Nongynecologic Cytology Research Articles

Evaluation of the Short and Long-term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Non-gynecological Cytology Practice

Evaluation of the Short and Long-term Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Non-gynecological Cytology Practice

Diagnostic Agreement in Whole Slide Digital Images ofCervical Cytology and Cell Blocks.

Cell blocks (CB) are an established technique in non-gynecological cytology, but experience in gynecological cytology is still relatively limited. In this study, we compared the diagnostic agreement between liquid-based cytology (LBC) and CB using whole slide digital imaging (WSI). WSI of 82 specimens (41 LBC and 41 CB) were evaluated independently by three observers. The overall agreement was 0.463 for all 82 cases including both LBC and CB, 0.439 for LBC alone, and 0.484 for CB alone. Agreement was highest for HSIL, NILM, cancers and lower for borderline (ASC-US, ASC-H). There was no significant difference in agreement between LBC and CB. WSI of CB can be used for the diagnosis of cervical lesions and may be particularly useful in cases with high atypical cellularity or large hyperchromatic cell groups.

Anal Cytology Interpretation Issues: Observations from the College of American Pathologists’ Nongynecologic Cytology Program

Anal Cytology Interpretation Issues: Observations from the College of American Pathologists’ Nongynecologic Cytology Program

Diagnostic utility of immunocytochemistry by using liquid-based cytology (LBC) slides.

Cytological specimens, such as fine needle aspirations (FNAs) and exfoliative cytology samples, are minimally invasive options for diagnostic purposes. Liquid-based cytology (LBC), originally designed for cervical cytology, has gained prominence as an alternative technique for non-gynecological cytology. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is an ancillary method used when diagnosis becomes challenging due to morphological overlap or the need for cellular origin clarification. This study aims to assess the diagnostic utility of ICC when applied to LBC slides and evaluate its effectiveness in relation to the waiting (lag) time of residual material. A total of 74 cases in which ICC was applied to LBC slides were studied over one year in a reference pathology laboratory (Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu, Pathology Laboratory, City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey). Cases in which immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks were excluded. The SurePath PAP method was used for the main LBC cytology slides. For the ICC study, 1-4 PAP-stained LBC slides were obtained from each case's residual material and stained with a primary antibody. The positive immunostaining was obtained in 81% of cases. The samples were categorized into groups based on the waiting time of residual LBC material for ICC analysis: 1-5 days, 6-10 days, 11-20 days, and 21-38 days. Comparative analysis revealed a decline in ICC efficacy as the waiting (lag) time increased. Additionally, a statistically significant difference was observed between the 11-20 days and 21-38 days groups (P < 0.05). An analysis of 142 LBC slides stained by ICC revealed that nuclear markers exhibited higher positivity compared to non-nuclear markers, although no significant difference was detected between the two groups. High positivity rates can be obtained in ICC studies performed on additional slides obtained from residual LBC material within the first 20 days. ICC applied to LBC slides is an important and useful alternative for diagnostic and prognostic markers in cases without a cell block or with a cell block without sufficient number of cells.

Evaluation of a Novel Fixative Solution for Liquid-Based Cytology in Diagnostic Cytopathology.

Since its introduction in the early 2000s, liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been increasingly used for gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytology, and its multiple advantages have been widely recognized. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a new fixative and pre-analytical method for morphological diagnosis in cytological samples. In particular, we evaluated the effect of a novel preservative solution on the preparation of diagnostic slides by comparing it with the standard reference used globally in cytology laboratories. This study included both gynecological (n = 139) and non-gynecological (n = 183) samples. Several morphologic variables were then identified and evaluated. Using this approach, we were then able to demonstrate the suitability of the new system, with improved safety, to be integrated within current pathology clinical practice. Overall, using a safer preservative solution, the study shows no statistical difference (and then non-inferiority) in the new fixation protocol compared with the standard reference used in routine practice in terms of diagnostic adequacy, evaluated both in clinically relevant gyn and non-gyn datasets.

Cytologic-Histologic Correlation Practices for Nongynecologic Cytology Specimens: A Survey by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee.

Cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC) is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-mandated requirement for gynecologic cytology, but no similar requirement exists for nongynecologic cytology. This study presents the findings from a College of American Pathologists survey of nongynecologic cytology practice patterns. To survey the current CHC practices for nongynecologic cytology. Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the committee and distributed to participants in the Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing. Adoption of CHC for nongynecologic cytology cases is worldwide, with 88.5% of institutions performing CHC on these specimens, a substantial increase from previous years. Performance of CHC varied by institution type, with clinic or regional/local independent laboratories and national/corporate laboratories performing CHC significantly less frequently than hospitals, university hospitals/academic medical centers, and Veterans Administration/Department of Defense hospital institutions. Most CHC was performed concurrently in real time, when the corresponding surgical specimen was reviewed. Selection for real-time concurrent CHC was by the interpreting pathologist, the pathologist diagnosing the surgical biopsy sample or cytopathology case, or both. Sampling was by far the most common reason for discordance. A 2-step difference was the most frequent threshold for discordance between cytology and surgical specimens, but this criterion varied among institutions, with no majority definition. The positive predictive value of a positive cytology finding was calculated rarely in North American institutions but was calculated more frequently in international institutions. CHC practices for nongynecologic cytopathology mirror those found for CHC of gynecologic cytopathology.

A mixed-methods study on the use of a nongynecological virtual microscopy platform in cytology education.

Expanding the virtual microscopy (VM) slide collection for nongynecological cytology is important to teaching. In a mixed-methods approach, this study evaluated VM's performance and user experience to determine its feasibility and usage in an educational setting. From September through October 2022, the students reviewed 44 whole-slide imaged nongynecological slides. The concordance rate with reference diagnosis was compared with that from light microscopy (LM) from 4 months earlier. In addition to assessing the overall performance from VM, imaged urinary cytology's accuracy was reviewed for both urinary and nonurinary cytology. Finally, the students' weekly feedback logs were analyzed to gain insights for improving the digital screening experience. The overall nongynecological diagnostic accuracy was significant between the 2 screening platforms (P < .001), favoring LM over the VM platform. Light microscopy also performed better than VM in urine cytology cases, with 84.2% concordance against reference diagnosis, compared with 61.1% for the VM platform (P = .03). As for the accuracy of nonurinary cases, its glass slide (LM) agreement with the reference diagnosis was also superior at 84.8%, compared with 58.8% for VM (P = .03). Finally, the overarching theme discerned from reviewing the user logs was concern over image quality, which was mentioned 76 times. The VM results were poorer compared with LM in our validation. Its use seems promising, but more focus is needed to improve the VM screening platform.

The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.

In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types. To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories. Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing. Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process. The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.

Comparison of liquid-based cytology and conventional preparations in nongynecological cytology

Abstract Introduction: The liquid-based cytology (LBC) has shown significant advantages over conventional preparation in cervical cytology. The use of LBC in aspiration and exfoliative nongynecologic cytology has been on the rise since the last few years with relatively few studies being available depicting its role in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from other sites. The study aimed to determine the diagnostic efficacy of LBC in nongynecological exfoliative as well as FNAC samples and compare the conventional and LBC methods for cytomorphological differences. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, analytical study that included the samples collected from two tertiary care centers over 8 months (January 2022 to August 2022). A total of 168 consecutive samples of aspiration and exfoliative nongynecological cytology were included. In each case, two passes were carried out one for a conventional smear (CS) and the other for LBC by Eziprep/Thin Prep (TP) method followed by smear staining with H and E stain and Leishman’s stain. The slides were studied by two observers for cellularity, background (blood and necrotic cell debris), informative background (such as colloid, stromal fragments, etc.), presence of monolayer cells, and cell architecture with nuclear and cytoplasmic details by a semiquantitative scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the SPSS program and histopathology correlation was attempted wherever available by using OpenEpi software version 3. Results: The mean age was 40 years, with the majority being females (70%). The TP smears were qualitatively superior to CS with statistical differences observed in fluid cytology. There was no statistical difference observed at other sites; except TP being superior to CS with regard to the background in breast cytology. The arithmetic mean in TP was higher than CS in all the parameters. Conclusions: The cytology smears of TP were qualitatively superior to CS in aspiration and nongynecological cytology. Overall diagnostic accuracy was comparable in both techniques. The core competencies addressed in this article are: Medical knowledge, Procedural skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Professionalism.

Quality metrics in non-gynecologic cytology: results from the 2022 American Society of Cytopathology survey.

Rapid advancements in minimally invasive techniques and the discovery of molecular biomarkers have resulted in major changes in the practice of non-gynecologic cytology and have highlighted a need for novel quality assurance (QA) metrics. To obtain data regarding the current and desired usage, methods of collection, and barriers to the implementation of non-gynecologic cytopathology QA, an 18-question survey was constructed by the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society for Cytopathology. A total of 206 responses were received. Respondents included 112 (54.4%) cytopathologists, 81 (39.3%) cytotechnologists, and 13 others. Almost all (97%) acknowledged the value of assessing QA metrics in cytology. The most commonly used QA metrics were cytotechnologist-pathologist diagnostic agreement and pathologist amendment rates. The desire to implement non-gynecologic QA metrics was significantly higher among academic hospitals, relative to nonacademic facilities. A combined manual and electronic approach to collect QA data was generally used (70% of institutions). QA metrics were more often collected by the cytology laboratory supervisors (59.5%), while the evaluation was most often performed by the cytology laboratory director (76.5%). Limited staffing and laboratory information system (LIS) capabilities were cited as major challenges in the implementation of novel QA metrics. While the collection of quality data might be perceived as an onerous task, a thoughtful selection of quality indicators, with an inbuilt search option in LIS, can contribute to the successful implementation of non-gynecologic QA metrics.

Use of nongynecologic cytologic-histologic correlation to identify patterns of error: An institutional experience.

Quality management practices empower cytology laboratories to deliver consistent, high-quality patient care. Monitoring of key performance indicators is one way by which laboratories can identify patterns of error and focus their improvement activities. Cytologic-histologic correlation (CHC) identifies error by retrospectively reviewing cytology cases when discordant surgical pathology diagnoses are reported. Analysis of CHC data can elucidate patterns of error and direct quality improvement initiatives. CHC data of nongynecologic cytology specimens were reviewed over a 3-year period (2018-2021). Errors were separated by anatomic site and classified as either sampling or interpretive errors. A total of 364 discordant cases were identified out of 4422 cytologic-histologic pairs (a discordant rate of 8%). The majority (272; 75%) were sampling errors, with fewer interpretive errors (92; 25%). Sampling errors were found to occur most commonly in lower urinary tract and lung. Interpretive errors were most commonly found in lower urinary tract and thyroid. Nongynecologic CHC data can be a valuable resource for cytology laboratories. By studying the types of errors, quality improvement activities can be targeted toward problem areas.

Assessment of the diagnostic usefulness of liquid-based cytology. The impact of modifications.

The technique of liquid-based cytology (LBC) is of increasing diagnostic value in non-gynecological cytology. The purpose of the present study was to validate modifications to stages of the LBC process and to assess the diagnostic usefulness of the LBC technique. Between May 2021 and January 2022, atotal of 484 samples were prepared from routine cytology tests carried out in the Department of Tumor Pathology of The Greater Poland Cancer Center. The material was obtained from fine-needle aspiration biopsies and fluid samples. One hundred cases were selected for the research described in the article. The slides were prepared using the Becton Dickinson Totalys SlidePrep device. Based on the research, it was concluded that predominantly the LBC technique gives better results than aconventional smear because the background, which would otherwise make it difficult to assess preparations, was eliminated. Additionally, in LBC preparations the cellularity was increased, and the cells were arranged in amonolayer system, which improves the image quality. The introduction of modifications to the LBC method facilitated the process of sample preparation, without adversely affecting the quality of the obtained material.

The Value of Second-Opinion Consultation in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.

The value of consultation in pathology has been well documented in surgical pathology, but there are few comprehensive studies of consultation cases in cytopathology. Here we report our experience with cytopathology consultation cases at a large academic center. A review of consultation cases at our institution was performed by searching our laboratory information system. The contributing institution's diagnosis was compared with that rendered by the reviewing cytopathologist to assess major and/or minor diagnostic discrepancies. In total, 928 cases were reviewed with the following distribution: fine-needle aspiration (FNA, 79.4%), exfoliative nongynecologic cytology (18.3%), and cases with both FNA and nongynecologic cytology (2.3%). There were 379 (40.8%) true consults and 549 (59.2%) confirming consults. A total of 586 (63.1%) cases were in agreement with the outside pathologist, 78 (8.4%) cases had major discrepancies, and 264 (28.4%) cases had minor discrepancies. Major discrepancies were most common for pancreas (38.5%), lymph node (11.5%), and soft tissue sites (9.0%). Of the cases, 8.4% had major diagnostic discrepancies between the original diagnosis and the consultation diagnosis, which is consistent with reported values in surgical pathology consultation studies. The findings support the importance of second-opinion consultation in cytopathology to guide patient care.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pathology and cytology practice in University Hospital Centre Rijeka

Aim: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the overall practice of the histopathological and cytological laboratory at the University Hospital Centre Rijeka, and on the diagnosis of the most common cancers. Methods: The numbers of histopathological and cytological reports, newly diagnosed cancers of breast, lung, colon, endometrium, and prostate, molecular tests for EGFR mutations and HPV were extracted. Two periods, from March 1 to September 30 in 2019 and 2020 were analysed and compared, as the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The total number of reports was statistically significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, compared to the same period in 2019 (p<0.000), histopathology by 24%, non-gynecological cytology by 20%, gynecological cytology by 13%, and Pap tests by 11%. During COVID-19 compared to the same period in 2019 the number of newly diagnosed malignant tumors was significantly reduced for colon cancers (–25%, p <0.0001). The decrease in the new cases of breast (–3%) and prostate cancer (–4%) was less pronounced while the increase was recorded for lung (+ 2%) and endometrial cancer (+ 53%). The number of HPV tests dropped significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, by 40% (p <0.0001). Conclusions: This study confirmed the expected significant reduction in workload during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, from 11% to 40%, although the number of patients with newly diagnosed cancers, except for colon, did not fall significantly. It would be important to form a joint national registry that would collect diagnostic and also therapeutic procedures, especially for oncology patients, in order to gain a more objective insight into the problems of the health system during pandemics. These data can be used to consider measures and strategies for the most adequate care, not only for COVID-19 but also for all other patients. © 2021 Hrvatski Lijecnicki Zbor. All rights reserved.

Mandatory Second Opinion Review Analysis of Outside Non-Gynecological Cytology Material: One Year Experience at an Academic Institution

Mandatory Second Opinion Review Analysis of Outside Non-Gynecological Cytology Material: One Year Experience at an Academic Institution

Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid on-site evaluation—Part 1: objective practice patterns

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a service provided by cytologists that helps ensure specimen adequacy and appropriate triage for ancillary testing. However, data on the current usage patterns across different practice settings have been lacking. To obtain an accurate and timely assessment of the current state of practice of ROSE, a 14-question online survey was constructed by the Clinical Practice Committee of the American Society for Cytopathology. The survey was available to the membership of the American Society for Cytopathology for a 3-week period in early2019. A total of 541 responses were received, including from 255 cytopathologists/pathologists, 261 cytotechnologists, 19 cytology resident/fellow trainees, and 6 others. ROSE was offered as a clinical service by 95.4% of the respondents, with telecytology for ROSE used in 21.9% of the practices. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration was the procedure most frequently reported to use ROSE (mean, 59.1%; median, 70%). Cytotechnologists were involved in ROSE in most practices. The number of daily ROSE procedures correlated with the annual nongynecologic cytology volumes. Approximately 70% of ROSE procedures were reported to require >30 minutes, on average, for the cytologist. The results from our survey of cytologists have shown that the reported practice patterns for the usage of ROSE vary considerably. The presented data can help inform future guideline recommendations and the implementation of ROSE in different clinical settings.

Characterizing the Effect of Automated Cell Sorting Solutions on Cytomorphological Changes

Introduction: Liquid-based cytology has become a widely adopted, automated screening system for gynecologic and nongynecologic cytology. Automated screening systems function by distinguishing atypical cells based on their cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, densitometric measurement, and so on. However, the morphological influence of the washing solution has not been fully considered. Here, we examined the morphological effect and temporal change resulting from saving the cytologic samples in various solutions. Methods: Cytologic specimens were obtained from the ascites (AS) of patients with peritoneal cancer. Various solutions of a physiological saline, a Ringer’s solution, a low-molecular dextran L injection, VOLUVEN 6% solution, MIXID L injection (ML), RPMI-1640 medium, and horse serum (HS) were added to aliquot sediments. All samples were refrigerated at 4°C, and aliquots were subsequently processed at specific time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 days). For all samples, cytoplasmic and nuclear size of the Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured. Results: In terms of cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, samples stored in ML and HS showed no significant difference compared to the AS sample; in contrast, the other samples were significantly larger in both cytoplasmic and nuclear areas than the AS sample. In examining the temporal change among the solutions, we found that the cytoplasms and nuclei became small over the time course for all of the tested solutions. Conclusion: We showed that cells swell in the solution after 1 h of storage and contract as time progresses. Together, our findings have important implications for how mathematical analysis is applied during the automated screening process.

Trends in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practices: Results From a College of American Pathologists 2016 Practice Survey.

The College of American Pathologists periodically surveys laboratories to determine changes in cytopathology practices. We report the results of a 2016 survey concerning thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). To provide a cross-sectional survey of thyroid cytology practices in 2016. In 2016, a survey was sent to 2013 laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists Non-Gynecologic Cytology Education Program (NGC-A) requesting data from 2015-2016 on several topics relating to thyroid FNA. A total of 878 laboratories (43.6% of 2013) replied to the survey. Radiologists performed the most thyroid FNA procedures in most laboratories (70%; 529 of 756), followed by endocrinologists (18.7%; 141 of 756), and most of these were performed under ultrasound guidance (92.1%; 699 of 759). A total of 32.6% of respondents (251 of 769) provided feedback on unsatisfactory rates for nonpathology providers who performed FNA. Intraprocedural adequacy assessment was primarily performed by attending pathologists (77.4%; 490 of 633) or cytotechnologists (28.4%; 180 of 633). Most laboratories used the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (89.8%; 701 of 781) and performed molecular testing based on clinician request (68.1%; 184 of 270) rather than FNA diagnosis. Correlation of thyroid excisions with prior cytology results most often occurred retrospectively (38.4%; 283 of 737) and was used for pathologist interpretive quality assurance purposes. These survey results offer a snapshot of national thyroid FNA cytology practices in 2016 and indicate that standardized cytology terminology is commonly used; pathologists perform most immediate adequacy assessments for thyroid FNA; laboratories use correlation statistics to evaluate pathologists' performance; and molecular tests are increasingly requested for indeterminate interpretations, but reflex molecular testing is rare.

Post-fine-needle aspiration biopsy communication and the integrated and standardized cytopathology report.

Communication between cytopathologists and patients and their care team is a critical component of accurate and timely patient management. The most important single means of communication for the cytopathologist is through the cytopathology report. Implementation of standardized terminology schemes and structured, templated reporting facilitates the ability of the cytopathologist to provide a comprehensive and integrated report. Cytopathology has been among the pathology subspecialties that have led the way in developing standardized reporting, beginning with the 1954 Papanicolaou classification scheme for cervical-vaginal cytology and continuing through the Bethesda systems for gynecological cytology and several nongynecological cytology systems. The effective reporting of cytopathology necessarily becomes more complex as it addresses increasingly sophisticated management options, requiring the integration of information from a broader range of sources. In addition to the complexity of information inputs, a wider spectrum of consumers of these reports is emerging, from patients themselves to primary care providers to subspecialized disease management experts. Both these factors require that the reporting cytopathologist provide the integration and interpretation necessary to translate diverse forms of information into meaningful and actionable reports that will inform the care team while enabling the patient to meaningfully participate in his or her own care. To achieve such broad and focused communications will require first the development of standardized and integrated reports and ultimately the involvement of cytopathologists in the development of the clinical informatics needed to treat all these items of information as structured data elements with flexible reporting operators to address the full range of patient and patient care needs. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125(6 suppl):486-93. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

External quality assurance in nongynecologic cytology: The Australasian experience.

The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Cytopathology Quality Assurance Program has operated an external quality assurance program in nongynecologic cytopathology since 1993. Glass slide preparations of a wide range of nongynecologic cases were circulated to approximately 200 cytopathology laboratories in 16 countries. General nongynecologic cytology cases were manufactured from residual specimens after routine diagnosis. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases were made by sampling fresh tissue and making direct specimens. The majority of cases consisted of both air-dried and fixed preparations. Results returned to laboratories included illustrated case discussions highlighting diagnostic features, key differential diagnoses, and useful adjunctive tests. The current study reviewed >22,000 results for 123 nongynecologic cases. Cases found to cause the most diagnostic difficulties included serous effusion cases with metastatic carcinoma in a dispersed pattern, well-differentiated carcinoma, and cellular reactive cases; urine specimens with sparse malignant cells; reactive pneumocytes in a bronchoalveolar lavage; breast FNA cases with papillary lesions; gestational specimens; and fibroadenoma. FNA specimens from the lung and thyroid, particularly papillary thyroid carcinoma, generally were well reported. The use of multiple preparations of the same specimen has allowed interlaboratory comparison, and the quality assurance program has played an educational role as well as informing the laboratory accreditation process. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:349-361. © 2017 American Cancer Society.