This paper examines a number of aspects of the open field system of agriculture in eastern Yorkshire. In particular, attention is focused upon the relationship between field layout and the traditional units of landholding. The evidence suggests that in both the Yorkshire Wolds and in the Vale of York, holdings were regularly laid out, and that numbers of holdings remained stable for long periods. There is a strong possibility that the fields were planned, and consideration is given to the likely circum- stances in which this might have occurred. The evidence suggests that a pre-conquest origin cannot be ruled out. In a number of recent publications, R. A. Dodgshon has argued that the most fundamental characteristic of the English open field system, the fragmentation and intermixture of holdings, cannot be explained satisfactorily by any single interpretation.' Instead, he has proposed a compound explanation in which the two processes of piecemeal colonization and shareholding acted in association to encompass all the different circumstances and forms of sub-divided fields. In his view, the open fields must be seen not as the product of pre-existing communities, but as influences themselves in the shaping of such communities in the context of feudalism. It is suggested that sub-divided fields, and with them the formation of farming communities, developed out of piecemeal colonization, and that their subsequent physical reorganization helped to formalize the growing scatter of holdings into a share tenure. A further factor of significance was the land unit framework within which the open fields developed. Townships in the early Middle Ages were made up of standardized tenemental units such as virgates and bovates, which formed the basis for both the calibration of labour services within the feudal system, and for land assessment. These units normally consisted of a number of parcels or strips, scattered throughout the arable land, together with a share in the meadow. They also had rights of grazing in the common pasture. Although the size of the tenements varied considerably from place to place, in any one township they were often of roughly equal extent.2
Read full abstract