Numerical Score Research Articles

Association Between Non-spinal Comorbid Medical Conditions and Neuropathic Low Back Pain. - A Further Unravelling of Pain Complexities in the Context of Back Pain.

Prospective cohort study. Understanding the complex nature of low back pain (LBP) is crucial for effective management. The PainDETECT questionnaire is a tool that distinguishes between neuropathic (NeP) and nociceptive (NoP) low back pain. Traditionally NeP and NoP have been primarily attributed to patho-anatomical abnormalities within the lumbar spine. However, increasing evidence points to multifaceted involvement, encompassing a range of physical, biomechanical, chemical, and psychosocial factors. The study aimed to determine the independent relationship between NeP as assessed by the PainDETECT questionnaire and non-spinal comorbid medical conditions. A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 400 patients suffering from chronic LBP (>6months), aged >18years, who complete the PainDETECT questionnaire and provided responses regarding the presence of any comorbid conditions. A binary logistic regression model was used to analyse the confounding status of comorbid medical conditions and pain severity measured by NRS to determine independent relationships between specific conditions and neuropathic pain. The study included 143 and 257 patients suffering from NeP and NoP, respectively. The NeP group had a 38% higher mean numerical rating scale score compared to the NoP group (8.10 1.55 vs 5.86 2.26, P < 0.001). The odds of developing NeP were 2.9 Exp(B) = 2.844, 95%C.I. [1.426-5.670], P < 0.01), 2.7 (Exp(B) = 2.726, 95%C.I. [1.183-6.283], P < 0.05) and 2.8 (Exp(B) = 2.847, 95%C.I. [1.473-5.503], P < 0.05) times higher in patients suffering from gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression, respectively. NeP as determined by the PainDETECT questionnaire, is associated with gastrointestinal conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, and depression. This pioneering study has shed light on the potential involvement of the gut microbiome as a common factor connecting non-spinal comorbidities and NeP. These findings underscore the importance of formulating personalized management plans tailored to individual pain and medical profiles, rather than relying on a blanket approach to pain management.

Integrative Korean medicine treatment for inpatients with osteoarthritis of the knee: An observational study.

The use of integrative Korean medicine treatment (IKMT) for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been reported previously; however, to date, no studies have investigated the long-term prognosis of these patients following IKMT for primary knee OA. We aimed to examine the long-term effects of IKMT in patients diagnosed with primary knee OA and receiving IKMT during hospitalization. This retrospective observational study, complemented by a follow-up survey, included patients with primary knee OA who received IKMT during hospitalization across 7 Korean medicine hospitals. The primary outcome was the Numerical Rating Scale knee-pain score, whereas the secondary outcomes were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), and Patient Global Impression of Change scores. Patients were evaluated at admission, discharge, and during follow-up. Of the 180 included patients, 81 responded to the survey. Compared with the corresponding values at admission, the Numerical Rating Scale score decreased by 2.44 (2.08-2.81) points at discharge and 1.89 (1.5-2.26) points at follow-up. Additionally, compared with their scores at admission, the WOMAC score decreased by 17.20 (13.68-20.71) points at discharge and 25.74 (22.22-29.26) points at follow-up, whereas the EuroQol-5 dimension-5 level questionnaire score improved by -0.15 (-0.18 to -0.12) points at discharge and -0.12 (-0.15 to -0.09) points at follow-up. The patients expressed high satisfaction with pharmacopuncture (65.4%), acupuncture (54.03%), physical therapy (35.8%), and herbal medicine (34.6%). Regarding Patient Global Impression of Change, 96.30% of the patients reported improvement. IKMT was effective in improving pain, functional disability, and quality of life in patients with primary knee OA. Its effects were maintained throughout the long-term follow-up period, and physical functions continuously improved.

Insomnia among patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study.

Insomnia can coexist with chronic pain and is a major cause of rapidly increasing medical expenses. However, insomnia has not been fully evaluated in patients with chronic pain. This retrospective study aimed to identify the risk factors for insomnia in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. A total of 301 patients with chronic non-cancer pain were enrolled. Patients with the Athens insomnia scale scores ≥ 6 and < 6 were classified into insomnia (+) and insomnia (-) groups, respectively. All patients completed self-report questionnaires as part of their chronic pain treatment approach. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict insomnia. We found that 219 of 301 (72.8%) patients met the AIS criteria for insomnia. Significant differences were depicted between patients with and without insomnia in terms of body mass index, numeric rating scale, pain catastrophizing scale, hospital anxiety, and depression scale (HADS), pain disability assessment scale, EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ5D), and pain self-efficacy questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis identified the numeric rating scale, HADS, and EQ5D scores as factors related to insomnia in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Anxiety, depression, and disability were associated with a greater tendency toward insomnia. HADS and EQ5D scores are useful screening tools for preventing insomnia in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.

Percutaneous Cryoneurolysis for Pain Control After Rib Fractures in Older Adults

This case series evaluates changes in numeric pain scores, opioid use, and other measures before, during, and 30 days after computed tomography–guided percutaneous cryoneurolysis in patients with rib injury.

Comparison of the preclinical quality of analgesia of emergency physicians and paramedics based on trauma patients

Adequate prehospital pain management is acritical component of emergency medical services. With the introduction of the paramedic profession and the Paramedics Act in Germany, the basis for more extensive competencies of paramedics was established. In many emergency medical service areas it is thus possible for paramedics to perform analgesia and sedation with esketamine/midazolam according to pre-established instructions and/or standard operating procedures. This study assessed the quality of analgesia administered to trauma patients by paramedics compared to emergency medical service physicians. The study included trauma patients who received prehospital administration of analgesia by either emergency medical service physicians or paramedics and were subsequently admitted to the central emergency department of the Saarland University Hospital. Astandardized data collection form was used to collect information from the emergency service protocol and initial emergency department assessment. The evaluation employed descriptive statistical methods and a total of 207 completed records were analyzed. Both professional groups achieved significant pain reduction and fulfilled the criteria for effective pain management (pain reduction: emergency medical service physicians 5.5 ± 2.0/paramedic 4.4 ± 2.1, p < 0.001). Emergency medical service physicians, however, more frequently attained ahigher reduction in numerical rating scale scores and administered oxygen. Notable differences were observed in the range of medications used and the dosages. This study could show that prehospital analgesia is comparable between emergency medical service physicians and paramedics in terms of effectiveness for trauma patients if the indications are correctly set, while observing pre-existing instructions. With their competencies paramedics are able to perform an effective and safe analgesic treatment within the framework of preformulated procedural instructions, which can be equal to that of an emergency medical service physician.

Low molecular weight 35 kDa hyaluronan fragment HA35 in the treatment of bone metastasis pain: A case report.

Late-stage cancer patients often experience severe pain due to bone metastasis, caused by structural damage and cancer-induced inflammation. Hyaluronan, known to alleviate pain by blocking the TRVP1 calcium channel, faces limitations due to its high molecular weight. However, 35 kDa low molecular weight hyaluronan fragment (HA35) have shown promise in relieving various pains, including cancer-related pain. Nonetheless, evidence regarding their efficacy in bone metastasis pain remains scarce. A 52-year-old female with a rectal malignant tumor and multiple secondary tumors in the sacrum and lungs, accompanied by bone metastasis pain. Despite undergoing radiotherapy, her pain relief was unsatisfactory. Before treatment with HA35, her numerical rating scale score was 10, severely affecting her sleep, appetite, and daily activities. The patient was diagnosed with rectal malignant tumor with multiple metastases, presenting symptoms such as sacral metastasis pain, anal pain, lower limb pain, and anterior abdominal pain. Sacral metastasis pain and lower limb pain indicated a clear diagnosis of bone metastasis pain. Treatment involved subcutaneous injection into the deep fat tissue layer of the abdomen. A subcutaneous injection of 100 mg/5 mL of HA35 was administered once into the deep fat tissue of the abdomen, with subsequent injections repeated every 3 days. Following 1 injection, the patient's pain score decreased to 6 points within 20 minutes, providing 40% pain relief. After 40 minutes, the score further dropped to 4 points, with 60% pain relief. After 50 injections, pain was consistently controlled at around 3 points. Subcutaneous injection of HA35 into the abdominal fat tissue effectively alleviates pain in cancer and bone metastasis patients resistant to conventional treatments. Additionally, it helps alleviate anxiety and fatigue, and improves diet and sleep, thereby offering crucial palliative care for advanced cancer patients.

Single session and repeated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increases reflective thinking but not working memory updating performance

BackgroundAnodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has shown to have effects on different domains of cognition yet there is a gap in the literature regarding effects on reflective thinking performance. ObjectiveThe current study investigated if single session and repeated anodal tDCS over the right DLPFC induces effects on judgment and decision-making performance and whether these are linked to working memory (updating) performance or cognitive inhibition. MethodsParticipants received anodal tDCS over the right DLPFC once (plus sham tDCS in a second session) or twice (24 h apart). In the third group participants received a single session of sham stimulation only. Cognitive characteristic measures were administered pre-stimulation (thinking disposition, impulsivity, cognitive ability). Experimental tasks included two versions of the Cognitive Reflection Test (numeric vs verbal-CRT), a set of incongruent base-rate vignettes, and two working memory tests (Sternberg task and n-back task). Forty-eight participants (mean age = 26.08 ± 0.54 years; 27 females) were recruited. ResultsSingle sessions of tDCS were associated with an increase in reflective thinking performance compared to the sham conditions, with stimulation improving scores on incongruent base rate tasks as well as marginally improving numeric CRT scores (compared to sham), but not thinking tasks without a numeric component (verbal-CRT). Repeated anodal stimulation only improved numeric CRT scores. tDCS did not increase working memory (updating) performance. These findings could not be explained by a practice effect or a priori differences in cognitive characteristics or impulsivity across the experimental groups. ConclusionThe current results demonstrate the involvement of the right DLPFC in reflective thinking performance which cannot be explained by working memory (updating) performance or general cognitive characteristics of participants.

Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Predict the Appropriate Treatment of Acute Hip Fractures in Older Adults? Comparing Appropriate Use Criteria With Recommendations From ChatGPT.

Acute hip fractures are a public health problem affecting primarily older adults. Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer may be useful in providing appropriate clinical recommendations for beneficial treatment. To evaluate the accuracy of Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4.0 by comparing its appropriateness scores for acute hip fractures with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria given 30 patient scenarios. "Appropriateness" indicates the unexpected health benefits of treatment exceed the expected negative consequences by a wide margin. Using the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria as the benchmark, numerical scores from 1 to 9 assessed appropriateness. For each patient scenario, ChatGPT-4.0 was asked to assign an appropriate score for six treatments to manage acute hip fractures. Thirty patient scenarios were evaluated for 180 paired scores. Comparing ChatGPT-4.0 with AAOS scores, there was a positive correlation for multiple cannulated screw fixation, total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails. Statistically significant differences were observed only between scores for long cephalomedullary nails. ChatGPT-4.0 scores were not concordant with AAOS scores, overestimating the appropriateness of total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and long cephalomedullary nails, and underestimating the other three. ChatGPT-4.0 was inadequate in selecting an appropriate treatment deemed acceptable, most reasonable, and most likely to improve patient outcomes.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Capitellum for the Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the humeral capitellum is a rare and challenging condition to treat. Several surgical options exist, but in the last few years, the pendulum has swung from debridement and microfracture to restoration of the articular surface. Osteochondral autografts from the rib and knee have been described, but donor-site morbidity is a concern. Purpose: To expand the results of fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation (FOCAT) in a previously published report with inclusion of additional patients and a longer follow-up period. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: After institutional review board approval, the charts of patients who underwent FOCAT for OCD of the capitellum between 2006 and 2022 by a single surgeon were reviewed. The majority of cases (94%) had unstable lesions (Minami grades 2 and 3). A trial of nonoperative treatment had failed in all. All patients underwent diagnostic arthroscopy, followed by a mini-open, ligament-sparing approach with grafting using commercially available guides and instruments. Results: A total of 35 patients were identified, of whom 25 were male. The mean age was 16 ± 3.9 years (range, 11-32 years). There were 24 baseball players (19 pitchers and 5 position players), 5 gymnasts, 3 cheerleaders/tumblers, 1 tennis player, 1 student (who did not participate in athletics), and 1 patient with avascular necrosis from chemotherapy. Eighteen patients had a mean flexion contracture of 14.1°± 11.9°. A single osteochondral allograft plug was used in 23 patients (mean diameter, 11.3 ± 2.8 mm), and 12 patients required 2 plugs (Mastercard technique). The mean follow-up was 92.6 ± 54.5 months (range, 24-204 months). There was significant improvement in Oxford (from 25.5 ± 4.9 to 46.7 ± 3.5; P < .00001) and visual analog scale for pain (from 7.5 ± 2 to 0.3 ± 1.0; P < .0001) scores. The mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score at the time of follow-up was 90.6 ± 10.8 (range, 60-100). In overhead athletes, there was significant improvement in the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score (from 40.8 ± 11.8 to 90.6 ± 10.8; P < .00001). A postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scan was obtained in 16 (46%) patients at a mean of 32.6 months. In all cases, the graft was incorporated. All overhead athletes were able to return to their sport and perform at the same level or higher for >2 years. Two elbows required a subsequent arthroscopy for loose-body removal; otherwise, there were no other complications. Conclusion: FOCAT is an excellent option for treating OCD lesions of the humeral capitellum. Excellent outcomes and high return-to-sport rates were observed, with midterm follow-up showing no graft failures. FOCAT eliminates donor-site morbidity.

Sensory neurapraxia after distal biceps repair is not associated with patient-reported outcomes or satisfaction: a retrospective cohort study

Cutaneous neurapraxia is the most common complication following distal biceps tendon repair (DBTR). Currently, no patient demographic factors have been implicated in its occurrence, course, or resolution. The purpose of this study is to explore various patient demographics and their association with postoperative neurapraxia. Further it investigates how mental health scores correlate with patient-reported outcomes, and whether occurrence of neurapraxia alters this association. This retrospective review evaluates a consecutive series of patients who underwent distal biceps repair with a single-incision cortical button technique. Patients with reported outcome data at a minimum of 1year (n=47) were included for analysis. Demographic data including age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, smoking status, and occurrence of neurapraxia were recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures include the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Visual Analog Scale for pain, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score, and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) Mental Component Score and Physical Component Score quality-of-life assessment. Postoperative neurapraxia of any duration occurred in 45% (21/47) of patients in this cohort following DBTR. Of these, 62% (13/21) reported resolution of symptoms by the latest follow-up. Mean time to resolution of neurapraxia was 148days. Patient age, body mass index, smoking history, time to surgery, tear thickness, and increasing surgeon experience across the study period were not significantly associated with the incidence or time to resolution of postoperative neurapraxia. Scores for patient satisfaction, Visual Analog Scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, VR-12 Mental Component Score, VR-12 Physical Component Score, and flexion ROM did not differ significantly between patients with and without postoperative neurapraxia. Patient satisfaction following DBTR was not significantly associated with postoperative neurapraxia. Patient and surgical characteristics did not influence the occurrence or time to resolution of neurapraxia. The occurrence of postoperative neurapraxia did not result in significant functional limitations.

Predictors of patient satisfaction in the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) experience progressive neurological impairment. Surgical intervention is often pursued to halt neurological symptom progression and allow for recovery of function. In this paper, the authors explore predictors of patient satisfaction following surgical intervention for CSM. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the multicenter Quality Outcomes Database. Patients who underwent surgical intervention for CSM with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Patient-reported satisfaction was defined as a North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction score of 1 or 2. Patient demographics, surgical parameters, and outcomes were assessed as related to patient satisfaction. Patient quality of life scores were measured at baseline and 24-month time points. Univariate regression analyses were performed using the chi-square test or Student t-test to assess patient satisfaction measures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess for factors predictive of postoperative satisfaction at 24 months. A total of 1140 patients at 14 institutions with CSM who underwent surgical intervention were included, and 944 completed a patient satisfaction survey at 24 months postoperatively. The baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was 12.0 ± 2.8. A total of 793 (84.0%) patients reported satisfaction (NASS score 1 or 2) after 2 years. Male and female patients reported similar satisfaction rates (female sex: 47.0% not satisfied vs 48.5% satisfied, p = 0.73). Black race was associated with less satisfaction (26.5% not satisfied vs 13.2% satisfied, p < 0.01). Baseline psychiatric comorbidities, obesity, and length of stay did not correlate with 24-month satisfaction. Crossing the cervicothoracic junction did not affect satisfactory scores (p = 0.19), and minimally invasive approaches were not associated with increased patient satisfaction (p = 0.14). Lower baseline numeric rating scale neck pain scores (5.03 vs 5.61, p = 0.04) and higher baseline mJOA scores (12.28 vs 11.66, p = 0.01) were associated with higher satisfaction rates. Surgical treatment of CSM results in a high rate of patient satisfaction (84.0%) at the 2-year follow-up. Patients with milder myelopathy report higher satisfaction rates, suggesting that intervention earlier in the disease process may result in greater long-term satisfaction.

Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Patients Presenting With Acute Abdomen to the Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Acute abdomen is a common and urgent clinical condition requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. This study determines the clinical and epidemiological profile of patients presenting with acute abdomen at a tertiary care hospital. To describe the demographic characteristics, provisional diagnoses, treatment modalities, and pain management effectiveness in patients with acute abdomen. This prospective observational study was conducted in the Emergency Medicine department at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Center, Pimpri, Pune, over a specified period. The study included patients presenting with acute abdomen, aged above 14 years, excluding those with traumatic acute abdomen and pregnant patients. A sample size of 146 was calculated based on the proportion of ureteric colic cases, with a 95% confidence interval and a 6% margin of error; however, a total of 176 patients were included in the study. Data collection involved recording demographic details, clinical features, provisional diagnoses, and pain scores, as well as performing required blood investigations and ultrasonography. Pain scores were assessed before and after treatment. Patients will be given non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs) or opioid analgesia, depending on the clinical severity. Emergency medicine residents, in consultation with the on-call consultant, determined the disposition of patients, deciding if they required surgical or conservative management. The study found that the majority of patients, n = 130 (73.86%), were aged 26-50 years, with cases n = 103 (58.52%) being males and cases n = 73 (41.48%) females. Acute appendicitis was the most common diagnosis, n = 41 (24.43%), followed by urolithiasis n = 33 (18.75%). Surgical interventions were required for n = 78 (45.08%) of patients, highlighting the urgent nature of these conditions. Pain management was effective, with significant reductions in pain scores post-treatment (mean visual analog score (VAS) decreased from 6.22 to 2.33, and mean numerical rating score (NRS) from 6.05 to 2.10; p < 0.001). The study underscores the high prevalence of gastrointestinal and renal conditions in patients with acute abdomen, particularly in middle-aged adults. The high rate of surgical interventions reflects the urgent nature of these conditions. Significant reductions in pain scores demonstrated effective pain management. Comprehensive care strategies are essential for optimizing patient outcomes. Future research with larger sample sizes and multi-center participation is recommended to validate these findings and enhance management protocols for acute abdomen.

Relationship of C-reactive Protein/Serum Albumin Ratio and qPitt Bacteremia Score With An All-Cause In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections.

Bloodstream infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite notable advances in their diagnosis and treatment. C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and the quick Pitt bacteremia score are two useful tools for clinicians to assess severity and predict mortality risk in patients with sepsis attributable to bloodstream infections. This study examined the relationship between C-reactive protein/serum albumin ratio and Q Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with bloodstream infections. Hospitalized adult patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics and clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from patient electronic records. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio was calculated using CRP (mg/L) and serum albumin (g/L) values obtained within 24 hours of blood culture collection and quick Pitt bacteremia score was calculated for each patient with each of the five variables of the score determined within 24 hours of blood culture collection and each patient was assigned a numerical score of 0-5 accordingly. The relationship between C-reactive protein/albumin ratio and quick Pitt bacteremia score with all-cause in-hospital mortality was determined. A total of 187 hospitalized adult patients with non-repeat bacteremic bloodstream infections were identified.Escherichia coliwas the most common Gram-negative blood isolate whileStaphylococcus aureuswas the predominant Gram-positive isolate. One hundred and five (56.1%) patients were male with a cohort mean age of 56.9 ± 2.7 years. All-cause in-hospital mortality was 27.3%. The mean CRP/albumin ratio (8.6 ±1.7) and mean quick Pitt bacteremia score (2.8 ±0.4) were significantly higher in patients with bloodstream infections who died during their hospitalization compared to those who survived. The all-cause in-hospital mortality was 8%, 12%, 22%, 46%, 93%, and 100% for patients with quick Pitt scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In hospitalized patients with bacteremic bloodstream infections, an incremental increase in quick Pitt bacteremia score and mean C-reactive protein/albumin ratio of >8 was associated with higher mortality.

Correlating Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Exam Scores and Pharmacist Licensure Status in a Single Program

ObjectivePharmacist licensure exam first-time pass rates have declined for several years. Predictors of licensure exam performance, including the Pharmacy College Admission Test, are no longer required, necessitating alternative strategies. Our aim is to assess the relationship between numerical scores on advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) exams and pharmacist licensure exams first-time pass rates. MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective, observational analysis. APPE examination results between May 2020 and November 2023 were analyzed for association with licensure information from the Texas State Board of Pharmacy. Exam scores were collected for student cohorts graduating from 2021 to 2022 as study cohort data. Correlation between exam scores and probability of successful licensure was assessed using logistic regression. A classification and regression tree analysis identified the most significant threshold. Predictive ability of the best-fit model was prospectively validated using the 2023 graduate cohort. ResultsThe overall licensure success rate was 80.6% for the study cohort (2021–2022, n = 206). Exam scores were well correlated to the likelihood of licensing success. The most significant threshold was 77.8%. The success rate was 82.5% vs 16.7% for those scoring above and below the threshold, respectively. The observed and predicted licensure success rates were 91.0% and 88.8%, respectively, in the validation cohort (2023, n = 89). The positive and negative prediction values were 94.9% and 40.0%, respectively. ConclusionThe performances on APPE exams were reasonable in predicting the first-time licensure success rate for a graduating class. Our assessment appears promising as a risk-stratification tool for students in gaining successful pharmacist licensure.

What’s inside matters: an assessment of the family planning content of digital self-care platforms

BackgroundDigital technology has proliferated rapidly in low- and middle-income countries in recent decades. This trend will likely persist as costs decrease, dramatically expanding access to reproductive health and family planning (FP) information. As many digital tools aim to support informed choice among individuals with unmet contraceptive need, it is essential that high-quality information is provided. We set out to assess the accuracy and comprehensiveness of FP content in select user-facing digital self-care platforms.MethodsWe identified 29 digital tools in circulation between 2018–2021 and selected 11 that met our eligibility criteria for analysis. Referencing global guidance documents such as the Family Planning Handbook, Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, and the Digital Health for Social and Behavior Change High Impact Practice Brief, we developed an original rubric outlining 12 key content areas necessary to support informed, person-centered counseling. We applied this to each tool, enabling assignment of a numerical score that represents content accuracy and comprehensiveness across the 12 key areas.ResultsFP content of digital tools varied greatly in accuracy and comprehensiveness. Of the 12 identified key content areas, 5 were included in all 11 tools, while 6 were addressed inconsistently or not at all. Four content areas were the most accurate and comprehensive: complete list of modern methods, duration of protection, dual method use, and return to fertility. The lowest scoring content areas were side effect management, non-contraceptive benefits, effectiveness, side effects, and instructions for use. ConclusionsComplete, accurate, and evidence-based FP content is a foundational element of quality digital self-care. Inaccuracies and omissions can impact individual user experiences and decision-making in critical ways. FP content quality should be verified before digital tools are scaled or researched at the programmatic level. From this exercise, we developed a checklist for use in conjunction with global guidance documents to improve future FP content of user-facing digital tools.

Breast implant illness: A United Kingdom patient-centred approach

Silicone breast implants are widely prevalent. An increasing group of patients detail self-reported somatic and psychological symptoms that have been ascribed as breast implant illness (BII) and seek capsulectomy and implant removal. To guide consultations and shared decision making, more outcome data relating to this intervention are required. To present a multicentre study of patient-centred (n = 100) outcome data, following total capsulectomy with implant removal for BII. A questionnaire survey was cross-referenced with medical records. Collected data included demographics, operation details, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, overall self-perceived percentage improvement in BII symptoms and breast shape satisfaction ratings after explantation. The 10 most frequently self-reported symptoms were fatigue (81%), pains/aches (72%), brain/memory fog (56%), mood disturbances (36%), neuropathic pain (28%), hair loss (28%), headaches (25%), gastric symptoms/intolerances (24%), eczema/rash (18%) and vision disturbance (17%). A high proportion of patients (98%) experienced a 62 ± 4% average symptom improvement; most self-reported symptoms (21/28) improved significantly after explantation with total capsulectomy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients had high overall self-perceived BII percentage improvement (76 ± 3%) and satisfaction with breast shape numerical rating score (8 ± 0.30) postoperatively. Despite BII not being a defined disease entity, symptom association with silicone breast implants continues for a growing number of patients. It is important to recognise that in this patient group, capsulectomy and implant removal may not be curative, however we have demonstrated that symptom improvement can occur. It is very difficult to prove a causal link between breast implants and BII; to do so will require extensive prospective data collection.

Preoperative Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plus Rectus Sheath Block for Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Noninferior Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has proven efficacy and is an important component of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The external oblique intercostal (EOI) block can provide a dermatomal sensory blockade of T6 to T10 using an anterior axillary line injection. The bilateral rectus sheath (RS) block can significantly reduce early postoperative pain caused by umbilical or periumbilical incisions. The current study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacies of ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP (UG-TAP) combined with the RS block and ultrasound-guided EOI (UG-EOI) combined with the RS block for LC. Patients were randomly assigned to TAP or EOI group. Patients in TAP group received UG-TAP combined with an RS block. Patients in EOI group received UG-EOI combined with an RS block. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption. A total of 49 patients were included in the final analysis. The postoperative 24-hour sufentanil consumption in the EOI group was significantly lower than that in the TAP group (9.79±10.22 vs. 18.67±12.58µg; P [noninferiority] <0.01; noninferiority confirmed). Fewer patients in the EOI versus TAP group had a numerical rating score of >3 during motion. Furthermore, the mean postoperative 48-hour sufentanil consumption was lower in the EOI versus TAP group (11.54±11.70 vs. 23.04±17.10µg; P =0.01). The mean postoperative 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 score was higher in the EOI versus TAP group (135.21±4.40 vs. 131.91±5.11; P =0.02). These findings suggest that UG-EOI combined with an RS block was superior to UG-TAP combined with an RS block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing LC.

Availability of Observational Pain Assessment Tools in Hospitalized Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Background and Objectives: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures in older patients cause lower back pain and abnormal posture, resulting in impaired activities of daily living (ADLs). Assessing pain using self-reported assessment tools is difficult, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. Recently, observational assessment tools have been used when self-reported ones were difficult to administer. No studies have reported the usefulness of observational assessment tools in patients with acute-phase orthopedic disorders without complication. This study aimed to examine the availability of observational tools for pain assessment in patients with lumbar vertebral fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to our hospital with acute-phase vertebral fractures were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Pain was assessed using Japanese versions of the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 observational assessment tools, and the Numerical Rating Scale, a self-reported assessment tool. To compare the pain assessment tool, we examined whether each tool correlated with ADLs and ambulatory status. ADLs were assessed using the Barthel Index. Ambulatory status was assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories and the 10-m walking test. Results: Similar to the Numerical Rating Scale scores, assessments with the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 showed significant decreases in scores over time. A significant positive correlation was observed between the self-reported and observational assessment tools. Each pain assessment tool was significantly negatively correlated with ADLs and ambulatory status. Conclusions: When self-reported assessment with the Numerical Rating Scale is difficult for patients with cognitive impairment, pain can be estimated using the Abbey pain scale and Doloplus-2 observational assessment tools.

The Influence of Students Academic Performance on Their Employability in the Field of Education

The study aims to determine the influence of academic performance to employability of the students in the field of education.The experimental research design will be structured for this study in which numeric score rating gathered the perception of the respondents observed in a structured pattern. This research design will deal at the problem of the study scientifically, to establish a clear cause and effect of Education Major students’ academic performance to their employability.The students’ perception on their employability in the field of education revealed that many disagreed their course is very important in their future work, and expressed that they are not more likely to work on a private school Majority of the students disagreed that they are more likely to work on a public school, and shared that their field of study is in-demand in terms of work opportunities in the education sector. Further, more students disagreed on the other indicators which are; they are confident that their skills and knowledge will match their work and confident that they will work in teaching or education sector, teachers are more likely to teach students than doing admin works, student skills are honed enough to move in an education work environment and they chose their field of study based on work demands of the education sector, teachers are more likely to do admin works than teaching students, students are more ready to teach and experience work environment, and lastly students already planned where they are going to work.

Effect of Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Fentanyl Infusion on Postoperative Recovery in Cardiac Surgeries via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesThe effect of ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane block (ESPB) on the time to extubation is unclear. This study aimed to assess the effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB on the time to extubation in patients who had cardiac surgery through midline sternotomy. DesignRandomized controlled trial. SettingCairo university hospital and national heart institute, Egypt. ParticipantsPatients aged from 18-70 years old who underwent cardiac surgery procedure through midline sternotomy. InterventionsRecruited patients were randomized to receive either preoperative single shot ultrasound guided bilateral ESPB or fentanyl infusion. MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the time to extubation. other outcomes included: total perioperative fentanyl consumption, pain score using the numerical rating score (NRS), length of ICU stay and incidence of perioperative complications. Main resultsTwo hundred and nineteen patients were available for final analysis. In the ESPB group, the mean time of extubation was significantly shorter (159.5 ± 109.5) minutes, compared to the control group (303.2 ± 95.9) minutes, mean difference (95% CI): -143.7(-171.1, -116.3) minutes, p= 0.0001. Ultrafast track (immediate postoperative) extubation was achieved in 23 (21.1%) patients in ESPB group compared to one patient (0.9%) in the control group. The ICU stay was significantly reduced in the ESPB group (47.2 2 ± 13.3) hours compared to the control group (78.9 ± 25.2) hours, p= 0.0001. There was significant reduction in NRS in ESPB group than control group for up to 24 hours postoperatively, p =0.001. ConclusionAmong adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery through medline sternotomy, the extubation time was halved in patients who received single shot bilateral erector spinae plane block compared to patients who received fentanyl infusion. Clinical trial identifierNCT05356715. Registration URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05356715