Numeric Pain Scores Research Articles

Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial Determining Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Compartment Blocks in the Immediate Postoperative Period

BackgroundThe purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to identify if a fascia iliaca block reduces postoperative pain and narcotic consumption and improves early functional outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed through the mini-posterior approach. MethodsPatients were recruited from September 2017 to September 2019. Eligible patients received a primary THA using a mini-posterior approach with epidural anesthesia. Postoperatively, patients were randomized to receive a fascia iliaca compartment block or a placebo block. Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, narcotic consumption, and functional outcomes were recorded at regular intervals postoperatively. ResultsUpon study completion, 122 patients were available for final analysis. There was no difference in the average pain scores at any time interval between the placebo and block groups during the first 24 hours (P = .21-.99). There was no difference in the morphine equivalents consumed between the groups during any time interval postoperatively (P = .06-.95). Functional testing showed no difference in regards to distance walked during the first therapy session (67.1 vs 68.3 ft., P = .92) and timed-up-and-go testing (63.7 vs 66.3 seconds, P = .86). There was an increased incidence of quadriceps weakness in the block group (22% vs 0%, P = .004) requiring alterations in therapy protocols. ConclusionThis randomized trial shows that a fascia iliaca compartment block does not improve functional performance and does not decrease pain levels or narcotic usage after mini-posterior THA, but does increase the risk of quadriceps weakness postoperatively. Based on these results we do not recommend routine fascia iliaca compartment blocks after THA performed with the mini-posterior approach.

Effectiveness of quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of quadratus lumborum (QL) block on pain after surgeries under general or spinal anesthesia. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to compare pain scores at rest and with movement 48 h postoperatively in a QL block group and a control group both with placebo block and without block and the time to first additional analgesics. The analgesic effect of the QL block according to the type of surgery and block approach was also examined. A literature search was performed using well-known databases for articles published up to March 2019. Nine RCTs were included. Compared to the control group, pain scores at rest were significantly lower for 48 h postoperatively in the QL block group. QL block reduced pain scores with movement at six, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The QL block group exhibited the most improved numerical pain scores at 12 h postoperatively both at rest and with movement, with a mean difference (MD) of -2.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.12 to -1.20) and -2.26 [95% CI -3.54 to -0.98]), respectively. The subgroup analysis of pain scores at rest showed a statistically significant subgroup difference (P=0.02, I2=75.7%), suggesting a different analgesic effect of QL block based on the approach. Time to first additional analgesics postoperatively was longer in the QL block group than in the control group (MD 333.51 minutes [95% CI 69.37 to 597.64]). QL block may be a good multimodal analgesic approach for pain after abdominal surgeries.

The effect of intravenous dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting after Cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine: a randomized-controlled trial.

Intrathecal morphine administered during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery is associated with a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Small studies performed to date provide conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of dexamethasone as prophylaxis in this setting, raising the possibility that efficacy may be linked to dose timing. This study hypothesized that intravenous dexamethasone given prior to intrathecal morphine during spinal anesthesia may reduce the incidence of PONV. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 108 patients undergoing Cesarean delivery were randomized to receive 8 mg dexamethasone or placebo prior to spinal anesthesia that included 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine. Outcomes were assessed on postanesthesia care unit arrival, as well as at postoperative hours one, three, six, 24, and 48. The primary outcome was the total number of subjects experiencing PONV during the study period of 48 hr postpartum. Secondary outcomes included severity of pain via the numeric rating scale pain score, and the use of rescue antiemetics and analgesics. No significant difference in the number of patients experiencing PONV was found between the treatment (n = 44, 80.0%) and control groups (n = 45, 84.9%) (difference -4.9%; 95% confidence interval, -19.2 to 9.4; P = 0.50), nor for median numeric rating scale pain scores (P = 0.24), total consumption of rescue antiemetics (P = 0.40), or opioid analgesics (P = 0.26). This trial does not support the use of dexamethasone prior to intrathecal morphine for PONV prophylaxis in Cesarean delivery. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01734161); registered 27 November, 2012.

Cannabinoids for adult cancer-related pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesThere is increased interest in cannabinoids for cancer pain management and legislative changes are in progress in many countries. This study aims to determine the beneficial and adverse effects of...

Impact of opioid dose escalation on pain intensity: a retrospective cohort study.

Prescribers are often confronted with the decision to escalate opioid doses to achieve adequate analgesia. Understanding the impact of dose escalation on pain intensity is warranted. Using a retrospective cohort study design, Veterans with chronic pain and chronic opioid therapy were identified. Opioid dose escalators (>20% increase in average morphine milligram equivalent daily dose) were compared with dose maintainers (±20% change in average morphine milligram equivalent daily dose) assessed over 2 consecutive 6-month windows. Pain intensity was measured by the Numeric Rating Scale. The primary analyses used linear repeated-measures models among a 1:1 matched sample of escalators and maintainers matched on propensity score and within ±180 days of the index date. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using adjusted linear repeated-measures models with and without incorporating stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting. There were 32,420 dose maintainers and 20,767 dose escalators identified with 19,358 (93%) matched pairs. Pain scores were persistently higher among dose escalators at each 90-day period after the index date (0-90 days after index date: dose escalators: 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.64-4.72 dose maintainers: 4.32, 95% CI: 4.28-4.36, P < 0.0001; 91-180 days after index date: dose escalators: 4.53, 95% CI: 4.49-4.57; dose maintainers: 4.25, 95% CI: 4.22-4.29, P < 0.0001) but were not different in the 90 days before the index date (dose escalators: 4.64, 95% CI: 4.61-4.68; dose maintainers: 4.59, 95% CI: 4.55-4.63, P = 0.0551). Sensitivity analyses provided similar results as the primary analyses. Opioid dose escalation among patients with chronic pain is not associated with improvements in Numeric Rating Scale pain scores.

Midterm Outcomes of Ultrasound-guided Local Treatment for Infrapatellar Saphenous Neuroma Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable treatment for advanced knee arthritis, up to 19% of patients after TKA remain dissatisfied, especially with residual pain. A less known source of medial knee pain following TKA is infrapatellar saphenous neuroma. Ultrasound-guided local treatment with hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection is an effective short-term solution. Our primary aim was to evaluate the durability of local treatment by comparing numeric pain scores for medial knee pain after TKA at pretreatment, one month following treatment, and midterm follow-up. A secondary aim was to identify associations of patient characteristics with degree of change in numeric pain score. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who had symptomatic infrapatellar saphenous neuroma following TKA and were treated with ultrasound-guided local treatment by hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection between January 1, 2012, and January 1, 2016. Those with follow-up less than three years were excluded. Patients who were unable to return for midterm follow-up were called. Numeric pain scores for the medial knee were recorded. Patient demographics, medical history, revision TKA status, number of prior knee surgeries, narcotic use, psychiatric disorders, and current tobacco use were also collected.Results: Of 32 identified patients, 29 (7 men, 22 women, median age 65.9 years) elected to participate in this study with a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.6 (0.8) years. The median (range) pretreatment pain score was 9 (5-10). After local treatment, the median (range) numeric pain score was significantly lower at both one-month and midterm follow-up (5; P<0.001). The initial response to treatment was durable given that the difference between one-month and midterm follow-up scores was not significant (P=0.47). Advanced age was associated with less overall pain relief from pretreatment to midterm follow-up, while female sex, history of fibromyalgia, and TKA revision prior to treatment were associated with worsening pain from one-month to midterm follow-up (P<0.05). Conclusions: Patients who underwent ultrasound-guided local treatment with hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection for painful postoperative infrapatellar saphenous neuroma following TKA experienced significant numeric pain score reduction. Pain relief remained consistent from 1onemonth to midterm follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Case Series

PASCAL Laser Produces Less Pain Responses Compared to Conventional Laser System During the Panretinal Photocoagulation

Background: Majority of patients experience pain during complete the panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Laser photocoagulation delivery progressed with the introduction of pattern-scanning laser systems (PASCAL). Shorter pulse duration and choroidal penetration are believed to reduce pain during laser treatment. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess pain response in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who underwent either PASCAL or conventional laser. Subjects and Methods: Eighty eyes with newly diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomly divided in to two groups each composed of 40 eyes: group (A) in which patients were received standard argon laser panretinal photocoagulation and group (B) in which patients were received pattern scan multispot panretinal photocoagulation. Results: Mean pain scores were 0.515 ±0. 834 in the PASCAL laser and 0.128 ±...1 in the conventional laser group. Numerical pain score was statistically significant higher in conventional group than in PASCAL group (p<0.001). Conclusion: It could be concluded that pattern scan multispot laser PRP was associated with more patient comfort compared to conventional PRP.

PASCAL Laser Produces Less Pain Responses Compared to Conventional Laser System During the Panretinal Photocoagulation

Background: Majority of patients experience pain during complete the panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Laser photocoagulation delivery progressed with the introduction of pattern-scanning laser systems (PASCAL). Shorter pulse duration and choroidal penetration are believed to reduce pain during laser treatment. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess pain response in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who underwent either PASCAL or conventional laser. Subjects and Methods: Eighty eyes with newly diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomly divided in to two groups each composed of 40 eyes: group (A) in which patients were received standard argon laser panretinal photocoagulation and group (B) in which patients were received pattern scan multispot panretinal photocoagulation. Results: Mean pain scores were 0.515 ±0. 834 in the PASCAL laser and 0.128 ±...1 in the conventional laser group. Numerical pain score was statistically significant higher in conventional group than in PASCAL group (p<0.001). Conclusion: It could be concluded that pattern scan multispot laser PRP was associated with more patient comfort compared to conventional PRP.

The Relationship between Mean Platelet Volume and Numeric Pain Scores during Vaso-occlusive Crises among Patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia in Zaria,Nigeria

The Relationship between Mean Platelet Volume and Numeric Pain Scores during Vaso-occlusive Crises among Patients with Sickle Cell Anaemia in Zaria,Nigeria

Infrapatellar nerve damage : Aneglected cause of severe localized leg pain.

Asmall portion of patients suffer from severe knee pain following previous knee surgery or atrauma. Awareness among traumatologists regarding aneuropathic origin of this persistent knee pain is poor. Ongoing pain close to the knee may be caused by damage of the infrapatellar nerve (IN). This branch of the saphenous nerve is purely sensory and is at risk for iatrogenic damage due to its superficial medial course. Once recognized using simple tests during physical examination, avariety of treatment modalities may be proposed. However, astandard treatment algorithm was hitherto absent. This study includes 15patients having IN damage who were offered astep-up regimen including lidocaine injections, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) or neurectomy. Success (>50% drop in numeric rating scale pain score) was attained in 11 (73% success rate, 9month median follow-up). The aim of this contribution is to increase knowledge regarding this illusive entity and to discuss the efficacy of our treatment protocol.

Dynamic analysis of variations in postoperative pain trajectories over time in patients receiving epidural analgesia using latent curve models.

Although epidural analgesia (EA) provides reliable pain relief after major operations, few studies have explored how postoperative pain trajectories change over time in patients receiving EA and the associated factors. This study aimed to model the dynamic features of pain trajectories after surgery and investigate factors associated with their variations using latent curve analysis. This retrospective study was conducted at a single medical center in Taiwan, and data were obtained from patients receiving perioperative EA by electronic chart review. Mean numeric rating pain scores were recorded daily in the first five postoperative days. Patient demographics, surgical sites, and infusion pump settings were also collected. Latent curve models using two latent variables, intercept and slope, were developed to explain the variations in postoperative pain scores over time. The influences of potential predictors of postoperative pain trajectories were further evaluated for the final model determination. Of the 1294 collected patients, the daily pain scores averaged 2.0 to 2.9 for different surgical sites. Among the nine significant factors influencing pain trajectories, chest and lower extremity surgery tended to induce less and more baseline pain, respectively, than those with abdomen surgery (both p < 0.001). In addition, male patients and those with a shorter anesthesia time had less baseline pain (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). The older and lighter patients and those with chest surgery or American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 tended to have milder decreasing trends in pain trajectories. A higher infusion rate was associated with an elevated baseline level and smoother decreasing trend in pain trajectory. The final model fit our data acceptably (root mean square error of approximation = 0.05, comparative fit index = 0.97). Latent curve analysis provided insights into the dynamic nature of variations in postoperative pain trajectories. Further studies investigating more factors associated with pain trajectories are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms behind the transitions of pain scores over time after surgery.

No Differences in the Prevalence and Intensity of Chronic Postsurgical Pain Between Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Prospective Study.

ObjectiveTo compare the prevalence and characteristics of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) between laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and abdominal hysterectomy (AH) groups 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and to assess the impact of pain on the activities of daily living (ADL) of patients.MethodsThe demographic characteristics, intraoperative clinical factors, and postoperative pain score were collected prospectively in patients scheduled for elective LH or AH for benign disease at our institution from July 2014 to June 2015. Patients were interviewed by telephone and followed up for pain assessment 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The prevalence, intensity, and specific locations of pain, as well as analgesic administration and impact on the ADL, were included in the questionnaire.ResultsThe results from 406 patients (225 patients in the LH group and 181 patients in the AH group) were obtained. Three months after surgery, the prevalence of CPSP was 20.9% in the LH group and 20.4% in the AH group. At 6 months, the prevalence of pain declined to 11.6% in the LH group and 9.4% in the AH group. At 12 months after surgery, only 13 (5.8%) patients in the LH group and 11 (6.1%) patients in the AH group complained about persistent pain. The prevalence of CPSP, as well as the average numerical rating scale pain scores at rest and during movement, during 12 months after surgery were not significantly different between the groups. CPSP after hysterectomy exhibited a negative impact on the ADL.ConclusionThe prevalence and intensity of CPSP were not significantly different between patients undergoing LH or AH within 12 months after surgery. A tendency towards a reduction in chronic pain over time was documented. Chronic post-hysterectomy pain exhibited a negative impact on the ADL.

The comparison of effects of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain in cesarean section under spinal anesthesia -A randomized controlled trial.

Background and Aims:Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been effectively used for anterior abdominal wall analgesia. The aim of the study was to compare the duration of analgesia produced by two drugs fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in TAP block under ultrasound-guidance after lower segment cesarean section in a randomized controlled trial.Material and Methods:Sixty-four women of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II coming for cesarean sections were randomized to receive TAP blocks on each side of the abdomen using the local anesthetic drug 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine with either fentanyl 25 mcg or dexmedetomidine 25 mcg. A ten point numerical pain score was done at baseline, at 1 h and then at intervals of 4 h postoperatively. The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oximetry were also monitored as above. The time to first analgesia demand from the time of the block and the total analgesic consumption were recorded. The statistical analysis was done by Mann-Whitney U test and the analgesics consumption by using Chi-square test with R software.Results:Our primary end-point was to assess the duration of analgesia produced by fentanyl added to ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided TAP block, which were 125 min with Q1–Q3 as 110–180 and dexmedetomidine 130 min with Q1–Q3 as 105–161 (P value = 0.47). The amount of analgesics used in the postoperative period in both the groups were analyzed using the Chi-square test not found to have any significant difference between both the groups (P-value = 0.512).Conclusion:Fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided TAP block were equally effective in both prolongation of analgesia and reducing the total consumption of analgesics.

Age - Does it really count? A study of the Perioperative Morbidity and Long-Term Outcome in Patients Above 70 Years of Age Undergoing Spine surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disorders.

Objective To assess the long-term outcome and perioperative morbidity in spine surgeries for lumbar degenerative disorders and, thereby, to evaluate the safety of surgery in the aging population. Methods Retrospective study of patients aged > 70 years, operated for degenerative lumbar disorders between 2011 and 2015. We evaluated patient demographic, clinical and surgical data; comorbidities, perioperative complications, pre & postoperative pain scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, patient satisfaction and overall mortality. Results A total of 103 patients (Males: Females55:48) with mean age 74.6 years (70–85yrs) were studied. 60 patients (58.2%) had decompression alone, while 43 (41.8%) had decompression & fusion. Mean hospital stay was 5.7days. Mean follow-up was 47.6months (24–73mnths). Patients reported significant improvement in backpain (Numerical pain score 7.7 vs 1.6; p < 0.001), leg pain (Numerical pain score 7.4 vs 1.7; p < 0.001), disability (ODI 82.3 vs 19.1; p < 0.001) and walking distance ( p < 0.001). 76% patients were satisfied with the results at the time of final follow-up. 26 patients (25.24%) had perioperative complications which were all minor, without mortality. Most common intraoperative & postoperative complications were dural tear (6.79%) & urinary tract infection (6.79%) respectively. Conclusions With meticulous perioperative care lumbar spine surgery is safe and effective in elderly population. Patients had longer mean hospital stay in view of the gradual and comprehensive rehabilitation program. Presence of comorbidities or minor perioperative complications did not increase the overall morbidity or affect the clinical outcomes of surgery in our study.

A multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with severe, nonflail fracture patterns (Chest Wall Injury Society NONFLAIL).

The efficacy of surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) in patients without flail chest has not been studied specifically. We hypothesized that SSRF improves outcomes among patients with displaced rib fractures in the absence of flail chest. Multicenter, prospective, controlled, clinical trial (12 centers) comparing SSRF within 72 hours to medical management. Inclusion criteria were three or more ipsilateral, severely displaced rib fractures without flail chest. The trial involved both randomized and observational arms at patient discretion. The primary outcome was the numeric pain score (NPS) at 2-week follow-up. Narcotic consumption, spirometry, pulmonary function tests, pleural space complications (tube thoracostomy or surgery for retained hemothorax or empyema >24 hours from admission) and both overall and respiratory disability-related quality of life (RD-QoL) were also compared. One hundred ten subjects were enrolled. There were no significant differences between subjects who selected randomization (n = 23) versus observation (n = 87); these groups were combined for all analyses. Of the 110 subjects, 51 (46.4%) underwent SSRF. There were no significant baseline differences between the operative and nonoperative groups. At 2-week follow-up, the NPS was significantly lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (2.9 vs. 4.5, p < 0.01), and RD-QoL was significantly improved (disability score, 21 vs. 25, p = 0.03). Narcotic consumption also trended toward being lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (0.5 vs. 1.2 narcotic equivalents, p = 0.05). During the index admission, pleural space complications were significantly lower in the operative, as compared with the nonoperative group (0% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.02). In this clinical trial, SSRF performed within 72 hours improved the primary outcome of NPS at 2-week follow-up among patients with three or more displaced fractures in the absence of flail chest. These data support the role of SSRF in patients without flail chest. Therapeutic, level II.

Transurethral resection in women with symptomatic keratinizing squamous metaplasia of urinary bladder: A retrospective study of 92 cases.

ObjectivesTo investigate the efficacy of transurethral resection (TUR) on relieving urinary symptoms in patients with keratinizing squamous metaplasia (KSM) of the urinary bladder.MethodsData were analyzed from a retrospective study of patients receiving transurethral bipolar plasma resection (bi‐TUR) treatment for symptomatic KSM. Urinary symptoms were assessed by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and a numeric rating scale pain score. Efficacy was assessed using the IPSS to determine changes from baseline in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Self‐reported quality of life (QoL) was assessed by the last question of the IPSS questionnaire.ResultsA total of 92 female patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 42 years. LUTS, pain, and hematuria were the most common symptoms that affected patients. The median follow‐up duration was 51 months. There were significant improvements in LUTS from baseline IPSS after TUR (P < .001). The percentage of the patients with moderate to severe LUTS went down from 52.2% to 18.5%. The median Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)‐11 pain score reduced from 3 at baseline to 0 at the last visit. Twenty‐one out of 40 patients reported that the pain symptoms disappeared completely. No patients reported hematuria symptoms at the final follow‐up. Improvement of self‐reported QoL was significant (P < .001). A total of 57.6% of patients reported an improvement, 26.1% of patients reported no improvement, and 16.3% reported deterioration.ConclusionsBi‐TUR therapy significantly relieved urinary symptoms in women with KSM. Improvement of QoL was acceptable with a success rate of 57.6%. Considering the very low complication rate, our study supported bi‐TUR as an alternative treatment for patients who are resistant to medical therapy.

A Pilot Study of a Functional Pain Assessment for Adult Patients Admitted with Sickle Cell Pain Crisis

Introduction Acute vaso-occlusive pain crises are the most common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD). Pain is a subjective sensation and is often difficult to describe and for practitioners to understand. The complexity and multidimensional nature of pain requires additional evaluation beyond pain intensity. Pain assessment is also influenced by implicit and explicit biases related to race and ethnicity which can negatively influence treatment (Wandner et al J Pain 2012). In this pilot quality improvement study, we studied resident perceptions to a functional assessment tool in adult patients hospitalized with sickle cell vaso-occlusive crises. We used the Youth Acute Pain Functional Ability Questionnaire (YAPFAQ), a validated questionnaire of physical function in youth experiencing acute pain (Zempsky et al J Pain 2014) (Figure 1). Resident responses to using the YAPFAQ were measured as an initial step to implementation of functional pain assessment in hospitalized adults with SCD pain crises. Methods We piloted this study on internal medicine residents. First, residents completed the Resident Acute SCD Pain Assessment Survey regarding their current management of acute pain in SCD (Figure 2). This was done to determine their baseline demographic information, methods of pain assessment, satisfaction with the numerical pain score system, and to understand barriers in assessing acute pain. This survey included a combination of multiple choice, free response, and binary response options. The residents then trialed the YAPFAQ with a patient admitted with vaso-occlusive pain crisis then the residents completed The Post YAPFAQ Evaluation Survey in response to this assessment tool (Figure 3). This survey included a combination of multiple choice, free response, and binary response options. The goal of this survey was to assess resident satisfaction with YAPFAQ, perceived patient receptiveness to YAPFAQ, and feasibility of using this tool during daily assessments. Patients were not surveyed during this pilot study. We performed descriptive statistics to describe the survey results. Results Sixteen residents completed the Acute SCD Pain Management survey prior to using the YAPFAQ. Sixty-nine percent of residents reported dissatisfaction with using numerical pain scores. Reported barriers to assessing pain included: subjectivity of pain scores, concern for malingering, and the ceiling effect of the numeric scale. Seven residents completed the post YAPFAQ evaluation survey. A majority of residents (86%) were extremely satisfied or satisfied with using the YAPFAQ. Fifty seven percent of residents felt that patients were extremely receptive or receptive to using this tool. The majority of residents (85%) felt that the YAPFAQ improved their understanding of patients' pain. All YAPFAQs were completed with patients in 10 minutes or less. Most residents (57%) reported that the tool would be feasible for implementation on rounds. Conclusions Similar to previous studies, our residents felt that numerical pain score systems inadequately describe pain. Residents had generally positive responses to the YAPFAQ. One resident stated that the questionnaire was "structured and easy to compare day to day." Functional pain assessment allows providers to better understand how pain limits daily activities and can provide useful functional targets for safe hospital discharge. Future directions of this project include performing a larger study of patients hospitalized with vaso-occlusive pain crises to validate the YAPFAQ in adult patients, survey patients regarding experiences with the YAPFAQ, and to create tailored pain management plans based on functional pain assessments. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Infrapatellar nerve damage : Aneglected cause of severe localized leg pain-German version

Asmall portion of patients suffer from severe knee pain following previous knee surgery or atrauma. Awareness among traumatologists regarding aneuropathic origin of this persistent knee pain is poor. Ongoing pain close to the knee may be caused by damage of the infrapatellar nerve (IN). This branch of the saphenous nerve is purely sensory and is at risk for iatrogenic damage due to its superficial medial course. Once recognized using simple tests during physical examination, avariety of treatment modalities may be proposed. However, astandard treatment algorithm was hitherto absent. This study includes 15patients having IN damage who were offered astep-up regimen including lidocaine injections, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) or neurectomy. Success (>50% drop in numeric rating scale pain score) was attained in 11 (73% success rate, 9month median follow-up). The aim of this contribution is to increase knowledge regarding this illusive entity and to discuss the efficacy of our treatment protocol.

PROMIS Patient Reported Pain Outcomes Compared With Numerical Pain Score Before and After Ankle Surgery

Category:Patient Reported OutcomesIntroduction/Purpose:Patient reported outcomes (PRO) are important for measuring clinical changes after surgical intervention. This study compares PROMIS pain intensity, PROMIS pain interference, and a zero-to-ten numerical pain score (NPS) before and after three common ankle surgeries to test the hypothesis that pain improvement is measurable by each scale. In addition, the effects size (ES) of each scale is compared to help determine which scale may provide the most power to detect an improvement in pain.Methods:PRO scores were routinely collected during clinic visits between 2015 and 2018. Over 175 patients who had undergone total ankle replacement, subtalar fusion, or lateral ankle ligament stabilization were identified in the electronic health record using the surgical billing codes for these procedures. The most recent preoperative and postoperative PROs for these patients were compared by Mann-Whitney U, and effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d.Results:For total ankle replacement, NPS, pain intensity, and pain interference all improved (p<0.05) with ES 1.29, 0.95, and 0.63 respectively. For subtalar fusion, NPS, and pain interference improved (p<0.05) with ES 0.86 and 0.54; pain intensity (p=0.21) was unchanged with ES 0.30. For lateral ankle ligament stabilization, NPS, and pain interference improved (p<0.05) with ES 0.49 and 0.59; pain intensity (p=0.49) was unchanged with ES 0.19.Conclusion:While both NPS and PROMIS pain interference consistently demonstrated improvements after common ankle surgeries, NPS is preferable given its single question format and greater effect size in two of the three procedures studies. PROMIS pain intensity did not routinely measure changes in our surgical population questioning its utility.

Assessment of Somatosensory Function, Pain, and Unpleasantness in Two Surrogate Models of Trigeminal Nerve Damage: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Crossover Study.

To assess the pain and/or unpleasantness and the somatosensory changes caused by two experimental models of trigeminal nerve damage (topical application of capsaicin and local anesthetics) in healthy participants using extensive evaluation tools. This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study included 20 healthy adult participants who underwent three separate sessions of testing. In each session, the psychophysical quantitative sensory testing (QST) and the electrophysiologic electrically evoked trigeminal "nociceptive-specific" blink reflex (nBR) investigations were performed at baseline. Following a 15-minute topical application of 0.1% capsaicin, 5% EMLA, or Vaseline (placebo) agents, the maximum numeric rating scale pain and unpleasantness scores were recorded. Additionally, qualitative sensory testing and somatosensory mapping were performed. The QST and nBR investigations were repeated immediately after each application. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Capsaicin application was associated with significantly higher pain and unpleasantness scores when compared to EMLA and Vaseline (P < .001), with varied bidirectional somatosensory changes among the participants and significant loss of thermosensory function (P < .030). EMLA application induced loss of thermal and mechanical somatosensory function (P < .030) and a significant reduction in electrically evoked pain scores on nBR investigation (P < .001). No significant changes were seen in the electrophysiologic component of the nBR after any of the applications (P = .922). Topical capsaicin and EMLA application mimicked certain aspects of somatosensory changes seen in trigeminal nerve damage patients and may be used as surrogate models of such changes.