Immunotherapy In Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Clinical outcomes in immunotherapy and chemotherapy in minority populations with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e20508 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths for Hispanics (HIS). Similarly, non-Hispanic blacks (NHB) are often disproportionately represented among cancer deaths compared to other racial/ethnic groups with lung cancer being the second most common cancer in black men and women, as well as the leading cause of cancer death. Despite these statistics, HIS and NHB remain underrepresented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) research. The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference in outcomes between HIS, NHB and NH Whites (NHW) who had NSCLC and were treated with surgery, immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Methods: We studied 645,221 observations from the 2004-2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB), categorized as HIS, NHB or NHW, who received surgery, immunotherapy or chemotherapy for NSCLC. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using ANOVA. Survival outcomes were assessed using a Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Results: Regardless of treatment types, HIS had the highest median overall survival (OS) compared to other groups (NHW: 14.7 months; NHB: 15.0 months; HIS: 16.4 months) (P < 0.001). Regardless of the type of systematic therapy received (immunotherapy or chemotherapy), HIS had the highest median OS (P < 0.001) with HIS in the immunotherapy cohort having the highest survival advantage of all other race/ethnicity and chemotherapy groups. Multivariate Cox regression model further support the survival advantage of HIS compared to NHW (HR = 0.86; P = 0.009). OS was also assessed between patients who received surgery and/or chemotherapy. Patients who received a combination of surgery and chemotherapy had the highest OS compared to patients who underwent surgery only or received chemotherapy only. Among the cohort who received both, HIS had the highest median OS (NHW: 55.2 months; NHB: 55.5 months; HIS: 61.5 months). The surgery only cohort had the next highest median OS of all treatment groups; however, the HIS ethnicity group was non-estimable due to the small sample size. Of all three treatment groups, the chemotherapy only cohort had the lowest median OS while HIS had the highest median OS (NHW: 11.8 months; NHB: 12.9 months; H: 13.5 months) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Results of our study suggest immunotherapy may offer an increased survival advantage for HIS and NHB compared to chemotherapy. For patients receiving chemotherapy, a combination of surgery and chemotherapy may offer a greater survival advantage for NSCLC patients. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with better survival regardless of the type of treatment received.

Co-occurring mutations in the DDR pathway and tumor-associated genes for predicting immunotherapeutic efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

e20539 Background: In recent years, the advent of immunotherapy had provided a new approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, only a small subset of patients can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the majority of patients still show poorly durable responses. Although some biomarker for predicting clinical efficacy of immunotherapy has been reported, the more proper predictive biomarker is required to screen dominant populations for ICI efficacy. Methods: A total of three publicly available datasets of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy were collected for analysis. The discovery contained 57 NSCLC patients sequenced by WES from Miao et al. and another cohort of 75 patients with clinical data and WES data download from Hellman et al. studies. We collected two MSK-IMPACT cohorts including 240 and 350 NSCLC immunotherapy patients used as validation set from cBioPortal(www.cbioportal.org). Results: We detected 79 mutation genes (mutation frequency > 5% cases) associated with a better progressive free survival PFS (HR < 1, P value < 0.05) by univariate Cox regression analysis in the discovery cohort. The survival analysis results indicated that patients who carried co-occurring mutations of GRIN2A, FAT1, FLT1, ASXL2, PTPRS , and DDR pathway showed a longer PFS (p = 0.004, HR = 0.37, 95% Cl 0.235-0.644). Notably, comparing with the non-co-mutation group, the higher tumor mutation burden (TMB)(P < 0.01) and more durable clinical benefit(P < 0.05) have been detected in the co-mutations group. Next, we validated our findings using two independent validation cohorts who received ICI therapies from MSKCC, the results showed that PFS was significantly prolonged in the co-mutation group (p = 0.036, HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.97), and with no significant difference in overall survival. Additionally, the TMB was significantly higher in the co-mutation group than that harbored non-co-mutation in two validation cohorts(p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this study, we found that co-occurring mutations in five genes and DDR pathways can predict a better immunotherapy efficacy of NSCLC. Therefore, the co-mutation signature may have great potential as a biomarker for guiding immunotherapy of NSCLC.

Measuring the great objective: Have we transferred the increase in overall survival in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer from clinical trials to clinical practice?

e18734 Background: In the last five years, different immunotherapy (IO) clinical trials have improved overall survival (OS) for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutation. However, it is necessary to check whether outcomes of clinical trials are reproduced in the general population, the true objective of any scientific advance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study selecting all patients with stage IV NSCLC without driver mutation treated in the Medical Oncology Department at Puerta de Hierro University Hospital between 2016 and 2019. Data cut off was June 30, 2021. Our goal was to evaluate treatment changes for NSCLC in clinical practice in our institution with OS in the real-world as the main outcome, in addition to assessing quality of care. Results: Between 2016 and 2019, 317 patients with stage IV NSCLC were diagnosed, 260 without driver mutation and 189 of them received systemic treatment. We observed a higher proportion of stage IVB patients in 2018 and 2019 compared to 2016 and 2017. A progressive greater use of IO was observed, except for a small decrease in 2019 compared to 2018. At the date of analysis, 77.8% of patients had died. With a median follow-up of 40.8 months, we observed a gradual increase in OS, with medians of 12.3, 13.6, and 18.9 months for patients diagnosed in 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively, with a decrease to 10.4 months for patients diagnosed in 2019. Survival rates over time show the same trend. IO (any line) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death: HR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.23 - 0.58) in multivariate analysis. The deterioration of the results of the patients diagnosed in 2019 is manifested in the median survival and in the survival rates at different points from 6 months onwards, which should correspond to the excess mortality in the year 2020 in our studied population. Conclusions: Our study shows that IO reduced risk of death: HR 0.35 (95% CI: 0.23 - 0.58) in stage IV NSCLC, observing an increase in overall survival from a median of 12.3 to 18.9 months for patients diagnosed in 2016 and 2018, suggesting that the progressive use of IO for NSCLC in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018 has transferred the benefit observed in clinical trials to the general population. The deterioration of outcomes for patients diagnosed in 2019, with a median OS of 10.4 months and decreased survival at 6, 12 and 18 months, could suggest the negative impact and excess mortality in the pandemic year 2020.[Table: see text]

Real-world study on the efficacy and prognostic predictive biomarker of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors

Objective: To describe the actual efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/ programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explore potential prognostic predictive biomarkers. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2016 to December 2019, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents, were consecutively enrolled into this study. We retrospectively collected the data of demographics, clinical information and pathologic assessment to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and conduct the survival analysis. Major endpoint of our study is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS). Results: The ORR of 174 patients who underwent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor was 28.7%, and the DCR was 79.3%. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 23 patients (13.2%). Brain metastasis, line of treatment, and treatment patterns were associated with the ORR of metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent immunotherapy (P<0.05). After a median follow-up duration of 18.8 months, the median PFS was 10.5 months (ranged from 1.5 to 40.8 months) while the median OS was not reached. The 2-year survival rate was estimated to be 63.0%. The pathologic type was related with the PFS of metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent immunotherapy (P=0.028). Sex, age, brain metastasis and autoimmune diseases were associated with OS (P<0.05). Analysis of the receptor characteristic curve (ROC) of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicting ORR of immunotherapy in metastatic NSCLC showed that the areas under the curve of NLR before immunotherapy (NLR(C0)), NLR after one cycle of immunotherapy (NLR(C1)) and ΔNLR were 0.600, 0.706 and 0.628, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR(C1) was an independent factor of the ORR of metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent immunotherapy (OR=0.161, 95% CI: 0.062-0.422), and the efficacy of combination therapy was better than that of single agent (OR=0.395, 95% CI: 0.174-0.896). The immunotherapy efficacy in patients without brain metastasis was better than those with metastasis (OR=0.291, 95% CI: 0.095-0.887). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NLR(C1) was an independent influencing factor of PFS of metastatic NSCLC patients after immunotherapy (HR=0.480, 95% CI: 0.303-0.759). Sex (HR=0.399, 95% CI: 0.161-0.991, P=0.048), age (HR=0.356, 95% CI: 0.170-0.745, P=0.006) were independent influencing factors of OS of metastatic NSCLC patients after immunotherapy. Conclusions: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are proved to be efficacious and have tolerable toxicities for patients with metastatic NSCLC. Patients at advanced age could still benefit from immunotherapy. Brain metastasis is related to compromised response. Earlier application of immunotherapy in combination with other modalities enhances the efficacy without elevating risk of irAEs. NLR(C1) is an early predictor of clinical outcome. The OS of patients younger than 75 years may be improved when treated with immunotherapy.

Relationship between Patients' Baseline Characteristics and Survival Benefits in Immunotherapy-Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background The difference of patients' baseline characteristics such as sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and smoking status may influence the immune response. However, little is known about whether these factors affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between patients' baseline characteristics and survival benefits in immunotherapy-treated NSCLC. Materials and Methods We performed a systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of NSCLC immunotherapy. We also searched abstracts and presentations from the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology to identify unpublished studies. These studies have available data based on patients' baseline characteristics (such as sex, age, ECOG PS, and smoking status). We take the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) as the effect index and use the random effect model to pool the results. Results We included 18 phase II/III RCTs with a total of 14,189 participants. The benefits of ICIs were found for both male (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82, P < 0.05) and female patients (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.87, P < 0.05); for both younger (<65 y: pooled OS-HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.81, P < 0.05) and older patients (≥65 y: pooled OS-HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.75-0.86, P < 0.05); and for both patients with ECOG PS = 0 (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, P < 0.05) and ECOG PS ≥ 1 (pooled OS-HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.82, P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the efficacy of ICIs among different sex (P value for interaction = 0.955), age (P value for interaction = 0.17), or ECOG PS (P value for interaction = 0.765). However, in patients with different smoking status, the application of ICIs significantly prolonged the OS of smokers (pooled OS-HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.83, P < 0.05) but could not significantly improve the OS of never smokers (pooled OS-HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70-1.03, P > 0.05). Conclusions ICIs could significantly improve prognosis in patients with advanced NSCLC, regardless of sex, age, or ECOG PS. But among patients with different smoking status, the survival benefits of never smokers treated with ICIs were no better than that of controls. The impact of these factors on immunotherapy should be considered in the future clinical practice and guidelines.

OX40 enhances T cell immune response to PD-1 blockade therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Immune-checkpoint blockade is widely studied for cancer therapy. Although the co-inhibitory receptor Programmed death-1(PD-1) blockade benefits some non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, a large portion of NSCLC patients still fail to respond to this immunotherapy, and the underlying mechanism is unclear. Thus, a synergistic therapy to enhance the effect of PD-1 is urgently needed to improve the poor outcome of NSCLC patients. Here, we demonstrated that effector memory T cells were increased and T cell response became stronger in PD-1 immunotherapy responders (n = 20) but not in non-responders (n = 10). The expression of co-stimulatory receptor OX40 was upregulated on T cells following PD-1 immunotherapy and was positively associated with the percentage of PD-1+T cells and the responsiveness of T cells. Combination treatment of antagonistic anti-PD-1 and agonistic anti-OX40 antibodies (Abs) promoted the proliferation and cytokines production of T cells from PBMCs of non-responders ex vivo. Consistently, anti-PD-1 and anti-OX40 therapy synergistically augmented T cell response in an in vivo mouse lung cancer model. Our study confirmed the antitumor effects of anti-PD-1/OX40 combination in lung cancer patients as well as in the murine lung cancer model, and the results provide a rationale for clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic effect of this combination of antibodies for NSCLC immunotherapy.

Research Progress in Immunotherapy of NSCLC With EGFR-Sensitive Mutations.

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with high incidence and mortality across the world. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for lung cancer has improved the prognosis of some lung cancer patients to a greater extent and provided a new direction for the clinical treatment of lung cancer. Immunotherapy still has limitations in terms of its appropriate population and adverse reactions. Particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, there has been no major breakthrough in current immunotherapy. Whether immunotherapy can bring new benefits after drug resistance is induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeted therapy and whether the combination of immunotherapy with other treatments can improve the prognosis remain to be studied in depth. In this article, we provide a detailed review of the relevant characteristics of the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC with EGFR mutation and the current research on immunotherapy for NSCLC with EGFR mutation.

Sex dimorphism in response to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a narrative review

Background and ObjectiveMultiple agents have been developed for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patients’ response to these therapies vary drastically, which indicates a need to tailor therapy. Sex is a readily usable clinical characteristic that has been shown to impact patients’ response to drugs. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge, compiled from meta-analyses, on sex differences in treatment efficacy for targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC. We discuss the interplay of patient characteristics, both molecular and demographic, with sex on how they impact therapeutic response.MethodsPubMed search was performed with the term “sex/gender differences” with currently FDA approved targeting therapy and immunotherapy agents in treating NSCLC.Key Content and FindingsFor targeted therapy, women tend to benefit more in terms of progression-free survival upon receiving first-generation anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment than men. On the other hand, there is an ongoing debate on sex differences in response to immunotherapy. Although preliminary, whether sex differences were observed depends on treatment settings, patient characteristics, and molecular features. Importantly, incorporating sex as a biological component in the biomarker discovery seems to reveal novel insights in immunotherapy response.ConclusionsTaken together, sex differences in responding to standard care have been observed in clinical settings for NSCLC patients. A better understanding of sex-associated treatment response and the underlying biology will improve cancer prognosis and eliminate these sex differences.

Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy: The Power of the Teamwork for the Treatment of NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) targeting programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite impressive success, only a small proportion of patients benefit from PD1/PDL1 inhibitors. Radiotherapy (RT) can induce a systemic anti-tumor immune response on local and distant tumors. Some preclinical and clinical evidence showed a critical role of RT to overcome acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Currently, durvalumab consolidation represents the new standard treatment for unresectable stage III NSCLC patients whose tumors express PDL1 on ≥1% of tumor cells (TC), and whose disease has not progressed following platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this review, we focus on the synergic effect of RT with ICPi and the new role that different RT schedules can play in combination with immunotherapy for early-stage NSCLC.

Role of STK11 in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors have been shown to be effective in treating patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib have been approved as clinical first-line therapeutic agents. The availability of these inhibitors has also largely changed the treatment strategy for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. However, patients still inevitably develop resistance to ALK inhibitors, leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis. The most critical issues that need to be addressed in the current treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC include the high cost of targeted inhibitors and the potential for increased toxicity and resistance to combination therapy. Recently, it has been suggested that the serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutation may serve as one of the biomarkers for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Therefore, the main purpose of this review was to summarize the role of STK11 in ALK-positive NSCLC. The present review also summarizes the treatment and drug resistance studies in ALK-positive NSCLC and the current status of STK11 research in NSCLC.

Effect of FBXW7 gene mutation on the prognosis of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To explore the effect of F-box and WD-40 domain protein 7 (FBXW7) gene mutation on the prognosis of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: (1) The clinical data of 125 patients with advanced NSCLC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2019 to June 2021 were collected. There were 70 males and 55 females, with a median age [M (Q1, Q3)] of 64(57, 70) years. The correlation of FBXW7 mutation with immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis was analyzed. (2) The Data set of NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy from cBioPortal database was downloaded. A total of 261 patients were included as immunotherapy group. There were 120 males and 141 females, with a median age of 66(57, 73) years. The association of FBXW7 mutation with clinical characteristics and prognosis of NSCLC patients was investigated. (3) The data of patients with NSCLC from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database were downloaded. A total of 1 030 patients were included as TCGA group. There were 633 males and 397 females, with a median age of 67(60, 73) years. The effect of FBXW7 mutation on the efficacy of immunotherapy was analyzed. The key molecules and their biological functions were also determined Results: Among the 125 NSCLC patients, the FBXW7 mutation rate was 5.6% (7/125). All FBXW7 mutation types was truncating mutation. In these FBXW7 mutation patients who received immunotherapy, 4 had partial response, 2 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 4/7 and 6/7, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.0 months (95%CI: 7.0-22.0 months) for patients with FBXW7 mutation and 4.0 months (95%CI: 2.0-11.5 months) for patients with FBXW7 wild type, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.046). The bioinformatics analysis indicated that patients with FBXW7 mutation have higher clinical benefits from immunotherapy. Moreover, patients with FBXW7 mutation in immunotherapy group had higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) [M (Q1, Q3): 17.8 (11.5, 29.3)/Mb] than those with FBXW7 wild type [5.7 (3.0, 10.4)/Mb, P=0.001]. The TMB of patients with FBXW7 mutation in TCGA group was 15.9 (4.2, 28.1)/Mb, insertion-deletion (Indel) neoantigen was 192.5 (70.8, 535.0) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) neoantigen was 363.0 (194.8, 534.8), which were significantly higher than those of patients with FBXW7 wild type [5.6 (3.2, 8.9)/Mb, 53.0 (12.0, 131.0), 83.5 (34.0, 178.0), respectively] (P=0.002, P=0.008, P<0.001). The results indicated that FBXW7 mutated tumors had stronger immunogenicity, which might generate anti-tumor immunity. FBXW7 mutation was also related to the activation of T cells (T lymphocyte receptor complexes and signaling). In addition, FBXW7 mutation was correlated with increased infiltration of CD8+T cells and M1 macrophages. CD8+T cells and M1 macrophages infiltration level was significantly up-regulated in FBXW7 mutation group than wild-type group [10% (8%, 14%) vs 7%(4%, 12%), P=0.049; 8%(4%, 11%) vs 4%(1%, 8%), P=0.046]. Conclusions: NSCLC patients with FBXW7 mutant have higher clinical benefits from immunotherapy. FBXW7 mutation has the potential as a predictive marker for the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Deep learning for predicting immunotherapeutic efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study combining progression-free survival risk and overall survival risk.

BackgroundRadiomics based on computed tomography (CT) images is potential in promoting individualized treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, its role in immunotherapy needs further exploration. The aim of this study was to develop a CT-based radiomics score to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsTwo hundred and thirty-six ICI-treated patients were retrospectively included and divided into a training cohort (n=188) and testing cohort (n=48) at a ratio of 8 to 2. The efficacy outcomes of ICI were evaluated based on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We designed a survival network and combined it with a Cox regression model to obtain patients’ OS risk score (OSRS) and PFS risk score (PFSRS).ResultsBased on OSRS and PFSRS, patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups in the training cohort and the test cohort with distinctly different [training cohort, log-rank P<0.001, hazard ratio (HR): 4.14; test cohort, log-rank P=0.014, HR: 4.54] and PFS (training cohort, log-rank P<0.001, HR: 4.52; test cohort, log-rank P<0.001, HR: 6.64). Further joint evaluation of OSRS and PFSRS showed that both were significant in the Cox regression model (P<0.001), and multi-overall survival risk score (MOSRS) displayed more outstanding stratification capabilities than OSRS in both the training (P<0.001) and test cohorts (P=0.002). None of the clinical characteristics were significant in the Cox regression model, and the score that predicted the best immune response was not as good as the risk score from follow-up information in the performance of prognostic stratification.ConclusionsWe developed a CT imaging-based score with the potential to become an independent prognostic factor to screen patients who would benefit from ICI treatment, which suggested that CT radiomics could be applied for individualized immunotherapy of NSCLC. Our findings should be further validated by future larger multicenter study.

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature

Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Histamine-2-Receptor Antagonists on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Simple SummaryThe current meta-analysis highlighted that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) could impact immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) efficacy in NSCLC patients, highlighting the need for a deeper comprehension of factors involved in treatment response or resistance. Since the number of indications and NSCLC patients receiving ICIs is supposed to increase further soon, identifying the impact of these agents on NSCLC immunotherapy represents a compelling and urgent need regarding NSCLC.(1) Background: In recent years, immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), representing a therapeutic breakthrough in this field. Antacid agents such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are commonly prescribed for extended periods in NSCLC patients, and these drugs have the potential to modify the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). (2) Materials and Methods: Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of PPIs and H2RAs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients receiving immunotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. Effect measures for OS were Hazard Ratios (HRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), which were extracted from available studies. Forest plots were used to assess HRs to describe the relationship between treatment and OS in the specified cohorts of patients. (3) Results: Six studies were included in the analysis, involving 2267 patients. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were 1.4 (95% CI, 1.25–1.58) and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.17–1.43), respectively, suggesting that PPIs and H2RAs administration was negatively associated with PFS and OS. (4) Conclusion: Concomitant antacid use could modify the activity of ICIs in NSCLC patients.

Association of Personal Characteristics and Effectiveness of Immunotherapy in Late-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundAlthough immunotherapy can increase survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), response rates are low. It is unclear which characteristics contribute to variability in immunotherapy efficacy and survival. Research is needed to identify reasons for heterogeneity in response rates to better tailor treatments.MethodsWeb of Science, Ovid EMBASE, and MEDLINE were queried from 2013 to January 2021, and all studies reporting overall or progression-free survival for patients treated with immunotherapy for NSCLC of at least stage IIIB were screened.ResultsIncluded were 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 6534 immunotherapy RCTs; 11 192 nonimmunotherapy RCTs) and 16 observational studies (n = 9073 immunotherapy patients). Among RCTs, there was improved survival with the addition of immunotherapy in patients aged younger than 65 years in 10 of 17 studies; smokers in 8 of 15 studies; and males in 10 of 17 studies and 6 of 17 females. Only 5 studies reported outcomes by race. Among observational studies, younger patients (aged younger than 60, younger than 65, or younger than 70 years in most studies) had better survival than older patients (aged 60 years and older, 65 years and older, or 70 years and older) in 4 of 13 studies, ever-smokers in 7 of 13, and females in 2 of 14. Three studies reported race with mixed results.ConclusionAlthough evidence is mixed, younger patients, smokers, and males may derive more benefit from immunotherapy. Evidence on racial differences is limited. Physicians should be mindful of personal characteristics when formulating treatment plans. Further research is needed to understand underlying mechanisms and to identify the best immunotherapy candidates and alternative treatments for those unlikely to benefit.

Assessing surrogacy using restricted mean survival time ratio for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy studies.

Proportional hazards (PH) assumption is often violated in cancer immunotherapy studies. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) ratio is a valid metric to quantify the size of treatment effect when non-proportional hazard (NPH) is present. This study investigated the use of RMST ratio and hazard ratio (HR) in studying progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy trials. Trial level data were collected from 14 phase III trials published between 2012 and 2018. A weighted least-square regression (WLSR) was performed to evaluate the trial-level surrogacy. Surrogacy was evaluated via the association between RMST ratios for PFS and OS and between HRs for PFS and OS. Using data extracted from published articles, low to moderate correlation (0.49) between PFS and OS was observed for HR while low correlation (0.35) was observed for RMST ratio. When trials violating PH in PFS were included, more consistent correlations for both HR (0.43) and RMST ratio (0.44) were observed. In summary, the strength of PFS surrogacy for OS depends on whether HR or RMST ratio are chosen. RMST ratio and additional sensitivity analysis should be considered in addition to HR.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundIn recent years, a series of clinical trials have explored the application of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, no randomized control trials comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chemoimmunotherapy have yet been reported. This study aimed to summarize and compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC.MethodsLiterature focusing on the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC published before June 2021 was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Study endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), complete pathological response (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), resection rate, surgical delay rate, and conversion to thoracotomy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were further performed.ResultsA total of 988 patients from 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis. For patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with single/combined ICIs or chemoimmunotherapy, the pooled MPR rate was 43.5% and the pooled pCR rate was 21.9%. The pooled incidence of TRAEs and SAEs were 54.8% and 15.3%, respectively. The pooled resection rate was 85.8%, the surgical delay rate was 7.4%, and the conversion rate was 17.4%. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy had remarkably improved pathological response (MPR rate: 53.3% vs. 28.6%; pCR rate: 28.6% vs. 9.9%) compared with those receiving neoadjuvant single-agent immunotherapy, while the incidence of SAEs (18.0% vs. 12.3%) and surgical delay rate (3.8% vs. 7.4%) did not significantly increase. Neoadjuvant nivolumab combined with ipilimumab also achieved a high pCR rate (28.6%) with tolerable toxicity. Nivolumab- and pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy showed a higher MPR rate (nivolumab 51.5%, pembrolizumab 46.8%) and pCR rate (nivolumab 29.1%, pembrolizumab 31.5%). Besides, patients with positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%] exhibited favorable pathological responses than PD-L1 negative patients.DiscussionOverall, neoadjuvant immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy is effective and safe in NSCLC. Compared with single-agent immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy provides a significant improvement in pathological response without increasing the incidence of SAEs or surgical delay. These results need further confirmation by more large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Exploring the Evolving Scope of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Simple SummaryImmunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has recently brought a paradigm shift in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but until now, most clinical benefits of immunotherapy have been demonstrated in the setting of advanced or metastatic disease. However, there has been a recent explosion in trial development and research focus exploring whether the benefits of immunotherapy can extend to the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable NSCLC. The aim of this review is to thoroughly outline the preclinical rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy research. In addition, we summarize and analyze the published interim results as well as results presented at major conferences from the initial early phase trials. An overview of the current and upcoming randomized clinical trials in this field is also provided. Finally, we highlight future challenges and questions that need to be addressed in upcoming research to clarify the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC.While lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, lung cancer mortality has notably decreased in the past decade. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors have played a noteworthy role in contributing to this improved survival, particularly for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, until now the benefits have primarily been seen in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Several recent early phase and ongoing phase III trials have been assessing whether the treatment benefit of immunotherapy in NSCLC can extend to the neoadjuvant setting for resectable diseases. In this comprehensive narrative review, we evaluate the most recent efficacy and safety data from these studies. We also outline questions that will need to be further examined to legitimate neoadjuvant immunotherapy’s role in NSCLC treatment, including the best surrogate marker of response, the incorporation of liquid biopsy for disease monitoring, the ability to be combined with other treatment modalities, the need for further adjuvant therapy, and potential future treatment combinations.

Genomic features and tumor immune microenvironment alteration in NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade

Several clinical trials have shown the safety and effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in neoadjuvant therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, 18–83% patients can benefit from it. In this study, we aimed to assess the association of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden, copy number alteration (CNA, including copy number gain and loss) burden with the pathologic response to neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade and investigate the changes in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) during neoadjuvant immunotherapy in NSCLC. Pre-immunotherapy treatment tumor samples from twenty-nine NSCLC patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with sintilimab, an anti-PD-1 drug, were subjected to targeted DNA sequencing and PD-L1 immunochemistry staining. The pathological response was positively correlated with tumor proportion score (TPS) of PD-L1 and negatively correlated with copy number gain (CNgain) burden. Of note, the combination of CNgain burden and TPS can better stratify major pathological response (MPR) patients than did CNgain or TPS alone. Whereas, TMB showed a limited correlation with pathological regression. Additionally, PD-1 blockade led to an increase in CD8+PD-1−T cells which was clinically relevant to MPR as evaluated by multiplex immunofluorescence. A significant reduction in CD19+ cells was observed in the Non-MPR group but not in the MPR group, indicating the involvement of B cells in improving neoadjuvant immunotherapy response in NSCLC. Together, our study provides new data for the correlation of PD-L1 expression and genomic factors with drug response in neoadjuvant immunotherapy settings in NSCLC. The changes of TIME may provide novel insight into the immune responses to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy.

Investigation of PALB2 Mutation and Correlation With Immunotherapy Biomarker in Chinese Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BackgroundPALB2, a gene in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway of the DNA damage response (DDR), is associated with the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and PARP inhibitor therapy in several tumors. However, the PALB2 characteristics, its correlation with immunotherapy biomarker, and the prognostic effect of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were unknown.MethodsTumor tissue samples from advanced Chinese NSCLC patients were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) (panel on 381/733-gene). Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is defined as the total number of somatic non-synonymous mutations in the coding region. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was evaluated by NGS of 500 known MSI loci. Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3 or SP263). One independent cohort (Rizvi2018.NSCLC.240.NGS cohort) containing genomic and clinical data from 240 patients with advanced NSCLC and two cohorts (the OAK and POPLAR study cohort) containing genomic and clinical data from 429 patients with advanced NSCLC were used to analyze the prognostic effect of PALB2 on immunotherapy.ResultsGenetic mutation of 5,227 NSCLC patients were analyzed using NGS, of which 162 (3.1%) harbored germline PALB2 mutation (PALB2gmut) and 87 (1.66%) harbored somatic PALB2 mutation (PALB2smut). In NSCLC patients with PALB2gmut and PALB2smut, the most frequently mutated gene was TP53 (65%, 64%). PALB2smut (14.52 Muts/Mb) was associated with higher TMB (p < 0.001) than PALB wild-type (PALB2wt) (6.15 Muts/Mb). However, there was no significant difference in TMB between PALB2gmut (6.45 Muts/Mb) and PALB2wt (6.15 Muts/Mb) (p = 0.64). There was no difference in PD-L1 expression among PALB2gmut, PALB2smut, and PALB2wt. In the Rizvi2018.NSCLC.240.NGS cohort, there was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR =1.06, p = 0.93) between PALB2 mutation (3.15 months) and PALB2wt (3.17 months). The OAK and POPLAR study cohort of NSCLC patients showed that there was no difference in overall survival (OS) (HR =1.1, p = 0.75) between PALB2 mutation (10.38 months) and PALB2wt (11.07 months).ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PALB2 may not be used as a biomarker for determining prognosis on immunotherapy in NSCLC.