Notification Of Changes Research Articles

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

Microbiology Society journals contain high-quality research papers and topical review articles. We are a not-for-profit publisher and we support and invest in the microbiology community, to the benefit of everyone. This supports our principal goal to develop, expand and strengthen the networks available to our members so that they can generate new knowledge about microbes and ensure that it is shared with other communities.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM.

Microbiology Society journals contain high-quality research papers and topical review articles. We are a not-for-profit publisher and we support and invest in the microbiology community, to the benefit of everyone. This supports our principal goal to develop, expand and strengthen the networks available to our members so that they can generate new knowledge about microbes and ensure that it is shared with other communities.

WebProtégé: a collaborative Web-based platform for editing biomedical ontologies.

WebProtégé is an open-source Web application for editing OWL 2 ontologies. It contains several features to aid collaboration, including support for the discussion of issues, change notification and revision-based change tracking. WebProtégé also features a simple user interface, which is geared towards editing the kinds of class descriptions and annotations that are prevalent throughout biomedical ontologies. Moreover, it is possible to configure the user interface using views that are optimized for editing Open Biomedical Ontology (OBO) class descriptions and metadata. Some of these views are shown in the Supplementary Material and can be seen in WebProtégé itself by configuring the project as an OBO project. WebProtégé is freely available for use on the Web at http://webprotege.stanford.edu. It is implemented in Java and JavaScript using the OWL API and the Google Web Toolkit. All major browsers are supported. For users who do not wish to host their ontologies on the Stanford servers, WebProtégé is available as a Web app that can be run locally using a Servlet container such as Tomcat. Binaries, source code and documentation are available under an open-source license at http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/WebProtege.

Authentication System for Android Smartphones

The dawn of the personal computer era gave birth to a new type of criminal, the hacker. Today there is a new even more attractive target for hackers to exploit, the Android smartphones. These devices allow us to use internet, camera, GPS tracking, and more features. Smartphones also contain detailed records of our contacts and SMS. The hacker then uses these records for committing identity theft. Hence to provide security to Android smartphone we have developed a circular screen locking application. This application provides various features like unlock phone using random number, taking system backup via email, receive notification of SIM change via message, track incoming calls and messages when our smartphone is lost or stolen.This helps user to know who is calling and sending messages on their device. Hence this application satisfies the need of today’s users & applications.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank do not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific communit y.

A study on the disposability of change notifications on income amount and the initial date of imposition exclusion period

A study on the disposability of change notifications on income amount and the initial date of imposition exclusion period

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

Prostate Cancer Screening in the Long Term Care Setting

In May of 2012, the USPSTF (officially) changed their recommendations for routine use of PSA as a screening tool for prostate cancer. It was October of 2011 when the notification of the upcoming changes was first made public by the USPSTF. It was unclear to the authors how much screening for prostate cancer was occurring on a regular basis in the long term care setting. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of our research was to determine how frequently PSA screening was being performed in our long term care facility.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

Cost Models and Productivity Building Applications Based on the Notification of Changes in Databases

This paper presents a generative approach to build a Software Product Line (SPL). This Software Product Line is used to build applications based on the Notification of Changes in databases. The paper highlights the benefits, in terms of productivity and cost, using this approach. To obtain the economicdata we have used two cost models, the SIMPLE Model (Structured Intuitive Model for Product Line Economics) and one adaptation of COPLIMO (Constructive Product Line Investment Model). Both models demonstrate the great productivity of this SPL. The paper also introduces the Exemplar Driven Development (EDD) process used to build the Software Product Line.

A Domain Engineering Approach to Increase Productivity in the Development of a Service for Changes Notification of the Configuration Management Database

This paper presents a domain engineering approach to build a software product line that supports the change notification service in a Configuration Management Database (CMDB) according to the Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) best practices. For the development of this product line, the proposed approach makes use of a construction of products methodology by analogy: this is a new notation which reports the variability of the products, obtaining metrics as important as the number of products and uses a language that enables, by means of the flexibilization of a product and the development of some generators, to build the rest of the product line. In addition the paper offers a standard for the analysis and design of the CMDB as well. Finally, the paper presents an economic model for the product line, where the profitability and productivity of the proposed solution are analyzed.

Evaluation of Driver Performance and Distraction during use of in-vehicle Signing Information

The goal of this study was to examine the in-vehicle signing (IVS) function displayed on a mobile device to determine whether drivers’ compliance with speed limits increased when IVS information was present. The study also sought to identify whether any visual distraction occurred while the IVS information was being used. Notifications of speed zone changes along a roadway, of school zones, construction zones, and curves were visually displayed on a mobile device as per project requirements. Sixty participants (balanced for gender) completed the study, which involved performing a simulated drive in one of three conditions along 24 mi of roadways. The three system-on groups represented the following information conditions: IVS plus navigation, navigation only, or IVS only. Each group also completed a baseline (system-off) condition. The driving performance results indicated that drivers complied with most speed zones whether IVS information was present or not; however, average speeds tended to be higher in the system-on conditions. Drivers in the IVS-only condition spent significantly less time looking at the in-vehicle display than drivers who were also presented with navigation information. Response time to a roadside visual detection task was significantly increased only in speed transition zones whether IVS information was present or not. This condition suggests that increased driver workload occurs during transitions to a new speed zone, particularly when drivers are required to search the environment for additional visual information (e.g., signs, pedestrians, other vehicles).

Haemodynamic effects of central neural blocks

Haemodynamic effects are the most important physiological responses to central neural blocks. This article is focused on the etiology of hypotension, bradycardia and asystole understanding of which is essential for the anesthesiologist for successful management in the perioperative period. The main causes of cardiovascular changes are decreased cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance and reflexes related to baroreceptors. Hypotension and / or bradycardia are usually of short duration and easily treatable. However, haemodynamic changes in hypovolaemic, elderly patients with comorbidity, and patients with increased catecholamine production, due to excessive alcohol intake, emergency situation, can be significant with worse outcomes. Therefore it is essential to correct hypovolaemia before surgery. Timely notification, identification and appropriate treatment of haemodynamic changes caused by already performed central neural blockade remain important in the perioperative period as well. Vital functions must be monitored throughout surgery so that adverse cardiovascular reactions could be managed with timely and adequate treatment including elevation of the legs, oxygen and infusion therapy, vasoactive and anticholinergic drugs.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

Currently Exempt From RoHS! Are Your Projects At Risk From Lead-Free?

As a result of legislation such as the European Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive and the UK RoHS regulations which came into force on 1 July 2006, commercial products now contain electronic components and assemblies with pure tin based lead-free finishes and materials. There are a number of reliability concerns relating to such finishes and materials, especially when used in long life and mission critical applications, such as those used in the defence, space, aviation, and medical industries.Demand for lead-free products in the commercial market has resulted in the majority of electronic component manufacturers changing their supply to lead-free, quite often without proper change notification and without changing the part numbers. As a result, industries requiring highly reliable systems such as defence, which are currently exempt from the legislation, may soon have no option other than to use lead-free products.A review recently conducted of a number of organisations within the defence industry concluded the knowledge and competence to deal with the issues presented by the use of lead-free finishes and materials varied across the industry. Whilst the companies involved were aware of the risks to reliability, quality and safety, many did not have or were not able to identify and quantify the processes they had in place to manage and mitigate them. The review also highlighted there is little experience or knowledge of methods to predict the life of lead-free products in the industry.This paper introduces the risks to reliability of using lead-free finishes and materials and provides some examples of publicly reported failures resulting from the use of such products. The paper then discusses the issues with the management of lead-free within the supply chain and the types of mitigation measures that should be in place to manage the risks.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

Design and Implementation of IEEE 1900.4 Architecture Using IMS Functionality

We propose a new cognitive radio network architecture using the IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) functionality. We implement the cognitive radio network entities standardized in IEEE 1900.4 on the IMS that exchanges RAN and terminal context information between the networks and the terminals to make optimum and immediate reconfiguration decisions. In our proposed architecture, RAN context information is obtained from cellular networks which are directly connected to the IMS. The presence management functions of the IMS are applied to exchange those information in a “push” manner, which enables immediate notification of changes in wireless environment. We evaluate the performance of the proposed context information exchange method, by comparing with the cases that adequate and immediate RAN context information is not available. The evaluation results show that the proposed framework gives 10-30% superior performance than the conventional cognitive radio networks.

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzéby et al. (2004). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list. Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank does not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.

ASHA Disputes Videostroboscopy Supervision Rule

You have accessThe ASHA LeaderASHA News1 Feb 2011ASHA Disputes Videostroboscopy Supervision Rule Mark Kander Mark Kander Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.AN2.16022011.9 SectionsAbout ToolsAdd to favorites ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In http://www.asha.org/Publications/leader/2011/110215/ASHA-Disputes-Videostroboscopy-Supervision-Rule.htm ASHA is protesting new Medicare regulations that require “personal” (in-the-room) supervision by a physician when a speech-language pathologist performs videostroboscopy or nasopharyngoscopy. The new regulation by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), which became effective Jan.1, requires a physician to be present in the examining room (not just in the office suite, as previously required) when an SLP performs a videostroboscopy (CPT 31579; Common Procedural Terminology, ©American Medical Association) or a nasopharyngoscopy (CPT 92511). CMS did not announce this new requirement—the change is identified only in the 2011 fee schedule “look-up” site. (To locate the supervision levels, type in 31579 and/or 92511 and select “all modifiers.” Then select MEDICAL POLICY. In the next screen at bottom see PHYS SUPV; the digit “3” represents personal supervision.) Under Medicare rules, physician supervisors of diagnostic tests for hospital outpatients must have the knowledge and ability to perform the procedure; in non-hospital settings, any physician fulfills the supervision requirement. ASHA contends that the supervision level be returned to “direct” (present in the office suite) because: Videostroboscopy is performed safely by SLPs. Regional Medicare administrative contractors do not require personal supervision for similar endoscopic procedures by SLPs. Personal supervision is an inefficient use of physician time. ASHA also notes that the change was made without any notice or consultation with the professional organizations of those affected by the new regulation—SLPs and otolaryngologists—and without public notice of consideration to revise the policy. ASHA has position statements, guidelines, technical reports, and knowledge and skills documents for endoscopy, including Vocal Tract Visualization and Imaging (1992; updated in 2004), Knowledge and Skills for Speech-Language Pathologists With Respect to Vocal Tract Visualization and Imaging (2004), and Use of Endoscopy by Speech-Language Pathologists (2008). These official ASHA documents demonstrate the long-standing inclusion of endoscopic procedures within the speech-language pathology scope of practice. SLPs have the ethical obligation to attain these skills and should be able to document proof of knowledge and skills through an appropriate process in their employment settings. ASHA is working with other health care organizations to press CMS to reverse the policy. Check ASHA’s website or “News Watch” at The ASHA Leader online for updates or subscribe to ASHA’s “Headlines” service for e-mail notification of regulatory changes and other late-breaking news (send a blank e-mail with the word “subscribe” in the subject line to [email protected]). Author Notes director of health care regulatory analysis, can be reached at [email protected]. Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Additional Resources FiguresSourcesRelatedDetails Volume 16Issue 2February 2011 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in print: Feb 1, 2011 Metrics Downloaded 199 times Topicsasha-topicsleader_do_tagleader-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2011 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...