Abstract Development of melanoma has previously been associated with compromised DNA repair which can be analyzed by genotyping SNPs in DNA repair genes. The Minnesota Skin Health Study collected DNA samples to investigate the hypothesis that DNA repair SNPs are associated with increased risk for melanoma among tanning bed users. 92 SNPs, with minor allele frequencies greater than 0.05, were analyzed in 20 genes for 1659 samples_893 melanoma cases and 766 controls. The SNPs were genotyped on the Illumina BeadExpress GoldenGate platform. The SNPs were then analyzed for individual SNP associations with melanoma, haplotype associations with melanoma, individual SNP interactions with ever/never indoor tanning, and haplotype interactions with ever/never indoor tanning after adjustments for age, gender, and phenotypic index. There were several SNPs that had an association with melanoma including: six SNPs in three nucleotide excision repair genes ERCC4, ERCC6 (rs4253190, adjusted OR=1.19, 95%CI: 1.04-1.37; rs4838518, adjusted OR=0.86, 95%CI: 0.75-0.99; rs4253121, adjusted OR=0.84, 95%CI:0.71-0.99), and XPC, one SNP in base excision repair gene RFC1, one SNP in direct reversal DNA repair gene MGMT, and one SNP in a novel gene FBRSL1(rs4883571, adjusted OR=0.87, 95%CI: 0.75-1.00). There were four haplotype associations with melanoma including one ERCC6 block (rs10745261, rs6537537, rs4253121: GGA, adjusted OR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71-0.99), two MGMT blocks, and one XPC block. Additionally, there was one SNP in FBRSL1 (rs4883557, p=0.0056) and one SNP in ERCC6 (rs10745261, p=0.025) that had an interaction with indoor tanning along with two haplotypes including one block in ERCC6 (rs10745261, rs6537537, rs4253121: AAG, p=0.0355) and one block in MGMT. While the interaction analyses were suggestive, the study is limited because none of the SNPs or haplotypes were only significant (p<0.05) before Bonferroni correction. Further analyses of the function of these SNPs will be necessary, particularly for ERCC6, which had SNPs that were significant in every analysis, and FBRSL1, which is a novel gene whose function is unknown. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2630. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2630
Read full abstract