Normal Biophysical Profile Research Articles

Sinusoidal Heart Rate Pattern And An Normal Biophysical Profile In A Severely Compromised Fetus

A case is described in which a woman complained of weakened fetal movements, and a persistent sinusoidal heart rate pattern was demonstrated in the presence of normal fetal breathing movements, normal fetal tone, and normal amount of amniotic fluid. In view of the subjective complaints and disregarding the normal biophysical profile, termination of pregnancy was performed. A compromised, severely anemic fetus was delivered by cesarean section. The role of sinusoidal heart rate pattern and the limitations of biophysical scores as a single determinant of fetal well being are discussed.

Biophysical profile scoring in the management of the diabetic pregnancy.

Biophysical profile scoring was the principal technique of antepartum fetal surveillance in 238 well-controlled diabetic pregnancies. Fifty insulin-dependent diabetics had twice-weekly testing, and 188 gestational diabetics had weekly testing. Intervention was not pursued unless there were maternal or fetal complications. There were no stillbirths and three neonatal deaths, all resulting from congenital anomalies, giving a corrected perinatal mortality rate of 0. The incidence of abnormal biophysical profile scores, eight of 238 (3.3%) overall, was low, with no significant difference between types of diabetics. In those with an abnormal score, intervention was mandated; the cesarean section rate was 50% and the rate of intensive care nursery admissions was high. Of the 230 fetuses with a normal biophysical profile score, 200 (87%) were delivered at term with minimal maternal or neonatal morbidity. Amniocentesis for phospholipid profile was performed in only 33 cases (13.9%). Hyaline membrane disease was confined to five premature neonates (incidence 2.1%). We conclude that antepartum fetal surveillance using the biophysical profile score permits safe expectant management in the diabetic pregnancy, yielding significant clinical advantages to both mother and fetus.

Fetal surveillance in insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancy: Predictive value of the biophysical profile

Ninety-eight insulin-dependent diabetic pregnancies underwent monitoring by means of 978 biophysical profiles from 28 weeks' gestation until parturition. Only 2.9% of the 978 tests had abnormal results (score less than or equal to 7). When performed within 2 days before birth, a normal biophysical profile predicted the 1-minute Apgar score to be normal in 92% and 5-minute Apgar score in 99%. When all biophysical profiles ever performed were included, the predictive value improved to 100%. The baby's first cry within 1 minute after birth was predicted in 95%. Furthermore, the predictive value of a normal biophysical profile regarding the absence of ominous intrapartum cardiotocographic patterns was excellent (95%). The specificity was in general good (80% to 90%), but the predictive value of abnormal test results and sensitivity were almost without exception poor. It seems that the very low rate of abnormal biophysical profiles indicates that obstetric interventions were made immediately after the occurrence of the first sign of fetal jeopardy; thus improved results were obtained.

Fetal Biophysical Profile and Perinatal Death

Baskett, T. F.; Allen, A. C.; Gray, J. H.; Young, D. C.; Young, L. M. Author Information

Fetal Biophysical Profile and Perinatal Death

Antepartum assessment of 5034 high-risk pregnancies to predict perinatal death included five biophysical variables (nonstress test, fetal breathing movements, fetal movements, fetal tone, and amniotic fluid volume) which combined to form a biophysical profile score. We assessed 4148 fetuses within seven days of delivery. The ability of each variable to predict perinatal death was expressed as the likelihood ratio, which incorporates sensitivity and specificity into one number. The predictive ability was most accurate with fetal movement (likelihood ratio 48.1) and the combined biophysical profile score (likelihood ratio 51.0). The biophysical profile score was more likely to predict perinatal death due to asphyxia (seven of eight) than lethal anomaly (six of 19). The overall perinatal mortality was 7.6 per 1000 total births. The perinatal mortality rate was 1.0 for a normal biophysical profile score, 31.3 for an equivocal score, and 200.0 for an abnormal score. The false-negative rate for the biophysical profile score was 0.7 per 1000.

Sonographic biophysical profile in the postdate pregnancy.

One hundred thirty-one postdate pregnancies were evaluated by the sonographic biophysical profile. Results of prenatal testing were compared to neonatal condition. Predictive values were calculated in order to determine whether this testing scheme could be used to detect the fetus at risk for neonatal distress. The results of this study show that a normal biophysical profile score is highly predictive of normal outcome, but an abnormal test has only a 14% predictive value of poor neonatal outcome.

Antepartum fetal assessment using a fetal biophysical profile score

The application of the fetal biophysical profile score in the management of 2,400 high-risk pregnancies was assessed. The negative predictive value for normal perinatal outcome was not improved compared to single variable tests. The positive predictive value for abnormal perinatal outcome was improved. The overall perinatal mortality in 2,485 fetuses was 9.2 per 1,000. In the 1,980 fetuses with a normal biophysical profile score within 7 days of delivery, excluding lethal anomalies, the perinatal mortality was 1 per 1,000. Fetal movement counting is supported as the most valid and appropriate test for universal fetal screening.