From Padi States to Commercial States: Reflections on Identity and the Social Construction Space in the Borderlands of Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar Frederic Bourdier, Maxime Boutry, Jacques Ivanoff, and Olivier Ferrari Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2015, 168pp.The case studies in this book encompass the utilization of, and an extension of, James Scott's concept. Deriving from anthropological works that focus on the adaptation strategies of the border population (p. 15), the book focuses on the enactment of alternative histories and (borderland) societies well on a revisiting of contemporary state-society relations, borrowing from the concept of Zomia. The authors add to the debates regarding Scott's Zomia, in their words de-territorialize (p. 15) the concept of Zomia and focus on the Inner Zomians, defined cast-out and widely dispersed migrants, modern resisters residing within ethno-national borders (p. 15).The argument is that even though Zomia territory has been penetrated by the emergence of a based on a paddy cash crop economy that serves a system of statehood where rice-farming constitutes the basis of power (p. 16), the post-colonial structures of control remain partial (p. 16). This can be seen in the cultural and economic exchanges well social and ethnic dynamism established between the commercial state and the Zomia communities.To be more precise, the quote on page 24 narrates the main focus of the book:. . . the modalities of the implementation of identities and the transformation of the interethnic relations provoked by development . . . starting from the center, reconfigure a Zomian reality that remains geographically hard for the center to access and exploit . . . we are attempting to understand the strategies that have been developed by the populations who are no longer external to the state and have become integrated, but who still remain externalized, either through their own will or through the state's paradoxical discourse resulting from a desire to integrate these groups without putting an end to stigmatization. (p. 24)The chapters celebrate the creativity and adaptability of the (inner) Zomians and address the questions of domination, resistance, and resilient acts through the politics of ethnic identification and construction. Despite the encroachment of the nation-states' developmental programs-some have even penetrated into Zomia territory and have impacted the socioeconomic development of minorities-the political economy of the borderlands operates as an element of reflection for our complementary understanding of a socio-cultural that cannot be restricted to a geographical landscape (p. 16) but arguably extends to cultural (ethnicity, religion, ideology) of the Inner Zomian . . . that is not only ethnic . . . but also socio-ethnic (p. 18).The book does not limit itself to locating resistance, or the processes of not-being-governed (Scott 2009), between two opposite categories such ethnic/minority groups versus the state, but the within the group, coupled with their appropriative capabilities to adapt to differences and survive through the creation of new ethnic identities within the nation-state system.The inner Zomia refers to the particular strata (p. 2) within the populations and other territorial groups-namely, the Jarai of Cambodia (Chapter 2), Chinese entrepreneurs or taukays and migrants (Chapter 3), the Moken or sea-gypsies (Chapter 4), and the minority groups of Moklen and Urak Lawoi vis-a-vis the dominant populations of Thai, Sino-Thai, and Malay Muslims (Chapter 5)-that move and flow between the dual dynamics either in their relationship with the state or with other minorities (p. 18).In Chapter 2, Frederic Bourdier's analysis locates the infinity of ethnic identity of the hill people and the resilience of Zomia in the borderland of northeast Cambodia despite the penetration of states activities. …
Read full abstract