LECTOTYPIFICATION OF PECTIS L. (ASTERACEAE) David J. Keil' Linnaeus (1759a) described Pectis and included within it two species, P. ciliaris and P. linifolia. In 1913 Britton and Brown designated P. ciliaris as lectotype for Pectis. This lectotypification was accepted by editors of Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum) (Farr et al., 1979). I will present evidence below that lectotypification of Pectis by Britton and Brown was superfluous and that Pectis was actually lectotypified over 90 years earlier by Cassini. Britton and Brown as adherents of American Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Anonymous, 1907) followed mechanical practice of designating the first binomial species in order as lectotype of a genus. This appears to have been method of lectotypification used for Pectis. This practice is in conflict with provisions of Article 8 of International Code of Botanical Nomen- clature (Voss et al., 1983). The choice of Pectis ciliaris as lectotype is also in conflict with Linnaean protologue of Pectis. Linnaeus (1759a) included both a diagnosis (p. 1221) and a description (p. 1376) for Pectis. The diagnosis is very brief: PECTIS. Recept. nudum. Pappus aristatus. Cal. 5-phyllus, cylindricus. Flosculi radiantes 5. Of features described, receptacle, involucre [cal.] and number of ray florets are same for both P. ciliaris and P. linifolia. However, only P. linifolia has an aristate pappus. Linnaeus's description of genus is more thorough than diagnosis but he again described pappus of