Nonemergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Short term clinical outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in patients with intermediate to high SYNTAX score: Ain Shams complex PCI Registry

Abstract Background Risk stratification is an important and essential component in proper patient counseling when dealing with complex coronary anatomy and decision making between either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The SYNTAX score was pioneered as an anatomical-based risk score that aided in this decision-making process. Objective To develop an electronic registry for patients with complex coronary anatomy with intermediate to high SYNTAX score undergoing non-emergent PCI who were indicated for CABG but either they were rejected by the surgeons or they refused it. Patients and Methods Our registry was conducted on 193 patients presented during eight months from the first of July 2021 till the end of February 2022 to Ain Shams University Hospitals and underwent PCI. Results comparing the intermediate to high SYNTAX score groups, there is a statistically significant increase in the in hospital and short term MACE and mortality with high SYNTAX score patients, while there was no difference regarding in hospital CIN. Regarding MACE it significantly increases in patients with anemia, CKD, LV dysfunction. For multivariate analysis it is shown that both incomplete revascularization and clinical SYNTAX II are independent predictors for the occurrence of short term MACE. Conclusion Both incomplete revascularization and clinical SYNTAX II score are independent predictors of short term (6 months) occurrence of MACE.

Real-world long-term survival after non-emergent percutaneous coronary intervention to unprotected left main coronary artery — From the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) registry

BackgroundCurrent evidence suggests that percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease (LMPCI) in selected patients is a safe alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting. However, real-world long-term survival data is limited. MethodsWe analyzed 24,644 patients from the MIG (Melbourne Interventional Group) registry between 2005 and 2020. We compared baseline clinical and procedural characteristics, in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, and long-term survival between unprotected LMPCI and non-LMPCI among patients without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or cardiac arrest. ResultsUnprotected LMPCI patients (n = 185) were significantly older (mean age 72.0 vs. 64.6 years, p < 0.001), had higher prevalence of impaired ejection fraction (EF <50 %; 27.3 % vs. 14.9 %, p < 0.001) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (40.9 % vs. 21.5 %, p < 0.001), and had greater use of intravascular ultrasound (21 % vs. 1 %, p < 0.001) and drug-eluting stents (p < 0.001). LMPCI was associated with longer hospital stay (4 days vs. 2 days, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in other in-hospital outcomes, 30-day mortality (0.6 % vs. 0.6 %, p = 0.90), and major adverse cardiac events (1.7 % vs. 3 %, p = 0.28). Although the unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival to 8 years was significantly less with LMPCI compared to non-LMPCI (p < 0.01), LMPCI was not a predictor of long-term survival up to 8 years after Cox regression analysis (HR 0.67, 95 % CI 0.40–1.13, p = 0.13). ConclusionIn this study, non-emergent unprotected LMPCI was uncommonly performed, and IVUS was underutilized. Despite greater co-morbidities, LMPCI patients had comparable 30-day outcomes to non-LMPCI, and LMPCI was not an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

Impella Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for High-Risk PCI: A Propensity-Adjusted Large-Scale Claims Dataset Analysis

Impella was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for use during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs); however, its safety and efficacy compared with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has not been evaluated in contemporary practice and remains debated. We aimed to compare postapproval outcomes and costs of Impella versus IABP support for high-risk PCI in real-world practice across hospitals in the United States. We identified patients from the Premier Healthcare Database undergoing nonemergent Impella- or IABP-supported high-risk PCI. We used propensity adjustment to control baseline, procedure, and post-PCI medical treatment differences between treatment groups. We included patients undergoing nonemergent single-PCI procedures with either Impella or IABP support and excluded patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock or requiring >1 mechanical support devices during index hospitalization. Outcomes included in-hospital survival, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiogenic shock, stroke, bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury, index hospitalization length of stay, and costs. From April 2016 to June 2019, a total of 48,179 patients were treated with Impella or IABP mechanical circulatory support at 304 hospitals in the United States. Among these, we identified 2,156 patients undergoing nonemergent high-risk PCI treated with Impella (n=1,447) or IABP (n=709). After propensity adjustment, Impella use was associated with improved survival (odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.36) and less MI (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.46) and cardiogenic shock (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.74). Stroke, bleeding requiring transfusion, and acute kidney injury were similar between groups. In conclusion, this Premier Healthcare Database propensity-adjusted analysis, Impella use during nonemergent high-risk PCI was associated with improved survival and reduced in-hospital MI and cardiogenic shock compared with IABP.

Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an important hemodynamic marker of left ventricular performance and affects coronary perfusion. We evaluated the association of LVEDP with patient outcomes after elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We included n=49,600 patients undergoing elective or urgent PCI. Patients were divided according to LVEDP tertile for descriptive analysis. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. A recursive partitioning tree model for mortality was built to guide decision-making in patients with high LVEDP undergoing nonemergent PCI. Overall, n=18,099 patients had an LVEDP <13 mm Hg, n=15,416 had an LVEDP 13 to 18 mm Hg, and n=16,085 had an LVEDP >18 mm Hg. Patients in the high LVEDP tertile had a worse clinical and angiographic/procedural profile and experienced a higher incidence of in-hospital post-PCI adverse outcomes, including death (LVEDP <13 mm Hg 0.3% vs LVEDP 13 to 18 mm Hg 0.4% vs LVEDP >18 mm Hg 0.8%, p <0.001). An elevated LVEDP was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes including mortality. An LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg was identified as a marker of high mortality (1.5%) in patients who underwent elective PCI, with rates varying from 0.5% to 10.4%, based upon a clinical profile defined by hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, renal and left ventricular function, and atrial fibrillation. In conclusion, an elevated LVEDP is observed in 1/3 of the patients who underwent elective or urgent PCI and is associated with higher rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes, including death. Patients with an LVEDP ≥26 mm Hg who underwent elective PCI had markedly higher mortality rates, suggesting that such patients may warrant further optimization before PCI.

Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: Incidence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular outcomes.

ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular outcomes of patients who developed symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsWe conducted a single-institution retrospective study of patients who developed symptomatic ICH after non-emergency PCI. To identify associations between clinical variables and outcomes, Cox-proportional hazards regression models were constructed. Outcomes analyzed include (1) all-cause mortality, (2) acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA), and (3) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).ResultsA total of 1,732 patients were included in the analysis. The mean (±SD) age was 61.1 (±11.3) years, and 1,396 patients (80.6%) were male. The cumulative incidence of symptomatic ICH after non-emergency PCI was 1.3% (22 patients). Age, chronic kidney disease, and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery were independently associated with a higher risk of ICH after PCI, while hyperlipidemia was independently associated with a lower risk of ICH after PCI. ICH after PCI was independently associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and AIS or TIA after PCI.ConclusionPatients who are older, who have chronic kidney disease, and who have had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery should be monitored for symptomatic ICH after non-emergency PCI.

Chronic Kidney Disease and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mortality in Patients With Left Main and Equivalent Coronary Artery Disease.

Patients with chronic kidney disease are underrepresented in registries and in randomized trials of coronary artery disease management. To investigate effects of chronic kidney disease on outcomes of nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left main or left main-equivalent coronary artery disease, we analyzed data from the New York State Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry during the calendar year 2015, involving 2,956 elective percutaneous coronary intervention cases. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with various degrees of chronic kidney disease and stable left main or left main-equivalent coronary artery disease were compared. Only patients with left main or left main-equivalent coronary artery disease and elective percutaneous coronary intervention were included in the study cohort. Patients with acute coronary syndromes within 24 hours of the index percutaneous coronary intervention, patients reported to be in shock, and patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery were excluded from the study cohort. In this cohort, stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, current congestive heart failure, and left main disease remained statistically significant predictors of post-percutaneous coronary intervention mortality. Our findings in this large, statewide cohort indicate that advanced kidney disease is associated with markedly increased post-nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention mortality.

Nitrates as a Marker of Multiple Co-morbidities and Increased Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

BackgroundNotwithstanding the guideline endorsement of various anti-anginal medications, there is a paucity of data on whether one anti-anginal regimen or medication is superior to another. It is also unknown how anti-anginal medications affect outcomes of elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To fill this knowledge gap, we investigated an association between commonly used anti-anginal medications and elective PCI outcomes in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) patients. MethodsUsing the New York State's (NYS) PCI Reporting System, we reviewed data on 33,568 consecutive patients who underwent non-emergent PCI in 2015. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause in-hospital mortality. ResultsRegardless of the combination therapy of nitrates with any other non-nitrate anti-anginal therapy, including beta-adrenergic blockers (BB) and/or calcium channel blockers (CCB), nitrate treatment continued to be associated with significantly increased post-elective PCI mortality.ConclusionsIn this large, all-inclusive state-wide contemporary cohort study of SIHD patients, treatment with nitrates, but not beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or ranolazine, was associated with increased post-PCI mortality. Utilization of nitrate therapy is likely reflective of advanced disease burden rather than directly related to the specific medication intolerance. Additional studies investigating optimal anti-anginal medical therapy on PCI outcomes are warranted.

Innovative Managed Care May Be Related to Improved Prognosis for Acute Myocardial Infarction Survivors.

Mortality following discharge in myocardial infarction survivors remains high. Therefore, we compared outcomes in myocardial infarction survivors participating and not participating in a novel, nationwide managed care program for myocardial infarction survivors in Poland. We used public databases. We included all patients hospitalized due to acute myocardial infarction in Poland between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. We excluded from the analysis all patients aged <18 years as well as those who died during hospitalization or within 10 days following discharge from hospital. All patients were prospectively followed. The primary end point was defined as death from any cause. The mean follow-up was 324.8±140.5 days (78 034.1 patient-years; 340.0±131.7 days in those who did not die during the observation). Participation in the managed care program was related to higher odds ratio of participating in cardiac rehabilitation (4.67 [95% CI, 4.44-4.88]), consultation with a cardiologist (7.32 [6.83-7.84]), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (1.40 [1.22-1.61]), and cardiac resynchronization therapy with cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (1.57 [1.22-2.03]) but lower odds of emergency (0.88 [0.79-0.98]) and nonemergency percutaneous coronary intervention (0.88 [0.83-0.93]) and coronary artery bypass grafting (0.82 [0.71-0.94]) during the follow-up. One-year all-cause mortality was 4.4% among the program participants and 6.0% in matched nonparticipants. The end point consisting of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 10.6% and 12.0% (P<0.01) of participants and nonparticipants respectively, whereas all-cause death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons in 42.2% and 47.9% (P<0.001) among participants and nonparticipants, respectively. The difference in outcomes between patients participating and not participating in the managed care program could be explained by improved access to cardiac rehabilitation, cardiac care, and cardiac procedures. Managed care following myocardial infarction may be related to improved prognosis as it may facilitate access to cardiac rehabilitation and may provide a higher standard of outpatient cardiac care.

Outcomes of bailout percutaneous ventricular assist device versus prophylactic strategy in patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention.

To compare in-hospital outcomes of bailout support to prophylactic support with percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVAD) for high-risk nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI). Prophylactic support with pVAD for a HRPCI is used in patients felt to be at risk for hemodynamic collapse during PCI. An alternative strategy of bailout pVAD support in the event of hemodynamic collapse is also entertained. We compared the outcomes of patients entered in the cVAD database who underwent Impella Protected PCI (ProPCI group) with patients from the cVAD and USpella databases receiving bailout Impella support for hemodynamic collapse during HRPCI (Bailout group). A total of 1,028 patients supported with Impella pVAD were entered into the cVAD database as of July 2019 and were included in this analysis. Of those 971 were in the ProPCI group and 57 in the Bailout group. Patients in the Bailout group were more often female (50.9%vs. 27.2%, p=.0002) with higher median baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40%vs. 30%, p < .0001) and with lower prevalence of both heart failure (42.1%vs. 56.9%, p=.0385) and left main disease (40.0%vs. 56.1%, p=.0250) compared to the ProPCI group. Unadjusted and adjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the Bailout group (49.1%vs. 4.3%, and 57.8%vs. 4.4%, p < .0001 for both). In our study population, the bailout group was associated with significant increased mortality compared to ProPCI group. Female gender was more frequently observed in patients requiring bailout pVAD. Further investigation is warranted in order to generalize the findings of our study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack after Non-Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

ObjectivesNon-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has lower risk of stroke than emergency PCI. With increasing elective PCI and increasing risk of stroke after PCI, risk factors for stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes needs to be better characterised. We aim to identify risk factors for cerebrovascular accidents in patients undergoing non-emergency PCI and long-term outcomes after stroke or TIA. Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on 1724 consecutive patients who underwent non-emergency PCI for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), unstable and stable angina. The primary outcomes measured were stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause death. ResultsUpon mean follow-up of 3.71 (SD 0.97) years, 70 (4.1%) had subsequent ischaemic stroke or TIA, and they were more likely to present with NSTEMI (50 [71.4%] vs 892 [54.0%], OR 2.13 [1.26–3.62], p = 0.004) and not stable angina (19 [27.1%] vs 648 [39.2%], OR 0.58 [0.34–0.99]). Femoral access was associated with subsequent stroke or TIA compared to radial access (OR 2.10 [1.30–3.39], p < 0.002). Previous stroke/TIA was associated with subsequent stroke/TIA (p < 0.001), death (p < 0.001) and MI (p = 0.002). Furthermore, subsequent stroke/TIA was significantly associated with subsequent MI (p = 0.006), congestive cardiac failure (CCF) (p = 0.008) and death (p < 0.001). ConclusionsIn patients undergoing non-emergency PCI, previous stroke/TIA predicted post-PCI ischaemic stroke/TIA, which was associated with death, MI, CCF.

Outcomes of Impella-supported high-risk nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention in a large single-center registry.

We aimed to evaluate the early and one-year outcomes of Impella-supported high-risk nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The evidence for the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in high-risk nonemergent PCI is limited and nonconclusive. We performed a single-center retrospective study including all patients who underwent high-risk nonemergent PCI supported by Impella 2.5/CP at our institution between January 2009 and June 2018. This patient population was propensity score matched with subjects undergoing PCI with no MCS. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE: all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization) at one-year follow-up. Two-hundred fifty patients undergoing Impella-supported nonemergent PCI were matched to 250 controls. The two groups were well balanced in terms of clinical and angiographic characteristics. Left main PCI was performed more frequently among Impella-supported patients (26% vs. 11%, p < .001), who also had numerically higher prevalence of rotational atherectomy use (44% vs. 37%, p = .10) and a higher number of vessels treated (1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 1.3 ± 0.6, p < .001), compared with controls. Impella-supported patients suffered a higher incidence of periprocedural MI (14.0% vs. 6.4%, p = .005), major bleeding (6.8% vs. 2.8%, p = .04), and need for blood transfusions (11.2% vs. 4.8%, p = .008). However, at one-year follow-up there were no differences in the rates of MACE (31.2% vs. 27.4%, p = .78) or any of its individual components between Impella-supported patients and controls. Although Impella-supported patients suffer a higher incidence of periprocedural adverse events (partially linked to more aggressive PCI), the incidence of one-year MACE was similar between the Impella and control group.

P5735Feasibility and safety of Impella mechanical circulatory support in different clinical scenarios: a single-centre experience

Abstract Background The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) mechanical circulatory support is a catheter-based axial-flow pump. It reduces left ventricular (LV) stroke work and myocardial oxygen demand while increasing systemic and coronary perfusion in the setting of cardiogenic shock (CS), and it provides hemodynamic support during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of Impella-supported patients in the context of CS and protected-PCI. Methods This single-center registry includes all patients implanted with Impella device at our institution between February 2013 and June 2018. Indications for Impella support were CS (hypotension despite adequate filling status with signs of hypoperfusion) and protected-PCI (prophylactic hemodynamic support during non-emergent high-risk PCI). Results A total of 145 patients were implanted with Impella: 130 (89.7%) for CS and 15 (10.3%) for protected-PCI. Among CS patients, mean age was 61.6±12.9, 79.2% males. The prevalence of chronic heart failure (HF) was 26.1%, prior myocardial infarction (MI) 29% and myocardial revascularization 36.6%, chronic kidney disease (CKD) 18.3%. Among protected PCI patients, mean age was 73.4±8.7 years, 86.7% males. The prevalence of HF was 85.7%, prior MI 42.9%, myocardial revascularization 35.7%, CKD 57.1%. In CS group, the indications for Impella implantation were myocarditis in 8 (6.2%) patients, acute coronary syndromes in 77 (59.2%), periprocedural ventricular tachycardia ablation CS in 10 (7.7%), decompensated heart failure in 26.9%. Out of hospital cardiac arrest occurred in 35 (30.4%) patients, INTERMACS I class in 70 (59.3%), mean arterial pressure was 65.4±18.4 mmHg, serum lactate 6.7±5.5 mmol/l, at least 1 inotropic agent use in 73 (66.4%), mean LV EF 21.4±11,7%, right ventricular dysfunction in 53 (48.6%). The rate of device-related complications was not negligible in CS group: 18 (14.5%) patients had limb ischemia and vascular surgery was required in 14, 17 (14.3%) had access-site bleeding. A total of 42 (33.3%) had haemolysis, and 67 (56.8%) acute kidney injury (AKI), half of whom requiring renal replacement therapy. Escalation to other therapies was necessary in 43 cases. Conversely, in the protected-PCI group a low rate of AKI (n=4, 28.6%) and acute limb ischemia (n=1, 7.1%) was observed, whereas no cases of haemolysis nor need of escalation therapy were recorded. Mean Impella support was 135.5±167.21 days for CS group, 60.6±80 for protected-PCI group. Survival at 30 days was 60.33% for CS group and 92.9% for protected-PCI group. One-year all-cause death was 50% for CS group and 13.3% for protected-PCI group. Conclusion Mechanical circulatory support with Impella is associated with good outcomes and reasonable rates of complications in the protected-PCI group, whereas less favorable results were observed in CS population probably due to the greater severity of clinical presentation.

Nonemergent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on an Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Supported with Impella® Heart Pump in Patients Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization.

Objectives We sought to assess if ineligibility to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) constitutes a risk factor in patients who underwent a nonemergent unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with prophylactic Impella® heart pump support. Background ULMCA PCI in patients not deemed eligible for CABG is associated with significantly worse outcomes compared to ULMCA PCI in eligible patients. Methods Patients from the cVAD Registry and the PROTECT II trial who underwent a nonemergent ULMCA PCI were identified. We compared in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates as well as 30-day survival and MACCE rates between CABG ineligible and CABG eligible patients. Results A total of 331 patients were included (293 Impella 2.5®, 38 Impella CP®); 227 were ineligible for CABG and 104 were eligible. Baseline characteristics were remarkable for a trend toward higher rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the ineligible patients. In-hospital mortality (3.52% vs. 5.77%; p=0.383) and MACCE (6.61% vs. 7.69%; p=0.816) rates as well as 30-day survival (92.0% vs. 93.4%; Log-Rank p-value =0.781) and MACCE (88.1% vs. 90.1%; Log-Rank p-value=0.648) rates were not different between the two groups. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that prophylactic Impella support appears to mitigate the risks inherent to surgical ineligibility in patients undergoing a nonemergent ULMCA PCI. Our results require further investigation.

Impact of Hemodynamic Support on Outcome in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The use of left-ventricular (LV) hemodynamic support might facilitate high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The impact on outcome is a matter of ongoing debate. We assessed the outcome of high-risk patients who underwent protected PCI in comparison to patients who underwent unprotected high-risk PCI. One hundred and thirty nine patients underwent nonemergent high-risk PCI; 24 (17%) patients underwent protected PCI. To address selection bias, we performed a propensity score matched subanalysis. The primary end point was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event during the first year. Patients with protected PCI had a higher logistic EuroSCORE (logES) (protected PCI: 19% vs unprotected PCI: 12%; p = 0.01), a higher SYNTAX score (45 vs 36, p = 0.07), and significantly more often reduced LV function (40% vs 55%; p < 0.001). In protected PCI patients, complete revascularization was more often achieved (87% vs 58%, p = 0.007) without the occurrence of death at 30 days of follow-up (0% vs 4%, p = 0.31). After propensity score matching, patients who underwent protected PCI had a similar 1-year major adverse cardiac event rate compared with patients who underwent unprotected PCI (21% vs 17%, p = 0.67), despite significantly higher procedural complexity for example, more often complex left main bifurcation lesions (71% vs 29%; p = 0.004). In conclusion, 1-year outcome of patients who underwent protected PCI was not different from that in patients with less complex procedures without hemodynamic support, despite more complex coronary anatomy, a higher comorbidity burden, and more often reduced LV function.

Abstract 32: Implementation of Bedside CYP2C19 Genotype Testing and Personalization of Antiplatelet Therapy in Cardiac Catheterization Lab

Background: CYP2C19 polymorphisms affect clopidogrel metabolism and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although FDA recommended pharmacogenetic testing and alternative antiplatelet agents in CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) allele carriers, implementation in practice has been minimal. Our goal is to personalize antiplatelet therapy using point-of-care (POC) assay to genotype patients immediately prior to PCI in a hospital cardiac catheterization lab. Methods: Appropriate P2Y 12 receptor antagonist therapy following non-emergent PCI based on bedside genetic testing (SpartanRx system) was initiated at Inova Heart and Vascular institute catheterization laboratory in February 2017. Patients were genotyped using buccal swab technique before proceeding to the catheterization laboratory. A best practice advisory (BPA) was implemented into the EPIC EMR prescription medication ordering system based on genotype. Poor (*2/*2, and *2/*3) and intermediate metabolizers (*1/*2, *1/*3, and *2/*17) were recommended more potent P2Y12 inhibitor therapy using BPA. Demographics, BPA compliance and 1 year outcomes including major adverse cardiac events (Cardiovascular death, MI, Ischemic stroke) and NACE (MACE + major bleeding) were collected. Results: Between 2/2017 to 12/2017, 1050 patients underwent POC genetic testing. The frequency of poor, intermediate, extensive, and ultra-rapid metabolizer status was 2.9%, 26.8%, 42.5%, and 27.9%, respectively. The highest percentage of poor metabolizers were observed in Middle-Eastern (12.1%) and Asian (8.9%) populations as compared to African Americans (n=3.4%) and Caucasians (1.1%). In patients treated with PCI (n=429), 28.9% were intermediate (n=112) or poor (n=12) clopidogrel metabolizers, with 87.1% of these patients receiving ticagrelor (n=84) or prasugrel (n=24) based on the BPA from genotype consortium. MACE (0.7%) and NACE (0.9%) rates were minimal as compared to historical controls (5-10%). Conclusions: CYP2C19 genotyping at the bedside facilitated early personalization of antiplatelet therapy according to BPA and is associated with low one year MACE and NACE rates.

LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AFTER CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY

Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) continues to be the most common cause of death globally and the most common cause of heart failure in the developed world. However, there is no head to head comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in randomized trials. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of CABG versus PCI in the long-term survival of patients with ICM. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario, using the CorHealth Ontario and Canadian Institute of Health Information data. ICM was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35%, in the presence of left main or multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Included were ICM patients aged 40-84, who underwent non-emergent CABG or PCI between October 1, 2008 and March 31, 2016. Excluded were those ≥85 years of age, those needing immediate revascularization on presentation for acute myocardial infarction, those with metastatic cancer and those who were dialysis dependent. Mortality was assessed through December 31, 2017 and mortality rate in each group was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. The relative hazard of death was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. A total of 11,916 patients were included in the study, of whom 4769 (40.0%) had CABG and 7147 (60.0%) had PCI. Mean follow up time was 4.5±2.5 years. CABG patients had a higher burden of comorbidities compared to PCI patients. Specifically, the mean (SD) Charlson comorbidity index was 2.7 (1.7) in CABG patients and 2.4 (1.7) in PCI patients. During follow up, 1173 (24.6%) of CABG and 2046 (28.6%) of PCI patients died (p<0.001). The adjusted estimated survival for patients who underwent CABG and PCI are summarized in the Figure. CABG was associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality than PCI after multivariable adjustment (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.73). In patients with ICM, CABG was associated with a lower adjusted risk of long-term mortality compared to PCI, despite CABG patients having a higher burden of comorbidities. Further research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of CABG versus PCI in major adverse cardiac events and the quality of life in patients with ICM.

Elevated Baseline Serum Fibrinogen: Effect on 2-Year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BackgroundElevated fibrinogen is associated with short‐term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention, but the relation with late MACE is unknown.Methods and ResultsBaseline demographics and 2‐year MACE were recorded among subjects undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 332 subjects (66.6±19.5 years, 69.9% male, 25.3% acute coronary syndrome) were enrolled. Two‐year MACE (periprocedural myocardial infarction 9.0%, rehospitalization 6.3%, revascularization 12.7%, non–periprocedural myocardial infarction 4.5%, stent thrombosis 0.9%, stroke 1.8%, and death 0.6%) were associated with higher fibrinogen (352.8±123.4 mg/dL versus 301.6±110.8 mg/dL; P<0.001), longer total stent length (40.1±25.3 mm versus 32.1±19.3 mm; P=0.004), acute coronary syndrome indication (38.7% versus 17.8%; P<0.001), number of bare‐metal stents (0.5±1.1 versus 0.2±0.5; P=0.002), and stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (55.8% versus 38.4%, P=0.003). No relation between platelet reactivity and 2‐year MACE was observed. Fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL (odds ratio [OR] 3.0, confidence interval [CI], 1.6–5.4, P<0.001), total stent length ≥32 mm (OR 2.2, CI, 1.3–3.8, P<0.001), acute coronary syndrome indication (OR 4.1, CI, 2.3–7.5, P<0.001), any bare‐metal stents (OR 3.2, CI, 1.6–6.1, P<0.001), and stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (OR 2.0, CI, 1.2–3.5, P=0.010) were independently associated with 2‐year MACE. Following a landmark analysis excluding periprocedural myocardial infarction, fibrinogen ≥280 mg/dL remained strongly associated with 2‐year MACE (37.0% versus 17.4%, log‐rank P<0.001).ConclusionsElevated baseline fibrinogen level is associated with 2‐year MACE after percutaneous coronary intervention. Acute coronary syndrome indication for percutaneous coronary intervention, total stent length implanted, and use of bare‐metal stents or smaller‐diameter stents are also independently associated with 2‐year MACE, while measures of on‐thienopyridine platelet reactivity are not.

Bleeding outcomes after non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in the very elderly.

BackgroundOctogenarians constitute an increasing proportion of patients presenting for non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).MethodsThis study evaluated the in-hospital procedural characteristics and outcomes, including the bleeding events of 293 octogenarians presenting between January 2010 and December 2012 for non-emergency PCI to a single large volume tertiary care Australian center. Comparisons were made with 293 consecutive patients aged less than or equal to 60 years, whose lesions were matched with the octogenarians.ResultsNon-ST elevation myocardial infarction was the most frequent indication for non-emergency PCI in octogenarians. Compared to the younger cohort, they had a higher prevalence of co-morbidities and more complex coronary disease, comprising more type C and calcified lesions. Peri-procedural use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; 1.0% vs. 5.8%; P < 0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (2.1% vs. 9.6%; P < 0.001) was lower, while femoral arterial access was used more commonly than in younger patients (80.9% vs. 67.6%; P < 0.001). Overall, there was a non-significant trend towards higher incidence of all bleeding events in the elderly (9.2% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.12). There was no significant difference in access site or non-access site bleeding and major or minor bleeding between the two cohorts. Sub-analysis did not reveal any significant influence on bleeding rates by the use of LMWH, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or femoral arterial access. In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of in-hospital mortality, stroke or acute stent thrombosis between the two groups.ConclusionsIn this single center study, we did not observe significant increases in adverse in-hospital outcomes including the incidence of bleeding in octogenarians undergoing non-emergency PCI.

Stay on the ambulance long enough and you'll go full circle: an evaluation of the clinical safety and effectiveness of non-emergency and multi-occupancy ambulance conveyance in non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention patients

Mechanisms to facilitate rapid ambulance transport of diagnosed STEMI patients from the community and emergency departments (ED) settings directly to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) facilities are well established within NHS Ambulance Services. Direct challenge of inter-hospital transfer requests for non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients by a regional NHS Ambulance Service identified disagreement between peripheral feeder hospitals and the NHS Ambulance Service on what level of ambulance transport is most appropriate. To reduce unnecessary peripheral feeder hospital requests for paramedic emergency service transfer and resource utilisation in non-emergency PCI patients and to assess the clinical safety of both non-emergency transport and multi-occupancy conveyance for this patient group. A process was established with a regional cardiothoracic centre to support pre-screening of non-emergency PCI patients for conveyance via non-emergency ambulance resources and multi-occupancy. This included centralisation of all non-emergency PCI ambulance transport booking practices and dissemination of learning materials on the process to all stakeholders. During the three-year period 3172 patients were identified as suitable for conveyance by both non-emergency ambulance transports. Of this, 36% (n=1767) were conveyed as part of a multi-occupancy journey and 56% (n=782) were conveyed by non-emergency resources. Overall, 69% (n=782) of all multi-occupancy conveyances were undertaken by non-emergency resources. Two clinical incidents were noted during this period, both of which were managed via clinical telephone advice. Non-emergency ambulances can be safely used to transport non-emergency PCI patients via multi-occupancy, following appropriate pre-screening by the receiving PCI unit. Further work is needed to understand the feasibility of this across other patient groups in the inter-hospital transfer scenario and its transferability to other NHS Ambulance Services.

Incidence and predictors of incomplete revascularization in a contemporary cohort.

Complete coronary revascularization has been associated with improved mortality among patients undergoing surgical bypass grafting. A similar evaluation among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel disease has produced largely concordant results, although complete percutaneous revascularization is often not achieved in this population. The present study sought to evaluate the clinical and anatomic limitations to complete revascularization among contemporary patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. All patients undergoing nonemergent PCI for unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease were identified at two academic medical centers from 2009 to 2012. Complete revascularization was determined through a review of the electronic medical records and corresponding coronary angiograms. The underlying reasons that precluded complete revascularization were then derived from a review of the clinical and angiographic findings. Among 978 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, 267 (27%) underwent complete percutaneous coronary revascularization. Factors that prevented complete revascularization included chronic total occlusions (54%), treatment limited to the culprit lesion (24%), or persistent disease in small nondominant vessels (24%). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of a chronic total occlusion was associated with significantly reduced odds of receiving complete revascularization (adjusted odds ratio: 0.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.12-0.27). Complete percutaneous revascularization is uncommon and is hindered by the presence of chronic total occlusions or isolated treatment of an angiographic culprit lesion. Evolving interventional techniques enabling treatment of chronic total occlusions may increase the prevalence of complete percutaneous revascularization in the future.