Abstract
Within the last decade, Sustainable Intensification (SI) has emerged as a strategy to respond to future food security challenges. It incorporates increased food production without the cultivation of more land while incurring no net environmental cost. Frameworks attempting to measure SI often focus heavily on production indicators while overlooking other important indicators, such as impacts on economic, social, or human conditions. In this study, we evaluate the purposeful assemblage and management of neglected and underutilized species (NUS) in fringe areas around rural homesteads as a potential SI strategy. We use a recent SI assessment framework developed by the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Collaborative Research on Sustainable Intensification (SIIL) that incorporates five measurable domains (productivity, economic, environmental, human condition, and social). We present findings from a qualitative case study in northwest Cambodia to assess local conceptualization of wild gardening, current uses of NUS, perceived benefits and challenges to their use and management, and the potential of wild gardening as a SI strategy. The qualitative methods employed 65 key informant interviews and four focus group discussions with both men and women participants. Our results indicate that wild gardening is an important component of rural livelihoods in northeast Cambodia. However, a general lack of knowledge of strategic benefits, such as nutrition potential, inhibits its use for maximum benefits. Wild gardening addresses multiple SI domains simultaneously and demonstrates the potential to be a promising SI strategy for improving rural livelihoods in Cambodia.
Highlights
semi-structured interviews (SSI) and focus group discussions (FGD) data were analyzed to identify the frequency of benefit types reported by participants of wild gardening
All participants (n=103) were asked the question, “How do you use neglected and underutilized species (NUS) or wild gardening for household consumption?” Only a portion of the total participants (n=49) were asked, “In general, what are the benefits to managing or using a wild garden or NUS?” For each benefit listed, the total number of participants that had an opportunity to answer or discuss the possible benefit is weighted against the total number of participants who reported that benefit
Whereas results of this study demonstrate that Cambodian smallholder farmers value these various aspects of wild gardening and NUS, a number of significant challenges remain if this sustainable intensification (SI) technology is to see a wider regional impact
Summary
It is estimated that by 2050 the world’s growing population will require 25% to 70% more food (Hunter et al, 2017). This presents a challenge given the increased global competition for required food production resources such as land and water. SI posits that increased food production (intensification) must play a role in meeting this food security challenge, but that this increase should come from existing agricultural land, and that the increased food production should incur no net environmental cost (sustainable) (Peterson & Snapp, 2015; Pretty & Bharucha, 2014, 2018; Tilman et al, 2011).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.