICAI); International Code Council (ICC); National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS); and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)] to develop standardized representational approaches for building regulations so that they can be applied and checked automatically against building information models and standardized data-exchange representations, such as the Industry Foundation Classes (IFCs). Numerous fields of engineering, particularly those that rely on interdisciplinary collaboration, are adopting vocabulary-management and ontologydevelopment software tools as part of the process of transitioning to computer-interpretable standards for engineering. Buildingsystems engineering, sustainable manufacturing (Lechevalier et al. 2013), and biomedical engineering are using these semantic tools to develop the needed infrastructure for a new generation of computer-interpretable engineering standards. With this editorial, we provide recommendations for broadening the support and coordination of these initiatives, which are needed and timely, and present a set of issues derived from research and prototyping that is related to development and industry deployment of formal computable representations of building regulations. We hope that these recommendations and deployment challenges will be taken up, either in the short-term or over the long-term, by everyone involved in the digitization of building regulations and the building industry, as we move to using building regulations as computer-interpretable resources for model-based engineering in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry.
Read full abstract