Abstract Objective RBANS is a widely used cognitive screener that lacks memory recognition measures for 2 recall tasks. Performance on verbal and visual recognition measures, relative to recall, may help inform clinical decision-making and treatment planning. Our pilot project aims to understand how individuals with valid cognitive data and normal memory functioning perform on newly developed RBANS story and figure memory recognition tests. Method Of those referred for outpatient neuropsychological assessment at a veterans hospital between 2017–2024, 89 received the newly established recognition measures as part of their clinical evaluation. Our analysis included veterans that displayed valid profiles (TOMM trial 1 ≥ 45, n = 53). Assessment occurred 30% face-to-face and 70% telehealth. In addition to key demographic factors listed in table 1, race/ethnicity breakdown included: 92% White, 4% Black, 2% Asian, 2% Hispanic. These veterans were subdivided into 3 intact memory groups: list recall (≥ 25%ile, n = 31), story recall (≥ 25%ile, n = 37), figure recall (≥ 25%ile, n = 42) to determine average recognition performances across domains. Results The individuals with valid cognitive data and normal memory recall performed as listed in table 1. Although our novel story and figure recognition measures differ from those published in Duff et al. (2021), our pilot project data largely overlapped with their reported findings despite demographic differences. Conclusion(s) These novel recognition scores can help establish normal story and figure recognition performance to assist with clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. With greater and more diverse samples, we may be able to establish relative cut points for expected recognition memory performances across intact, amnestic/cortical, and vascular/subcortical.