The assessment and management of fluid volume overload has been a recurrent and perplexing issue in the management of patients hospitalized and often re-hospitalized with decompensated heart failure (DHF). The objective of this study was to quantitate plasma volume (PV) status in patients with DHF, and to determine the effectiveness of standard in-hospital diuresis management in reducing volume overload, and if the quantitation of PV could serve as a tool to guide more effective in-hospital diuretic therapy to achieve practice guideline-recommended euvolemia. PV was measured in patients with a history of chronic HF admitted to hospital for management of clinically determined volume overload. Intravascular volume was determined by a validated radiolabeled-albumin dilutional technique (Volumex, Daxor Corp., NY, NY) at hospital admission and at hospital discharge. Normal PV is defined pre hoc as measured volumes within ±8% of the expected normal value; mild volume expansion is ≤20% of predicted normal value. Volume status reported as absolute value and percentage of the normal value for the individual patient. The coefficient of variation of the analytic technique is <3.5%. Changes in quantitated volume status pre-post diuretic therapy were compared to clinical parameters of volume assessment [body weight change; net fluid input and urine output (I/Os)]. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated (73±9 yrs, sCr 1.7±0.8 mg/dL, LVEF 40±18%, LOS (length of stay) 6.3±2.1 days). All patients except 3 received intravenous loop diuretic therapy (furosemide) at 10-20 mg/hr for average of 5±2 days. The remaining 3 patients received oral furosemide equivalent of 80-160 mg per day. Admission to discharge PV and clinical parameters are shown below. Quantitated PV demonstrates that patients with DHF are significantly intravascularly volume expanded and that usual clinically-guided diuretic therapy only marginally impacts volume status at discharge despite large reductions in body weight and high net negative I/Os. Mobilization of interstitial volume intravascularly likely accounts for this disparity and suggests that DHF patients require longer periods of, or more effective diuretic therapy, to achieve euvolemia. Longer LOS may, however, be compensated by lower rates of 30-day re-hospitalization.Tabled 1AdmissionDischargeMeasured PV4.7 ± 1.1 Liters4.3 ± 1.0 LitersNormal Expected PV(Euvolemia)3.2 ± 0.4 LitersPV Expansion+46 ± 30%+32 ± 22% (p=0.214)Change in Body Weight−7.0 ± 4.6 kgNet I/Os−7.4 ± 6.5 Liters Open table in a new tab
Read full abstract