Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Cost-effectiveness of liquid biopsy for molecular profiling of newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.

178 Background: Liquid biopsy is complementary to tissue biopsy for lung cancer profiling, yet evidence of the cost-effectiveness is limited. This could retard implementation and reimbursement in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of profiling strategies that include liquid biopsy and to identify the optimal profiling approach for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an Asian population using Singapore as an example. Methods: A decision tree and partitioned-survival model was developed from the Singapore healthcare system’s perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five molecular profiling strategies: either tissue or plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) alone, a concurrent, and two sequential approaches. Model inputs were informed by local data or published literature. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were undertaken to understand the robustness of the conclusions for decision making. The optimal strategy at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds was presented by cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier and the expected loss curve. Results: The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach revealed an additional 0.0981 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for an extra cost of S$3,074 over a 20-year time horizon compared to tissue NGS alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of S$31,318/QALY and an incremental net monetary benefit of S$1,343 per patient. The findings were sensitive to the costs of pembrolizumab and osimertinib and the probabilities of re-biopsy after tissue NGS. Sequential plasma-tissue NGS and plasma NGS alone were more costly and less effective than alternatives. Conclusions: The sequential tissue-plasma NGS approach generated the highest net monetary benefit and was the optimal testing strategy when WTP was S$45,000/QALY. It retained superiority but understandably with a higher ICER when expensive, non-first line treatments were included. Overall, its routine clinical practice should be proactively considered for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC in an Asian population.

Repeat Next-Generation Sequencing (15-Gene Panel) in Unifocal, Synchronous, and Metachronous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Single-Center Experience.

In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR, KRAS, PI3KCA, and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients' samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.

Induction chemotherapy backbone in frail patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab: a single institution retrospective audit of dose intensities from modified regimens.

Guidelines historically recommended mono-chemotherapy for the 1st line treatment of elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status (PS). Nowadays, there is no clear indication whether chemo-immunotherapy (chemo-IO) combinations can be effectively delivered in this population. We collected induction chemotherapy data in consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimens plus pembrolizumab, to compute the received dose intensity (RDI) from standard regimens or patient-tailored regimens modified due to age, comorbidities and PS. Comorbidities were stratified according to the comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS). The established cut-off of ≥85% for RDI was used to define adequate delivery. 116 pts were treated from Feb-20 to July-23, of whom 96 and 20 with non-squamous and squamous NSCLC, treated with carboplatin-pemetrexed or carboplatin-paclitaxel doublets plus pembrolizumab, respectively. The majority of patients were aged ≥ 70 years (52.6%), the median CPS was 5, with 58.6% having a CPS ≥5, whilst 47.4%, 44.8% and 7.8% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) - PS of 0, 1 and 2, respectively. PD-L1 TPS were <1% in 31.9% and 1-49% in 65.4%. Overall, 47.4% received a priori modified regimens due to poor PS, age, or comorbidities. Among patients with non-squamous NSCLC, median received doses of carboplatin and pemetrexed were 1.37 AUC/week and 138.8 mg/m2/week, with RDIs of 86% and 75% (p < 0.01) for patients treated with standard or modified regimens, respectively. Of note, the RDI was 57.9% among patients with ECOG-PS 2. However, patients treated with modified regimens experienced similar toxicities as those treated with standard regimens, despite being older (p < 0.01), with higher PS (p < 0.01) and more comorbid (p = 0.03). Patients treated with modified regimens achieved a shorter survival (7.1 vs 13.9 months), which is comparable to IO-free historical controls. Among patients with squamous NSCLC, 90% received modified regimens upfront, with median received doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel of 1.19 AUC/week and 40 mg/m2/week, and an overall RDI of 73.5%. Although regimen modifications ensure a safe administration of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in frail patients, the RDI seems to be subtherapeutic, especially in those with squamous histology. Dedicated trials are needed to implement combination strategies in this population.

Health and Economic Outcomes of Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) and Melanoma in Italy.

In Italy, the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma leads to significant healthcare challenges, necessitating cost-effective treatment strategies and offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and stakeholders. This study was designed to assess the costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with the health and economic outcomes of (1) pembrolizumab-combined chemotherapy administered as a first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous and squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where the tumour presents with a programmed death-ligand 1 expression level <50% and of (2) adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment for stage III melanoma. Three cost-effectiveness models developed by MSD were investigated for each treatment indication. A unique model was built to assess the overall effect of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or watchful waiting in patients with lung cancer or melanoma, respectively. Theoretical cohorts of patients with metastatic squamous and non-squamous NSCLC were followed over time using a partitioned survival model with weekly cycles. A weekly cycle Markov model was employed for melanoma. The analysis was conducted from the Italian National Health Service perspective, considering a time horizon of 40 years (lifetime). A single closed cohort of treatable patients was followed over time for each indication (4000, 7000 and 900 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma, respectively). The costs evaluated included those for adverse drug events, non-drug disease management, subsequent treatment and terminal care. Drug acquisition and administration costs were excluded. For each treatment indication assessed, pembrolizumab produced downstream direct cost offsets (- €122,498,568, -€133,369,076 and -€32,993,242 for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively), increased quality of life (+2088, +5317 and +2307 QALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively) and reduced disability (-2658, -7202 and -3029 DALYs for NSCLC squamous, non-squamous and melanoma indications, respectively). Across indications, the total cost offsets of pembrolizumab were -€288,860,885, with 9712 QALYs gained and 12,889 DALYs avoided. The analysis demonstrated that, compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab is more cost effective in Italy as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic squamous or non-squamous NSCLC and, if compared with watchful waiting, as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III melanoma. The present analysis suggested that pembrolizumab use could lead to important health benefits for patients while offsetting a portion of cancer care costs.

Brief Report: Impact of Maintenance Pemetrexed Cessation on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC

IntroductionCombination chemoimmunotherapy including pemetrexed and a PD(L)1 inhibitor is a common first-line systemic therapy approach for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Patients often discontinue maintenance pemetrexed due to adverse effects, and little is known about the impact of maintenance pemetrexed cessation on real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS). MethodsA total of 121 patients with stage IV or recurrent, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC treated at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients diagnosed between July 2017 and September 2023 were included if they received maintenance pemetrexed and pembrolizumab. Patients were divided into two groups: those who stopped pemetrexed due to toxicity and those who did not. rwPFS and OS were measured from time of stage IV or metastatic diagnosis to the date of radiographic progression or death, respectively. ResultsAmong patients with stage IV or recurrent, metastatic NSCLC (n = 121), who remained on maintenance pemetrexed and pembrolizumab (n = 68), the median rwPFS was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.47–not applicable [NA]) compared with 24.3 months (95% CI, 19.37–NA) among patients who stopped maintenance pemetrexed (n = 53) (p = 0.1). The median OS in the same patient groups was 25.8 months (95% CI: 13.8–NA) compared with 36.4 months (95% CI: 26.9–NA) (p = 0.15), respectively. ConclusionsIn this study of patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC who received maintenance pemetrexed and pembrolizumab, patients who stopped pemetrexed due to toxicity experienced similar outcomes to those who continued with pemetrexed. The optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy should be further evaluated in the immunotherapy era.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Sintilimab and Chemotherapy with Cryoablation in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study protocol for a single center, single arm, phase II study (Preprint)

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy of Sintilimab and Chemotherapy with Cryoablation in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a pilot study protocol for a single center, single arm, phase II study (Preprint)

Optimising primary molecular profiling in non-small cell lung cancer.

Molecular profiling of NSCLC is essential for optimising treatment decisions, but often incomplete. We assessed the efficacy of protocolised molecular profiling in the current standard-of-care (SoC) in a prospective observational study in the Netherlands and measured the effect of providing standardised diagnostic procedures. We also explored the potential of plasma-based molecular profiling in the primary diagnostic setting. This multi-centre prospective study was designed to explore the performance of current clinical practice during the run-in phase using local SoC tissue profiling procedures. The subsequent phase was designed to investigate the extent to which comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) can be maximized by protocolising tumour profiling. Successful molecular profiling was defined as completion of at least EGFR and ALK testing. Additionally, PD-L1 tumour proportions scores were explored. Lastly, the additional value of centralised plasma-based testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations using droplet digital PCR was evaluated. Total accrual was 878 patients, 22.0% had squamous cell carcinoma and 78.0% had non-squamous NSCLC. Stage I-III was seen in 54.0%, stage IV in 46.0%. Profiling of EGFR and ALK was performed in 69.9% of 136 patients included in the run-in phase, significantly more than real-world data estimates of 55% (p<0.001). Protocolised molecular profiling increased the rate to 77.0% (p = 0.049). EGFR and ALK profiling rates increased from 77.9% to 82.1% in non-squamous NSCLC and from 43.8% to 57.5% in squamous NSCLC. Plasma-based testing was feasible in 98.4% and identified oncogenic driver mutations in 7.1% of patients for whom tissue profiling was unfeasible. This study shows a high success rate of tissue-based molecular profiling that was significantly improved by a protocolised approach. Tissue-based profiling remains unfeasible for a substantial proportion of patients. Combined analysis of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA is a promising approach to allow adequate molecular profiling of more patients.

Ivonescimab: First Approval.

Ivonescimab (®) is a first-in-class, humanized, tetravalent bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A being developed by Akeso Biopharma for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumours, including breast cancer, liver cancer and gastric cancer. Ivonescimab simultaneously blocks the binding of PD-1 to its ligand (PD-L1), thereby relieving PD-1/PD-L1-mediated immunosuppression, and blocks the binding of VEGF-A to its receptor (VEGFR2), thus blocking tumour angiogenesis in the tumour microenvironment. In May 2024, ivonescimab, in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin, received its first approval in China for the treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC who have progressed after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Clinical studies of ivonescimab are underway in multiple countries worldwide. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of ivonescimab leading to this first approval for EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC who have progressed after TKI therapy.

‘Plasma first’ approach for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

IntroductionThe treatment approach for recently diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations primarily relies on confirming the tissue diagnosis as non-squamous NSCLC. This routine clinical practice of tissue diagnosis imposes several barriers and delays in turnaround time (TAT) for biomarker testing, significantly delaying the time to treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate the ‘plasma first’ approach for detection of EGFR mutation in advanced stage treatment naïve NSCLC patients.MethodsWe prospectively collected blood samples of treatment naïve patients with clinical and radiological suspicion of advanced stage NSCLC prior to obtaining tissue biopsy. Plasma cfDNA was tested for EGFR mutation using two different methods. We compared the sensitivity and TAT of liquid biopsy with tissue biopsy.ResultsIn total, we analyzed plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 236 patients suspected of having advanced NSCLC for EGFR mutations. We observed a notably shorter turnaround time (TAT) of 3 days, which was significantly quicker compared to the 12-day TAT for tissue biopsy (p < 0.05). The ddPCR method had a sensitivity of 82.8%, which was higher than 66.34% sensitivity of ARMS-PCR. The current study also highlights that there is no significant difference in the clinical outcome of the patients whether treated based on liquid biopsy only or tissue biopsy (median progression-free survival of 11.56 vs. 11.9 months; p = 0.94).ConclusionsUtilizing a ‘plasma first’ strategy, given its shorter turnaround time, strong positive concordance and comparable outcomes to tissue biopsy, emerges as a highly specific and reliable method for detecting EGFR mutations in advanced-stage NSCLC.

Ancestry-associated co-alteration landscape of KRAS and EGFR-altered non-squamous NSCLC

Racial/ethnic disparities mar NSCLC care and treatment outcomes. While socioeconomic factors and access to healthcare are important drivers of NSCLC disparities, a deeper understanding of genetic ancestry-associated genomic landscapes can better inform the biology and the treatment actionability for these tumors. We present a comprehensive ancestry-based prevalence and co-alteration landscape of genomic alterations and immunotherapy-associated biomarkers in patients with KRAS and EGFR-altered non-squamous (non-Sq) NSCLC. KRAS was the most frequently altered oncogene in European (EUR) and African (AFR), while EGFR alterations predominated in East Asian (EAS), South Asian (SAS), and Admixed American (AMR) groups, consistent with prior studies. As expected, STK11 and KEAP1 alterations co-occurred with KRAS alterations while showing mutual exclusivity with EGFR alterations. EAS and AMR KRAS-altered non-Sq NSCLC showed lower rates of co-occurring STK11 and KEAP1 alterations relative to other ancestry groups. Ancestry-specific co-alterations included the co-occurrence of KRAS and GNAS alterations in AMR, KRAS, and ARID1A alterations in SAS, and the mutual exclusivity of KRAS and NF1 alterations in the EUR and AFR ancestries. Contrastingly, EGFR-altered tumors exhibited a more conserved co-alteration landscape across ancestries. AFR exhibited the highest tumor mutational burden, with potential therapeutic implications for these tumors.

Unraveling the influence of TTF-1 expression on immunotherapy outcomes in PD-L1-high non-squamous NSCLC: a retrospective multicenter study.

Several studies explored the association between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the effect of TTF-1 on the therapeutic efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor/chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq NSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or more who are highly susceptible to immunotherapy remains unresolved. Therefore, we evaluated whether TTF-1 has a clinical impact on this population. Patients with non-Sq NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment efficacy was compared after adjusting for baseline differences using propensity score matching. Among the 446 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, 266 patients with non-Sq NSCLC were analyzed. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were observed between the TTF-1-positive and -negative groups in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Of chemoimmunotherapy, pemetrexed containing regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy without pemetrexed, regardless of TTF-1 expression (TTF1 positive; HR: 0.46 (95% Confidence interval: 0.26-0.81), p<0.01, TTF-1 negative; HR: 0.29 (95% Confidence interval: 0.09-0.93), p=0.02). TTF-1 expression did not affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-Sq NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. In this population, pemetrexed-containing chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy, irrespective of TTF-1 expression.

A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients.

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapy is a standard of care for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC); however, the lack of safety data limits its clinical application in Japan. This study compared the safety of ABCP with that of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) combination for the treatment of advanced NSQ-NSCLC in Japanese patients by evaluating the clinical background and incidence of adverse events (AEs) based on data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) for up to 1 year were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method. A search conducted using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes identified 350,987 patients, of whom 202 were included in the ABCP cohort and 232 in the BCP cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly higher in the ABCP cohort versus the BCP cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.65 [95%confidence interval (CI) 1.43-4.91] for skin disorder and 1.70 (95% CI 1.01-2.85) for FN. The adjusted RMST differences were-64.2 days (95% CI-93.0 to-35.4 days) and-46.0days (95% CI-73.5 to-18.5 days) for skin disorder and FN, respectively. These results were comparable to those of other pivotal clinical trials. The findings of this DPC database study highlight the safety of ABCP in Japanese clinical practice, and this methodology may facilitate more efficient research in real-world settings. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041507.

Real world results of locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer patients treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy in first line: Moroccan cohort

BackgroundDoublet platin-chemotherapy was the old standard treatment for different histology types of advanced and metastatic lung cancer (LC) and is still an option for patients who are not eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, in low- and middle-income countries, chemotherapy, either in monotherapy or in combination with platinum, is still the only accessible option in public institutions. The efficacy of different platin-based chemotherapy in patients with LC who are treatment-naïve is unknown. MethodsIn this retrospective study, we selected patients with advanced and metastatic (IIIB-IVB) non-squamous non-small cell LC (NSCLC), squamous NSCLC, and lung neuroendocrine tumours (small cell LC (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine, and atypical carcinoid) aged beyond 18 years who received first-line chemotherapy (docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and vinorelbine) combined with platinum between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Within the population with non-squamous NSCLC, squamous NSCLC, and neuroendocrine tumours, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary assessed endpoints. Hematologic safety was the secondary endpoint. ResultsOverall, 611 patients were included. In the group of patients with non-squamous NSCLC (n = 390), there was no statistical difference between subgroups of patients who received first-line platin-chemotherapy. The median PFS was 182 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 167–208) days (hazard ratio for progression: NR [Not Reached]; p = 0.37), and the median OS was 446 (95 % CI, 405–559) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.94 - 1.82; p = 0.1). In the group of patients with squamous NSCLC (n = 149), we note the absence of statistical significance between subgroups of patients who received platin-based chemotherapy. The median PFS was 195 (95 % CI, 142–238; hazard ratio for progression: 1.21, 95 % CI, 0.29–5.02; p = 0.27), while the median OS was 428 (95 % CI, 324–940) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.76; 95 % CI, 0.93 to 3.3; p = 0.32). The absence of significance has been noticed in the neuroendocrine subgroup of patients who received first etoposide-platinum, vinorelbine-platinum, or paclitaxel-platinum (n = 72). The median PFS was 216 (95 % CI, 193–277) days; hazard ratio for progression: 1.74, 95 % CI, 0.41–7.27; p = 0.69, while the median OS was 273 (95 % CI, 241–459) days (hazard ratio for death: 2.95; 95 % CI, 0.4–21.7; p = 0.51). Grade 3–4 neutropenia grade was the predominant adverse event associated with chemotherapy in almost 11 % of patients. ConclusionMoving forward, treatment strategies must be refined for patients, with an emphasis on increasing the number of patients who can benefit from emergent approaches in order to guarantee a wider, deeper, and longer-lasting outcome.

Comparison of the Response to Geftinib between EGFR Mutations in Exon 19 and Mutations in Exon 21 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Egyptian Patients

Abstract Background The management of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically changed following the introduction of target therapy in the last 15 years. Comprehensive reflex biomarker testing, including EGFR, is recommended for all patients with a diagnosis of non-squamous NSCLCs, regardless of disease stage and should be initiated by the pathologist at the time of initial diagnosis. Objective To compare the response to Geftinib between EGFR mutation exon 19 and EGFR mutation exon 21 in non- small cell lung cancer in Egyptian patients. Methods Our retrospective analysis examined 60 patients with advanced NSCLC who had received gefitinib therapy and the specimen were available at Shefa Alorman Oncology Hospital from June 2017 to May 2020. Results Our study showed no statistically difference as regard response to first line treatment between exon 19 deletion and exon 21 mutation with P Value = 0.1273. Our study showed no statistically significance as regard progression free survival after first line treatment Gefitinib between exon 19 deletion and exon21 mutation with median PFS 12 months for patient with exon 19 deletion compared to 10 months for patients with exon 21 mutation (Hazard ratio of progression or death 1.57; 95 % confidence interval 0.87 – 2.82; P- Value= 0.1269).Median PFS of study population was 12 months. The median survival was 27 months for exon 21 group while median survival not reached for exon 19 group (Hazard ratio for death 2.95; 95 % confidence interval 0.78 – 11.20). Median survival of whole study population was 33 months. Conclusion The EGFR mutation subtype should be considered when making treatment decisions for designing new clinical trials for chemotherapy-naïve, EGFR mutation- positive patients with advanced NSCLC.

Bevacizumab for Brain Radiation Necrosis in Patients With Nonsquamous Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionRecent advances in therapies based on molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have prolonged the survival of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and increased the number of such patients undergoing radiotherapy for brain metastases. Brain radiation necrosis, a late adverse event of radiotherapy, occurs in ∼10% of these latter individuals. Whereas bevacizumab has shown efficacy for brain radiation necrosis, optimal treatment strategies have remained elusive. We here assessed the efficacy of bevacizumab for brain radiation necrosis in NSCLC patients. Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective study, we evaluated NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab for brain radiation necrosis diagnosed on the basis of MRI or [11C]methionine-PET. The volumes of radiation necrosis and peripheral edema were measured. ResultsFour NSCLC patients were treated with bevacizumab for brain radiation necrosis. All four patients manifested neurological symptoms with radiation necrosis accompanied by peripheral edema. Histological analysis showed adenocarcinoma in all patients, with two harboring EGFR mutations, one a HER2 mutation, and one a KRAS mutation. The median radiation dose was 24 Gy, median time from radiation to bevacizumab treatment was 27 months, and median time from the start of bevacizumab treatment to radiological improvement was 5 weeks. Neurological symptoms improved in two of the four patients, and the dose of dexamethasone was reduced in three patients. The volumes of necrosis and peripheral edema in each patient were noticeably reduced by bevacizumab treatment. ConclusionBevacizumab is an effective treatment for brain radiation necrosis in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC.

PP01.53 Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): PERLA Trial Comparing First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Dostarlimab or Pembrolizumab

PP01.53 Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): PERLA Trial Comparing First-Line Chemotherapy Plus Dostarlimab or Pembrolizumab

PPD01.07 Phase 2 Trial of Mecbotamab Vedotin (BA3011), a CAB-AXL-ADC, Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Non-Squamous NSCLC

PPD01.07 Phase 2 Trial of Mecbotamab Vedotin (BA3011), a CAB-AXL-ADC, Alone or in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Non-Squamous NSCLC

Cost-effectiveness of large-panel next-generation sequencing in guiding first-line treatment decisions for patients with nonsquamous advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Clinical practice guidelines recommend broad-panel genomic profiling to identify actionable genomic alterations for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). To assess the cost-effectiveness of large-panel next-generation sequencing (LP-NGS) compared with current empirical single-gene test (SGT) patterns to inform first-line treatment decisions for patients with aNSCLC from a US commercial payer perspective, accounting for the effect of testing turnaround time and time to treatment initiation. We developed a discrete-event simulation model to estimate the impact of LP-NGS vs SGT for patients with nonsquamous aNSCLC. Discrete events and timing included testing patterns, receipt of the initial test result, treatment initiation (targeted vs nontargeted therapies), switching, retesting, rebiopsies, clinical trial participation, progression on therapy, and death. LP-NGS and SGT cohorts each comprised 100,000 adults with aNSCLC simulated over a 5-year postdiagnosis period, assumed to have the same distribution of genomic alterations. The model predicted the proportion of patients receiving appropriate first-line therapy according to clinical practice guidelines. Economic outcomes included expected life-years gained, quality-adjusted life-years, and the total costs of care over 5 years. Sensitivity and scenario analyses explored the robustness of the base-case model results. In the base-case model, LP-NGS was likely to identify more alterations than SGT. Total 5-year costs per patient were $539,658 for LP-NGS and $544,550 for SGT (net difference, $4,892 lower costs per patient for LP-NGS), which is likely to be cost-effective 95.1% of the time. The most influential model parameters on the 5-year total costs of care were preprogression nondrug medical costs on nontargeted therapy, NGS turnaround time, and clinical trial participation. This study suggests that LP-NGS to guide first-line treatment decisions is clinically more appropriate (more likely to identify alterations and subsequently allocate patients to clinically appropriate therapy) and provides a dominant cost-effectiveness treatment strategy over 5 years for patients with newly diagnosed aNSCLC in the United States.

Evaluating Safety and Clinical Activity of Front-line Treatment with Cadonilimab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced/Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Harboring STK11 Genetic Aberration: A Protocol of Phase II Study

BackgroundCadonilimab is a first-in-class bispecific PD-1/CTLA-4 antibody. Serine/threonine kinase (STK11) mutation was shown to be related to low PD-L1 expression and objective response rate (ORR) in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we hypothesized that combining cadonilimab with chemotherapy could enhance antitumor immunity and extend survival in these patients. Consequently, we designed this study to explore the clinical activity and safety of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC harboring STK11 alteration. Trial designThis single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial is conducted at the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Treatment-naïve advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients harboring STK11 mutation will be enrolled in this study. Eligible patients will receive either cadonilimab (10mg/kg on Day 1) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) for nonsquamous NSCLC or abraxane (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC = 5) for squamous NSCLC for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy (cadonilimab plus pemetrexed or abraxane). The treatment will be discontinued when disease progression, intolerability to cadonilimab, and/or chemotherapy occurs. Measurable lesions were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (1.1). The main endpoint is ORR and safety. Subordinate endpoints include PFS, disease control rate, and duration of response. ResultsThe study commenced enrolment in September 2023, with preliminary findings regarding the primary endpoint anticipated by January 2025.

PP01.88 REZILIENT3: Phase 3 Study of Zipalertinib plus Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated, Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

PP01.88 REZILIENT3: Phase 3 Study of Zipalertinib plus Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated, Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Patients with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions