Dynamic analysis has been performed with a new Type of 20' box container qualified as an industrial package Type 2 and 3 and as a Type A container. In the model for a numerical collision experiment the container was partially loaded with 21 × 1000 kg drums, arranged along three parallel rows forming a single layer. One of the aims in the container development was to achieve a system that could transport cargoes with a variable number of drums stacked in changeable configurations, while ensuring the safety of the container for dynamic forces that could arise during normal conditions of transport. This led to the design of an interchangeable tray for the drums that can easily be handled and loaded into the container, together with passive restraining devices that prevent this assembly from moving inside the container when subjected to dynamic forces. The container system is designed to withstand accelerations of up to 6g in the longitudinal direction. These can be expected during normal switchyard operations at collision speeds of about 13 km.h−1. In the dynamic analysis, initially the collision speed is assumed to be low, but then it is gradually increased until damaging forces are observed. For moderate collision speeds <10 km.h−1) the shock absorbers of the railroad and ram car remain fully functional. However, at speeds exceeding 10 to 11 km.h−1 the shock absorbers reach their full travel capacity, and a true impact occurs. At this point, the forces on the walls of the container, caused by the inertia of the cargo, grow rapidly with the speed of the collision, depending on how well the tray support system functions in its shock-absorbing capacity. One result of the calculations is that stiff support systems are not capable of absorbing the impact forces once the critical velocity of 10 km.h−1 is exceeded, since the forces quickly grow beyond even the design strength of a new 20' box container of 500 kN. In comparison the design strength of a today's IP 2/IP 3 container is only approx. 80 kN. In the numerical experiments, it was observed that a soft cushioning support tray system like the one developed by CORROBESCH/STM has excellent shock absorbing characteristics. By contrast, a rigid support system, or worse, no support system at all, is likely to produce impact forces at normal conditions of transport capable of endangering the container walls.
Read full abstract