Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Hypersensitivity Research Articles

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) in the pediatric population

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is predominantly encountered in adults and rarely documented and less well-defined clinically and epidemiologically in children. The cause remains unclear, with the main pathogenic mechanism being represented by a decrease in prostaglandin E2 production, increased production of cysteinyl-leukotrienes, and eosinophilic inflammation. N-ERD symptoms in the pediatric population are similar to those in adults: chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma and respiratory symptoms upon aspirin/NSAID administration, but they can initially present with gastrointestinal or cutaneous symptoms or be more subtle, making early diagnosis difficult and requiring rigorous differential diagnosis. Pediatric onset of N-ERD should be considered by specialists when faced with cases of asthma associated with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Studies involving a larger number of patients are needed to determine the frequency of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in children with asthma and to establish the evolutionary and therapeutic characteristics of this patient category.

Clinical management of plant food allergy in patients sensitized to lipid transfer proteins is heterogeneous: identifying the gaps.

Patients sensitized to lipid transfer protein (LTP) present a wide clinical variability. The lack of practical diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines complicate their management. The aim of the study was to describe the clinical approach of Spanish allergists to this pathology using a survey designed by PICO method and subsequent Delphi approach validation. Designed survey was answered by 224 allergists (75% women; 57.1% with >20 years of professional experience). Homogeneity regarding clinical practice on the main points of LTP allergy diagnosis was observed, except for patients with suspected NSAID hypersensitivity (44.6% frequently include LTP skin testing). Oral food challenges were not frequently performed (63.6% occasionally to never), and they were generally (75.5%) used to confirm tolerance. It was common to recommend fruit skins avoidance (77.2%) and maintaining consumption of foods to which patients are sensitised but tolerant (99.1%). There was heterogeneity on other dietary indications, modifications due to co-factors, or traces avoidance. Peach sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was considered very/quite effective by 55.9% of allergists. The majority (79.5%) consider SLIT indicated in <25% of LTP allergic patients, based on severity (95.2%), frequency of reactions (99.4%), allergy to multiple food families (97.4%), and the quality of life/nutrition impairment (91.5%). There was different practice on SLIT prescription based on co-factor involvement. These data suggest that there is a need to increase evidence to reduce the clinical practice heterogeneity in the management of LTP allergy.

A case of possible anaphylaxis to ASA and structurally unrelated NSAIDs

BackgroundNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used classes of medications, and are among the leading causes of drug hypersensitivity. NSAIDs hypersensitivity reactions are classified by symptom involvement and NSAIDs subclass cross-reactivity. Reactions varying from cutaneous involvement to respiratory symptoms can be triggered by multiple NSAIDs subclasses. Anaphylaxis, while rare, can be induced by a single NSAID, with tolerability of other structurally unrelated subclasses. Reactions that fall outside of these traditional categories are deemed “blended reactions”. We report a unique case of possible anaphylaxis to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ibuprofen, two structurally dissimilar NSAIDs, indicating a severe blended reaction outside of the typical NSAIDs hypersensitivity reaction categories.Case presentationAn otherwise healthy 45 year old woman was referred to the Allergy and Immunology clinic after developing acute onset dyspnea, lip swelling, and generalized urticaria with ibuprofen use requiring treatment with intramuscular epinephrine in the emergency department. She previously tolerated ibuprofen, naproxen, and acetaminophen and had no history of urticaria, angioedema, asthma, or nasal polyps. She underwent an oral challenge to ASA whereby she developed urticaria and throat irritation with rebound symptoms requiring 2 doses of intramuscular epinephrine. On subsequent visits she passed treatment dose acetaminophen and celecoxib challenges. She was counseled to avoid all other NSAIDs and ASA desensitization was offered should this medication be clinically indicated in the future.ConclusionsNSAIDs hypersensitivity reactions can be triggered by individual NSAIDs with tolerance of other subclasses or by multiple structurally unrelated NSAIDs due to COX-1 inhibition. Determining the type of reaction (NERD, NECD, NIUA, SNIUAA, or SNIDHR) allows for appropriate oral challenges and safe alternative therapy recommendations. However, not all clinical reactions fit perfectly into these categories. Patients may also develop blended reactions. Our case highlights a severe blended reaction to multiple unrelated NSAIDs, including likely anaphylaxis to ASA. We note the utility of drug provocation tests (DPTs) to identify safe alternative medication options, as well as the importance of performing DPTs in settings properly equipped to assess and manage severe hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis.

Practical Approach to Hypersensitivity to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Children.

We aimed to assess the real-life prevalence, patient profile, and clinical presentation of drug hypersensitivity to NSAIDs in children after an incidence of an adverse event during treatment, verified by a drug challenge test. We included 56 children, aged 4-18 years, referred to our allergy clinic due to the incidence of adverse reaction during treatment. Skin prick tests and a drug provocation test were performed in all patients. Diagnostics for persistent urticaria were performed. In 56 patients suspected of drug allergy, we proved NSAID hypersensitivity in 17 patients (30.1%). In 84.9% (n = 47) of patients, the clinical manifestations of hypersensitivity revealed angioedema and urticaria. The most common culprit drug among NSAIDs in children was ibuprofen. Thirty-one (55.4%) reactions were immediate, and 25 (44.6%) were delayed or late. Previous history of allergy was a risk factor for NSAID hypersensitivity (p = 0.001). Vitamin D deficiency in the blood serum was a risk factor for NASID hypersensitivity (OR = 5.76 (95% Cl: 1.42-23.41)). Hypersensitivity to NSAIDs is a difficult diagnostic problem in pediatric allergy. The most common manifestation of hypersensitivity to ibuprofen in children is acute urticaria and angioedema. Two important problems in the differential diagnosis are cofactors such as vitamin D levels and viral infections, which require further research.

Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Who Have Wheals, Angioedema, or Both, Differ Demographically, Clinically, and in Response to Treatment—Results From CURE

Patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have spontaneous wheals (W), angioedema (AE), or both, for longer than 6 weeks. Clinical differences between patients with standalone W, standalone AE, and W and AE (W+AE) remain incompletely understood. To compare W, AE, and W+AE CSU patients regarding demographics, disease characteristics, comorbidities, disease burden, and treatment response. Baseline data from 3,698 CSU patients in the ongoing, prospective, international, multicenter, observational Chronic Urticaria REgistry (CURE) were analyzed (data cut: September 2022). Across all CSU patients, 59%, 36%, and 5% had W+AE, W, and AE, respectively. The W+AE patients, compared with W and AE patients, showed the lowest male-to-female ratio (0.33), higher rates of concomitant psychiatric disease (17% vs 11% vs 6%, respectively), autoimmune disease (13% vs 7% vs 9%, respectively), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity (9% vs 5% vs 2%, respectively) and the highest disease impact. The W patients, compared with W+AE and AE patients, showed the lowest rates of concomitant hypertension (15% vs 21% vs 40%, respectively) and obesity (11% vs 16% vs 17%, respectively), the highest rate of concomitant inducible urticaria (24% vs 22% vs 6%, respectively), and shorter W duration. The AE patients, compared with W+AE and W patients, were older at disease onset, showed longer AE duration, and the best response to increased doses of H1-antihistamines (58% vs 24% vs 31%, respectively) and omalizumab (92% vs 67% vs 60%, respectively). Our findings provide a better understanding of CSU phenotypes and may guide patient care and research efforts that aim to link them to pathogenic drivers.

Sex, Ethnicity, Body Mass Index, and Environmental Exposures Associated With NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease Symptom Sequence

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) has a triad of symptoms: nasal polyposis, asthma, and NSAID hypersensitivity. Little is known about symptom timing and disease progression. The aim of this study is to characterize disease progression in N-ERD. Patients with N-ERD were prospectively interviewed and classified into 4 groups based on their first symptom at initial N-ERD onset (asthma, nasal polyps, NSAID hypersensitivity, or all concurrently). Associations of patient characteristics with the 4 groups were examined, along with associations within the "asthma first" group. Patients (N= 240) were mostly female (68%) and self-identified as non-White (77%). Half (N= 119) reported asthma as the earliest symptom in the N-ERD triad. Compared with other groups, "asthma first" was associated with younger age of onset (25 years, standard error ±1.3, P < .001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR]= 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.7, P= .02). In this group, age of onset <20 years was associated with female sex, Latino ethnicity, and higher BMI (all P < .05). The "NSAID sensitivity first" group was significantly associated with male sex (OR= 3.3, 95% CI: 1.5-7.4, P= .004) and pollution exposure (OR= 4.4, 95% CI: 1.6-11.9, P= .003). At the initial presentation, 27% of patients were unaware of their N-ERD diagnosis. Black and Latino patients were more likely to be unaware of their N-ERD diagnosis compared with White (P= .003). The median diagnostic delay was 3 years (interquartile range: 0-5 years). In this cohort, N-ERD is highly variable in onset and progression, with sex, BMI, race and ethnicity, and environmental exposures significantly associated with disease patterns and diagnostic delay.

Evaluation and Updated Classification of Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): NSAID-Exacerbated or -Induced Food Allergy (NEFA/NIFA).

There are hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to foods in which nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) act as aggravating factors (NSAID-exacerbated food allergy, NEFA) or cofactors (NSAID-induced food allergy, NIFA), often misdiagnosed as HRs to NSAIDs. Urticarial/angioedematous and/or anaphylactic reactions to ≥ 2 chemically unrelated NSAIDs do not meet the current classification criteria. However, they may be considered as part of a cross-reactive type of acute HR, which is NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema with/without respiratory and/or systemic symptoms of anaphylaxis (NIUAA). To evaluate patients reporting acute HRs to NSAIDs and classify them according to updated criteria. 414 patients with suspected HRs to NSAIDs were studied prospectively. NEFA/NIFA was diagnosed in those who met all the following criteria: 1) mild reactions to (NEFA) or tolerance of (NIFA) the suspected foods without taking NSAIDs; 2) cutaneous and/or anaphylactic reactions to the combination foods + NSAIDs; 3) positive allergy tests to the suspected foods; 4) negative drug challenges (DCs) with the NSAIDs involved. 252 patients (60.9%) were diagnosed with NSAID hypersensitivity, 108 of whom had NIUAA. NSAID hypersensitivity was excluded in 162 patients (39.1%) who tolerated DCs with the suspected NSAIDs, 9 of whom were diagnosed with NEFA and 66 with NIFA. Pru p 3 was implicated in 67 of these 75 cases. NEFA/NIFA accounts for about 18% of patients reporting HRs to NSAIDs, with Pru p 3 as the main responsible food allergen. Therefore, patients with cutaneous and/or anaphylactic reactions to NSAIDs should be carefully questioned about all foods ingested within 4 hours before or after NSAID exposure, and targeted food allergy tests should be considered in the diagnostic workup of these patients. If testing is positive, DCs with the suspected NSAIDs should also be considered.

Hypersensitivity to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on a pediatric Portuguese cohort.

Background. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/analgesics (paracetamol) are among the most common causes of drug hypersensitivity reactions in children, with a reported prevalence of around 0.3% in the pediatric population. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most commonly reported culprits in the pediatric population. Our objective was to describe the allergy workup to NSAID/paracetamol of a pediatric population monitored in an allergy outpatient clinic. Methods. Retrospective observational study by consulting the medical records of patients evaluated in a pediatric outpatient clinic with history of NSAID/paracetamol, between January 2016 to August 2022. Results. A total of 43 patients have been evaluated for NSAID/paracetamol suspected allergy: 53.5% females, mean age of 9.8 ± 5.1 years, 47.7% atopic. The drugs reported as culprits were: ibuprofen (75.6%), paracetamol (17.8%), metamizole (4.4%) and naproxen (2.2%) and clinical manifestations were mainly urticaria/angioedema and maculopapular exanthema. Skin tests were performed in 7 patients: paracetamol (n = 5) and metamizole (n = 2), which were all negative. Fourty-six drug provocation tests were performed: 28 with the culprit drug and 18 with an alternative one; only 2 were positive (ibuprofen - culprit NSAID group): one immediate periorbital angioedema and one delayed lip edema with oropharyngeal tightness. Conclusions. The investigation of allergy to NSAID/paracetamol in children remains a challenge. In our population, ibuprofen was the most common NSAID reported. There were only 2 (4.3%) mild reactions on DPT. We could allow the use of the culprit NSAID/analgesic in 11 patients and an alternative one in 9 patients. This study highlights the importance of DPT in children for a correct diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity and selection of an alternative drug.

Safety and outcomes of “at-home self-provocation tests” in patients with mild nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug–induced urticaria/angioedema

BackgroundNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity is common; however, many patients do not receive an accurate diagnosis and are using unnecessary alternative drugs or have medication restrictions. ObjectiveTo establish a protocol for provocation tests that can be performed safely and effectively at home to give patients an accurate diagnosis, whereas also delabeling NSAID hypersensitivity. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 147 patients with NSAID hypersensitivity. All patients had NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema with less than 10% body surface area skin involvement. One specialist developed the protocol through history taking and chart review. If NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed, an oral provocation test was performed to confirm the safe alternative medications (group A). If it was undetermined, an oral provocation test was performed to confirm the diagnosis and alternative medications (group B). All oral provocation tests were performed by patients in their homes according to the protocol. ResultsApproximately 26% of group A patients had urticaria or angioedema symptoms with alternative drugs, whereas the remaining 74% was safe. In group B, 34% of the patients were diagnosed with having NSAID hypersensitivity. However, 61% did not respond to the culprit drug; therefore, NSAID hypersensitivity had been misdiagnosed. During this at-home self-provocation test, no severe hypersensitivity reactions occurred. ConclusionMany patients originally suspected of having NSAID hypersensitivity were confirmed to have been misdiagnosed. We successfully conducted an effective and safe at-home self-provocation test.

Recent Updates in Understanding NSAID Hypersensitivity.

To provide a review of available literature regarding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity with an emphasis on more recent findings. Oral provocation tests with aspirin are important for diagnosis and management in adult and pediatric populations with reported NSAID hypersensitivity. Risk of cross-reactivity to COX-2 inhibitors varies by NSAID hypersensitivity phenotype. COX-2 inhibitors are tolerated in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. Reported NSAID allergy is associated with a higher risk of a substance use disorder. Effective treatment of underlying chronic spontaneous urticaria can allow tolerance of NSAIDs in NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease. The pathophysiology, cross-reactivity, and appropriate diagnostic evaluation differ between the 5 distinct NSAID hypersensitivity phenotypes. Further research into the pathophysiology of NSAID hypersensitivity in patients with and without underlying disease is needed.

Acetylsalicylic acid challenge or desensitization in sensitive patients with cardiovascular disease.

The use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is problematic in subjects with histories of hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to it or with cross-reactive types of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose ASA challenge (LDAC) and desensitization to allow ASA therapy at an antiplatelet dose in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or multiple related risk factors and histories of HRs to ASA or ≥ 2 chemically unrelated NSAIDs. We studied prospectively all patients with such histories and ≥ 3 risk factors for ASCVD (group I), chronic coronary syndrome (CCS, group II), and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with indication for ASA desensitization (group III). Patients from groups I and II underwent LDACs (cumulative dose of 110mg), while those from group III were desensitized (cumulative dose of 100.1mg). We evaluated 103 patients: 62 from group I, 24 from group II, and 17 from group III. Eighty-two of the 86 patients from the first two groups underwent LDACs and 2 reacted. Subsequently, 22 (27.5%) of the 80 patients with negative LDACs were administered dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA after successful percutaneous coronary interventions, thus sparing desensitizations. The remaining 4 patients with CCS and all 17 patients from group III were successfully desensitized. In this pragmatic study,LDAC proved to be a safe and reliable diagnostic tool for identifying patients with histories of HRs to ASA or ≥ 2 different NSAIDs who can tolerate ASA at antiplatelet doses. Routine LDAC is advisable in all patients at high risk for ASCVD or with CCS who report HRs to ASA or ≥ 2 NSAIDs. ASA desensitization remains a safe and effective option in patients with ACS. Study flow-chart. ASCVD atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CCS chronic coronary syndrome; ACS acute coronary syndrome; ASA acetylsalicylic acid; DAPT dual antiplatelet therapy; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; NSAIDs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; NERD NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease; NECD NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease; NIUAA NSAID-induced urticaria-angioedema or anaphylaxis; SNIUAA single NSAID-induced urticaria-angioedema or anaphylaxis; SNIDHR single NSAID-induced delayed hypersensitivity reaction.

Association of NSAID hypersensitivity with opioid prescribing following total joint arthroplasty

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are indicated for post-operative pain management, but medication use may be precluded by report of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The impact of NSAID allergy labeling on opioid prescribing following total joint arthroplasty is unknown.

Drug Allergy Practice Parameter Updates to Incorporate Into Your Clinical Practice

The drug allergy practice parameter was developed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions. It was last updated in 2010. With the growth of research and evidence-based data since then, experts came together to update the practice parameter with a focus on sections that the work group deemed to have significant changes (or were not addressed) in the previous practice parameter. This review is a focused update on aspects of the practice parameter deemed to have the greatest impact on clinical practice and includes significant updates on diagnosis of antibiotic allergyincluding penicillin, cephalosporin, sulfonamide, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide allergies. Other topics include the evolution in our management approach to patients with aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy, diagnostic testing for delayed drug hypersensitivity and allergy to chemotherapeutics and biologics, and the key consensus-based statements for clinical practice. Specifically, the updated practice parameter helps allergists understand the place of 1- or 2-step drug challenges that are valuable tools often without the need for skin testing in many clinical situations. A proactive approach to delabeling penicillin allergy as well as unnecessary avoidance of safe antibiotic alternatives for patients with proven penicillin allergy is emphasized. New guidance is provided on management of patients with different phenotypes of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions. Approaches to delayed drug hypersensitivity and use of delayed intradermal and patch testing for specific phenotypes are reviewed. Lastly, practical approaches to management of patients with reactions to chemotherapeutics and biologics are discussed.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced anaphylaxis infrequent in 388 patients with mastocytosis: A two-center retrospective cohort study.

Anaphylaxis is a well-known feature of mastocytosis, particularly in relation to hymenoptera venom stings. It is therefore hypothesized that mastocytosis patients may also be predisposed to severe hypersensitivity reactions to certain medications including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). For this reason, these patients are usually discouraged from using these drugs. The current study aimed to determine the prevalence and evaluate the severity of NSAID-related hypersensitivity reactions among patients with mastocytosis. A retrospective study was conducted among a total of 388 (≥18 years old) consecutive patients from two independent European mastocytosis centers, in Sweden and Italy. Patients underwent a thorough allergy work-up where self-reported NSAID-hypersensitivity reactions were re-evaluated by an allergist in the first cohort (202 patients) and results were validated in the second cohort (186 patients). Overall frequency of NSAID-hypersensitivity was 11.3% in the total study cohort. Most patients reacted with cutaneous symptoms (89%), whereas severe hypersensitivity reactions were infrequent with only 11 patients (2.8%) experiencing anaphylaxis. All NSAID-related hypersensitivity reactions had occurred before mastocytosis was diagnosed. There was no difference between the groups regarding gender, baseline tryptase levels or presence of atopy, asthma/rhinitis. Our study indicates an approximate 4-fold increased prevalence of NSAID hypersensitivity among mastocytosis patients compared to the general population. However, most NSAID reactions were limited to the skin as the prevalence of overall anaphylaxis was infrequent. Our results support that mastocytosis patients with a known tolerance to NSAIDs can continue using these medications without special precautions, whereas those with a prior reaction to NSAIDs should undergo thorough allergy work-up, including drug challenges.

A new classification option for NSAID hypersensitivity: Kalyoncu classification.

The European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) proposed a consensus document for hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in 2011. A subgroup of patients with NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) develop urticaria/angioedema type reactions in response to NSAIDs. The Kalyoncu classification might be a novel option to classify patients with NSAID hypersensitivity (NH). In this study, we compare the ENDA and the Kalyoncu classifications. This study enrolled a total of 196 patients. NH reaction types were categorized as asthma, rhinitis, urticaria/angioedema and anaphylaxis. Based on the reaction history and oral provocation test findings, patients were grouped according to ENDA and Kalyoncu classifications. The mean age of the 196 patients was 40.32±13.28 years, and 130 (66.3%) of them were female. Under the ENDA and Kalyoncu classifications, the most common NH subgroups were NERD (32%), and isolated NH (34.2%), the least prevalent NH subgroups were single NSAID-induced delayed reactions (SNIDR) (1.5%), and pseudo Samter's syndrome (11.7%). Our research revealed that the Kalyoncu classification is more descriptive of patients with NERD exhibiting urticaria/angioedema-type reactions. It also provides future risk assessment for development of NERD. For controversial cases, the Kalyoncu classification can be utilized as a new complimentary option alone or in conjunction with ENDA classification.

SAMTER'S TRIAD IN A 9 YEARS-OLD PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

<h3>Introduction</h3> Samter's triad, associating asthma, nasal polyposis, and NSAIDs hypersensitivity, is rarely documented in children. The pathophysiology of such condition is probably related to a dysregulation of arachidonic acid metabolism, with a consequent imbalance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. <h3>Case Description</h3> A 9 years-old boy came to our clinic with partially controlled non atopic asthma. Suffering from a concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis, a sinus CT scan was performed, revealing the presence of nasal polyposis. Genetic disorders, and other different etiologies were excluded. Polyp surgery allowed the disappearance of local symptoms and the control of asthma symptoms. The same patient also presented an anaphylactic reaction (hypotonia, vomiting, urticaria and asthma) immediately after taking 400 mg of Ibuprofen. Oral challenges were positive for ibuprofen and diclofenac, and he was diagnosed as suffering from NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), and, consequently, from Samter's triad. <h3>Discussion</h3> Such condition is extremely rare in pediatrics. In fact, nasal polyposis is rarely described in the pediatric population, in children non-suffering from other underlying systemic diseases, mainly cystic fibrosis. Also, the most common form of NSAIDs hypersensitivity in children is the one associated with induced urticaria/oedema, while NERD remains less common. For these reasons, the clinical report we presented needs to be considered as a rare presentation of Samter's triad in a young, non-adolescent child and make us underline that, pediatricians, should look for such diagnosis even in younger patients.

TWO-STEP NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG CHALLENGE DURING PREGNANCY: A CASE SERIES

<h3>Introduction</h3> Preeclampsia is a multi-system disorder associated with serious maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, and low-dose aspirin is recommended for prevention in high-risk women. However, up to 2.5% of women of childbearing age report allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which may preclude aspirin use. We have previously shown that 2-step NSAID challenges can be safely performed in the outpatient setting. <h3>Case Description</h3> Three pregnant women were referred for NSAID allergy evaluation between 2021-2022: a 33-year-old with twin pregnancy and history of skin flushing with aspirin use >30 years prior; a 34-year-old with twin pregnancy and history of delayed facial angioedema and rash after aspirin ingestion within the past year; a 40-year-old with elevated BMI and history of lip angioedema with ibuprofen use >10 years prior. Two patients had well-controlled asthma, and none had history of chronic spontaneous urticaria. After risk-benefit discussion of drug challenge versus desensitization, all three underwent outpatient 2-step oral graded challenge (aspirin, aspirin, and ibuprofen, respectively) in the second trimester. All challenges were negative with no subjective symptoms or objective signs of a reaction elicited. <h3>Discussion</h3> For pregnant women with history of NSAID hypersensitivity and an indication for aspirin use, empiric aspirin desensitization can be performed but is time and resource intensive and requires subsequent daily administration to prevent risk of re-sensitization. For women with history of a prior mild reaction, we propose that a 2-step drug challenge may be considered in select patients after a risk-benefit discussion with the patient and obstetrician.

POSSIBLE ANAPHYLAXIS TO ASPIRIN IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT

<h3>Introduction</h3> Aspirin challenges are often used to characterize NSAID hypersensitivity, as there have been no confirmed reports of anaphylaxis to aspirin. <h3>Case Description</h3> A 6-year-old boy with history of allergic rhinitis and asthma received oral ibuprofen for fever and within 1 hour developed isolated eye and lip swelling, which persisted for several days despite taking diphenhydramine. At age 8, he underwent an oral graded ibuprofen challenge. About 30 minutes after the third dose (240 mg ibuprofen), he developed nasal congestion, throat discomfort, periorbital angioedema, and generalized pruritis. He was treated with cetirizine, and his symptoms resolved. Two months later, he underwent an oral graded aspirin challenge (cumulative dose 324 mg). While asymptomatic during the 2-hour observation period, he developed cough, throat clearing, eye itching, and nasal congestion shortly after discharge. He initially received his daily inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone) and nasal corticosteroid (fluticasone), as well as albuterol, with partial improvement in cough. He presented to an ED with throat itching and nasal congestion and was treated with diphenhydramine and discharged. That night, he developed upper eyelid swelling, treated with diphenhydramine, followed by lower eyelid swelling and nasal congestion the next day, for which he was started on twice-daily cetirizine 10 mg. Full avoidance of all NSAIDs was recommended. <h3>Discussion</h3> Although IgE mediated anaphylaxis to aspirin has not been reported, this patient experienced symptoms suggestive of anaphylaxis after a graded oral challenge to aspirin. Alternatively, symptoms may represent a blended non-IgE mediated reaction.

Hypersensitivity to Ibuprofen: Real-Life Experience in Children with History of Suspected Immediate Reactions

Introduction: Ibuprofen is the most common culprit drug causing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity in children. We aimed to evaluate the frequency, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of confirmed ibuprofen allergy in children presenting with a history of suspected immediate type ibuprofen-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Methods: We evaluated 50 (35 M, 15 F) children with a median age of 7 years, who were referred to our clinic with suspected immediate ibuprofen hypersensitivity. Patients were subjected to a diagnostic work up including drug provocation tests (DPTs) with the culprit drug. Reactions were classified according to the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force recommendations for pediatric patients. Proven ibuprofen allergic patients underwent DPT to find a safe alternative drug. Results: Ibuprofen allergy was confirmed in 34% (n: 17) of children; 9 patients were diagnosed by DPTs and 8 patients diagnosed based on their histories. Angioedema was the most common clinical manifestation (n: 30, 60%). Among patients with proven ibuprofen allergy, 7 of them were classified as cross-intolerant. Cross-intolerance reactions were further classified as NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease (n = 1) and NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema/anaphylaxis (n = 6). As an alternative drug, paracetamol was safely tolerated, whereas 1 patient developed angioedema and urticaria with nimesulide. Older age and male gender were identified as independent risk factors for immediate-type ibuprofen allergy. Conclusion: DPTs should be performed to confirm or exclude ibuprofen allergy in children and to find safe alternative drugs. Male gender and older age are risk factors for ibuprofen allergy. NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions in the pediatric population cannot be well defined using the adult classification system.

NSAID Hypersensitivity in the Pediatric Population: Classification and Diagnostic Strategies.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most frequently administered drugs, mainly for their anti-pyretic, but also for pain-relieving and anti-inflammatory effects in children. NSAIDs are composed of structurally divergent subgroups of drugs with similar pharmacological and adverse effects. Aspirin originates from salicin and was the first synthesized analgesic. As a prototype of NSAIDs; aspirin-induced hypersensitivity reactions were first reported, but subsequently, other phenotypes of hypersensitivity reactions were also described with aspirin and other NSAIDs. There are certain challenging aspects of NSAID-hypersensitivity in the pediatric population that need to be further investigated. These include the effect of age on drug metabolism and the natural history of the various phenotypes of NSAID-hypersensitivity, the effect of certain co-factors (infections, exercise) on NSAID-hypersensitivity, and diagnostic clinical and laboratory biomarkers clarifying the endotypes. In recent years, a non-negligible number of case series, studies and expert panel reports have been published in this field with some novel features and diagnostic modalities in the pediatric population. With the current review; the clinical phenotypes and diagnostic and management modalities of suspected NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions in childhood and adolescence were explained and updated by examining past and current publications.