Nucleosome Positioning Sequences Research Articles

Identification and characterization of genomic nucleosome-positioning sequences

Positioned nucleosomes are believed to play important roles in transcriptional regulation and for the organization of chromatin in cell nuclei. Here, we have isolated the DNA segments in the mouse genome that form the most stable nucleosomes yet characterized. In separate molecules we find phased runs of three to four adenine nucleotides, extensive CA repeats, and in a few cases phased TATA tetranucleotides. The latter forms the most stable nucleosome yet characterized. One sequence with CAG repeats was also found. By fluorescence in situ hydridization the selected sequences are shown to be localized at the centromeric regions of mouse metaphase chromosomes.

Fate of linear and supercoiled multinucleosomic templates during transcription.

Electron microscopy was used to monitor the fate of reconstituted nucleosome cores during in vitro transcription of long linear and supercoiled multinucleosomic templates by the prokaryotic T7 RNA polymerase and the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Transcription by T7 RNA polymerase disrupted the nucleosomal configuration in the transcribed region, while nucleosomes were preserved upstream of the transcription initiation site and in front of the polymerase. Nucleosome disruption was independent of the topology of the template, linear or supercoiled, and of the presence or absence of nucleosome positioning sequences in the transcribed region. In contrast, the nucleosomal configuration was preserved during transcription from the vitellogenin B1 promoter with RNA polymerase II in a rat liver total nuclear extract. However, the persistence of nucleosomes on the template was not RNA polymerase II-specific, but was dependent on another activity present in the nuclear extract. This was demonstrated by addition of the extract to the T7 RNA polymerase transcription reaction, which resulted in retention of the nucleosomal configuration. This nuclear activity, also found in HeLa cell nuclei, is heat sensitive and could not be substituted by nucleoplasmin, chromatin assembly factor (CAF-I) or a combination thereof. Altogether, these results identify a novel nuclear activity, called herein transcription-dependent chromatin stabilizing activity I or TCSA-I, which may be involved in a nucleosome transfer mechanism during transcription.

Mechanism of Nucleosome Dissociation Produced by Transcription Elongation in a Short Chromatin Template

We have used a linear DNA template (239 bp) containing a nucleosome positioning sequence (NX1) downstream of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter to study the mechanism of transcription elongation through a nucleosome. Under ionic strength approaching physiological conditions we have observed that transcription causes nucleosome dissociation and histone redistribution within the template. We have examined the role of the different elements that, in principle, could induce nucleosome dissociation during transcription. The high affinity of histones for single-stranded DNA observed in titration experiments performed using the purified (+) and (-) strands of the NX1 fragment suggests that nucleosome dissociation is not due to the formation of segments of single-stranded DNA by RNA polymerase in the elongation process. Furthermore, our results show that although RNA can interact with core histones, the synthesized RNA is not bound to the histones dissociated by transcription. Our results indicate that core histones released during transcription can be bound to naked DNA and chromatin (with or without histones H1-H5). From the dynamic properties of excess histones bound to chromatin, we suggest a nucleosome transcription mechanism in which displaced histones are transiently bound to chromatin and finally are reassembled with DNA after the passage of the polymerase.

A histone octamer can step around a transcribing polymerase without leaving the template

The mechanism by which nucleosome cores are displaced and re-formed during transcription in vitro has been investigated. A nucleosome core was assembled on a short linear DNA template (227 bp) containing an SP6 RNA polymerase promoter and a nucleosome-positioning sequence. Transcription induced the translocation of the nucleosome core over 75 or 80 bp to two positions at the other end of the template, blocking the promoter. At low rNTP concentrations, transfer occurred only on the same template molecule, even in the presence of large excesses of competitor DNA. On a longer template (262 bp), nucleosome core position after transcription depended on its position before transcription. The data suggest that the octamer transfers without dissociation from DNA and provide strong evidence for a translocation mechanism in which DNA ahead of the polymerase uncoils from the octamer as the DNA behind coils around it. In this way, the octamer steps around the transcribing polymerase.

Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer.

It is demonstrated that the histone (H3-H4)2 tetramer can find specific positions on DNA, even in the absence of other histones. Purified histone (H3-H4)2 tetramers were reconstituted onto 208-base-pair (bp) DNA molecules containing a nucleosome-positioning sequence by using salt-gradient dialysis. The stoichiometry of histone tetramer to DNA was shown to be 1:1. Digestion with micrococcal nuclease led to formation of protected DNA fragments of approximately 73 bp. Cleavage of the 73-bp DNA with restriction enzymes produced a small set of defined bands, demonstrating positioning of the (H3-H4)2 tetramer on DNA. Analysis of the restriction digests shows that the 73-bp DNA corresponds mainly to two fragments, one lying on either side of the pseudo-dyad axis of the major position adopted by complete histone octamers on this DNA. This result means that a single (H3-H4)2 histone tetramer can fold approximately 146 bp of DNA with the same positioning as the complete octamer but that a region near the pseudo-dyad is only weakly protected against micrococcal nuclease attack in the absence of histones H2A and H2B.

Chromatosome positioning on assembled long chromatin

Long chromatin containing linker histones H1 or H5 was assembled on tandemly repeated 172 or 207 base-pair nucleosome positioning sequences from a sea urchin 5 S RNA gene. The effects of H1 and H5 on spacing and positioning of nucleosomes were assessed. In the absence of linker histones, precise determinations of core particle boundaries showed that, although a large proportion of the histone octamers occupy a unique position, there is a small group of other, less populated sites located around this major site. The dominant position was found 10 to 15 base-pairs upstream from the unique position previously reported for the histone octamer on the monomer 260 base-pair sequence. Linker histones do not override the underlying DNA signals that induce the very regular spacing of nucleosomes in chromatins assembled on these strongly positioning multimer DNA sequences. They were nevertheless found to be decisive in determining the chromatosome positions and their distributions, and as such define the chromatosome as a positioning entity.

Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement

Using competitive reconstitution, we have refined the parameters for the binding of histone octamers to artificial nucleosome-positioning sequences of the form: (A/T3nn(G/C)3nn. We find that the optimal period between flexible segments is approximately 10.1 base-pairs, supporting the view that the DNA on the nucleosome surface is overwound. The strongest requirement for flexible DNA is near the protein dyad. However, we see no indication of changes in DNA helical repeat in this region. Using a series of repetitive sequences, we confirm that neither all A/T-rich nor all G/C-rich regions are identical in promoting nucleosome formation. Surprisingly, A/T-rich segments containing the TpA step, subject to purine-purine clash in the minor groove, favor nucleosome formation over sequences lacking this step. Short tracts of adenine residues are found to position on the histone surface like other A/T-rich regions, in the manner predicted by the direction of their sequence-directed bends as determined by electrophoretic methods. Tracts containing five adenine residues are extremely aniostropic in their flexibility and are strongly detrimental to nucleosome formation when positioned for major groove compression. Longer adenine tracts are found to position near the ends of the nucleosomal DNA. However, other positions may be occupied by an A12 tract, with only a minor penalty in the free energy of nucleosome formation. Overall, reconstituted nucleosome positions are translationally degenerate, suggesting a weak dependence on DNA flexibility for nucleosome positioning. Dinucleosomal reconstitutions on tandem dimers of the 5 S RNA gene of Lytechinus variegatus demonstrate a weak phasing dependence for the interaction between nucleosomes. This interaction is maximal for the 202 base-pair repeat and suggests a co-operative mechanism for the formation of ordered nucleosomal arrays based on a combination of DNA flexibility and nucleosome-nucleosome interactions.

A nucleosome-positioning sequence is required for GCN4 to activate transcription in the absence of a TATA element.

In the gal-his3 hybrid promoter his3-GG1, the yeast upstream activator protein GCN4 stimulates transcription when bound at the position normally occupied by the TATA element. This TATA-independent activation by GCN4 requires two additional elements in the gal enhancer region that are distinct from those involved in normal galactose induction. Both additional elements appear to be functionally distinct from a classical TATA element because they cannot be replaced by the TFIID-binding sequence TATAAA. One of these elements, termed Q, is essential for GCN4-activated transcription and contains the sequence GTCAC CCG, which overlaps (but is distinct from) a GAL4 binding site. Surprisingly, relatively small increases in the distance between Q and the GCN4 binding site significantly reduce the level of transcription. The Q element specifically interacts with a yeast protein (Q-binding protein [QBP]) that may be equivalent to Y, a protein that binds at a sequence that forms a constraint to nucleosome positioning. Analysis of various deletion mutants indicates that the sequence requirements for binding by QBP in vitro are indistinguishable from those necessary for Q activity in vivo, strongly suggesting that QBP is required for the function of this TATA-independent promoter. These results support the view that transcriptional activation can occur by an alternative mechanism in which the TATA-binding factor TFIID either is not required or is not directly bound to DNA. In addition, they suggest a potential role of nucleosome positioning for the activity of a promoter.

A Nucleosome-Positioning Sequence Is Required for GCN4 To Activate Transcription in the Absence of a TATA Element

In the gal-his3 hybrid promoter his3-GG1, the yeast upstream activator protein GCN4 stimulates transcription when bound at the position normally occupied by the TATA element. This TATA-independent activation by GCN4 requires two additional elements in the gal enhancer region that are distinct from those involved in normal galactose induction. Both additional elements appear to be functionally distinct from a classical TATA element because they cannot be replaced by the TFIID-binding sequence TATAAA. One of these elements, termed Q, is essential for GCN4-activated transcription and contains the sequence GTCAC CCG, which overlaps (but is distinct from) a GAL4 binding site. Surprisingly, relatively small increases in the distance between Q and the GCN4 binding site significantly reduce the level of transcription. The Q element specifically interacts with a yeast protein (Q-binding protein [QBP]) that may be equivalent to Y, a protein that binds at a sequence that forms a constraint to nucleosome positioning. Analysis of various deletion mutants indicates that the sequence requirements for binding by QBP in vitro are indistinguishable from those necessary for Q activity in vivo, strongly suggesting that QBP is required for the function of this TATA-independent promoter. These results support the view that transcriptional activation can occur by an alternative mechanism in which the TATA-binding factor TFIID either is not required or is not directly bound to DNA. In addition, they suggest a potential role of nucleosome positioning for the activity of a promoter.