Nonusers Of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Research Articles

The impact of the use of aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the risk of prostate cancer detection on biopsy.

To evaluate the association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and the risk of prostate cancer (PC) detection in men undergoing biopsy. Men were identified using our academic institution's prospectively maintained prostate biopsy database. Patients were classified as aspirin (ASA) users, users of other NSAIDs, or nonusers. The primary outcome was any PC on biopsy, and the secondary outcome was clinically significant PC (CSPC; Gleason sum ≥7). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for a priori defined clinical confounders. Of 839 patients, 408 (48.6%) were diagnosed with PC and 201 (24.0%) had CSPC. A higher proportion of ASA users (63.5%) and other NSAID users (61.2%) had PC compared with nonusers (41.9%; P <.001). CSPC was more common among ASA users (34.9%; P <.001) compared with other NSAID users (20.0%) and nonusers (20.9%). In multivariate regression analyses, ASA use (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-3.13; P = .001) and other NSAID use (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.36-431; P = .003) were associated with higher odds of PC detection, whereas ASA use was associated with higher odds of CSPC (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.00-2.62; P = .048). In men undergoing biopsy, ASA and other NSAID use were associated with increased probability of detecting PC, whereas ASA use was associated with the risk of detecting CSPC. Although NSAID use might have a protective biological effect against PC, men who develop elevated prostate-specific antigen levels while on NSAIDs may nonetheless be less likely to have an inflammatory etiology and more likely to harbor PC. It may be warranted for clinicians to consider the influence of NSAIDs when evaluating patients being considered for biopsy.

A healthy lifestyle index is associated with reduced risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps among non-users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

In a Columbia, South Carolina-based case-control study, we developed a healthy lifestyle index from five modifiable lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, diet, and body mass index), and examined the association between this lifestyle index and the risk of colorectal adenomatous polyps (adenoma). Participants were recruited from a local endoscopy center and completed questionnaires related to lifestyle behaviors prior to colonoscopy. We scored responses on each of five lifestyle factors as unhealthy (0 point) or healthy (1 point) based on current evidence and recommendations. We added the five scores to produce a combined lifestyle index for each participant ranging from 0 (least healthy) to 5 (healthiest), which was dichotomized into unhealthy (0-2) and healthy (3-5) lifestyle scores. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for adenoma with adjustment for multiple covariates. We identified 47 adenoma cases and 91 controls. In the main analyses, there was a statistically nonsignificant inverse association between the dichotomous (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.22, 1.29) and continuous (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.51, 1.10) lifestyle index and adenoma. Odds of adenoma were significantly modified by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (p(interaction) = 0.04). For participants who reported no use of NSAIDs, those in the healthy lifestyle category had a 72% lower odds of adenoma as compared to those in the unhealthy category (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.08, 0.98), whereas a one-unit increase in the index significantly reduced odds of adenoma by 53% (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26, 0.88). Although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given our small sample size, our results suggest that higher scores from this index are associated with reduced odds of adenomas, especially in non-users of NSAIDs. Lifestyle interventions are required to test this approach as a strategy to prevent colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cardiovascular outcomes in women: results from the women's health initiative.

Conclusive data about cardiovascular toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are sparse. We hypothesized that regular NSAID use is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women, and that this association is stronger with greater cyclooxygenase (cox)-2 when compared with cox-1 inhibition. Postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative were classified as regular users or nonusers of nonaspirin NSAIDs. Cox regression examined NSAID use as a time-varying covariate and its association with the primary outcome of total cardiovascular disease defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary analyses considered the association of selective cox-2 inhibitors (eg, celecoxib), nonselective agents with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition (eg, naproxen), and nonselective agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition (eg, ibuprofen) with the primary outcome. Overall, 160 801 participants were available for analysis (mean follow-up, 11.2 years). Regular NSAID use at some point in time was reported by 53 142 participants. Regular NSAID use was associated with an increased hazard for cardiovascular events versus no NSAID use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.15; P<0.001). Selective cox-2 inhibitors were associated with a modest increased hazard for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.13; 1.04-1.23; P=0.004 and celecoxib only: HR, 1.13; 1.01-1.27; P=0.031). Among aspirin users, concomitant selective cox-2 inhibitor use was no longer associated with increased hazard for cardiovascular events. There was an increased risk for agents with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition (HR, 1.17; 1.10-1.24; P<0.001 and naproxen only: HR, 1.22; 1.12-1.34; P<0.001). This harmful association remained among concomitant aspirin users. We did not observe a risk elevation for agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition (HR, 1.01; 0.95-1.07; P=0.884 and ibuprofen only: HR, 1.00; 0.93-1.07; P=0.996). Regular use of selective cox-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs with cox-2>cox-1 inhibition showed a modestly increased hazard for cardiovascular events. Nonselective agents with cox-1>cox-2 inhibition were not associated with increased cardiovascular risk. www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000611.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and functional outcome from ischemic cerebral events among women

BackgroundUse of some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been linked to an increased risk of stroke. However, information on the impact of NSAID use on functional outcomes from stroke is limited. MethodsUsing women enrolled in the Women's Healthy Study who were free of a history of stroke or TIA at baseline, a prospective cohort study was performed to examine the impact of NSAID use on functional outcomes from stroke. Women were classified as NSAID non-user (<11days of use in the past month), user (≥11days of use in the past month), and missing (did not answer the question about NSAID use) during each year of the study. Possible functional outcomes were TIA or ischemic stroke with modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0 to 1, 2 to 3, or 4 to 6. ResultsAfter 15.7 mean years of follow-up, 702 TIAs, 292 ischemic strokes with mRS 0–1, 233 ischemic strokes with mRS 2–3 and 98 ischemic strokes with mRS 4–6 occurred. Compared to women who were NSAID non-users, women who were NSAID users had multivariable-adjusted (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.77, 1.29) for TIA, 1.48 (1.04, 2.10) for mRS 0–1, 0.83 (0.52, 1.33) for mRS 2–3, and 1.33 (0.68, 2.59) for mRS 4–6. ConclusionResults from this large cohort study suggest than NSAID use may be associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke with mild functional outcome.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and cervical cancer risk: A case-control study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Purpose: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have many anticarcinogenic properties via the inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Only one study, a cohort study examining risk of all cancers, investigated their role in cervical cancer with inconsistent findings between non-aspirin NSAIDs and aspirin. The aim of this study was to further investigate NSAID/aspirin use and cervical cancer risk. Methods: Using the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 724 women diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1 January, 1995 and December 2010 were compared to 3479 women (without cervical cancer) matched on year of birth and general practice. Conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for smoking, sexually transmitted infections, HRT and contraceptive use, was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cervical cancer risk among users of any oral NSAIDs, non-aspirin NSAIDs and aspirin, as assessed from primary care prescribing data. Results: Excluding the year prior to diagnosis, there was no association in adjusted analyses between ever vs. never use of an NSAID (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77–1.09), non-aspirin NSAID (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80–1.13) or low-dose aspirin (OR 1.07, 0.80–1.44) and cervical cancer risk. In analysis of daily defined doses, there was no association with cervical cancer risk comparing the highest users to non-users of NSAIDs (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69–1.39) or non-aspirin NSAIDs (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.70–1.43) or low-dose aspirin (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.59–1.81). Conclusion: This large historical cohort study found no evidence of an association between non-aspirin NSAID or aspirin use and cervical cancer risk.

Polymorphisms in genes related to inflammation, NSAID use, and the risk of prostate cancer among Danish men

The etiology of prostate cancer (PC) remains mostly unknown, but increasing evidence suggests that chronic inflammation in the prostate is associated with an increased risk of PC. Epidemiological studies have suggested that use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may protect against PC. Inborn variations in genes involved in the inflammatory response may modulate the risk of PC and interact with NSAIDs. The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate whether polymorphisms and haplotypes of the inflammation-related genes COX-2, Il1B, NFKB1, and PPARG are associated with risk of PC; 2) to investigate gene-environment interactions between polymorphisms and NSAID use; and 3) to examine whether the studied polymorphisms were associated with the aggressiveness of PC. The study population consisted of 370 cases of PC and 370 risk-set matched (age) controls nested within the prospective Danish "Diet, Cancer, and Health" cohort. Carriers of the variant deletion allele of NFKB1 -94ins/delATTG had a tendency toward a reduced risk of PC (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.04). A lowered risk for PC was also found for carriers of variant allele NFKB1 -94ins/delATTG among non-users of NSAIDs (IRR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.99), for non-aggressive disease (IRR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.99), and among men with a body mass index above 30 kg/m(2) (IRR 0.56; 95% CI 0.27-1.16), although the latter estimate was based on small numbers. A similar pattern was seen for the variant C allele of the COX-2 +8473T→C polymorphism. No apparent association with PC was observed for the other studied polymorphisms. Our study did not indicate that chronic inflammation is a major risk factor for aggressive PC.

Myocardial infarction and individual nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs meta‐analysis of observational studies

ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of observational studies on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with use of individual nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).MethodsA search of Medline (PubMed) for observational studies published from 1990 to 2011 identified 3829 articles; 31 reported relative risk (RR) of AMI with use of individual NSAIDs versus nonuse of NSAIDs. Information abstracted in a standardized form from 25 publications was used for the meta-analysis on 18 independent study populations.ResultsRandom-effects RR (95% confidence interval (CI)) was lowest for naproxen 1.06 (0.94–1.20), followed by celecoxib 1.12 (1.00–1.24), ibuprofen 1.14 (0.98–1.31), meloxicam 1.25 (1.04–1.49), rofecoxib 1.34 (1.22–1.48), diclofenac 1.38 (1.26–1.52), indometacin 1.40 (1.21–1.62), etodolac 1.55 (1.16–2.06), and etoricoxib 1.97 (1.35–2.89). Heterogeneity between studies was present. For new users, RRs (95% CIs) were for naproxen, 0.85 (0.73–1.00); ibuprofen, 1.20 (0.97–1.48); celecoxib, 1.23 (1.00–1.52); diclofenac, 1.41 (1.08–1.86); and rofecoxib, 1.43 (1.21–1.66).Except for naproxen, higher risk was generally associated with higher doses, as defined in each study, overall and in patients with prior coronary heart disease. Low and high doses of diclofenac and rofecoxib were associated with high risk of AMI, with dose–response relationship for rofecoxib. In patients with prior coronary heart disease, except for naproxen, duration of use ≤3 months was associated with an increased risk of AMI.ConclusionsMost frequently NSAIDs used in clinical practice, except naproxen, are associated with an increased risk of AMI at high doses or in persons with diagnosed coronary heart disease. For diclofenac and rofecoxib, the risk was increased at low and high doses. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Use of aspirin, but not other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with decreased prostate cancer risk at the population level

The cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) enzyme overexpression in prostate cancer has led to the hypothesis that COX-2 inhibition may reduce prostate cancer growth. Some previous studies have linked the usage of COX-2 inhibiting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with a decreased prostate cancer risk. We estimated the association between cumulative COX-2 inhibition by NSAID usage and prostate cancer risk at population level.All new prostate cancer cases in Finland during 1995–2002 and matched controls (24,657 case–control pairs) were identified from national registries. Detailed information on medication purchases was obtained from a national prescription database. A total cumulative COX-2 inhibition value was calculated based on total cumulative mg amount of each NSAID drug and the drug-specific COX-1/COX-2 inhibition ratio. Prostate cancer risk was analysed with propensity score-matched conditional logistic regression model.In total, 53.8% of the cases and 46.5% of the controls had any prescription-use of NSAIDs, while 8.1% and 7.9%, respectively, had used aspirin. Compared to the non-users, any NSAID use was associated with an elevated overall prostate cancer risk (46.4% versus 53.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3, 1.4) and risk of advanced cancer (11.8% versus 14.1%; OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5, 1.8). The risk remained elevated despite the amount of cumulative COX-2 inhibition. In a separate analysis, the risk increase was similar for each NSAID with the exception of aspirin, which was associated with a decreased overall prostate cancer risk (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84, 0.96) in a dose-dependent fashion.NSAID use is associated with an increased prostate cancer risk at the population level regardless of the COX-2 inhibition. This may be explained by systematic differences between prescription NSAID users and non-users. In contrast, aspirin use is associated with a decreased overall prostate cancer risk. Further studies on aspirin and prostate cancer will be needed.

Drug Interactions with Rivaroxaban following Total Joint Replacement Surgery

To evaluate potential drug-drug interactions with rivaroxaban in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries. PubMed; January 2009-April 2012 abstract databases of major congresses for hematology and cardiovascular medicine. Searches were performed using the key words rivaroxaban and drug interaction. Studies were included if they evaluated interactions with drugs that are commonly used in patients undergoing THR or TKR, based on our clinical experience. A Phase 1 study found that coadministration of rivaroxaban and the nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) naproxen significantly increased bleeding time. However, in a retrospective analysis of 4 large trials evaluating rivaroxaban in patients undergoing THR or TKR, the difference between major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was not significantly different between NSAID users and nonusers. In addition, proton pump inhibitors, which are frequently coadministered with NSAIDs to prevent gastrointestinal toxicity, have not been demonstrated to cause any appreciable changes in rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. A Phase 2 study that evaluated several doses and administration intervals of rivaroxaban in combination with aspirin or both aspirin and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome found that clinically significant bleeding events occurred in patients receiving rivaroxaban 10 mg daily (the dose approved for the orthopedic indication). However, this risk was not great enough to end the trial early. Phase 1 drug-drug interaction studies in healthy humans provided little insight into the pharmacodynamic drug interactions between rivaroxaban and NSAIDs or antiplatelet agents. A pooled analysis of the RECORD (Regulation of Coagulation in Orthopedic Surgery to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism) trials and data from other large trials provides clinical evidence that these agents can be coadministered with rivaroxaban, as long as proper monitoring is instituted.

Factors predicting older adults’ use of exercise and acetaminophen for osteoarthritis pain

To identify predictors of older adults' use of exercise and/or acetaminophen, and avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to treat their osteoarthritis pain. Data were analyzed from 457 adults aged 60 and older with moderate or greater osteoarthritis pain intensity who responded to the Brief Pain Inventory between 2006 and 2007. The following predictors were entered into a logistic regression to predict use of exercise and/or acetaminophen and nonuse of NSAIDs: age, gender, ethnicity, race, education, arthritis treatment by a practitioner, pain treatment by a practitioner, pain intensity, functional interference from the pain, and percent of pain relief from current treatments. A total of 213 (46.6%) reported using exercise and/or acetaminophen and did not report using NSAIDs. Older adults reporting arthritis treatment by a practitioner were 2.2 (confidence interval 1.08-4.59) more likely to use recommended arthritis pain treatment, p < .03. Only 3-4% of the variance for use of recommended pain management treatment was explained by the predictors. Results underscore the importance of guidance by practitioners who are knowledgeable about safe osteoarthritis pain management for older adults.

Prospective evaluation of analgesic use and risk of renal cell cancer.

Epidemiologic data suggest that analgesic use increases the risk of renal cell cancer (RCC), but few prospective studies have been published. We investigated the association between analgesic use and RCC in 2 large prospective studies. We examined the relationship between analgesic use and RCC risk in the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Use of aspirin, other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and acetaminophen was ascertained in 1990 in the Nurses' Health Study and in 1986 in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and every 2 years thereafter. We evaluated baseline and duration of use of analgesics. During follow-up of 16 years among 77,525 women and 20 years among 49,403 men, we documented 333 RCC cases. Aspirin and acetaminophen use were not associated with RCC risk. However, regular use of nonaspirin NSAIDs was associated with an increased RCC risk; the pooled multivariate relative risk was 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.04) at baseline. The absolute risk differences for users vs nonusers of nonaspirin NSAIDs were 9.15 per 100 000 person-years in women and 10.92 per 100,000 person-years in men. There was a dose-response relationship between duration of nonaspirin NSAID use and RCC risk; compared with nonregular use, the pooled multivariate relative risks were 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.11) for use less than 4 years, 1.36 (0.98-1.89) for 4 to less than 10 years, and 2.92 (1.71-5.01) for use for 10 or more years (P < .001 for trend). Our prospective data suggest that longer duration of use of nonaspirin NSAIDs may increase the risk of RCC.

Statin or Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Is Associated With Lower Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis

Previous studies have found that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statins may impact erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients. The current study was performed to determine if NSAID or statin use is associated with lower ESR and CRP in patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA). A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted that included 161 patients via chart review. Charts of patients with GCA seen at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from 1960 to 2008 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were adequate medication records, serum ESR and/or CRP on record, no prior corticosteroid use, and biopsy-positive GCA. Exclusion criteria were the presence of diseases known to elevate ESR or CRP. Main outcome measures included ESR and CRP values measured while evaluating patients for GCA but prior to receiving treatment. Statin nonusers had an ESR of 85.0 mm per hour (interquartile range [IQR] = 60-110 mm per hour) and a CRP of 8.7 mg/dL (IQR = 2.7-16.2 mg/dL). Statin users had an ESR of 57.5 mm per hour (IQR = 35-85) and a CRP of 2.4 mg/dL (IQR = 0.8-15.9 mg/dL). Statin use was associated with a lower ESR (P = 0.005), while there was no significant association with a lower CRP (P = 0.127). NSAID nonusers had an ESR of 98.0 mm per hour (IQR = 64-116) and a CRP of 8.7 mg/dL (IQR = 2.1-16.2 mg/dL). NSAID users had an ESR of 75.0 mm per hour (IQR = 46-98.5 mm per hour) and CRP of 8.0 mg/dL (IQR. = 1.5-16.2 mg/dL). NSAID use was associated with a lower ESR (P = 0.004), but there was no significant association with a lower CRP (P = 0.522). Statin use and NSAID use were associated with a lower ESR; however, they were not associated with lower CRP values. Clinicians should be aware that statin or NSAID use is associated with lower ESR in patients with GCA, and this test may therefore have lower sensitivity and specificity for recognizing patients with GCA, and CRP may be a superior test to evaluate patients for GCA.

Use of Aspirin or Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Increases Risk for Diverticulitis and Diverticular Bleeding

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin, have been implicated in diverticular complications. We examined the influence of aspirin and NSAID use on risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding in a large prospective cohort. We studied 47,210 US men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohort who were 40-75 years old at baseline in 1986. We assessed use of aspirin, nonaspirin NSAIDs, and other risk factors biennially. We identified men with diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding based on responses to biennial and supplementary questionnaires. We documented 939 cases of diverticulitis and 256 cases of diverticular bleeding during a 22-year period of follow-up evaluation. After adjustment for risk factors, men who used aspirin regularly (≥2 times/wk) had a multivariable hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.47) for diverticulitis and a HR of 1.70 (95% CI, 1.21-2.39) for diverticular bleeding, compared with nonusers of aspirin and NSAIDs. Use of aspirin at intermediate doses (2-5.9 standard, 325-mg tablets/wk) and frequency (4-6 days/wk) were associated with the highest risk of bleeding (multivariable HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.34-4.02, and multivariable HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.82-5.38, respectively). Regular users of nonaspirin NSAIDs also had an increased risk of diverticulitis (multivariable HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.40-2.11) and diverticular bleeding (multivariable HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.15-2.64), compared with men who denied use of these medications. Regular use of aspirin or NSAIDs is associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Patients at risk of diverticular complications should carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of using these medications.

NSAID-induced deleterious effects on the proximal and mid small bowel in seronegative spondyloarthropathy patients

To investigate the small bowel of seronegative spondyloarthropathy (SpA) patients in order to ascertain the presence of mucosal lesions. Between January 2008 and June 2010, 54 consecutive patients were enrolled and submitted to a video capsule endoscopy (VCE) examination. History and demographic data were taken, as well as the history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption. After reading each VCE recording, a capsule endoscopy scoring index for small bowel mucosal inflammatory change (Lewis score) was calculated. Statistical analysis of the data was performed. The Lewis score for the whole cohort was 397.73. It was higher in the NSAID consumption subgroup (P = 0.036). The difference in Lewis score between NSAID users and non-users was reproduced for the first and second proximal tertiles of the small bowel, but not for its distal third (P values of 0.036, 0.001 and 0.18, respectively). There was no statistical significant difference between the groups with regard to age or sex of the patients. The intestinal inflammatory involvement of SpA patients is more prominent in NSAID users for the proximal/mid small bowel, but not for its distal part.

Abstract A75: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colorectal cancer risk in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study

Abstract Background and Aims: Prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has been associated with lower colorectal cancer risk; however, little is known about the association of NSAID use within colorectal subsites or among individuals with a family history of colon cancer. This study assessed NSAID use and colorectal adenocarcinoma by subsite, including subanalysis of individuals with a family history of colon cancer. Methods: Using Cox proportional hazard regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between NSAID use and colorectal cancer incidence among 301,240 participants; of whom 26,994 individuals reported having a first degree relative with history of colon cancer. We accrued 3,894 colorectal cancer cases during 10 years of follow-up; 372 cases had a first degree relative with colon cancer. Results: Use of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs (yes versus no) reduced colorectal cancer risk (HR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.85, 0.98; HR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.77, 0.87, respectively); these risks were lowered with increasing frequency of use (HR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.94; HR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.80 for daily use compared to non-users of aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs, respectively). Participants with a first degree relative with colon cancer who used non-aspirin NSAIDs daily had reduced colon cancer risk specifically (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.82). Conclusions: NSAID use reduced colorectal cancer risk; the magnitude of this association varied with NSAID type and tumor location. Daily non-aspirin NSAID use was associated with a 50% lower risk of colon cancer in those with a first degree relative with this malignancy. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(12 Suppl):A75.

Do NSAIDs Affect Longitudinal Changes in Knee Cartilage Volume and Knee Cartilage Defects in Older Adults?

Background The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on knee osteoarthritis progression are unclear. The aim of this longitudinal study was to determine the associations between use of NSAIDs and changes in knee cartilage volume and knee cartilage defects over 2.9 years in older adults. Methods T 1-weighted fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging on the right knee was performed in a total of 395 randomly selected subjects (mean age 62 years, range 51-80 years, and 50% female) to assess knee cartilage volume at tibial sites and knee cartilage defects (0-4 scale) at baseline and 2.9 years later. Medication use in the last month was recorded by questionnaire. Results Compared with nonusers of NSAIDs (n = 334), users of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors (n = 40) had decreased knee cartilage defect development in the medial tibiofemoral compartment (odds ratio [OR] 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.99), whereas users of conventional NSAIDs (n = 21) had increased knee cartilage defect development in both medial (OR 3.1, 95% CI, 1.0-9.1) and lateral (OR 2.6, 95% CI, 1.0-6.7) tibiofemoral compartments. Comparing users of COX-2 inhibitors with users of conventional NSAIDs, the latter had higher knee cartilage volume loss (−5.3% vs −3.1% at medial tibia and −3.6% vs −1.1% at lateral tibia; all P <.05). All associations were adjusted for potential confounders including knee pain and radiographic osteoarthritis. Conclusions This study suggests that nonselective NSAIDs may have deleterious effects, while selective COX-2 inhibitors might have beneficial effects on knee cartilage. Randomized controlled trials examining knee structure to confirm this finding are warranted.

IGF2R polymorphisms and risk of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas

The mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (M6P/IGF2R) encodes a protein that plays a critical role in tumor suppression, in part by modulating bioavailability of a potent mitogen, insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2). We tested the hypothesis that the common nonsynonymous genetic variants in M6P/IGF2R c.901C > G (Leu > Val) in exon 6 and c.5002G > A (Gly > Arg) in exon 34 are associated with risk of esophageal and gastric cancers. Study participants in this population-based study comprise 197 controls and 182 cases, including 105 with esophageal-gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (EGA), 57 with noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma and 20 with esophageal squamous (ES) cell carcinoma. Among white males, odds ratios (ORs) were elevated in relation to carrying at least 1 c.901C > G allele for EGA [OR = 1.9; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.0-3.6] and noncardia gastric cancer (OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.2-5.5), but not ES. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that associations between EGA and this variant were stronger among irregular or nonusers of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.2-4.2) and cigarette smokers (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.0-4.2). An association between carrying the c.5002G > A genotype and EGA was not evident. These findings suggest that nonsynonymous polymorphisms in M6P/IGF2R may contribute to the risks of EGA and noncardia adenocarcinomas. Larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Chronic nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug (NSAID) use suppresses multiple CpG islands hyper methylation (CIHM) of tumor suppressor genes in the human gastric mucosa

There have been reports showing a protective role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) against gastrointestinal cancers. CpG island hyper methylation (CIHM) of tumor suppressor genes is a major event in carcinogenesis. We investigated the CIHM status of non-cancerous gastric mucosa in chronic NSAID users and non-users and assessed the effect of NSAIDs on CIHM. Gastric mucosa samples were obtained from 51 chronic NSAID users and 180 non-users. CIHM of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), death-associated protein kinase (DAP-kinase), and E-cadherin (CDH1) genes were determined by methylation-specific PCR. CIHM high was defined as two or more CpG islands methylated. CIHM of p14, p16, CDH1, and CIHM high were lower in chronic NSAID users than in non-users (p14: non-users vs users = 32.2%vs 9.8%, P = 0.003; p16: non-users vs users = 35.0%vs 15.7%, P = 0.02; CDH1: non-users vs users = 36.1%vs 9.8%, P = 0.0009; CIHM high: non-users vs users = 44.4%vs 17.6%, P = 0.0009). NSAID use was also associated with decreased number of CIHM by anova (R = -0.32, P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for sex, age, Helicobacter pylori infection, and NSAID use revealed that NSAID use was inversely correlated with all four CIHM and CIHM high as an independent factor (p14: odds ratio [OR] = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06-0.48; p16: OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.14-0.75; DAP-kinase: OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22-0.92; CDH1: OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.06-0.48; CIHM high: OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.09-0.49). No association was found between CIHM status and the duration or dose of NSAIDs. Chronic NSAID use suppresses CIHM in human gastric mucosa. NSAIDs may have a suppressive role against methylation-related gastric carcinogenesis.

Drugs Used in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Relationship between Current Use and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

ObjectivesDrugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have the potential to affect cardiovascular risk factors. There is concern that corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and COX-2 inhibitors could affect cardiovascular risk adversely, while drugs such as the antimalarial, hydroxychloroquine, may have beneficial effects. However, there is limited information about cardiovascular risk factors in patients with RA receiving different drugs.MethodsWe measured cardiovascular risk factors including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum HDL and LDL cholesterol, glucose and homocysteine concentrations and urinary F2-isoprostane excretion in 169 patients with RA. Risk factors were compared according to current use of corticosteroids, methotrexate, antimalarials, NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, leflunomide and TNF-α blockers. Comparisons were adjusted for age, sex, race, disease activity (DAS28 score), current hypertension, diabetes, smoking status and statin use.ResultsNo cardiovascular risk factor differed significantly among current users and non-users of NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, methotrexate and TNF-α blockers. Serum HDL cholesterol concentrations were significantly higher in patients currently receiving corticosteroids (42.2 ± 10.5 vs. 50.2 ± 15.3 mg/dL, adjusted P < 0.001). Diastolic blood pressure (75.9 ± 11.2 vs. 72.0 ± 9.1 mm Hg, adjusted P = 0.02), serum LDL cholesterol (115.6 ± 34.7 vs. 103.7 ± 27.8 mg/dL, adjusted P = 0.03) and triglyceride concentrations (157.7 ± 202.6 vs. 105.5 ± 50.5 mg/dL, adjusted P = 0.03) were significantly lower in patients taking antimalarial drugs. Plasma glucose was significantly lower in current lefunomide users (93.0 ± 19.2 vs. 83.6 ± 13.4 mg/dL, adjusted P = 0.006).ConclusionsIn a cross-sectional setting drugs used to treat RA did not have major adverse effects on cardiovascular risk factors and use of antimalarials was associated with beneficial lipid profiles.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use and Endometrial Cancer Risk in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Chronic inflammation may play an etiologic role in endometrial cancer. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce inflammatory activity by inhibiting the proinflammatory cyclooxygenase enzymes and, therefore, may decrease cancer risk. However, few studies have examined the association between NSAID use and endometrial cancer. We conducted a prospective study among 72,524 women in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Women completed a questionnaire in 1996-1997 on lifestyle and health-related factors, including type and frequency of NSAID use within the past year, and were followed through 2003 by linkages to cancer registries and vital status databases. During 488,261 person-years of follow-up, there were 732 incident endometrial cancers. NSAID use, compared with nonuse of NSAIDs, was not significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk [relative risk (RR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.74-1.09]. Null associations were also observed by type of NSAID use [aspirin only: RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.11; nonaspirin NSAID (NA-NSAID) only: RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.29; both aspirin and NA-NSAIDs: RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.06]. Generally, results were not statistically significant by frequency of use for aspirin or NA-NSAIDs. Results did not change when women with a history of heart disease, hypertension, or diabetes were excluded to minimize the potential for confounding by indication. Overall, our data do not support an association between aspirin or NA-NSAID use and endometrial cancer risk.