Some time ago I was asked to attempt the radiographic determination of a foreign body of a rather unusual nature. This foreign body was supposed to have been the spur of a catfish.1 Being unfamiliar with the composition of this spur, I secured one and was rather surprised to find it dense enough to cast an excellent shadow through the flesh or bones of a man's foot. As the wounds from this fish are of frequent occurrence in this region, I felt that the matter might be of some interest. The catfish is often caught by those who fish along the beaches of the South Carolina coast and since it is not regarded as edible except by the colored people, it is felt to be a nuisance and is left to die on the shore, where it is frequently stepped upon. The spur (Figs. 1 and 2) has a number of barbs which make it very difficult of withdrawal from the wound and there is some chance that small fragments may be broken off. While it is commonly believed that the slime from this fish is poisonous, there is no real foundation to that idea; but at least the wound gives pain out of all proportion to a clean wound. In this particular instance a woman stepped on a catfish which had been recently caught. The spur penetrated through the sole of her shoe, obliquely through the second toe, and into the great toe. The spur was examined by some one in the party and pronounced whole but it is doubtful if the examination was very carefully made. For about five days the patient was able to walk, but with difficulty, following which the pain became so severe that she had to remain in bed for a week. Discharge continued from the wound for about one month. A radiographic examination made about two weeks after the injury showed a minute foreign body in the soft tissue of the great toe, just medial to the base of the proximal phalanx. This body, which was triangular in shape, was seen in the same position on five films of different densities. It seems reasonable to believe that this was the point of the spur. No attempt was made to remove the fragment, as it could hardly have been found. Another series of films made two months later showed that it had disappeared, either by discharge from the wound or absorption. This piece of spur was so small that it could not be reproduced in a magazine illustration, so a similar spur was procured, placed beneath a foot, and a test film made. This spur, which is shown in Figure 3, is seen to be quite dense, showing well through the metatarsal bones. This case is reported because, so far as I know, no mention has been made of a similar one in any previous writings. I am indebted to Mr. E. Milby Burton, Acting Director of the Charleston Museum, for the in formation about this fish.