Notary Honorary Council Research Articles

Pertimbangan Hukum Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Kota Palangka Raya dengan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah (MPW) Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah dalam Memutuskan suatu Perkara di Wilayah Kalimantan Tengah

The purpose of this study is to determine and examine the authorities to hold and/or conduct examinations of notaries who commit violations, both in the form of the Notary Code of Ethics and provisions in applicable laws and regulations. The first research result: Supervision carried out by the Notary Supervisory Board to prevent violations of the Notary's position is carried out by holding seminars on notary affairs, holding meetings once a month attended by the Regional Supervisory Board to provide direction to implement the UUJN and Code of Ethics and Notaries are required to continue to increase their insight into notary affairs, and the Regional Supervisory Board visits the Notary's office at least once a year to check the Notary's protocol. Second: there is no difference at all between the Notary Supervisory Board and the Notary's Honorary Council because basically preventive supervision is preventive or mitigating so that violations of the Notary Code of Ethics and the Notary's position authority do not occur. Furthermore, regarding the differences in reports from the public addressed to the Notary Supervisory Board and the Notary Honorary Council, there is no difference at all, so if the public reports to one of these organizations, it is possible, but it will be followed up by the authorized organization because it concerns the sanctions that will be given.

Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 Regarding the Honorary Council's Approval of Summoning a Notary in the Examination of Criminal Cases

In writing this journal the author discusses legal issues regarding the Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 16/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Approval of the Honorary Notary Council for Summoning Notaries in the Examination of Criminal Cases. The Constitutional Court (MK) stated that it did not accept and rejected the judicial review of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions regarding the examination of Notaries in the judicial process with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council ( MKN). The Petitioners argue that the phrase with the approval of the Notary Honorary Council in Article 66 of the Law on the Position of Notaries places the Notary Honorary Council as having absolute and final authority to approve or disapprove a notary's summons to attend a case examination. This means that investigators, public prosecutors and judges cannot take further legal action if the Notary Honorary Council does not give their approval. With the Constitutional Court's decision issued by the Constitutional Judge regarding Article 66 paragraph (1) of the Notary Law, a problem arises regarding the basis of the judge's consideration of the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the Honorary Council's approval of the summons of a Notary in the examination of criminal cases. The approval of the Notary Honorary Council in granting permission to the parties to take or notarize and examine the Notary remains valid. The Constitutional Court (MK) stated that it did not accept and rejected the material review requested by the Indonesian Prosecutors Association.

Juridical Analysis of the Notary's Position as a Witness in Trials Is Linked to the Notary's Right To Refuse

The importance of the Notary's role as an official who witnesses the execution of a legitimate deed cannot be overstated. Notaries have the option to retract their statements, but occasionally they are called upon to give testimony. This study is to investigate notaries' status as witnesses in court proceedings and to assess the legal safeguards afforded to them about their refusal rights. Normative juridical research methodology is used. Secondary data is the kind of data that is used. Techniques for analyzing data that combine deductive reasoning and qualitative analysis. The results of this research are: first, The role of a Notary as a witness in a trial is essentially governed by the UUJN. Notaries are not required by laws to testify; in fact, their Oath of Office and Article 16 of the UUJN forbid them from speaking, not even in front of the court. Notaries have the prerogative and duty to refuse. To finish the legal process in court, the Notary must, however, also represent the state's interests. The Notary must testify during the trial if mandated by law. Notaries cannot decline to be used as witnesses without the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, in accordance with the provisions of Article 66 UUJN. Instead, notaries must be able to control when to speak and when to remain silent. Second, In order to testify in court, notaries are granted legal protection as Public Officials. Protection of Notaries as witnesses in criminal cases following the publication of Constitutional Court Decision No. 49/PUU-X/2012, which states that summoning a notary public requires first going via the Honorary Council of Notaries in compliance with Article 66 UUJN regulations. The rights and obligations of a Notary as stated in the Notary's oath of office, Article 16 paragraph (1) letter e and Article 54 UUJN, Article 1909 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code, and Article 322 of the Criminal Code also provide protection for notaries.

THE LEGAL STUDY OF ALLEGED MALPRACTICES IN THE PROCESS OF MAKING AUTHENTIC DEEDS OF SALE AND PURCHASE

The notaries who are suspected of committing acts of malpractice in their official duties, either intentionally or through negligence and violating Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries, can result in losses for the parties and can complain to the Notary Honorary Council and the police. This research aims to determine and analyze the authority of notaries in making authentic deeds, and legal certainty for the parties in an authentic deed. The research method uses normative legal research with a legislative approach that uses legal sources with library methods which are then analyzed to obtain a conclusion. The results and conclusions of the research are that a Notary is a public official who has the authority to make an authentic deed based on attribution or Law No. 2 of 2014, apart from that, authentic deeds are required by statutory regulations in order to create legal certainty, order and legal protection, so that the meaning of legal certainty will be properly actualized if the parties understand what is the purpose of the deed.

Analysis of The Application of Sanctions Against Notaries Who Forgery Deeds of Transferring Land Rights (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 139 K/Pid/2016)

The Law on the Position of Notaries does not regulate the existence of criminal sanctions for the actions of notaries. This does not absolve the notary from criminal liability. Notaries can be held criminally liable if their actions contain a criminal element, where the relevant Notary can be summoned by the Notary Honorary Council. The problem is how to apply legal sanctions to a notary who falsifies the deed transferring land rights in Supreme Court Decision Number 139 k/PID/2016? And what is the responsibility of the Notary who falsified the deed of transferring land rights in Supreme Court Decision Number 139 K/PID/2016? The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research are that the Notary concerned cannot be held responsible when elements of fraud and error are committed by the parties, because the Notary only records what is conveyed by the parties to be included in the deed, this is often known as partij deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. This means that a notary is only responsible if the fraud originates from the wishes and/or desires of a notary. In the UUJN which regulates sanctions for violations committed by a notary, the deed made by a notary does not have the power of an authentic deed but only has the power of a private deed. In relation to the actions of notaries who commit criminal acts of forgery of deeds or criminal acts of false statements committed by parties, the UUJN does not specifically regulate criminal provisions because they are based on the principle of legality which are the principles in the Criminal Code.

Legal Protection of a Notary Against the Crime of Falsification of Information in an Authentic Deed According to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary

Notary is a public official appointed by the government to carry out the task of making authentic deeds or other legal actions in accordance with applicable statutory provisions. The functions of a notary vary depending on the legal system in each country. In some cases where documents notarized by a notary contain false or fraudulent information, the notary may be subject to legal sanctions. Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Office of a Notary indeed regulates the duties of a notary in certifying detailed documents provided by clients, as stated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (f). Notary Honorary Council (MKN) is an institution established under UUJN and has a role in carrying out ethical oversight of notaries. However, MKN is not an institution that provides direct legal protection in criminal cases. MKN's duties are more focused on the ethical and disciplined aspects of the notary profession. This research uses a normative legal approach and departs from a void of norms, the aim of the research can be to identify and analyze the legal protection available to notaries in contexts where there are no specific provisions regarding the matter. The results of the study show that there is legal protection for notaries, namely stated in article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN by establishing a new legal protection institution for Notaries, namely MKN, law enforcers when summoning them must ask permission from the Notary Honorary Council.

Notary Responsibilities for Making Deeds Based on False Statements (Case Study of Decision Number: 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL)

Notaries are public officials (openbare ambtenaren) appointed by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (KEMENKUMHAM) who have the authority to make authentic deeds. The notary deed clearly explains the rights and obligations of the parties so that the notary deed becomes the strongest and most complete means of evidence because it can prove the truth of its contents compared to a deed made privately. If a Notary as a public official is proven to have made a mistake in the deed they made, then as a result of their actions they can be held accountable both criminally and civilly if it causes a loss. In the case of the South Jakarta District Court decision number 782/PDT.G/2020/PN JKT.SEL a Notary in Tangerang was involved in a civil case of unlawful acts that resulted in the deed’s cancellation. A notary deed that is canceled by a court decision does not mean the result of a notary's mistake in making the deed, but can also be caused by an error or negligence on the part of the parties resulting in a lawsuit because the notary has made the deed in accordance with the regulations. The notary as a public official has the right to refuse not to notify the contents of the deed in accordance with the oath of office they uttered and taking the minutes of the deed and calling the notary must go through the approval of Notary Honorary Council as an institution that has the authority to carry out guidance and supervision of the notary and the existence of the right of refusal. become a form of legal protection for Notaries when carrying out their duties. This study uses normative legal research methods, by analyzing court decisions as the primary legal.

The Urgency of The Indonesian Notary Association (INI) In Development And Supervision Of Notary

Notary is a job or position that in carrying out its authority requires ethics. The code of ethics is used as a guideline for member behavior along with clear and strict sanctions for violators of the code of ethics. The notary code of ethics aims to make the notary profession run professionally with motivation and orientation to intellectual skills and to argue rationally and critically and uphold moral values. Enforcement and supervision of the implementation of the notary professional code of ethics is carried out through the Notary Honorary Council. Notaries feel the need to be supervised so that the possibility of irregularities in carrying out their positions that are not in accordance with the corridors of law and professional code of ethics as well as abuse of authority or trust given to Notaries can be avoided. The revival of the existence of the Indonesian Notary Association is one of the efforts to reduce the existence of violations committed by Notaries in carrying out their positions, related to the causes of the non-maximum occurrence of an Indonesian Notary Association (INI), namely where notaries do not carry out their profession professionally. With problems like this, the role of the Indonesian Notary Association is needed. The urgency of the notary association in fostering and supervising as an effort to reduce the occurrence of violations committed by notaries.
 KEYWORDS: Urgency, Notary Association, Guidance and Supervision

The Role of Regional Honor Council In Maintaining The Honor of Notary Position

A profession that in carrying out its duties, functions and authorities requires an ethics, so does a Notary. So the code of ethics is used as a guideline for the behavior of members of the profession in acting and behaving. The existence of a Notary code of ethics aims to make the Notary profession run professionally with motivation and orientation to intellectual skills as well as rational and critical argumentation as well as upholding moral values. So that the notary in carrying out his position is supervised by the Notary Honorary Council, because this supervisory function is very necessary so that the Notary does not ignore the nobility and dignity of his profession. Writing this article aims to identify, examine and analyze the role of the Honorary Board in maintaining the honor of the position of Notary Public by upholding a code of ethics. This writing uses a normative juridical approach, using primary and secondary legal sources. Primary legal materials are obtained from laws and regulations and secondary legal materials are obtained from library materials, archives, and documents related to the object of research. The results of the discussion show that the position of the Honorary Board in the Notary organization has a strategic and important role in enforcing the code of ethics as an effort to maintain the honor of a notary. The Ethics Council will supervise so that there are no violations committed by the Notary, such as signing the deed without dealing with the client and the Notary, Setting substandard rates, Carrying out efforts that can lead to unfair competition, Name sign issues and changing addresses are not reported. The obstacles faced by the Honorary Council were the increasing number of Notaries, the formation of the Honorary Council which only numbered three people and was collective in nature. The Honorary Council in enforcing the Notary's code of ethics identifies, evaluates and improves the supervisory system for Notaries so that violations of the code of ethics can be minimized, the Honorary Council makes strategic steps to be implemented and used according to the objectives to be achieved.
 KEYWORDS: Code of Ethics, Honor Council, Notary.

The Role of the Honorary Tribunal of the Notary of the Territory at the Request of Law Enforcement Against Alleged Violations by the Notary

The Honorary Panel of Notaries rejected the investigator's application for approval in the judicial process. The rejection of the case was carried out by testing article 66 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notary at the Constitutional Court. This study aims to analyze the role of the Regional Notary Honorary Assembly at the request of law enforcement against alleged violations by notaries, and to analyze the reasons for the refusal of the Regional Notary Honorary Assembly to the application for examination of the Notary by police investigators. The approach method used in this study is normative juridical which is prescriptive. The legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of this study show that: The role of the Regional Notary Honorary Council in responding to the request of the investigator to present as a witness or suspect in the case that is resolved, the Regional Notary Honorary Council can refuse and or grant the request, very much depends on the objective conditions at the time of the examination of the notary. The reason for the Regional Notary Honorary Council refusal to the investigator's request to present a Notary as a witness or suspect, if from the results of the hearing the examination of the object in the Deed before the Deed was made was carried out in accordance with the standard operating procedures according to theKeyword: the Regional Notary Honorary Council; Law Enforcement; Offense Notary

The Implementation of Notary Inclusive Rights in The Frame of Law Enforcement As a Public Official

This article aims to describe the implementation of a notary’s inclusive rights within the framework of carrying out his duties as a public official. The granting of attribution authority to a notary as a public official is a special assignment that is intentionally made based on laws and regulations with certain roles, functions, and authorities to provide legal services (law enforcement) to the public who need authentic written evidence and the other civil laws authorities, along with inclusive legal protection in the enforcement of duties of a notary. The research method used is juridical normative, in which analyzing a legal event occur and followed by the comparative study between the legal source material and the legal rules that govern it in practice. This study aims to find out what, how, and why the position of a notary is attached to inclusive rights in terms of various legal aspects according to the research topic. The results showed that the form of legal protection that is inclusive of notaries as general officials have been sufficiently regulated in the constitution of the Notary Commission as well as the right to disobey and the obligation to disobey notaries. In addition, the existence of the Notary Honorary Council as a tool for the organization of the Indonesian Notary Association as well as the Notary Supervisory Board and the Notary Honorary Council has strengthened the position of an inclusive notary through preventive measures in the context of fostering and supervising the ethics of notary behavior and the practice of carrying out the duties of the notary commission under the rules in UUJN and UUJN-P.

Accountability of a Notary in Making a Deed Based on Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of a Notary

This research aims to examine how the Notary official is responsible with the deed he has made, and examine legal remedies against a Notary official if a loss occurs to another party due to false documents or incorrect information from the party as an appearer which has been stated in the process of making the dead. . And legal protection for Notary officials. This research uses quantitative research using a normative juridical approach which is known as doctrinal law research. Data ta obtained from library research (library research), as well as using legal material analysis. The results of this study, namely, the first notary official can be held accountable to the deed he made if there is an error. There are 3 (three) responsibilities, namely civil. Administratively, and criminally. Second, a Notary cannot be held responsible if there are false documents or incorrect information from the parties appearing to cause harm to other parties, because the Notary is only in charge of writing down all the statements of the parties in the deed. Also, Notary officials cannot be summoned for examinations relating to the disputed deed for the benefit of court proceedings, investigators, public prosecutors and judges without the approval of the Notary Honorary Council.

Examination and Confiscation of Notarial Deeds for The Purpose of Criminal Law Enforcement without Approval from The Notary Honorary Council

The Notary’s right of refusal through the approval of the Notary Honorary Council (NHC) hinders the practice of criminal law enforcement because it is absolute and there is no further (final) legal remedy, even though a similar policy (beleid) has been revoked by the Constitutional Court. In practice, the notary cannot be examined by investigators, public prosecutors, or judges, unless they have previously obtained NHC approval, as regulated in Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2004 as amended by Law Number 2 of 2014 (Notary Position Law). Even if Notary Honorary Council refuses, then there will only be further legal remedies through a lawsuit by the State Administrative Court. In fact, the provisions regarding the Notary’s right of refusal should be ‘determination’ by court decisions (vonnis) as regulated in Article 170 of the Criminal Code, and not ‘administrative determination’ (beschikking) through NHC approval based on the delegation of supervisory authority from state institutions. This paper concludes that every law enforcer in criminal cases (police, prosecutors, and judges) can examine a Notary with the condition of special permission from the Head of the local District Court, approval of direct interested parties, or NHC approval as stipulated in Article 43 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 66 paragraph (1) of the Notary Position Law. This paper is normative research with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach.

PERAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMERIKSA KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN JABATAN SEBAGAI NOTARIS

Writing this article will discuss the role of the notary honorary council in examining cases of abuse of notary office. In this article, we will discuss what a notary is, what are his authorities and powers as a notary in accordance with his profession. This problem is motivated by the many cases of notary errors in carrying out their profession. For example, the number of dual land deeds that should be the role of a notary in making the deed. As a notary cohort, it is necessary to investigate several existing cases, especially those concerning notaries. In this investigation, it will be divided into several parts. Which parts will later become the authority of the notary honorary assembly. This is also related to the code of ethics as a notary. In carrying out a position, of course someone is required or required to apply in accordance with the existing code of ethics. If someone who holds a position then commits a violation or acts outside the code of ethics, it can be classified as a criminal act of violating the code of ethics. One of the codes of ethics that is highly respected in the notary profession is to behave honestly, independently and not take sides with anyone. This is then upheld in the notary profession. This study uses normative legal methods. The normative method is legal research consisting of research on legal principles, legal systematics, and legal comparisons. The sources for writing this article are from journals and articles or other reading materials as research sources. These sources are then analyzed and presented in written form to produce a scientific work that is expected to be well understood. In addition, this article is expected to be an input or source of reading for other law students

Tindak Pidana Dugaan Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Dan Keadaan Perlindungan Hukum Notaris

This study aims to examine the criminal act of alleged forgery of authentic deeds and the state of notary legal protection. An authentic deed is a formal truth that concerns any matter and is notified by the parties to the Notary which is then contained in a deed. However, in practice, a good number od unlawful acts have occurred because the public has provided information that is not in accordance with the authentic deeds and providing fake documents. Hence the Notary can be harmed in this case. This study has a formulation of the problem, namely how is the condition of the notary's legal protection against the alleged crime of forgery of deed? The research method used is Juridical Empirical with statutory approach. The results of the study conclude that there is a state of legal protection for alleged criminal acts if the violation committed is still in the position of a notary, not a personal violation. Legal protection for notaries is carried out by the Notary Honorary Council under the Law on Notary Positions. Criminal acts committed by a notary also violate the provisions of the Criminal Code and can be tried by investigators through procedures approved by the Notary Ethics Council.

Politik Hukum Persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Memberikan Ijin Pemanggilan Notaris Oleh Penyidik

Notary in Granting Permission to Summon a Notary by Investigators. The discussion begins with the legal political basis, then the political legal approval of the Regional Notary Honor Council in granting permission to summon a Notary by the Investigator. Therefore, this study raises the formulation of the problem, namely How is the Legal Politics of the Approval of the Notary Honorary Council in giving permission to summon a Notary by Investigators? This is a normative which the research object being Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 on the Position of Notary Public and uses secondary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations and legal documents related to the approval of notary summons, obtained by searching the literature. The approach used in this study is the statutory approach and is analyzed by descriptive qualitative method. The results of this study indicate that political aspects appear to be more dominant than legal aspects, the birth of the Notary Honorary Council as an effort to guarantee legal certainty and protection for the profession A notary who is bound by an oath of office to keep the deeds he makes secret.

Violation of Installing Notary Nameplates Based on the Notary’s Code of Conducts

The Notary Code of Ethics aims to be a guideline for Notaries to maintain dignity in carrying out their position as a Notary. Enforcement of the Notary's Code of Ethics must be enforced so that Notaries do not experience irregularities in carrying out their positions, but in practice there are still many who do not pay attention to the provisions as in the code of ethics, especially regarding the arrangement of installing a Notary's nameplate which is regulated in the Notary's Code of ethics tends to be ignored and causes Notaries to experience violations code of Ethics. The purpose of this research is to analyze the arrangements for installing notary nameplates based on the noris code of ethics and efforts to impose sanctions on notaries who violate the code of ethics on installing notary nameplates. This study uses normative juridical by using written legal materials. The results of this study are that the arrangement for installing a Notary's nameplate is regulated in the Notary's code of ethics and Supervision for notaries is carried out by two different institutions, namely the Notary Supervisory Board externally and the Notary Honorary Council internally.

RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 49/PUU-X/2012 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PASAL 66 AYAT (1) UUJN-2004

This study aims to: (1) analyze and find the ratio of the decision of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012 concerning the annulment of Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN-2004, (2) the legal impact of the Constitutional Court's decision no. 49/PUU-X/2012 Against Legal Protection for Notaries. The type of research is normative law. While the research approach used, namely: Legislation, contextual approach, and case approach, as well as a comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. While the analysis of legal materials using qualitative analysis.
 The results of the study show that: (1) The ratio decidendi of the cancellation of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public is based, that the article is not in accordance with the principle of equality before the law (equality in law) for every citizen. There is the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, not in accordance with the sense of justice and the criminal law enforcement process, as well as the principle of an independent judicial power; (2) Legal Impact of MK Decision No. 49/Puu-X/2012 Regarding Legal Protection for Notaries, the notary loses his special rights, namely summoning a Notary in the case of interest in a criminal examination does not need to obtain permission from the Regional Supervisory Council as stipulated in the provisions of Article 66 of the JN Law, this is for guarantee legal certainty and responsibility for the deed issued.

Authority of The Notary Honorary Assembly In Construction And Issuance of Recommendations For Inspector Calls

Notaries are public officials appointed by the Government to assist the public in making authentic deeds for civil acts. A position held by a notary has the characteristics that have been regulated in the Law on the Position of a Notary and its Amendments. Notaries are not necessarily immune from the law, it may be possible for him to become a suspect if he fulfills elements and can be prosecuted civilly if he makes a mistake. In the event that the investigator will conduct an investigation of the notary, he will first apply for permission in writing to the regional honorary assembly, which will then be carried out with procedural law procedures in accordance with the Law on Notary Positions. It has been found a case of state administrative law relating to the issuance of a letter of recommendation issued by the honorary assembly of the notary area to be investigated in this legal research. The purpose of this legal research is none other than as a means of increasing knowledge in the field of state administrative law and notary science which is expected to be useful for notaries and legal practitioners. This research is normative legal research using a conceptual approach, legislation and a case approach (referring to a decision that has permanent legal force). The results of this study are: In the framework of the function of supervising the position of a notary, an honorary assembly was formed consisting of elements of the notary, government, and academics. The authority of the honorary assembly is the attribution authority which is an authority born from law. The main task of the notary honorary council is to carry out the guidance of a notary and the obligation to give approval or rejection for the purposes of the investigation and judicial process, for taking a photocopy of the minutes of the deed and summoning a notary to attend an examination related to the notary deed or protocol that is in the notary's storage. The legal product issued by the Honorary Council is in the form of a letter of recommendation containing the rejection or approval of the summons of a notary for the purposes of the investigation and judicial process, for taking a photocopy of the minutes of the deed and summoning a notary to attend an examination related to the deed or Notary Protocol which is in the Notary's custody. The legal product is an act of determination that gives birth to a State administrative decision in accordance with the regulations and the AUPB. That the honorary assembly did not immediately give permission for summons, but first a meeting was held with the notary concerned to hear his statement.

The Role of the Notary Honorary Council on the Confiscation of Minutes of Deed by Police Investigators

The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the role of the notary honorary council in the confiscation of the minutes of deed by the Southeast Sulawesi regional police investigators. And to find out and analyze the process of examining a criminal case allegedly carried out by a notary with the offense of entering false information in an authentic deed. The research method usedis a sociological juridical method. The sociological juridical research method is legal research that uses secondary data as initial data which is then continued with primary data in the field or on the community, examines the effectiveness of a ministerial regulation and research that wants to find a relationship (correlation) between various symptoms or variables, as a data collection tool consists of from the study of documents or library materials and interviews. The results of this study found that: first, the Regional Notary Honorary Council from the results of the examination by the examining council could not give approval for the confiscation of the minutes of the notary deed but gave permission to the investigator to take a photocopy of the minutes of the notary deed. Second, from the results of the examination by the examining board, there was also no offense of entering false information into the minutes of the deed. Even from the results of the examination it was also found that the complainant did not question the contents of the deed, but what was questioned was his absence at the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), and in the minutes of the GMS there was the signature of the reporter which indicated that the reporter was present at the GMS and the Reporting Party itself was also present.