You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Basic Research VIII1 Apr 20101436 SIMVASTATIN INHIBITS THE GROWTH OF ANDROGEN-SENSITIVE AND ANDROGEN-INDEPENDENT CELLS IN VITRO Elizabeth Masko, Lionel L. Banez, Salvatore V. Pizzo, and Stephen J. Freedland Elizabeth MaskoElizabeth Masko More articles by this author , Lionel L. BanezLionel L. Banez More articles by this author , Salvatore V. PizzoSalvatore V. Pizzo More articles by this author , and Stephen J. FreedlandStephen J. Freedland More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1129AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Statins, the most widely used family of drugs, inhibit the enzyme HMG-coA reductase and effectively lower serum cholesterol at concentrations ranging from 3.2-8.8 ng/ml (∼7-20nM). Statins may be better therapy rather than chemoprevention for prostate cancer (PCa), as recent data suggest statins do not prevent PCa, but instead may prevent its progression. Many studies examined the role of statins in vitro as treatment of various PCa cell lines, but typical doses were well above normal physiological range (2-200μM). METHODS A total of three androgen-sensitive (LAPC-4, LNCaP, and CWR22) and two androgen-independent (PC-3 and DU145) cell lines were treated with varying concentrations of simvastatin (100-1000nM) for 1-5 days. Cell proliferation was measured by MTS assay, and IC50 calculated using BioDataFit 1.02. Cell viability was determined using the androgen-sensitive LAPC-4 and androgen-independent PC-3 cell lines via Trypan Blue exclusion assay. All experiments were completed in triplicate, and results represent the mean value for each treatment. RESULTS For all cell lines, simvastatin inhibited cell growth within the nanomolar range. More specifically, the IC50 for the androgen-sensitive cell lines ranged 250-500nM after 3 days and lower doses after 5 days. As for the androgen-independent cell lines, the 3-day IC50 for DU145 was 628nM. Of all the cell lines, PC-3 was the most sensitive with a 3-day IC50 of 75nM. In the cell viability assays, although simvastatin inhibited growth at concentrations less than 250nM in LAPC-4 and 75nM treatment in PC-3 (as measured by MTS assay), cell death was not induced until higher concentrations. In LAPC-4, cell viability was reduced by 28% at 500nM simvastatin, and by 92% at 750nM simvastatin. In the PC-3 cell line, cell death was not induced until 100nM simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS In this study, simvastatin inhibited cell growth of androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent PCa cell lines in vitro at concentrations slightly higher than normal physiological concentrations, but still dramatically less than most currently published studies. While the results are promising, there are many mechanisms through which statins may inhibit PCa growth that could not be tested in this in vitro model (i.e. lowering serum cholesterol levels, reduced systemicinflammation, anti-angiogenesis, etc.). Thus, statins remain an exciting agent for further testing in PCa therapy and further studies are needed to determine the exact mechanisms of action for statins on PCa cells. Durham, NC© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e553-e554 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Elizabeth Masko More articles by this author Lionel L. Banez More articles by this author Salvatore V. Pizzo More articles by this author Stephen J. Freedland More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...