Reviewed by: Anglican Confirmation, 1662–1820 by Phillip Tovey Martha F. Bowden Phillip Tovey. Anglican Confirmation, 1662–1820. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014. Pp. xii [H11001] 201. $149.95. Mr. Tovey emphasizes the historical context of Anglican confirmation in the eighteenth century, spreading a net wide enough to include not just British parish churches, but the wider imperial map, including the North American colonies and the Indian subcontinent. The intention is to subvert misperceptions caused by viewing the eighteenth-century church through "Victorian lenses." His review of the twentieth-century scholarship that began to dismantle Victorian ecclesiastical historiography is useful, but omits a number of revisionist historians such as Jeremy Gregory, B. W. Young, and Peter B. Nockells. Some of them are drawn into the later discussion, but the groundbreaking collection, The Church of England c.1689–c.1833: From Toleration to Tractarianism (1993), edited by J. Walsh, C. Haydon, and S. Taylor, does not appear. The Victorian two-step theory of initiation, forgiveness (baptism) followed by reception of the Spirit (confirmation), which became the accepted orthodoxy, was not part of most eighteenth-century theologians' view of the rite, nor was confirmation universally considered a sacrament. Mr. Tovey's very thorough research is a useful [End Page 84] reminder that the church in this period was not the sleepy, complacent organization that is also the legacy of Victorian history-making. He demonstrates a church engaged in concerned scrutiny of the meaning and proper procedures for confirmation, the place of catechizing, and the qualifications of candidates, revealing the very different theologies of baptism that ground the arguments. Samuel Clarke believed that confirmation was required to provide full membership in the church, when confirmands entered into the covenant introduced in baptism; Thomas Bray did not believe in "automatic baptismal regeneration." Richard Baxter's famous description of the chaos attending his confirmation, long considered normative, appears to be an exception. Thus it is unfortunate that the frontispiece, showing a bishop laying hands on a group of young men kneeling at a communion rail, dates from 1885. It may indicate the paucity of images of church practices in the earlier period, but it is solidly Victorian. The chapters cover theology, liturgy, sermons, practice, case studies of five dioceses, and the Anglican communion in North America. Because confirmation was eliminated in 1645 with the abolition of the Book of Common Prayer and not reinstated officially until the Restoration there were many congregants in 1660 who had never been confirmed. Mr. Tovey disputesS. L. Ollard's claim, however, that the vast numbers of candidates at eighteenth-century confirmation services, sometimes more than 3,000, indicated a need to "catch up." He points out that in that case, the numbers would diminish as the century progresses, but they do not. He also refutes Ollard's contention that catechizing was neglected in the period. The variety of catechetical materials and descriptions of practice in visitation returns demonstrate that Laurence Sterne, whom Mr. Tovey does not mention, and whom Ollard points to as exceptional for instructing youth at the parsonage rather than catechizing them briefly at Evensong, was in fact in line with many of his contemporaries. The chapter on sermons illustrates changing practice in the period. As he indicates, the confirmation rite calls for neither readings from scripture nor a sermon, but there is some evidence that the service normally included both; the sermons are easier to establish, because there are so many in print. Here again, the history of the practice is illuminating, because earlier in the period, the sermon was normally preached, not by the bishop, but by another clergyman. By the end of the century, though, it was normative for the bishop to preach, supporting the argument that confirmation was increasingly accepted as an episcopal act as the century went on. Here, however, the dates of publication can be misleading. Thomas Secker's sermon published in 1790 is used as evidence of increasing episcopal involvement late in the period, but this publication must be a reprint since Secker died in 1768. It is less easy to establish what the lectionary might have been; later versions of the Book of Common Prayer have passages from...
Read full abstract