Trend analysis is an important component of most total maximum daily load (TMDL) projects in assessing the adequacy of implementation plans on water quality improvement. One problem in trend analysis of water quality data is the confounding effect of varying streamflow conditions at the time of sampling. Commonly used methods of flow adjustment are ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots (LOWESS) with a prespecified smoothing factor (f) of 0.5. We compared trend analysis results using these two methods of flow adjustment as well as LOWESS flow adjustment approach with the optimal f value based upon the bias corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc1). The objectives of the study were to evaluate the importance of flow adjustment in trend analysis and to determine the best flow adjustment method among these three procedures. Monthly concentrations from grab and flow-weighted data sets of soluble orthophosphate-phosphorus (PO4-P), total P (TP), and total suspended solid (TSS) were evaluated for three stream sites within the North Bosque River watershed in central Texas. The nonparametric Kendall statistic was employed to test for the presence of trend. As expected, the detection of trend was greatly influenced by flow adjustment. The LOWESS procedure was considered more appropriate than OLS, because LOWESS was able to better define the relationships between flow and constituent concentration. The AICc1 based f value and f = 0.5 in the LOWESS procedure gave similar trend results indicating that the default f value of 0.5 is adequate for reducing variability in constituent concentrations due to flow.
Read full abstract