In their Report “Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines” (28 May, p. [1164][1]), S. H. M. Butchart and colleagues commented that on a global scale there is little evidence that the rate of biodiversity decline is slowing and some evidence that it is increasing. However, there are some encouraging stories at national levels. For instance, the Chinese government has implemented biodiversity conservation action plans. The proportion of China's gross domestic product invested in environmental pollution control and forestry conservation has increased since 1990 and exceeded 1% since 2001; the number of nature reserves was 32 times the number in 1978, and the area devoted to reserves was 120 times the area in reserves in 1978 ([ 1 ][2]). There is more good news: Some indicators of pressures on biodiversity show declining trends. The total discharge of chemical oxygen demand and the amount of sulfur dioxide in waste gas, two nationally targeted pollutants, decreased 9.66 and 13.14%, respectively, as compared with that of 2005 ([ 2 ][3]). The discharge of toxic and harmful pollutants in wastewater, the emission intensity of chemical oxygen demand of key industries, the emission of soot dust and industrial dust in waste gases, and the discharge of solid wastes decreased annually 12.24, 21.62, 5.16, and 16.89% since 1998, respectively ([ 1 ][2]). Some indicators of the state of biodiversity showed recovering trends. The annual average net primary productivity, including forest resources as well as the area and growing stock of natural forests, has been increasing in the past two decades ([ 1 ][2], [ 3 ][4]); there is also a steady increase in the Marine Trophic Index from 1997 until now ([ 1 ][2]). Although substantial progress toward the 2010 target was made ([ 4 ][5]), we agree that China still faces severe environmental pressures, because total pollutant emissions are still high, and trends toward the loss of habitats, threatened species, and genetic resources are not effectively checked ([ 1 ][2]). 1. [↵][6] 1. H. G. Xu 2. et al ., BioScience 59, 843 (2009). [OpenUrl][7][CrossRef][8][Web of Science][9] 2. [↵][10] Ministry of Environmental Protection of China ([www.mep.gov.cn/zhxx/hjyw/201005/t20100514_189487.htm][11] [in Chinese]). 3. [↵][12] 1. Z. Q. Gao, 2. J. Y. Liu , Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 317 (2008). [OpenUrl][13][CrossRef][14] 4. [↵][15] Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, China's Fourth National Report on Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity (China Environmental Sciences Press, Beijing, 2009). [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1187512 [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: #ref-3 [5]: #ref-4 [6]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1 in text [7]: {openurl}?query=rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1525%252Fbio.2009.59.10.6%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [8]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.6&link_type=DOI [9]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000271420000007&link_type=ISI [10]: #xref-ref-2-1 View reference 2 in text [11]: http://www.mep.gov.cn/zhxx/hjyw/201005/t20100514_189487.htm [12]: #xref-ref-3-1 View reference 3 in text [13]: {openurl}?query=rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1007%252Fs11434-008-0064-4%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [14]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11434-008-0064-4&link_type=DOI [15]: #xref-ref-4-1 View reference 4 in text