Nonextraction Treatment Research Articles

Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption in Cases with Extraction and Non-Extraction Fixed Orthodontic Treatment.

The objective of this study was to evaluate external apical root resorption (EARR) in cases with extraction and non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatment. Ninety subjects were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups: 43 with extraction treatment and 47 with non-extraction orthodontic treatment. EARR was measured using the crown-to-root ratio of the maxillary and mandibular incisors and canines on panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning (T0) and end of the treatment (T1). The Bonferroni corrected Z test was used for multiple comparisons. There were 24 (55.8%) individuals in the extraction group and 12 (25.5%) in the non-extraction group, with a minimum of one tooth with severe resorption. There was no resorption in 0% of individuals in the extraction group and five (10.6%) individuals in the non-extraction group. There was a statistically significant correlation between the groups and the degree of resorption (p = 0.008). When the maxillary and mandibular teeth in the extraction group were compared, a significant difference was found in all degrees of resorption except for mild resorption. There was a significant difference in EARR between the extraction and non-extraction treatment groups, with maxillary incisors showing more resorption in the extraction treatment.

Digital-assisted diagnosis and orthodontic management of an impacted mandibular lateral incisor: a case report

BackgroundThe impaction of mandibular lateral incisors presents significant aesthetic and functional challenges in orthodontics, including Bolton ratio discrepancies and anterior occlusal anomalies. The increasing preference for nonextraction treatment further complicates space management within the dental arch. However, the advent of digital-assisted orthodontic technologies, particularly advanced digital simulations, has revolutionized the precision and effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment planning. These technologies enable clinicians to strategically leverage natural jaw development and create the necessary space for the alignment of impacted teeth without resorting to extraction.Case presentationThis case report details the treatment of a 12-year-old male with an impacted mandibular lateral incisor, which resulted in both aesthetic concerns and functional impairments, alongside Class II malocclusion. By employing a digital-assisted diagnostic approach, including comprehensive digital simulations, we meticulously evaluated the feasibility of a nonextraction treatment plan. The strategy centred on harnessing the patient’s mandibular growth potential to expand the available space naturally. The treatment involved surgical exposure of the impacted tooth, followed by precise orthodontic traction guided by continuous digital monitoring. The integration of digital tools throughout the treatment process was crucial in achieving successful eruption and alignment of the impacted tooth, thus restoring optimal aesthetics and function without the need for extraction.ConclusionThis case highlights the transformative impact of digital-assisted technologies in the management of complex orthodontic cases, such as impacted mandibular lateral incisors. The successful integration of these advanced tools with a nonextraction treatment approach underscores their potential to significantly enhance clinical outcomes. Digital technologies not only improve the accuracy and effectiveness of treatment but also facilitate a multidisciplinary approach that elevates the standard of patient care in addressing complex orthodontic challenges.

A Cephalometric Study Of Vertical Skeletal Changes After Extraction And Non-Extraction Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Of Class I Malocclusion In North Indian Population

Background: Orthodontic treatments frequently involve tooth extractions to address crowding and protrusion, but the effects of these extractions on vertical skeletal changes are still debated. Research has extensively covered aspects like soft tissue response and smile aesthetics, yet there is no consensus on their impact on vertical dimensions. This issue is particularly pertinent for hyperdivergent individuals, who make up about 22% of orthodontic patients. A proposed technique for such cases includes counterclockwise rotation of the lower jaw and advancement of posterior teeth to manage open bites or excessive vertical facial height. This study aims to compare vertical skeletal changes in Class I malocclusion patients undergoing extraction versus non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatments. Material and Methods: We analysed pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs from 60 Class I crowding patients, evenly split into extraction and non-extraction groups. Eight vertical skeletal parameters were assessed and compared statistically between the two groups. Superimposition analysis of radiograph tracings was used to explore vertical changes related to molar mesialization, particularly in the extraction group. Results: The extraction group demonstrated significant reductions in vertical skeletal dimensions compared to the non-extraction group. Measurements including FMA, SN-GoGn, Y-axis, SN-PP, and PP-MP showed significant differences, with reductions in the extraction group (P = 0.001). Procrustes superimposition indicated effective molar mesialization in the extraction group, which was not observed in the non-extraction group. Conclusion: Extraction of first premolars in fixed orthodontic treatment leads to a notable decrease in vertical skeletal dimensions, in contrast to the slight increase seen with non-extraction treatments. This reduction is largely due to molar mesialization, which enhances vertical skeletal dimensions and treatment stability in Class I crowding cases.

Effectiveness of Machine Learning in Predicting Orthodontic Tooth Extractions: A Multi-Institutional Study.

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting whether orthodontic patients would require extraction or non-extraction treatment using data from two university datasets. A total of 1135 patients, with 297 from University 1 and 838 from University 2, were included during consecutive enrollment periods. The study identified 20 inputs including 9 clinical features and 11 cephalometric measurements based on previous research. Random forest (RF) models were used to make predictions for both institutions. The performance of each model was assessed using sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), accuracy (ACC), and feature ranking. The model trained on the combined data from two universities demonstrated the highest performance, achieving 50% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 85% accuracy. When cross-predicting, where the University 1 (U1) model was applied to the University 2 (U2) data and vice versa, there was a slight decrease in performance metrics (ranging from 0% to 20%). Maxillary and mandibular crowding were identified as the most significant features influencing extraction decisions in both institutions. This study is among the first to utilize datasets from two United States institutions, marking progress toward developing an artificial intelligence model to support orthodontists in clinical practice.

Orthodontic movement after regenerative endodontic procedure in mature permanent tooth associated with dens invaginatus: a case report with 4-year follow-up

BackgroundRegenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are innovative treatments aimed at restoring damaged dental structures. However, the effect of orthodontic movement on REP-treated teeth is not well understood and may have significant long-term consequences. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of orthodontic movement on a mature permanent tooth associated with dens invaginatus that has undergone a regenerative endodontic procedure (REP).Case presentationThis report describes the case of a 13-year-old healthy male who presented with pulp necrosis and a chronic apical abscess (tooth number 2.2). Following REP according to the American Association of Endodontists' guidelines, the patient began non-extraction orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances after a 9-month healing period, which lasted 17 months in the upper arch. Subsequent follow-ups at 24, 36 and 48 months post-REP revealed an asymptomatic state with minimal cervical discoloration and diminished cold sensitivity. Radiographic analyses revealed periapical healing, mild apical remodeling on tooth 2.2, and moderate apical remodeling on other maxillary incisors. The treated tooth displayed a positive response to both REP and orthodontic treatment, yet further research is required to determine the long-term effects of orthodontics on REP-treated teeth.ConclusionOrthodontic movement following REPs in mature permanent teeth is feasible and do not seem to prone teeth to orthodontic tooth resorption. Our experience indicates that a 9-month healing period allows successful orthodontic outcomes following REPs. Nonetheless, the predictability of outcomes and the ideal healing period before orthodontic movement is initiated remain to be established.

Assessment of mini-aesthetics in Class I malocclusion subjects who underwent orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of four premolars – A prospective study

Smile and facial attractiveness are strongly correlatedThis study aimed to assess the effect of extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment on mini-aesthetics in patients with Class I malocclusion by measurement of the smile variables.A total of 56 subjects were selected and grouped as Group 1- treated non-extraction, Group 2A-treated with extraction of first premolars and groups 2B- treated with extraction of second premolar teeth. Each subject was photographed with a posed smile and NHP using DSLR camera. The images were then imported into a computer software and the following smile parameters were assessed: gingival display, smile index, maxillary incisor display on smile and buccal corridor ratio.The mean measured maxillary incisor display was 1.39±0.34, 2.31±0.50 and 0.90±0.19mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured gingival display on smiling was 0.07±0.07, 0.38±0.65 and 0.07±0.15mm in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured smile index was 0.15±0.68, 1.20±0.22 and 0.95±0.41 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. The mean measured buccal corridor ratio was 0.83±0.39, 1.59±0.26 and 1.26±0.31 in Group 1, Group 2A and Group 2B. There was an increase in maxillary incisor display after fixed Orthodontic treatment in the non-extraction group and a decrease in first premolar extraction group while second premolar extraction group showed no changes. Smile index was increased post-treatment in first premolar and second premolar extraction group while non-extraction group showed no significant difference. Buccal corridor ratio decreased in first premolar and second premolar extraction groups while non-extraction group showed no changes.

A Cross-Sectional Survey of the Use of Clear Aligners by General Dentists in Australia.

The primary aim of the investigation was to survey clear aligner therapy (CAT) use among general dentists in Australia. A secondary aim was to evaluate the factors that influenced general dentists in Australia not to provide CAT. General dentists registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency were invited to participate in a structured cross-sectional electronic survey. The survey covered demographics, preferred CAT systems and practices, relevant treatment planning and retention protocols, patient-reported CAT issues, pertinent respondent opinions, and reasons for not providing CAT. Descriptive statistics were computed via GraphPad Prism v10 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Most of the 264 (n = 172; 65.2%) respondents indicated that they provided CAT. The majority (n = 82; 58.6%) reported that they treated between 1 and 20 patients with CAT annually. Invisalign was the most used system (n = 83; 61.2%), with 55 (41.7%), indicating that they used more than one system. Most (n = 124; 98.4%) were comfortable using CAT for mild crowding, whereas 73.4% (n = 94) were not comfortable in treating severe crowding with CAT. The median (IQR) number of patients per respondent treated with extraction of a permanent incisor or premolar was 0 (0). Issues regarding tooth positions were reportedly always or mostly in need of change in the initial treatment plan by 68.7%. Problems regarding patient compliance with CAT wear protocols (n = 67; 45.6%) and the predictability of treatment outcomes (n = 31; 21.1%) were the most identified themes of the free-text comments. Over 80% of those who did not provide CAT indicated that they preferred to refer to an orthodontist for management. Almost two-thirds of the respondents provided CAT. Invisalign was the most used system. The majority use CAT combined with nonextraction treatment. Most of those who did not provide CAT preferred to refer to an orthodontist for patient management.

Impact of Invisalign® first system on molar width and incisor torque in malocclusion during the mixed dentition period.

In orthodontic treatment of patients during the mixed dentition period, arch expansion and opening deep overbite are one of the objectives to achieve proper alignment of the teeth and correction of sagittal and vertical discrepancies. However, the expected outcomes of most therapeutic regimens are not clear, making it impossible to standardize early treatment effects. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of the Invisalign® First System on the dental arch circumference and incisor inclination in patients during the mixed dentition period. A total of 21 children during the mixed dentition period (10 females and 11 males, with an average age of 8.76 years) were included in this study. The patients received non-extraction treatment through Invisalign® First System clear aligners, and no other auxiliary devices were used except Invisalign® accessories. Subsequently, the cooperation degree of patients during treatment and the oral measurement parameters at the beginning (T1) and the end (T2) of treatment were collected. All patients showed moderate/good cooperation degree during treatment. Besides, horizontal width of the maxillary first molar increased significantly; the designed arch expansion was 4.1 mm (±1.4 mm), while the actual arch expansion was 3.0 mm (±1.7 mm). Furthermore, the torque expression rate of upper anterior teeth reached 56.53%. Invisalign® First System clear aligners can effectively correct the teeth of patients during the mixed dentition period, widen the circumference of dental arch, and control the torque of incisors.

Orthopaeddontics in Cleft Treatment

Orthopaeddontics offers a comprehensive treatment paradigm tailored to paediatric patients aged 5 to 11 years with cleft anomalies, focussing on early correction of dento-alveolar and orthognathial deformities alongside structured psychological support. The intensive pre- surgical preparational treatment phase, conducted during this very active growth period, lays the foundation for subsequent surgical interventions, particularly secondary osteofusion, in children with the CLA and CLAP deformities. The primary objective is to achieve optimal gothic arch formation, ideal maxillary-mandibular occlusal relationship and attain balanced facial aesthetics while mitigating orthognathial deformities. Following surgery, orthopeaddontic maintenance continues into the pre-adolescent years, typically until the age of 12 years, ensuring sustained treatment efficacy before transitioning to standard orthodontic care. Central to this approach is a non-extraction treatment philosophy targeting both primary and permanent dentition, aimed at aligning teeth to achieve the most ideal arch or horse-shoe- shaped alveolus arch for all of the two (uCLA/uCLAP) or three arch segments (bCLA/bCLAP) within a balanced maxillary-mandibular occlusal relationship with an ideal facial balance. Various orthopaeddontic techniques are employed to address abnormal dimensional appearances, complimented by a psychologically sensitive approach to support paediatric patients and their families. During the orthopaeddontic treatment the treating expert needs to liaise with the parents to support the cleft child with a gentle, psychologically meaningful approach to warrant essential ultimate outcome with lifelong positive aesthetic appearance and functionality and to secure an easier acceptance of their odyssey as a person with a cleft deformity. A result of the utilization of this growth phase, related to the midfacial development and function, needs to be comparable with the expected development of a non-cleft child at a similar age. Ultimately, successful orthopeaddontic intervention during the critical growth phase should yield marked improvements in speech, facial aesthetic and a functional occlusion, potentially reducing the need for future orthodontic treatments and minimizing treatment duration.

Accuracy of Digital Imaging Software to Predict Soft Tissue Changes during Orthodontic Treatment.

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Digital Imaging software in the prediction of soft tissue changes following three types of orthodontic interventions: non-extraction, extraction, and orthognathic surgery treatments. Ninety-six patients were randomly selected from the records of three orthodontic interventions (32 subjects per group): (1) non-extraction, (2) extraction, and (3) orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. The cephalometric analysis of soft tissue changes in both the actual post-treatment and the predicted treatment was performed using Dolphin Imaging software version 11.9. A paired t-test was utilized to assess the statistically significant differences between the predicted and actual treatment outcomes of the parameters (p < 0.05). In the non-extraction group, prediction errors were exhibited only in the lower lip parameters. In the extraction group, prediction errors were observed in both the upper and lower lip parameters. In the orthognathic surgery group, prediction errors were identified in chin thickness, facial contour angle, and upper and lower lip parameters (p < 0.05). Digital Imaging software exhibited inaccurate soft tissue prediction of 0.3-1.0 mm in some parameters of all treatment groups, which should be considered regarding the application of Dolphin Imaging software in orthodontic treatment planning.

A clinical evaluation of low-level laser therapy for pain reduction in early treatment stages: A pilot study

Objectives: This study aimed to clinically evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in reducing pain associated with orthodontic movement during the early stages of treatment. Material and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 20 participants undergoing non-extraction orthodontic treatment. The laser group (LG, n = 10) received LLLT (808 nm, 100 mW) immediately after appliance installation, while the control group (CG, n = 10) received no pain control intervention. Pain levels were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h till 7 days with an interval of 24 h. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney tests. Results: The LG consistently demonstrated significantly lower pain scores during chewing and at rest compared to the CG. After 6 h post-treatment, the median pain score on chewing in the LG was markedly lower than the CG (P &lt; 0.001), a trend observed at each subsequent interval till 7 days. The comparison of spontaneous pain also favored the LG at various time points. Lower median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were zero and two, respectively, with a significant difference. The maximum median VAS scores for pain on chewing among the LG and CG were five and seven, respectively, with a significant difference. Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence supporting the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing orthodontic pain during the early stages of treatment. The sustained and significant reduction in pain scores, coupled with rigorous statistical analyses, emphasizes the potential of LLLT as a valuable adjunctive therapy in orthodontic practice.

Duration of orthodontic treatment with clear aligners versus fixed appliances in crowding cases: a systematic review.

To critically appraise and assess the currently observed evidence about the difference in orthodontic treatment duration between clear aligners and fixed appliances in crowding cases. An electronic search without limitations was conducted from inception to June 2023 covering nine databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Trip, CINAHL via EBSCO, EMBASE via OVID and ProQuest. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and matched non-randomized studies were included in this systematic review. Risk of Bias was assessed via Cochrane's tool (RoB 2) for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was employed to evaluate the overall quality of evidence. Out of the 3537 articles initially identified, ten eligible studies were included in this systematic review; six were RCTs. Only one study offered extraction-based treatment, while the other nine adopted non-extraction treatments. According to the GRADE, there is low evidence that treatment duration in mild to moderate crowding cases with clear aligners is similar to that in fixed orthodontic appliances. Meta-analysis was not administered due to high inconsistency. Based on currently available information, there was no significant difference in the treatment duration between the CA and FA groups in mild to moderate crowding cases. Further well-performed RCTs, especially in severe cases, are required. Time efficiency is an essential outcome measure for clinical orthodontic practice. While the type of appliance used is a critical determinant of treatment duration, orthodontists should be aware of other factors that can significantly impact treatment time, such as patient and treatment-related factors.

A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment.

This study aimed to assess and compare dental arch widths in the anterior and posterior regions among patients undergoing extraction and non-extraction treatments for Class I and Class II malocclusions. A total of 40 patients were selected, with 10 in each of the categorized groups based on malocclusion type and treatment status. Dental arch widths were meticulously measured using a digital Vernier caliper at the canine and molar regions to ensure precise data collection. Statistically significant differences were noted when comparing mean inter-canine and molar widths between pre- and post-treatment periods among extraction cases in Class I malocclusion (p < 0.001). Conversely, there were no significant changes observed in arch widths among non-extraction cases in Class I malocclusion. Similarly, significant changes were observed in both extraction and non-extraction cases of Class II malocclusion when comparing mean inter-canine and molar widths between pre- and post-treatment periods (p < 0.05). After treatment, both Class I and Class II extraction cases showed an increase in inter-canine arch width, while intermolar arch width remained unchanged, suggesting that the treatment did not significantly alter the buccal corridor. Additionally, there were no notable changes in inter-canine arch widths between pre- and post-treatment in Class I non-extraction cases. However, the Class II non-extraction group exhibited increased upper and lower inter-canine arch widths after treatment.

Occlusal contact changes in patients treated with clear aligners: A retrospective evaluation using digital dental models

This study used digital intraoral scans to evaluate how clear aligner treatment affects occlusal contacts and to determine the influence of sex and age on contact changes. Results were compared with contact changes that occur during fixed appliance therapy. Patients included in this study were treated in a University setting and private practice. Inclusion criteria were a Class I malocclusion treated nonextraction with clear aligners and the presence of pretreatment and posttreatment digital intraoral scans. Scans were imported into specialized software, and occlusal contacts were analyzed. The effects of age and sex on contact changes during clear aligner treatment were determined. Changes in occlusal contacts were compared with changes that occur during nonextraction treatment of patients with a Class I relationship using fixed edgewise appliances. A total of 45 clear aligner patients fit the eligibility criteria. Clear aligner treatment reduced the percentage of tight, near, and approximating contacts, whereas the percentage of open and no contacts increased. These changes in occlusal contacts were greater for the older age group studied. Genderinfluenced occlusal contact changes in the anterior dentition only where the decrease in near contacts and increase in open contacts were greater for males. These results for patients treated with clear aligners were similar to those for patients treated with fixed appliances; both treatment modalities reduced close occlusal contacts at the time active treatment was completed. These results indicated that when clear aligners or fixed appliances are used to treat a Class I malocclusion, the resulting occlusion immediately after debonding is not as "tight" as it was at pretreatment.

Noninvasive conservative management of anterior open bite treated with TADs versus clear aligner therapy.

Anterior open bite can be treated non-surgically via molar intrusion using temporary skeletal devices (TAD). Clear aligner therapy (CAT) is recognized as a viable therapeutic modality for non-extraction treatment of adults with mild open bite. This study aimed to compare the treatment effect and mechanisms of open bite closure between patients treated with braces and TADs double arch intrusion and those treated with CAT. Treatment success at T3 was based on 1- positive overbite on ceph; 2- Change in the vertical dimension 3- post treatment POSI score equal to zero. The TAD group includes 18 consecutively treated patients from the main author. The CAT group consisted of 16 selected patients from three different orthodontists. The observation time points were as follows: pretreatment (T1), end of molar intrusion and positive overbite achieved (T2), end of treatment (T3), at least 6-month follow-up (T4). Treatment changes were assessed by cephalometric analysis and frontal intraoral photo. At the end of treatment, 100% of the patient of the TAD group and 78,6% of the CAT group had a posi score of 0. The TAD group showed a significant reduction in vertical measurements (SN-MPA: -1,55° ± 0.41, LAFH: -3,05 ± 0.51mm, U6-PP: -1.48 ± 0.30mm), but the CAT group did not have significant changes for these variables. Both groups had significant increases in overbite from T1 to T3 (TAD: 4,32 ± 0,5mm; CAT: 2,33 ± 0.56mm), and overbite remained stable at T4. The CAT group did not have a significant upper molar intrusion, but a significant extrusion of 1.22 ± 0.42mm of the lower incisor occurred. The TAD group achieved bite closure by upper molar intrusion, lower molar and incisors vertical control, and mandibular plane counterclockwise rotation, resulting in an improved AP and vertical relationship. The CAT group achieved bite closure through the lower incisor extrusion without significant change in the vertical dimension. This study provides relevant information about the skeletal and dental changes of open bite treatment with TADs double arch intrusion. The comparison with a control group treated with CAT confirms known information.

Dental and Periodontal Changes After Accelerated Correction of Lower Anterior Teeth Crowding With Periodontally Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics (PAOO) Procedure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective To evaluate the relative efficacy of periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) compared to conventional fixed appliances in correcting lower anterior teeth crowding using a non-extraction treatment approach. Material and methods A single-center, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted on 38 patients (9 males, 29 females) with moderate crowding. These patients did not require premolar extraction and were randomly allocated into two treatment groups: the PAOO group and the conventional orthodontic treatment group. The Little Irregularity Index (LII) measured crowding intensity on pre-treatment study models. Changes in this index were recorded monthly in both treatment groups. The inter-canine width, inter-second-premolar width, plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and papillary bleeding index (PBI) were also measured before and after the leveling and alignment stage. Statistical analysis between the two groups was performed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results For the LII, the average time for irregularity resolution was three months in the PAOO group, compared to five months in the conventional orthodontic treatment group. Regarding changes in inter-second-premolar width, the PAOO procedure led to a significant decrease in the increase of inter-second-premolar width, with an average increase of +1.52 mm compared to +2.71 mm in the control group. For the GI and PBI, it was found that their values significantly increased with PAOO application, averaging 0.18 and 0.17, respectively, compared to 0.05 and 0.07 in the control group. Conclusions The use of PAOO in orthodontic treatment accelerated the leveling and alignment process by 40%. Changes in the inter-canine width, the inter-second-premolar width, and the status of periodontal tissues were minimal and clinically negligible.

Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

This study compared third molar angulation and eruption status in Class I and II malocclusions after orthodontic treatment with and without first premolar extractions. The sample comprised 93 patients divided into four groups: Group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; Group 2, Class I malocclusion treated without extractions; Group 3, Class II malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; and Group 4, Class II malocclusion treated without extractions. Panoramic radiographs were used to evaluate the third molar mesiodistal angulations at T1 (pretreatment), T2 (posttreatment), and T3 (long-term posttreatment). Third molar eruption status was assessed in dental casts. Intergroup angulations and eruption status comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. Significantly greater mesial angulation and percentage of erupted right maxillary third molars were observed in the Class I extraction group. Significantly greater eruption status of the right mandibular third molars was observed in the Class I and Class II malocclusion extraction groups. Class I and II malocclusion extraction treatment exhibited more favorable angulations and a greater number of erupted third molars than non-extraction treatment. The non-extraction groups exhibited a greater percentage of unerupted third molars.

Efficacy of Immunoglobulin Y Chewable Tablets on Streptococcus mutans Count in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment.

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of commercially available immunoglobulin Y (IgY) chewable tablets on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) count in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Participants aged between 12 and 19 years who had fixed, nonextraction orthodontic treatment with no carious lesion were included in the study and advised to take IgY chewable tablet for 15 days (one course) and saliva samples were collected from the patients on day 61, 91, and 121 days from the placement of fixed appliance, to assess its ability in reduction of S. mutans count. The collected samples were processed, and S. mutans levels were estimated. The results were tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20, and the repeated measures test was used to compare different groups. Immunoglobulin Y (IgY) chewable tablet was found to be significantly effective in decreasing S. mutans counts in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment during the study period. Oral passive immunotherapy via egg yolk antibody IgY effectively decreased the S. mutans level, which was found to increase during orthodontic fixed appliance treatment. The IgY chewable tablets can be used as an adjuvant to reduce S. mutans counts and provide basic oral hygiene measures. Muthukumaran M, Jayaprakash J, Arangannal P, et al. Efficacy of Immunoglobulin Y Chewable Tablets on Streptococcus mutans Count in Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(3):265-269.

Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of mandibular incisor alveolar bone changes for the intrusion arch technique: A retrospective cohort research.

: Alveolar bone loss is a common adverse effect of intrusion treatment. Mandibular incisors are prone to dehiscence and fenestrations as they suffer from thinner alveolar bone thickness. : Thirty skeletal class II patients treated with mandibular intrusion arch therapy were included in this study. Lateral cephalograms and cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before treatment (T1) and immediately after intrusion arch removal (T2) to evaluate the tooth displacement and the alveolar bone changes. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation was used to identify risk factors of alveolar bone loss during the intrusion treatment. : Deep overbite was successfully corrected (P < 0.05), accompanied by mandibular incisor proclination (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant change in the true incisor intrusion (P > 0.05). The labial and lingual vertical alveolar bone levels showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05). The alveolar bone is thinning in the labial crestal area and lingual apical area (P < 0.05); accompanied by thickening in the labial apical area (P < 0.05). Proclined incisors, non-extraction treatment, and increased A point-nasion-B point (ANB) degree were positively correlated with alveolar bone loss. : While the mandibular intrusion arch effectively corrected the deep overbite, it did cause some unwanted incisor labial tipping/flaring. During the intrusion treatment, the alveolar bone underwent corresponding changes, which was thinning in the labial crestal area and thickening in the labial apical area vice versa. And increased axis change of incisors, non-extraction treatment, and increased ANB were identified as risk factors for alveolar bone loss in patients with mandibular intrusion therapy.

Long-term stability of curve of Spee depth among orthodontically treated patients: A retrospective longitudinal study.

The curve of Spee is deemed important characteristic of the dentition for a balanced occlusion and distribution of masticatory forces, while orthodontic levelling of an accentuated curve of Spee is generally included as a treatment goal for deepbite correction. However, relapse is often seen and can be problematic. A retrospective longitudinal study of predominantly young patients with a deep curve of Spee, who had been treated orthodontically with 0.018"-slot Edgewise fixed appliances, was performed. The depth of the curve of Spee was digitally measured before treatment (T1), at debond (T2), and an average of 7 years post-debond (T3) and analysed statistically at 5%. A total of 157 patients were included (56.7% female; 11.6-year-old at T1), 16.6% of which were treated with premolars extractions. Non-extraction treatment reduced the curve of Spee at the first premolar from 1.87 mm (T1) to 0.22 mm (T2), which relapsed 0.12 mm (T3; P = .04). The respective depths for the second premolar were 2.0 mm (T1), reduced to 0.80 mm (T2). No significant relapse was seen for the second premolar (0.08 mm; P > .05) or the first permanent molar (0.06 mm; P > .05). No overall significant differences in absolute relapse were seen between extraction and non-extraction patients, but premolar extractions were associated with less clinically relevant relapse at the first molar (odds ratio 0.27; 95%-confidence interval 0.08-0.88; P = .003). Steep curves of Spee can be satisfactorily levelled orthodontically with satisfactory stability in the long term, while premolar extractions might be associated with less relapse.