I072 Reviews and English-speaking cultural systems from the eighteenth century (Laclos's Les Li aisons dangereuses, 1782) to the very recent past (Jens Sparschuh's Lavaters Maske (Cologne: Kiepenheuer &Witsch, 1997) and Jeffrey Ford's The Physiognomy (New York: Avon, I997)). The volume marks an interdisciplinary effort in the truest sense: not only is Lavater's legacy approached from philosophical, theological, scientific, literary, pho tographic, and artistic angles, it is also traced in the French, German, British, and American cultural contexts. The appropriation of Lavater's teachings becomes un derstandable as amirror of themodern transformation of European culture: not only modern techniques (mechanical representations of nature) but also modern concerns (anonymity and facelessness in the urban metropolis) can be studied with Lavater as the cue. In this volume, the engagement with Lavater's legacy is showcased as a truly rewarding and timely activity. NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, MAYNOOTH FLORIAN KROBB How to Make it as aWoman: Collective Biographical History from Victoria to thePre sent. By ALISON BOOTH. (Women inCulture and Society) Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 2004. 423 pp. /17.50. ISBN 0-226-o6546-4. Taking as her subject the underexplored area of female prosopography, Alison Booth offers a fascinating and insightful exploration of the significance of these texts and the way inwhich they have both challenged and reinforced concepts of womanhood, gender difference, nationhood, race, and class. Exploring the problematic categoriza tion of women throughout history, Booth considers the (mis)representation of women in collective biographies. Uncovering over goo collective biographies of women pub lished between I830 and 1940 (this exhaustive bibliography is included in an ap pendix, with an annotated version available online at http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/ WomensBios), Booth argues convincingly for the influence of these texts in con structing representative 'types' of womanhood, and thus lays the groundwork for further study in this area. The large number of female prosopographies listed in the bibliography is indicative of the wide scope of Booth's study, and, inevitably, the author is selective in terms of her approach, electing to focus primarily on the broader themes of biography and gender, with a comprehensive exploration of a number of female 'types' (e.g. heroic women, Medusas) supported by a detailed study of a few individual women, whose reputations have been directly influenced by their inclusion in or exclusion from collective biographies. Of these individuals, Queen Victoria epitomizes the extent towhich representation can influence reputation-a woman, as Booth observes, 'so representative, she is hard to distinguish' (p. 264). Of particular interest is Booth's analysis of how eminent women have directly influenced the reputations of other notable women through (sometimes negative) biographical depictions of them: Anna Jameson's descent into relative obscurity was, Booth argues, aided by Harriet Marti neau's less than complimentary obituary, while Charlotte Bronte's reputation in the nineteenth century was, in part, shaped byMargaret Oliphant's (rather negative) and Elizabeth Gaskell's (more positive) biographical representations. Through the selective process of inclusion and exclusion which Booth herself in evitably employs, her position becomes analogous with that of the editors and authors of collective female biographies, who effectively determined which women were to be represented in society's collective historical conscience. Thus Booth imitates the authors and editors of nineteenth-century prosopographies, selecting for her reader's attention various prominent women and offering a synopsis of their lives and contri butions to history. However, Booth's study goes much further than this, forcing us to MLR, 101.4, 2oo6 I073 question the implications of these varying constructions of 'representative' feminine types. Her awareness of her problematic position as author of a text on the represen tation of women in collective biographies leads her to question feminist criticism's approach to the past-particularly its emphasis on literary women-forcing the fe minist reader to consider feminism's selectivity and tendency to overlook or dismiss women who do not conform to certain expectations. Feminist criticism has, in a sense, been as selective as the authors of female prosopographies in determining who has 'made it' as awoman. Booth suggests that Virginia Woolf encouraged the trend of dis missing from history certain previously eminent women...
Read full abstract