Nonunion Rate Research Articles

Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

Evaluate if nonoperative or operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures delivers reduced rates of nonunion and improved Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Multicenter, prospective, observational. Seven Level 1 Trauma Centers in the United States. Adults with closed, displaced (100% displacement/shortened >1.5 cm) midshaft clavicle fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association 15.2) were treated nonoperatively, with plates and screw fixation, or with intramedullary fixation from 2003 to 2018. DASH scores (2, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months), reoperation, and nonunion were compared between the nonoperative, plate fixation, and intramedullary fixation groups. Four hundred twelve patients were enrolled, with 203 undergoing plate fixation, 26 receiving intramedullary fixation, and 183 treated nonoperatively. The average age of the nonoperative group was 40.1 (range 18-79) years versus 35.8 (range 18-74) in the plate group and 39.3 (range 19-56) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.06). One hundred forty (76.5%) patients in the nonoperative group were male compared with 154 (75.9%) in the plate group and 18 (69.2%) in the intramedullary fixation group (P = 0.69). All groups showed similar DASH scores at 2 weeks, 12 months, and 24 months (P > 0.05). Plate fixation demonstrated better DASH scores (median = 20.8) than nonoperative (median = 28.3) at 6 weeks (P = 0.04). Intramedullary fixation had poorer DASH scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months than plate fixation and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months (P < 0.05). The nonunion rate for nonoperative treatment (14.6%) was significantly higher than the plate group (0%) (P < 0.001). Operative treatment of displaced clavicle fractures provided lower rates of nonunion than nonoperative treatment. Except at 6 weeks, no difference was observed in DASH scores between plate fixation and nonoperative treatment. Intramedullary fixation resulted in worse DASH scores than plate fixation at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and worse DASH scores than nonoperative at 6 months. Implant removal was the leading reason for reoperation in the plate and intramedullary fixation groups, whereas surgery for nonunion was the primary reason for surgery in the nonoperative group. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment of Z-Type Comminuted Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: A Prospective Substratified Cohort Analysis.

To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of nonoperative and operative treatment of adolescents with comminuted "Z-type" midshaft clavicle fractures. Prospective observational cohort. Eight tertiary care pediatric centers. Patients aged 10-18 years who were treated either operatively or nonoperatively for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture between 2013 and 2017 were screened/enrolled at the time of injury. The current subcohort analysis was derived from a larger adolescent clavicle study population of 907 patients. Complications and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROs):(ASES, QuickDASH, Marx Shoulder Activity Score, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and patient satisfaction score) were compared between operative and nonoperative cohorts. Eighty-one patients (69 male [85.2%], 12 female; average age 15 years [11.1-18.7]; 78 with sports participation [96.2%]) were followed through bony healing and return to sports, while 59 patients (73%) completed 2-year follow-up with PROs, 26 of whom were treated nonoperatively and 33 treated operatively. All demographic and fracture characteristics were similar (P > 0.05) between the 2-year follow-up cohorts except for fracture shortening, which was greater in the operative cohort (23 vs. 29 mm, P = 0.01). After controlling for this potential confounder through both regression and propensity matched subgroup analysis, nonoperative versus operative cohorts showed no difference in rates of nonunion (0%), delayed union (0% vs. 2.3%, P = 1.0), symptomatic malunion (2.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.4), refracture (2.7% vs. 2.2%, P = 1.0), unexpected subsequent surgery (5.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.45), or clinically significant complications (5.4% vs. 16%, P = 0.17). There were no differences in any PROs between cohorts, both before and after controlling for the difference in fracture shortening (all P-values >0.05). In this prospective comparison of complications and 2-year PROs in adolescents with comminuted Z-type clavicle fractures, nonoperative and operative treatment yielded similar outcomes. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Which interbody device minimized nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing allograft versus polyetheretherketone cage.

Nonunion and significant subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are associated with poor clinical outcomes, which occasionally lead to revision surgery. Allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are the two most commonly used interbody spacer devices for ACDF. Although studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of these two interbody materials, the question remains regarding the superiority of one over the other. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates after ACDF using allograft and PEEK cages as interbody devices. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published prior to November 2023 that compared the efficacy and safety of allograft and PEEK cages for ACDF. A pooled analysis was designed to identify differences in nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates between the two interbody devices. Ten studies involving 1462 patients (allograft, 852 patients; PEEK cage, 610 patients) were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that allograft had a significantly lower rate of nonunion compared to that of PEEK cages (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.79; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the reoperation rate due to nonunion was significantly higher with PEEK cages compared to that with allograft (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.71; p < 0.01), whereas the reoperation rate due to overall causes did not display significant results (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.29; p = 0.12). The incidence of significant subsidence (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.28-1.55; p = 0.34) and the mean amount of subsidence (standard mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.47; p = 0.90) did not demonstrate significant differences between allograft and PEEK cages. Overall, the current meta-analysis suggests the advantages of allograft over PEEK cages used for ACDF, due to an enhanced fusion rate and minimized revision risk, with no increase in the risk of subsidence.

Minimally Invasive Surgery For Management of Bunionette Deformity (Tailor's Bunion) Using Fifth Metatarsal Osteotomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There has been increasing interest in the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette correction. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following percutaneous or minimally invasive surgery for bunionette deformity correction. A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. All clinical studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library Database from inception until December 2023 reporting on the use of percutaneous or minimally invasive osteotomy techniques for bunionette deformity correction were included. The primary outcome was radiographic deformity correction. A meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes was performed to assess the mean difference following surgery. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. A total of 942 potential studies were identified, of which 18 were included encompassing 714 feet in 580 patients. There were no comparative studies identified. The majority of studies (n = 14/18) used an unfixed distal osteotomy technique. All studies showed a statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score and visual analog scale for pain) and radiologic outcomes (fourth-fifth intermetatarsal angle and fifth metatarsophalangeal angle). Complication rates ranged from 0% to 21.4%. The nonunion rate was 0% to 5.6%. Overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The most common complication was development of a hypertrophic callus that tended to resorb over time without needing further surgical intervention. The results of this systematic review must be considered in light of the methodologic limitations of the studies analyzed-including additional procedures performed at the same time as the bunionette correction, lack of comparative studies, and heterogeneity of the case series included. Despite these limitations, our review suggests that percutaneous techniques for bunionette deformity correction are generally clinically safe and associated with improvement in radiographic alignment and patient-reported outcome measures.

The Role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Temporizing Traumatic Wounds before Lower Limb Soft Tissue Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

In practice, there is often a delay from initial debridement and temporary fixation to definitive soft tissue coverage of traumatic leg wounds. Without clear evidence, conservative negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is increasingly used to temporize these wounds. This systematic review summarizes and synthesizes the literature on using NPWT to temporize traumatic leg wounds before surgery in adult surgical patients. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed from inception until July 2022, inclusively. Two independent reviewers performed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Primary English studies, including adult patients (≥16 years old) with a fracture below the knee up to and including the ankle that received NPWT to temporize wounds before definitive soft tissue reconstruction with a flap and/or graft, were included. Thirty-four studies, including 804 patients who received NPWT, were included. The partial/total flap loss rate was 6.95% (n = 9 studies), the infection rate was 19.5% (n = 25 studies), the nonunion rate was 18% (n = 15 studies), the delayed union rate was 9.31% (n = 3 studies), and the amputation rate was 15.4% (n = 6 studies). The mean late stay was 43.1 days (n = 9 studies), and the follow-up length was 23.7 months (n = 9 studies). The mean time to wound healing was 5.63 months (n = 2 studies), and the time to soft tissue coverage was 40.8 days (n = 12 studies). The mean time to achieve bone union was 7.26 months (n = 6 studies). NPWT can be used to temporize traumatic wounds while awaiting soft tissue reconstruction.

Cutibacterium acnes Infection as a Cause of Nonunion After Ulnar-Shortening Osteotomy.

Ulnar-shortening osteotomy is a reliable solution to treat ulnar impaction syndrome, but it has a significant rate of nonunion as a known complication. Generally nonunion after the procedure is attributed to noninfectious causes. When infections happen, they follow the microbiological trends of nonunions elsewhere in the body. We present a case of ulnar-shortening osteotomy using an oblique-cut osteotomy system that resulted in septic nonunion. At the time of revision surgery, Cutibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus hominis were isolated from the osteotomy site. The patient was successfully treated using intravenous antibiotics and the two-stage Masquelet technique and eventually went on to bony union. As C acnes is rarely encountered in this context, this report highlights the need to consider all possible pathogens in the workup of a potentially septic nonunion. Surgeons should consider bacteria such as C acnes that require prolonged incubation for isolation from cultures, which may not be part of many institutions' usual protocol. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e211-e213.].

Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined with Proximal Femoral Reconstruction Effectively Treats Severe Hip Deformities: A Novel Osteotomy Technique.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) combined with proximal femoral reconstruction is a novel osteotomy technique developed to address severe hip deformities. There is a paucity of robust clinical and radiological evidence regarding the outcomes of this novel osteotomy technique. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction during the early follow-up. This is a retrospective case series of 63 hips who underwent THA combined with proximal femoral reconstruction at a single institution between January 2020 and July 2023. The mean age of patients was 39.6 ± 12.6 years. The mean follow-up was 25.6 ± 3.8 months. Surgical characteristics and perioperative variables were evaluated to assess the efficacy of this technique. Harris hip score (HHS) was utilized to evaluate hip function. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) was evaluated in X-ray. The incidence of major adverse events including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), osteolysis, nonunion of the osteotomy, intraoperative femoral fracture, and infection was also evaluated. Paired-samples t-test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative HHS and LLD. The mean operative time was 125.1 min. The mean size of the acetabular components used was 45.2 mm, and the stem size was 7.5. The primary friction interface was ceramic-on-ceramic, accounting for 92.1% of cases. The average length of hospital stay was 8.5 days. The mean cost of treatment was 46,296.0 Yuan. There was a significant improvement in postoperative HHS (p < 0.001) and LLD (p < 0.001) compared to preoperative values. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis was 4.8%; osteolysis rates for the cup and stem were 4.8% and 6.4%, respectively. The non-union and dislocation rates were 1.6% and 3.2%, respectively. There was no incidence of postoperative infection. The novel osteotomy surgical procedure yields reliable and impressive clinical and radiological outcomes, with minimal complications. We advocate for its use in complex primary THA cases involving severe proximal femoral deformities.

A MORPHOLOGICAL REVIEW OF MEDIAL MALLEOLAR FRACTURES: ARE THERE ANY FACTORS WHICH MAY PREDISPOSE TO NONUNION AND MALUNION?

BackgroundMany approaches to management of medial malleolar fractures are described in the literature however, their morphology is under investigated. The aim of this study was to analyse the morphology of medial malleolar fractures to identify any association with medial malleolar fracture non-union or malunion.MethodsPatients who had undergone surgical fixation of their MMF were identified from 2012 to 2022, using electronic patient records in a single centre. Analysis of their preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative radiographs was performed to determine their morphology and prevalence of non-union and malunion. Lauge-Hansen classification was used to characterise ankle fracture morphology and Herscovici classification to characterise MMF morphology.ResultsA total of 650 patients were identified across a 10-year period which could be included in the study. The overall non-union rate for our cohort was 18.77% (122/650). The overall malunion rate was 6.92% (45/650). There was no significant difference in union rates across the Herscovici classification groups. Herscovici type A fractures were significantly more frequently malreduced at time of surgery as compared to other fracture types (p=.003). Medial wall blowout combined with Hercovici type B fractures showed a significant increase in malunion rate. There is a higher rate of bone union in patients who have been anatomically reduced.ConclusionThe morphology of medial malleolar fractures does have an impact of the radiological outcome following surgical management. Medial wall blowout fractures were most prevalent in adduction-type injuries; however, it should not be ruled out in rotational injuries with medial wall blowouts combined with and Herscovici type B fractures showing a significant increase in malunions. Herscovici type A fractures had significantly higher malreductions however the clinical implications of mal reducing small avulsions is unknown.

IMPACTION BONE GRAFTING OF LARGE DEFECTS IN ANKLE AND HINDFOOT FUSIONS

BackgroundAnkle and hindfoot fusion in the presence of large bony defects represents a challenging problem. Treatment options include acute shortening and fusion or void filling with metal cages or structural allograft, which both have historically low union rates. Impaction grafting is an alternative option.MethodsA 2 centre retrospective review of consecutive series of 32 patients undergoing hindfoot fusions with impaction bone grafting of morselised femoral head allograft to fill large bony void defects was performed. Union was assessed clinically and with either plain radiography or weightbearing CT scanning. Indications included failed total ankle replacement (24 patients), talar osteonecrosis (6 patients) and fracture non-union (2 patients). Mean depth of the defect was 29 ±10.7 mm and mean maximal cross-sectional area was 15.9 ±5.8 cm2. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis was performed in 24 patients, ankle arthrodesis in 7 patients and triple arthrodesis in 1 patient.ResultsMean age was 57 years (19–76 years). Mean follow-up of 22.8 ±8.3 months. 22% were smokers. There were 4 tibiotalar non-unions (12.5%), two of which were symptomatic. 10 TTC arthrodesis patients united at the tibiotalar joint but not at the subtalar joint (31.3%), but only two of these were symptomatic. The combined symptomatic non-union rate was 12.5%. Mean time to union was 9.6 ±5.9 months. One subtalar non-union patient underwent re-operation at 78 months post-operatively after failure of metalwork. Two (13%) patients developed a stress fracture above the metalwork that healed with non-operative measures. There was no bone graft collapse with all patients maintaining bone length.ConclusionImpaction of morselised femoral head allograft can be used to fill large bony voids around the ankle and hindfoot when undertaking arthrodesis, with rapid graft incorporation and no graft collapse despite early loading. This technique offers satisfactory union outcomes without the need for shortening or synthetic cages.

LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP, REOPERATIONS, AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES FOLLOWING REVISION SURGERY FOR FAILED TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTIES

IntroductionPrimary ankle arthroplasty (TAR) is increasingly used to treat end-stage ankle arthritis. Reported revision rates of TAR vary from 8.5% to 11.1% at 9 years. Revision surgery remains technically challenging with options ranging from simple joint debridement to tibio-talar-calcaneal fusion. The efficacy of these procedures remains unclear and there is no consensus on optimal revision options.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients undergoing surgery for a failed primary TAR at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (2004–2021). TAR failure was determined by clinical assessment, serial radiographs and CT scans. Primary outcome measures included type and time of index surgery post TAR. Secondary outcomes included frequency of re-operations, post-operative complications, patient reported outcomes and union rate (for revision arthrodesis procedures).Results70 failed TARs in 69 patients (35M:34F, mean 65.7 years, s.d.=11.6) underwent re-operation a mean of 6.24 years (range 1–30) post primary. In total, 107 operations were performed including revision fusion (n=50), revision arthroplasty (n=14), bearing exchange (n=9) and joint clearance (n=9). The overall revision fusion union rate was 73.5% over a mean of 12.5 months (s.d.=7.6). 16/23 (69.6%) Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal and 9/12 (75%) ankle fusions (previous subtalar/triple fusion) using a hindfoot nail united over a mean 11.4 months (s.d.=6.0) and 15 months (s.d.=9.48) respectively. Only 64% of ankle fusions using screws alone united (mean=10.6 months, s.d.=8.14). The average post-operative MOXFQ score was 28.3 (s.d.=19.3). 73% said the operation improved their function and would recommend it to a friend/family member.ConclusionDespite low post-operative MOXFQ scores, over 70% of patients were satisfied with re-operation for a failed TAR. Over 26% of all TAR revision fusions fail to unite with the highest non-union rates observed post ankle arthrodesis with screws alone (36.4%).

Effect of Obesity on Short- and Long-Term Complications After Ankle Fracture Fixation.

This study evaluated the relationship between obesity and postoperative complications in patients undergoing ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Retrospective cohort study. PearlDiver-Mariner All-Payor Database. Patients who underwent ankle ORIF from 2010 to 2021 and had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were identified using Current Procedural Terminology, ICD-9, and ICD-10 codes. Patients were stratified by body mass index into nonobese, obese, morbidly obese, and super-obese groups. Complication rates, including 90-day readmissions, infection, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis, were compared between obesity groups. Patients were additionally compared with a 1:1 matched analysis that controlled for demographics and comorbidities. A total of 160,415 patients undergoing ankle ORIF from 2010 to 2021 were identified. The cohort consisted mostly of females (64.8%) and the average age was 52.5 (SD 18.4) years. There were higher rates of 90-day readmissions, UTIs, DVT/PE, pneumonia, superficial infections, and acute kidney injuries in patients with increasing levels of obesity (P < 0.001). There were increased odds of nonunion and post-traumatic arthritis in the matched analysis at 2 years in the obesity group [OR: 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.68-3.31, P < 0.001; OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.77-2.68, P < 0.001, respectively]. Postoperative medical complication rates in patients undergoing ankle ORIF, including infection, are higher in obese patients, even in the 1:1 matched analysis that controlled for demographic and comorbidity factors. Rates of nonunion and post-traumatic arthritis were higher in obese patients, as well. As such, it is important for surgeons to provide appropriate education regarding the risks after ankle ORIF in patients with obesity. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOMES OF ARTHROSCOPIC ANKLE FUSION: PRE-EXISTING TRIPLE FUSION AND THE RISK TO NONUNION

BackgroundOpen or arthroscopic ankle fusion (AAF) is a successful operative treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. Evidence suggest that AAFs have better outcomes. In addition to the operative technique other patient-factors can influence outcomes. The most significant complication of ankle fusion is a non-union. To better understand the risk factors related to this we undertook a retrospective investigation of primary AAFs.MethodsWe reviewed all AAFs conducted at our institution over a 10-year period. Patients excluded if they had simultaneous fusion of neighbouring joints or were lost to follow-up. The primary outcome variable was radiographic union. Other operative complications were analysed as secondary outcomes. Two hundred and eighty-four eligible AAFs in 271 patients were performed over the study period.ResultsThe overall non-union rate was 7.7 %. Univariate logistic regression analysis found that smoking (6.2% non-union in non-smokers vs 24% in smokers) and prior triple fusion (5.5% non-union in the absence of prior triple fusion vs 70% in the presence of a prior triple fusion) were independent risk factors for non-union. Multivariate analysis showed that only prior triple fusion was predictive (OR 40.0 [9.4,170.3], p &lt; 0.0001). Increasing age, obesity (BMI &gt;30), surgical grade (trainee vs consultant), diabetes or the degree of weightbearing status post-operatively were not significant risk factors of non-union. The leading cause of reoperation was the removal of metal (18%). There were 5 superficial (1.8%) and 4 deep (1.4%) infections. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 75% ‘survivorship’ of the subtalar joint at 10 years following an arthroscopic ankle fusion.ConclusionThis is the largest case series of AAFs in the literature and the first to demonstrate that patients who had an AAF performed after a previous triple fusion have unacceptably high non-union rates and may benefit from other surgical options. This study data could also useful for patient consenting purposes.

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Nonunion in Open Tibial Shaft Fracture among Patients Treated with External Fixation in Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital

Background: The definitive treatment of open tibial shaft fractures remains challenging and nonunion after treatment of open tibial shaft fractures with external fixation complicates a significant proportion of cases. There are varying rates of occurrence of nonunion and the prevalence is not well known in Ethiopia. The objective of the study is to assess the prevalence and associated factors of nonunion in open tibial shaft fractures treated with EX FIX in TGSH. Methods: The study was conducted using a cross-sectional study in patients with open tibial shaft fractures who were admitted and treated with external fixation in the Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital orthopedics department from January 1, 2019, to January 29, 2021. The study involved 75 patients, which was the total number of cases in the study period and fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Bivariate and multiple variable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the association between variables. The degree of association between variables was determined at the p-value of &lt;0.05. Results: The overall prevalence of nonunion in open tibial shaft fractures treated with external fixation in TGSH was 21.3%. The severity of the injury, presence of wound infection, and treatment factors affect the occurrence of nonunion. It occurs in 9 of 19 (47.4%) Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB fractures and 6 of 48 (12.5%) Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIA fractures. A delay in soft tissue covering of Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB fracture of 15 days or more increases the nonunion rate to 72.7%. Nonunion occurred in 41.7% of cases with SSI and 11.8% of cases without SSI. Gustilo-Anderson grade (AOR=4.85, CI 95%: 1.31-18.01), surgical site infection (AOR=4.12, CI 95%: 1.11-15.26), and time until coverage of bone of Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB fracture (AOR=18.23, CI 95%: 1.17-284.8) have statistically significant association with nonunion. Conclusion and Recommendation: External fixation use for definitive treatment of open tibial fractures should be disfavored as the prevalence of nonunion in open tibial shaft fractures treated with EX FIX is higher than other previous studies done in European and Asian countries. Gustilo-Anderson grade of injury, surgical site infection, and time from injury to bone coverage of Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB fractures were found to be statistically significantly associated with the occurrence of nonunion. Therefore, attention should be given to early soft tissue reconstruction of exposed bones to establish a favorable environment for bone healing and to make treatment with internal fixations possible. Better management of wounds to minimize surgical site infections is required for better healing of open tibial shaft fractures. Prospective studies are also recommended on the issue.

Wrist &amp; Hand

The June 2024 Wrist &amp; Hand Roundup360 looks at: One-year outcomes of the anatomical front and back reconstruction for scapholunate dissociation; Limited intercarpal fusion versus proximal row carpectomy in the treatment of SLAC or SNAC wrist: results after 3.5 years; Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of traumatic central tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex; The rate of nonunion in the MRI-detected occult scaphoid fracture: a multicentre cohort study; Does correction of carpal malalignment influence the union rate of scaphoid nonunion surgery?; Provision of a home-based video-assisted therapy programme in thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty; Is replantation associated with better hand function after traumatic hand amputation than after revision amputation?; Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for detection of scaphoid and distal radius fractures: a systematic review.

Le double verrouillage distal dans l’enclouage centromédullaire des fractures diaphysaires de l’humérus réduit-il le taux de pseudarthrose ?

Introduction: Intramedullary nailing is one of the surgical treatments for humeral shaft fracture. Non-union is a common complication, with rates of 10-20%. The objective of this study was to compare non-union in humeral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing with double distal locking, single distal locking or no locking.Hypothesis: Nailing with double distal locking decreases non-union rates compared to single or no locking.Material and Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with closed humeral shaft fracture without neurologic deficit treated by anterograde intramedullary nailing: group 1 (double locking): 15 fractures; group 2 (single locking): 63 fractures; group 3 (no locking): 9 fractures. Non-union was defined as absence of radiographic callus at 6 months without clinical pain. The primary endpoint was non-union rate per group. The secondary endpoints were Constant score at 6 months, and postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).Results: There were no significant differences in non-union rate: 20.0% in group 1, 20.3% in group 2, and 0% in group 3 (p = 0.32). Constant score at 6 months was significantly different between the 3 groups (p = 0.01). Group 2 used more NSAIDs than the other groups (39.1% vs 20.0% in group 1 and 33.3% in group 3; p = 0.37).Discussion: Non-union rates were similar regardless of distal locking for closed humeral shaft fractures without neurologic deficit treated by intramedullary nailing. Nevertheless, patients in the double locking group had higher Constant scores at 6 months, probably related to greater stability of fixation, allowing more efficient rehabilitation.Level of evidence: III; Retrospective comparative study

Does double distal locking reduce non-union rates in intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture?

IntroductionIntramedullary nailing is one of the surgical treatments for humeral shaft fracture. Non-union is a common complication, with rates of 10–20%. The objective of this study was to compare non-union in humeral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing with double distal locking, single distal locking or no locking. HypothesisNailing with double distal locking decreases non-union rates compared to single or no locking. Material and methodsThis single-center retrospective comparative study included 87 patients with closed humeral shaft fracture without neurologic deficit treated by anterograde intramedullary nailing: group 1 (double locking): 15 fractures; group 2 (single locking): 63 fractures; group 3 (no locking): 9 fractures. Non-union was defined as absence of radiographic callus at 6 months without clinical pain. The primary endpoint was non-union rate per group. The secondary endpoints were Constant score at 6 months, and postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). ResultsThere were no significant differences in non-union rate: 20.0% in group 1, 20.3% in group 2, and 0% in group 3 (p=0.32). Constant score at 6 months was significantly different between the 3 groups (p=0.01). Group 2 used more NSAIDs than the other groups (39.1% vs. 20.0% in group 1 and 33.3% in group 3; p=0.37). DiscussionNon-union rates were similar regardless of distal locking for closed humeral shaft fractures without neurologic deficit treated by intramedullary nailing. Nevertheless, patients in the double locking group had higher Constant scores at 6 months, probably related to greater stability of fixation, allowing more efficient rehabilitation. Level of evidenceIII; retrospective comparative study.

Given the encouraging results of biomechanical studies on femoral neck fractures, are locking plates more safe?

This current study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes of femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with either cannulated screws (CS) or proximal femoral locking plates (PFLP). We conducted a retrospective study in patients aged 18 to 60 years with femoral neck fractures and investigated medical records between January 2005 and December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups based on implants, screw and plate, used for fixation assigned. In addition, two groups were compared for their complications and functional outcomes, which were assessed with Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Parker Palmer mobility scores. Sixty-nine of 104 patients met the inclusion criteria. Forty patients were treated with cannulated screws, while 29 were treated with a proximal femoral locking plate. The two groups were comparable in terms of their perioperative variables. The overall complication rate (screw group, n = 10; plate group, n = 14) and non-union rate were significantly high in the plate group (p < 0.05). Other complications did not show statistically significant differences. The screw group had better functional outcomes than the plate group, where only the Parker-Palmer mobility score comparison was significant (p < 0.05). Poor reduction quality and Pauwels' type III fractures were statistically associated with high complication rates regardless of the implants used (p < 0.05). Although PFLP showed better outcomes in biomechanical studies than CSs, we observed poorer clinical results. Therefore, although some of our results appeared to be statistically significant, reduction quality should also be considered.

Nailing precision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing piriformis and trochanteric entry points for femoral antegrade nailing.

Entry point selection, a crucial aspect of femoral antegrade nailing, can impact nail fit and consequently fracture reduction. In adults, the standard entry portals used are the piriformis fossa and the tip of the greater trochanter. Previous systematic reviews comparing the two techniques have not been limited to Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and have not consistently included the same available RCTs. A systematic search of comparative studies regarding entry portal selection in femoral antegrade nailing was conducted on seven databases. Only Prospective RCTs comparing trochanteric and piriformis entry in the management of trochanteric or diaphyseal femur fractures were eligible for inclusion. Ultimately, only 6 RCTs were found eligible for inclusion. Five of the six included studies reported on operative time. The resulting mean difference (MD) illustrated a significant decrease in operative time by approximately 21.26min (95% CI - 28.60 to - 13.92, p < 0.001) using trochanteric entry. Fluoroscopy exposure was reported on by four studies, however, only two studies were included in the analysis due to different reporting methods. Trochanteric entry used significantly less fluoroscopy than piriformis entry (MD -50.33s, 95% CI - 84.441 to - 16.22, p = 0. 004). No significant difference in malalignment rates, delayed union rates, nonunion rates, pain scores, or complication rates was found. The significant differences found in operating time and fluoroscopy time align with those in other studies. While we were not able to pool the data on functional outcome scores, none of the included studies found a significant difference in scores by their last follow-up. Both approaches demonstrate comparable functional outcomes and safety profiles, indicating the choice of entry point should be at the discretion of the surgeon based on technique familiarity and fracture characteristics.

Graft Position, Healing, and Resorption in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Comparison of 4 Glenoid Augmentation Techniques.

The success of glenoid augmentation procedures depends on accurate placement and healing of the graft to the glenoid. Different glenoid augmentation techniques have been described, but no comparative studies between them exist. To assess the bone graft position, healing, and resorption in a group of patients treated with 1 of 4 procedures: arthroscopic anterior bone-block procedure using either (1) fresh-frozen iliac crest allograft or (2) iliac crest autograft, (3) open Latarjet, or (4) arthroscopic Latarjet. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 40 patients (87.5% men; mean age, 29.5 ± 7.9 years) were included, with 10 patients in each of the procedure groups. The graft position in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Graft healing and resorption were assessed in a second CT scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Qualitative variables were compared between the 4 procedures using the chi-square test, and quantitative variables were compared with the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. No differences were found between the procedures in the axial or sagittal position. The healing rate was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group (20%) compared with the autograft bone-block (80%), open Latarjet (90%), and arthroscopic Latarjet (90%) groups (P < .001). Graft resorption developed in 17 of 40 (42.5%) cases overall. Osteolysis occurred in 100% of cases in the allograft bone-block group compared with 50% in the autograft group, 20% in the open Latarjet group, and 0% in the arthroscopic Latarjet group (P < .001). The glenoid surface area on 1-year CT scan was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group compared with the autograft bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet groups (P < .001). Arthroscopic bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provided accurate bone graft positioning. However, very high rates of osteolysis and nonunion were observed in the iliac crest fresh-frozen allograft bone-block procedure when compared with the other procedures.

Four-screw compression plate fixation for diaphyseal humerus fractures.

While many humeral shaft fractures can be successfully treated with nonoperative management, compression plating techniques using at least three or four screws on either side of the fracture are the current gold standard. We hypothesized that a less rigid construct using compression with only two screws on either side of the fracture can provide adequate strength for uneventful fracture union. This is a retrospective review of all the patients who underwent open reduction and compression plate fixation for acute diaphyseal humerus fractures (ADHFs) at an academic Level-1 urban trauma center between 2018 and 2023. Patients treated with compression plating using only two screws and three or four plate-holes on either side of the fracture (Group 1) were matched one-to-one with patients treated using the conventional number of screws (three or more on either side of the fracture - Group 2). The incidence of nonunion/malunion, infection, and implant failure was compared among the two groups. There were eleven matched patients in both groups. The nonunion, infection complications, and hardware failure rates were 0% and 9.1% for the control group (Group 2) and four-screw group (Group 1) respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 1.00). Although convention dictates the use of six or more bicortical screws (at least three bicortical screws on each side of the fracture), four-screw bicortical fixation may be a feasible option for ADHFs treated with large fragment compression plating techniques.