As artificial intelligence (AI) technology becomes more prevalent in education, AI automatic grading systems have emerged as essential tools for enhancing homework grading efficiency and alleviating teachers' workloads. The two leading platforms, Zuoyebang and MathGPTPro, are widely utilized in mathematics education. This study employs an experimental research method to compare the performance of these platforms in automatically grading function solution problems. The sample consists of 30 questions from the Function Solution Problems section of China's National College Entrance Examination. The focus will be on four key dimensions: logical steps, final answers, expression symbols, and analysis feedback to assess accuracy rates. A t-test will then examine differences in their handling of complex solution steps. The results show that MathGPTPro can achieve higher accuracy in complex reasoning, and its AI system has more potential to be applied to homework correction and math learning. However, there are still problems of inaccurate identification and wrong judgment in the process of Zuoyebang step recognition. This study offers insights into the application of AI automatic grading systems in education and suggests areas for system optimization.
Read full abstract