Number Of Neurosurgeons Research Articles

Pioneers of Neurosurgery in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Region: A Historical Vignette and Beyond

South Asia, consisting of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, spreads between the Himalayan base and the Indian Ocean and shares identical geophysical characteristics. With the inclusion of its newest member Afghanistan, these 8 member nations of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) share more or less a homogenous geographical, political, and historical background and cultural heritage, with a significant role in shaping the world. This densely populated area is home to around a quarter of the world's total population. From the ancient ages, the neurosurgical practice has paced relentlessly and in the last 100years, it has reached its zenith. With modern advancements, neurosurgery has developed in its diagnostic and treatment modalities along with facilities for training and education. Despite falling behind owing to economic, educational, and geopolitical constraints, the pioneers of the SAARC region have established the fields of neurosurgery in their respective countries with command. No constraint could stop them from educating and training young physicians to make competent neurosurgeons to evolve the field of neurosurgery in their countries. Their firm determination and hard work paved the way to keep this field striving and thriving, to serve a substantial volume of the world population with their neurosurgical insight and skill. However, this region needs to go a long way as the number of neurosurgeons and facilities is still insufficient. This can be achieved with the guidance and collaboration among the neurosurgeons of the SAARC region as the youth here are talented and hardworking.

Neurosurgical Workforce of Nepal

BackgroundHistorical aspect and some of the ongoing neurosurgical scenario in Nepal were reported and published earlier. However, the neurosurgical workforce with updated data of neurosurgical manpower in Nepal has not yet been published. This study aims to explore the exact number of neurosurgical workforces in Nepal involved in different administrative territories and in different health sectors. MethodsIt is a cross-sectional descriptive study. A nationwide survey was conducted through personal communication from April to September of 2023. Data of neurosurgeons in all the seven provinces of the country and the major sectors of health services were collected. Similarly, the number of neurosurgeons every year from 1988 in the country was also collected. ResultsUntil September 2023, there are 114 actively practicing neurosurgeons in the country for the population of 29,164,578 meaning one neurosurgeon serving about 255829 people. Neurosurgeons are available in all the seven provinces of the country. More than half of the neurosurgeons in the country are fully involved in private practice while about one third are in medical college and less than one-fifth are in the government service. Capital city has more than half of the neurosurgeons of the country. ConclusionNumber of neurosurgeons in the country is still small, however its ratio with population is better than most of the other South Asian countries. In short duration Neurosurgical service flourished significantly in Nepal and is available in all the provinces and thus it has become more easily accessible.

Global Neurosurgical Challenges: A Focus on Central Asia

Neurosurgical care in Central Asia is marked by significant variation across the region's five countries—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. This variation is influenced by factors such as limited modern technology, a shortage of neurosurgeons, and inadequate healthcare infrastructure. Despite these obstacles, there have been notable advancements in the field, particularly in Kazakhstan, where the number of neurosurgeons has increased, and specialized fields such as vascular neurosurgery and brain tumor management have seen significant progress. Other countries in the region, such as Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan, have also made strides in improving neurosurgical care. However, these advancements in neurosurgical care are insignificant to those seen globally which make standard neurosurgical care inaccessible to many patients in Central Asian countries due to shortages of neurosurgeons and limited facilities. The dearth of research data in some CA countries further emphasize the need for urgent intervention. Therefore, we recommend a multipronged approach involving targeted investments, policy reforms, international collaborations, and knowledge sharing is recommended to bolster neurosurgical care capabilities and expand access to essential care across Central Asia. This approach include establishing specialized neurosurgical training programs and fellowships, investing in infrastructure and technology for neurosurgical facilities, and fostering collaborations with international centers for training and research. Additionally, early introduction of neurosurgery education in medical schools, enhancing access to online education resources for neurosurgeons, and promoting the use of telemedicine for neurosurgical consultations and follow-up care are recommended

The availability, access, challenges and advancements in neurosurgical care in Africa: a mini review.

The availability and accessibility of neurosurgical care across Africa remains limited despite recent advancements. Overall, Africa accounts for 15% of the global neurosurgical disease burden but has access to less than 1% of neurosurgeons globally. While the number of neurosurgeons has increased in recent decades, huge workforce shortages remain, with the region facing the second-largest neurosurgical deficit. Access to adequate facilities and equipment is also lacking. Barriers like poverty, conflicts, and distance from care centres negatively impact patients' ability to access services. However, training programs like the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Rabat Training Center have contributed to building local capacity. Use of technologies like neuro-endoscopy is expanding access to more cost-effective interventions for conditions such as hydrocephalus. Undergraduate medical education is also seeing a rise in African students interested in neurosurgery. Despite these advancements, workforce shortfalls, inadequate infrastructure, and challenges posed by geopolitical instability continue to hinder the provision of comprehensive neurosurgical care. Limited research and funding discourage experienced surgeons from practicing in their home countries. Increased international collaboration, support for education, and tackling of structural issues are needed to continue strengthening Africa's neurosurgical capacity and reducing the disease burden. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current state of neurosurgery on the continent, highlight achievements, and identify persisting challenges.

Great Hospitals of Central Asia: The Kazakhstan National Centre for Neurosurgery

This paper aimed to describe the National Centre for Neurosurgery, the only specialized hospital in the treatment of neurological diseases in Kazakhstan and the leading neurosurgical hospital in Central Asia. Historical data were collected from the archive materials of the National Centre for Neurosurgery. The paper outlines the achievements of the Centre in providing neurosurgical care to the population over the past 15years, commencing with its establishment in 2008. During this period, there has been a 2.3-fold increase in the number of neurosurgeons at the Centre, accompanied by a significant seven-fold rise in the number of surgeries conducted. Additionally, the Centre has hosted international conferences and educational programs in collaboration with the Asian Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies. Throughout the last 15years, more than 70 treatment techniques were introduced, and subsequent technology transfer initiatives extended these methods to regions within the country. The National Centre for Neurosurgery has achieved remarkable progress in delivering patient-centered neurosurgical care, rehabilitation programs, and innovative treatments, supported by state funding, benefitting patients across Central Asia.

Geographical Distribution of Neurosurgeons and Emergency Neurosurgical Services in Pakistan

According to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), a minimum neurosurgery workforce density should be 1 per 200,000 population for optimum access to neurosurgical care. Pakistan lags behind in the number of neurosurgeons, and disproportionate geographical distribution further increases disparity. Our objective was to geographically map the density of neurosurgeons and emergency neurosurgical services (ENS) in Pakistan. This survey was circulated among 307 neurosurgeons. Data were analyzed using SPSS v21. The number of neurosurgeons and ENS were plotted on the population density map using ArcGIS Pro 3.0.0 software. Three hundred and seven neurosurgeons working at 74 centers responded to our survey (93.3% coverage). The current density of neurosurgeons in Pakistan is 0.14/100,000. The 2 more populous provinces, Punjab and Sindh, have 42.3% (130) and 35.8% (110) neurosurgeons, respectively. They also housed nearly 3 quarters of all the neurosurgery centers in urban districts. Karachi and Lahore accommodate 135 (44%) of all the country's neurosurgeons, having 0.29 and 0.51 neurosurgeons/100,000 respectively. Management of traumatic brain injury is offered at 65 centers (87.8%). Nearly all centers are equipped with computed tomography (CT) scan machine (74; 97%), but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) facility is available at 55 (72%) centers and 37 (49%) centers have angiography suites. Sixty nine centers (93.2%) have C-arm fluoroscopes available. The geographical mapping of neurosurgeons and neurosurgical facilities is highly skewed towards urban centers, increasing disparity in access to timely neurosurgical emergency services. Four times more neurosurgeons are required in Pakistan to bridge the gap in neurosurgical workforce.

Neurosurgical Education in Tanzania: The Dar es Salaam Global Neurosurgery Course

Postgraduate neurosurgical training is essential to develop a neurosurgical workforce with the skills and knowledge to address patient needs for neurosurgical care. In Tanzania, the number of neurosurgeons and neurosurgical services offered have expanded in the past 40 years. Training opportunities within the country, however, are not sufficient to meet the needs of residents, specialists, and nurses in neurosurgery, forcing many to train outside the country incurring associated costs and burdens. We report on the Dar es Salaam Global Neurosurgery Course, which aims to provide local training to neurosurgical health care providers in Tanzania and surrounding countries. We report the experience of the Global Neurosurgery Course held in March 2023 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. We describe the funding, planning, organization, and teaching methods along with participant and faculty feedback. The course trained 121 participants with 63 faculty-42 from Tanzania and 21 international faculty. Training methods included lectures, hands-on surgical teaching, webinars, case discussions, surgical simulation, virtual reality, and bedside teaching. Although there were challenges with equipment and Internet connectivity, participant feedback was positive, with overall improvement in knowledge reported in all topics taught during the course. International collaboration can be successful in delivering topic-specific training that aims to address the everyday needs of surgeons in their local setting. Suggestions for future courses include increasing training on allied topics to neurosurgery and neurosurgical subspecialty topics, reflecting the growth in neurosurgical capacity and services offered in Tanzania.

Structure of Neurosurgical Care in Germany in Comparison to Countries Organized in the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies: A Need to Reorganize Neurosurgical Training and Care in Germany.

Although the world is experiencing a deficit in the neurosurgical workforce, the number of neurosurgeons in Germany has increased within the last two decades. The aim of the present study was to assess the neurosurgical workforce in Germany, compare it to European countries, and assess structures in neurosurgical departments in Germany. Data regarding the number of neurosurgeons in Germany as well as the number of departments, beds, cases, and neurosurgical procedures were gathered. A survey among German neurosurgical departments was performed to assess the structure of neurosurgical care. Furthermore, another survey among European countries was performed to acquire information regarding the number of surgeons and the regulation of training. From 2000 to 2019, the number of board-certified neurosurgeons in Germany increased by 151% from 973 to 2,446. During the same period, the German population increased by only 1% from 82.26 million to 83.17 million. Thus, the number of neurosurgeons per 100,000 inhabitants increased from 1.18 to 2.94. The increase of neurosurgeons is not paralleled by an increase in departments or an increase in neurosurgical procedures within the active neurosurgical departments. In comparison to the participating European countries, where the number of neurosurgeons per 100,000 inhabitants ranged from 0.45 to 2.94, with Germany shows the highest number. German institutions of medical administration urgently need to consider regulation of neurosurgical specialist training to prevent a further uncontrolled increase in neurosurgeons in a manner that is not adapted to the needs of neurosurgical care for the German population. Actions might include a regulation of entry to the training and of the number of training sites. Furthermore, an integration of non-physician assistant health care professionals and delegation of non-surgical workload from neurosurgeons is necessary. A further increase in neurosurgeons would be associated with a decrease in the surgical caseload per surgeons during training and after board certification, which might compromise the quality of neurosurgical care.

International Neurosurgery: The Role for Collaboration.

The global death toll from lack of access to basic surgical care is three times as much as for tuberculosis, HIV and malaria combined. Patients dying of curable neurosurgical conditions solely because of inadequacy or absence of neurosurgical infrastructure is an issue deserving immediate attention and action. Global neurosurgery is an important step forward in this regard, under which different models of collaboration between HICs and LMICs aim to increase both the number of neurosurgeons as well the quality of neurosurgical care available in these countries through arranging surgical camps, providing neurosurgical training and education, and restructuring the health system in these countries in order to create an environment conducive to the provision of the highest form of neurosurgical care. Despite the many challenges faced by LMICs in furthering neurosurgery programs such as poor resource allocation, brain drain, turbulent socioeconomic conditions, limited training facilities, and population explosion, data now being reported from LMICs the world over, exemplifies the immense positive impact that collaborations have had over the last few decades in improving neurosurgical capacity and infrastructure. So far, conventional methods of collaboration (i.e. neurosurgical missions to LMICs and training of neurosurgeons in HICs) have been effective in progressively bringing about the desired change in LMICs. However, these methods have been limited by a finite funding, pushing the global neurosurgical community to look for alternatives such as online curricula, task shifting and sharing, and long distance mentor-mentee relationships. In this review, we aim to provide an update on the current state of neurosurgical collaborations and identify the barriers in the way of collaborations and what alternative models of collaboration might be used to overcome them..

Neurosurgical research in Southeast Asia: A bibliometric analysis

ObjectivesBibliometric analysis can provide insight into the growth, development and dissemination of research in neurosurgery. Little work has been done to examine the role of country-specific characteristics affecting research productivity. We aimed to characterize andcompare the research productivity among SEA countries in terms of bibliometric indicesand determine associations with country-specific factors. MethodsWe performed a systematic search of all articles by authors affiliated with a neurosurgical department in any of the Southeast Asian countries, indexed in 3 databases from inception to June 10, 2020. Bibliometric indices – number of publications, number of citations, average citations per publication, h-index, and the i-10-index – were computed for each country. Correlations between the indices and country-specific characteristics (population size, GDP per capita, percentage of GDP allocation to research and development (R&D), number of neurosurgeons, number of neurosurgeons per capita, and number of collaborations with non-SEA authors) were determined. ResultsThe number of publications showed an increasing trend up to 2019. Most studies were cohort studies (37%) or case reports or series (37%). Of the country-specific factors analyzed, only percentage of the GDP allocated to R&D was positively correlated with number of publications (p = 0.0004), total citations (p < 0.0001), H-index (p < 0.0001), and i(10)-index (p < 0.0001). Number of collaborations also positively correlated with the same indices. ConclusionOur bibliometric analysis showed increasing contribution by neurosurgeons in the SEA region. Correlational analysis support the view that increased R&D budget allocation and international collaboration can improve neurosurgical research capacity and productivity.

Geospatial evaluation of disparities in neurosurgical access in the United States

When neurosurgical care is needed, the distance to a facility staffed with a neurosurgeon is critical. This work utilizes geospatial analysis to analyze access to neurosurgery in the Medicare population and relevant socioeconomic factors. Medicare billing and demographic data from 2015 to 2019 were combined with national National Provider Identifier (NPI) registry data to identify the average travel distance to reach a neurosurgeon as well as the number of neurosurgeons in each county. This was merged with U.S. Census data to capture 23 socioeconomic attributes. Moran’s I statistic was calculated across counties. Socioeconomic variables were compared using ANOVA. Hotspots with the highest neurosurgeon access were predominantly located in the Mid-Atlantic region, central Texas, and southern Montana. Coldspots were found in the Great Plains, Midwest, and Southern Texas. There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between high- and low-access counties, including: stroke prevalence, poverty, median household income, and total population density. There were no statistically significant differences in most races or ethnicities. Overall, there exist statistically significant clusters of decreased neurosurgery access within the United States, with varying sociodemographic characteristics between access hotspots and coldspots.

Perceptions and Likelihood of Medical Students to Pursue a Career in Neurosurgery: Findings from the Philippines

The number of neurosurgeons in the Philippines is less than ideal for its population, so there is a need to recruit and train more. This study aimed to determine medical students' perception of neurosurgery and their likelihood of pursuing a career in this specialty. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of medical students in the Philippines to assess their perceptions and likelihood of pursuing a career in neurosurgery. Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a χ2 test with a significance level of 0.05. A total of 627 medical students completed the survey, with a response rate of 72.4%. The mean age was 23.8 years, and almost half (49.1%) were women. They had mostly negative perceptions of neurosurgery, and only 18.7% were likely to pursue a career in this specialty. Reasons included poor work-life balance, poor understanding of neuroscience and neurosurgery, and the self-perceived lack of manual dexterity. The most common sources of their perceptions included lectures, movies, and neurosurgery residents and consultants whom they met in hospital. Previous exposure to neurosurgery lectures or rotations, going back to their hometown to work, and having a physician parent were associated with a higher likelihood of pursuing neurosurgery. Our study showed that medical students' perceptions of neurosurgery were generally negative and that only 18.7% were likely to pursue it as a career. Major changes would have to be made to improve students' perceptions to attract more students to the field and increase the neurosurgical workforce.

Recent trends in high-volume Medicare stroke thrombectomy provider characteristics

BackgroundIntracranial mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is increasingly indicated for use in acute ischemic stroke patients. We analyzed recent trends in the characteristics and geographic distributions of physicians providing this service with...

A detailed analysis of anatomical plausibility of crossed and uncrossed streamline rendition of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT(T)) in a commercial stereotactic planning system

BackgroundAn increasing number of neurosurgeons use display of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRT) based on diffusion weighted imaging (dMRI) as basis for their routine planning of stimulation or lesioning approaches in stereotactic tremor surgery. An evaluation of the anatomical validity of the display of the DRT with respect to modern stereotactic planning systems and across different tracking environments has not been performed.MethodsDistinct dMRI and anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of high and low quality from 9 subjects were used. Six subjects had repeated MRI scans and therefore entered the analysis twice. Standardized DICOM structure templates for volume of interest definition were applied in native space for all investigations. For tracking BrainLab Elements (BrainLab, Munich, Germany), two tensor deterministic tracking (FT2), MRtrix IFOD2 (https://www.mrtrix.org), and a global tracking (GT) approach were used to compare the display of the uncrossed (DRTu) and crossed (DRTx) fiber structure after transformation into MNI space. The resulting streamlines were investigated for congruence, reproducibility, anatomical validity, and penetration of anatomical way point structures.ResultsIn general, the DRTu can be depicted with good quality (as judged by waypoints). FT2 (surgical) and GT (neuroscientific) show high congruence. While GT shows partly reproducible results for DRTx, the crossed pathway cannot be reliably reconstructed with the other (iFOD2 and FT2) algorithms.ConclusionSince a direct anatomical comparison is difficult in the individual subjects, we chose a comparison with two research tracking environments as the best possible “ground truth.” FT2 is useful especially because of its manual editing possibilities of cutting erroneous fibers on the single subject level. An uncertainty of 2 mm as mean displacement of DRTu is expectable and should be respected when using this approach for surgical planning. Tractographic renditions of the DRTx on the single subject level seem to be still illusive.

Neurosurgery in Ethiopia: A New Chapter and Future Prospects

Inequitable access to surgical care is most conspicuous in low-income countries (LICs), such as Ethiopia, where infectious diseases, malnutrition, and other maladies consume the lion's share of the available health resources. The aim of this article was to provide an update on the current state of neurosurgery in Ethiopia and identify targets for future development of surgical capacity as a universal health coverage component in this East African nation. Publicly available data included in this report were gathered from resources published by international organizations. A PubMed search was used for a preliminary bibliometric analysis of scholarly output of neurosurgeons in Ethiopia and other low-income countries. Statistical analysis was used to determine the correlation between the number of neurosurgeons and academic productivity. Neurosurgeon density has increased >20-fold from 0.0022 to 0.045 neurosurgeons per 100,000 population between 2006 and 2020. The increase in neurosurgeons was strongly correlated with an increase in total publications (P < 0.001) and the number of new publications per year (P= 0.003). Despite recent progress, the availability of neuroimaging equipment remains inadequate, with 38 computed tomography scanners and 11 magnetic resonance imaging machines for a population of 112.07 million. The geographic distribution of neurosurgical facilities is limited to 12 urban centers. Ethiopian neurosurgery exemplifies the profound effect of international partnerships for training local surgeons on progress in low-income countries toward improved neurosurgical capacity. Collaborations that focus on increasing the neurosurgical workforce should synchronize with efforts to enhance the availability of diagnostic and surgical equipment necessary for basic neurosurgical care.

The Hybrid Neurosurgeon: The Japanese Experience.

In Japan, hybrid neurosurgeons who perform both open surgical clipping as well as endovascular embolization for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms are common. Although many Japanese neurosurgeons can perform surgical clipping of middle cerebral artery aneurysms or internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery aneurysms and coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms using simple techniques-only a limited number of neurosurgeons are able to perform surgical clipping and endovascular procedures for anterior communicating artery aneurysms, paraclinoid, or posterior circulation aneurysms using both treatment modalities equally and safely. The senior author's personal experience of more than 500 cases each of surgical clipping and endovascular embolization over the past 25years included 110 cases of basilar tip aneurysms and 104 cases of paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The safety and efficacy of both treatments appears to be the same, while the durability of surgical clipping is superior to that of endovascular embolization. Among the 110 basilar tip aneurysms, 18 patients were treated by surgical clipping and 94 were treated by endovascular embolization. The initial results of endovascular therapy seemed to be better than those of surgical clipping, although the rate of retreatment was higher. Among the 104 cases of paraclinoid ICA aneurysm, 23 patients were treated by surgical clipping and 81 were treated by endovascular embolization. The results of both treatments seemed to be same, while surgical clipping had apparently good long-term durability. Over the past 15years, the frequency of surgical clipping for basilar tip aneurysms has decreased, and the procedure may eventually be abandoned for this type of aneurysm. However, surgical clipping still offers several advantages in the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Hybrid neurosurgeons can make reasonable decisions concerning the choice of treatment for cerebral aneurysms, as they perform both treatments and understand the benefits and drawbacks of each modality.

Increases in Subdural Hematoma with an Aging Population—the Future of American Cerebrovascular Disease

Subdural hematomas (SDHs) are a common and dangerous condition, with potential for a rapid rise in incidence given the aging U.S. population, but the magnitude of this increase is unknown. Our objective was to characterize the number of SDHs and practicing neurosurgeons from 2003-2016 and project these numbers to2040. Using the National Inpatient Sample years 2003-2016 (nearly 500 million hospitalizations), all hospitalizations with a diagnosis of SDH were identified and grouped by age. Numerical estimates of SDHs were projected to 2040 in 10-year increments for each age group using Poisson modeling with population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau. The number of neurosurgeons who billed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services from 2012 to 2017 was noted and linearly projected to2040. From 2020-2040, SDH volume is expected to increase by 78.3%, from 135,859 to 208,212. Most of this increase will be seen in the elderly, as patients 75-84 years old will experience an increase from 37,941 to 69,914 and patients older than 85 years old will experience an increase from 31,200 to 67,181. The number of neurosurgeons is projected to increase from 4675 in 2020 to 6252 in2040. SDH is expected to increase significantly from 2020-2040, with the majority of this increase being concentrated in elderly patients. While the number of neurosurgeons will also increase, the ability of current neurosurgical resources to properly handle this expected increase in SDH will need to be addressed on a national scale.

The state of neurosurgical training and education in East Asia: analysis and strategy development for this frontier of the world.

The authors, who are from Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Taiwan, sought to illustrate the processes of training neurosurgeons in their respective settings by presenting data and analyses of the current state of neurosurgical education across the East Asian region. The authors obtained quantitative data as key indicators of the neurosurgical workforce from each country. Qualitative data analysis was also done to provide a description of the current state of neurosurgical training and education in the region. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis was also done to identify strategies for improvement. The number of neurosurgeons in each country is as follows: 370 in Indonesia, 10,014 in Japan, 152 in Malaysia, 134 in the Philippines, and 639 in Taiwan. With a large neurosurgical workforce, the high-income countries Japan and Taiwan have relatively high neurosurgeon to population ratios of 1 per 13,000 and 1 per 37,000, respectively. In contrast, the low- to middle-income countries Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines have low neurosurgeon to population ratios of 1 per 731,000, 1 per 210,000, and 1 per 807,000, respectively. In terms of the number of training centers, Japan has 857, Taiwan 30, Indonesia 7, Malaysia 5, and the Philippines 10. In terms of the number of neurosurgical residents, Japan has 1000, Taiwan 170, Indonesia 199, Malaysia 53, and the Philippines 51. The average number of yearly additions to the neurosurgical workforce is as follows: Japan 180, Taiwan 27, Indonesia 10, Malaysia 4, and the Philippines 3. The different countries included in this report have many similarities and differences in their models and systems of neurosurgical education. Certain important strategies have been formulated in order for the system to be responsive to the needs of the catchment population: 1) establishment of a robust network of international collaboration for reciprocal certification, skills sharing, and subspecialty training; 2) incorporation of in-service residency and fellowship training within the framework of improving access to neurosurgical care; and 3) strengthening health systems, increasing funding, and developing related policies for infrastructure development. The varied situations of neurosurgical education in the East Asian region require strategies that take into account the different contexts in which programs are structured. Improving the education of current and future neurosurgeons becomes an important consideration in addressing the health inequalities in terms of access and quality of care afflicting the growing population in this region of the world.

Workforce planning in neurosurgery

Purpose: Since the introduction of run-through training in UK Neurosurgery in 2007, there has been no limit on the number of posts deaneries may apply for. The rationale for run-through training was based on the premise that the number of trainees recruited would match the number of consultant posts eight years later. There has been no formal survey of the number of consultant neurosurgeons in the UK for several years. A survey was undertaken to measure the current Neurosurgical workforce.Methods: The Specialist Advisory Committee undertook a survey to establish the current workforce and estimate how best to ensure that the correct number of trainees are being recruited. Data was also obtained from public bodies including the GMC, NHS Jobs and JCST.Results: Since 1993 the number of Neurosurgeons in UK and Ireland has increased from 132.5 to 389 whole time equivalents (4.4% curvilinear annual increase). The number of registered neurosurgical trainees fell 9% from 278 in 2012 to 248 in 2017. The number of UK graduates in Neurosurgical training has remained constant. The number of trainees failing to complete training has increased from 1.25 per annum in 2009–2012 to 5–6 in 2014–2017. The number of ST1 level trainees recruited has risen, which a fall in the number of trainees entering at the ST3 level has partially offset. The number of doctors with a CCT in Neurosurgery but no substantive consultant post has risen from 26 to 43 between 2015 and 2018.Conclusions: Neurosurgical workforce data should be collected regularly and a workforce planning process should be implemented. Consultant expansion is required to reduce the number of CCT holders without consultant jobs. The specialty should prevent any further increase in the number of trainees recruited and we should consider a marginal reduction in recruitment.

From bench to bedside: trends in National Institutes of Health funding for neurosurgeons from 1991 to 2015.

Neurosurgeons play an important role in advancing medicine through research, the funding of which is historically linked to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The authors defined variables associated with neurosurgical NIH funding, prevalence of funded topics by neurosurgical subspecialty, and temporal trends in NIH neurosurgical funding. The authors conducted a retrospective review of NIH-funded American Association of Neurological Surgeons members using NIH RePORTER (http://report.nih.gov/) for the years 1991-2015. The authors followed 6515 neurosurgeons from 1991 to 2015, including 6107 (94%) non-MD-PhD physicians and 408 (6%) MD-PhDs. NIH grants were awarded to 393 (6%) neurosurgeons, with 23.2% of all first-time grants awarded to the top 5 funded institutions. The average total funded grant-years per funded neurosurgeon was 12.5 (range 1-85 grant-years). A higher percentage of MD-PhDs were NIH funded than MDs (22% [n = 91] vs 5% [n = 297], p < 0.0001). The most common grants awarded were R01 (128, 33%), K08 (69, 18%), F32 (60, 15%), M01 (50, 13%), and R21 (39, 10%). F32 and K08 recipients were 9-fold (18% vs 2%, p < 0.001) and 19-fold (38% vs 2%, p < 0.001) more likely to procure an R01 and procured R01 funding earlier in their careers (F32: 7 vs 12 years after residency, p = 0.03; K08: 9 vs 12 years, p = 0.01). Each year, the number of neurosurgeons with active grants linearly increased by 2.2 (R2 = 0.81, p < 0.001), whereas the number of total active grants run by neurosurgeons increased at nearly twice the rate (4.0 grants/year) (R2 = 0.91, p < 0.001). Of NIH-funded neurosurgical grants, 33 (9%) transitioned to funded clinical trial(s). Funded neurosurgical subspecialties included neuro-oncology (33%), functional/epilepsy (32%), cerebrovascular (17%), trauma (10%), and spine (6%). Finally, the authors modeled trends in the number of active training grants and found a linear increase in active R01s (R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001); however, both F32 (R2 = 0.36, p = 0.01) and K08 (R2 = 0.67, p < 0.001) funding had a significant parabolic rise and fall centered around 2003. The authors observed an upward trend in R01s awarded to neurosurgeons during the last quarter century. However, their findings of decreased K08 and F32 training grant funding to neurosurgeons and the impact of these training grants on the ultimate success and time to success for neurosurgeons seeking R01 funding suggests that this upward trend in R01 funding for neurosurgeons will be difficult to maintain. The authors' work underscores the importance of continued selection and mentorship of neurosurgeons capable of impacting patient care through research, including the MD-PhDs, who are noted to be more represented among NIH-funded neurosurgeons.